深化中小学职称评定改革 完善教师职务评聘制度

深化中小学职称评定改革完善教师职务评聘制度郭斧，赵义中小学教师职务聘任制度，是１９８６年国务院作出改革职称评定，在我国中小学首次实行的教师职务聘任制度。它的建立和实施，第一次明确了中小学教师的专业技术人员身份属性，提高了中小学教师的社会地位，改善了中...     

高校教师职称评定和聘任制度改革刍议

高校教师职称评定和聘任制度是高校教师管理工作中的重要内容,只有在做好这项工作的基础上才能够较好的调动教师工作积极性并推动高校教学科研工作稳定发展,所以对高校教师职称评定和聘任制度改革作出研究具有重要的现实意义。本文以推动我国高校教师职称评定和聘任制度的科学化发展与合理化发展为出发点,在对当前我国高校教师评聘制度中存在的主要问题做出分析的基础上,对我国高校教师职称评聘制度改革策略进行了研究与探讨。     

对当前高校教师职称评聘问题的探讨

在高校的人事制度改革中,职称的评聘工作是一个非常重要的问题。当前正在推行教师职务聘任制的改革,将教师职务聘任在原来“评聘分开”的职称评审制度下,先由专家组成的评审委员会完成教师水平和资格的评审,再由学校完成对教师的聘任。但在实施过程中,无论在政策规定上还是实际操作中,均着存在不合理的状况,在一定程度上为职称评聘工作带来了负效应。为此应及时研究解决工作中出现的新情况、新问题,从而推动职评工作的健康发展。     

刀刺校长刺痛职称评聘制度

据《京华时报》报道,北京市某小学一名体育教师因对学校的职称评定不满,把校长刺成重伤,另外还有3名教师在劝阻中受伤……因职称评聘问题,拔刀相向,大开杀戒,血淋淋的场面,令人心惊胆颤。虽已事过境迁,却在人们心中留下阴影。当前的中小学教师评价体系是按照职称来确定教师的专业技术职务的,但随着教育事业改革发展不断深入,现行的中小学教师专业技术职务评聘制度也暴露出一些问题。一是教师专业技术职务评聘缺乏科学的评价标准,评聘中主观因素过多,可依据的有操作性的法规过少,在“人情味”甚浓的环境中,容易滋生腐败。二是评聘中存在许多…     

我国高校教师职称评审与聘任制度调研分析报告

本文在回顾我国职称制度发展历程、调研部分地区高校教师职称评聘现状基础上,分析了专业技术任职资格评审与职务聘任两种制度的内涵和异同,提出将职称资格评审与职务聘任分离,发挥职称评审的人才评价与激励作用,完善职务聘任的岗位系统管理功能。     

如何对教师职务进行聘后考核

对教师职务评聘后应从二个方面进行考核。一是履职考核,它包括试用考核、年度考核、聘期考核、任职期满的考核。二是聘任管理。目的在于改变目前在职称管理工作中普遍存在的重视评审、聘任,轻视聘任后管理、考核的现象     

论我国中小学教师职务的评与聘

当前,中小学教师职务的评聘关系处理有多种方式.评聘合一的模式导致教师的三大任用制度在结构上不尽合理.完善中小学教师职务制度,须将教师职务任职资格的评审与现行教师资格的认定合并,将教师职务的聘任与现行教师聘任制度合并,形成新的中小学教师资格和教师聘任制度.     

总结经验,坚持和完善高校教师职务评聘制度——辽宁省高校教师职务评聘工作十年回顾

总结经验，坚持和完善高校教师职务评聘制度———辽宁省高校教师职务评聘工作十年回顾辽宁省教委人事处张学广李庆才关键词：高校教师职务评聘制度经验回顾自１９８６年党中央、国务院批准“改革职称评定，实行专业技术职务聘任制”以来，高等学校教师职务评聘工作以坚实...     

大学教师职称评聘问题剖析

做好高校教师职称评聘工作,首先要理清问题。当前,我国高校教师职称评聘工作主要存在以下问题:重视科学研究,轻视教学育人;标准主义严重,个性评价不足;存在编制瓶颈,出现晋升困难;重视职称评定,轻视岗位聘任。     

农村中小学教师职称评定制度的问题与对策

中小学教师的职称评聘制度是20世纪80年代初建立的，实践证明，此制度在农村的建立与推广具有重要的现实意义。由于目前职称评聘政策、管理体制、运作机制等方面的不健全，致使农村教师职称评定工作中出现了许多问题。本文通过对上述问题的详细分析，提出采用适用性、倾斜性、激励性和发展性的原则，来解决农村中小学教师职称评定存在的相关问题.     

Can you increase teacher engagement with evaluation simply by improving the evaluation system?

We know various factors can influence how teaching staff engage with student evaluation, such as institutional policies or staff beliefs. However, little research has investigated the influence of the technical processes of an evaluation system. In this article, we present a case study of the effects of changing the technical system for administering student evaluations at one New Zealand university. We develop a socio-technical model of the institutional evaluation system, and use this model to examine whether introducing an online system for ordering student feedback questionnaires and reducing processing time influenced academic staff engagement with evaluation. Survey responses, interview comments and data about ordering trends suggest the change did increase staff engagement by: (1) improving staff perceptions of evaluation and (2) increasing engaged behaviour, such as voluntarily ordering more evaluations. The outcomes of this study imply that the ‘practical implementation’ of an evaluation system is an important factor in influencing engagement with evaluation. We conclude that we can increase teacher engagement with evaluation simply by improving the ‘practical implementation’ of the evaluation system.     

完善实验系列职称评聘体系,促进实验室人才队伍建设

从分析目前高校实验队伍职称评聘体系存在的问题入手，强调了完善实验系列职称评聘体系的重要性，阐述了该校实行实验系列职称评聘改革的具体实施办法，总结了9年来所取得的成绩与存在的不足，并对进一步完善实验系列职称评聘工作提出建议。     

A Person-Centered Approach to Students' Evaluations of Perceived Fear Appeals and Their Association With Engagement

A person-centered approach was employed to investigate how students' evaluation of perceived teacher utility value messages, i.e., fear appeals, as a threat and as a challenge, combined within individuals and how these combinations related to student engagement. Two studies were conducted with students in their final two years of secondary education. Empirically distinct clusters emerged at two time points in the academic year. Evaluating the message in the fear appeal at a higher level of challenge than threat was beneficial. Unexpectedly, high threat was associated with high engagement, as long as high challenge was also present, however, this combination was also related to high emotional disaffection. Moderate threat combined with moderate challenge had the most detrimental relationship with student engagement. Educational interventions should aim to increase the likelihood of a challenge evaluation.     

在线协作学习中小组学习投入的分析模型构建及应用

在协作学习中学习投入与学习成效紧密相关,是学生进行有效参与和深度学习的必要条件。但目前的研究大多针对个人学习投入,缺乏在协作学习中小组学习投入的相关研究。在前人研究基础上,本研究从认知投入、行为投入、社会投入、情感投入四个维度构建了在线协作学习中小组学习投入的分析模型,并通过实证研究进一步探索小组投入分析模型各维度与小组学习成绩之间的关系。结果表明,在小组学习投入中行为投入、社交投入与小组成绩呈显著正相关关系,而积极、消极、困惑三类情感投入则与小组成绩呈负相关关系。研究同时发现,高分组在中立情感投入、认知投入的问题和元认知维度中的均值都高于低分组。最后,通过分析在线小组学习投入与成绩之间的关系,为今后优化学习支持服务以及提高小组成员协作质量提供了依据。     

学生课程参与的内涵、结构与类型

学生课程参与在深层次上体现了人与世界、人与知识以及人与社会关系的转变。学生课程参与的结构不仅限于认知维度,还包含社会维度和自我维度。但在三个维度上,学生常常处于"公共知识"、"教师权威"和"学生本份"的宰治下,不能真正有效地参与课程。突破三重宰治,需要展开知识建构式参与、文化批判式参与和存在体验式参与。     

大学生学习投入影响因素的研究——基于学习行为投入、情感投入、认知投入维度

大学生学习投入水平高低是学业成就的重要预测因素。文章通过从学习行为投入、情感投入、认知投入维度分析大学生学习投入的影响因素,给出学习投入影响因素与大学生学习投入之间的关系概念模型,并定量分析了自身因素、人际关系因素、学习环境因素对大学生学习行为投入、情感投入、认知投入维度的主要影响及其影响程度。     

AR游戏化学习环境下的学习行为投入影响因素研究

在全球基础教育教学方式不断重组改变的今天,教育游戏作为一种新兴的教学媒体,其寓教于乐的作用受到了相关领域专家、教师以及家长的广泛关注.游戏化学习或基于游戏的学习,尤其是使用移动应用程序和增强现实游戏,已经成为许多教育研究领域的主题.本文首先阐述了学习行为投入的概念和构成维度,并结合体验学习、动机—活动以及自我调节学习理...     

How and why students make academic progress: Reconceptualizing the student engagement construct to increase its explanatory power

This paper sought to explain how the student engagement construct could be reconceptualized so to increase its capacity to explain course-specific academic progress.To do so, we proposed that agentic engagement should be added as a new engagement component while the status of emotional engagement should be reconsidered. In two longitudinally-designed studies, secondary-grade students self-reported four aspects of their course-specific classroom engagement (behavioral, emotional, cognitive, and agentic) throughout an 18-week semester, and these scores were used to predict their objectively-scored course achievement (Study 1) and end-of-semester gains in perceived academic progress and perceived autonomy-supportive teaching (Study 2). In both studies, multilevel regressions showed that agentic engagement explained independent variance in the outcomes, while emotional engagement (and cognitive engagement) did not. These findings highlight the need to add agentic engagement and to reconceptualize the role of emotional engagement, so the discussion offers a reconceptualized model with greater explanatory power than its 3-component (behavioral, emotional, cognitive) predecessor.     

Engaging students in learning: a review of a conceptual organiser

Student engagement in learning is a complex process influenced by many factors. This article introduces a conceptual organiser developed from a review of the literature. It captures four key perspectives – motivation and agency, transactional engagement, institutional support and active citizenship – and suggested indicators for each perspective. Data from a project researching student engagement with first‐time enrolled students in Aotearoa New Zealand is then used to review the conceptual organiser. Findings show that the four perspectives were all evident, though some indicators were more clearly supported than others. As a result of the evaluation, changes were made to the organiser. We argue that it has value as a way for teachers and institutions to inform and evaluate their efforts to engage students in learning.