分合衰兴、渐入佳境:教育心理学这一百年——北京师范大学百年来对教育心理学的贡献

教育心理学是一门研究学习与教学相互作用过程及其影响因素的科学.我国教育心理学的发展由于政治的变迁,1949年建国前后之间的研究工作存在明显的断沟.建国以前,艾伟、廖世承、张耀翔、周先庚、阮镜清等人做了一些开拓性的工作,编制教育心理学教材,开展本土化的一些研究工作[1].建国初期,主要学习前苏联的理论,到文革前的一段时间里,开展了学科教学心理研究,文革中研究工作停滞,文革后逐渐恢复,在介绍和学习西方教育心理学的基础上,逐渐开展多方面的研究工作.直到现在,研究队伍日渐庞大,对教师培训、课程改革、学科教学、心理健康教育等方面都产生了重要影响.     

批判性话语分析对教育研究的意义

围绕着语言与社会之间的双向建构,英国社会语言学家费尔克拉夫深入探讨了话语在何种程度上受制于具体的社会情境,又在何种程度上积极地推动社会变迁。在方法论上,由于批判性话语分析特别强调在情境中体会语义和语用,所以民族志与文本分析必须在研究过程中相互交织在一起。在意义诠释的基础上,批判性话语分析还具有一层批判的维度。研究者需借助社会学及教育学的相关理论去挖掘蕴含在文本之中的权力。从批判性话语分析的视角出发来研究教育问题,我们能够获得以往的社会研究模式无法提供的新视野。     

关于高等学校科研促进教学的几点思考

如何构建教学与科研的和谐关系,提高培养人才的质量成为当前高校生存和发展的重要问题,对于促进学校的发展、从整体上提升高校的层次具有一定的现实意义。文章重点分析了高等学校科研对教学的促进作用,并提出了高校科研促进教学的几点建议。     

利用Blog开展《教育心理学》的教学实践

利用Blog开展教学是一种新型的信息化教学方式。以唐山师范学院教育技术专业2005级学生为研究对象,以专业课程《教育心理学》为研究载体,进行了为期半年的教学实践。在实践的基础上系统分析了利用Blog进行《教育心理学》授课的优势以及具体实践过程,以期对今后进行的高校教师教育技术能力培训模块提供实践性支持。     

The Lure of Psychology for Education and Educational Research

Psychology has penetrated many domains of society and its vocabulary and discourse has become part of our everyday conversations. It not only carries with it the promise that it will deliver insights into human behaviour, but it is also believed that it can address many of the problems human beings are confronted with. As a discipline it thrives in the present climate of performativity, where more attention is given to means than to ends. The article observes first that for education and thus for educational research, though psychology's approach can be valuable, other theoretical stances are also necessary. It then analyses why psychology may be attractive nowadays in the educational field and identifies its prestige in academia, partly arising from its professionalization, but above all the use of a particular method and the focus on certain contents. This has historical antecedents, and so some illustrations are given of previous developments, paying attention as well to the controversies in which educational psychology has been involved in the past, as well as to the need of biographical research, which warns us to be careful with generalizations. It is argued that a more balanced approach (invoking the particularities of the situation as well as a broader concept of practical rationality) is required for the study of education and that educational researchers therefore should resist the tendency to see psychology as the default auxiliary science of education; instead they should reclaim their territory, do justice to the responsibility that is required and highlight the importance of understanding social practices to a large extent in terms of reasons and intentions.     

The Spanish Contribution to Educational Comparativism

Introduction

Comparative education is not the same thing as educational comparativism; similarly, a "comparative" educator is not the same as an educational comparativist. The former makes rigorously scientific comparisons in space and in time (past, present, and future) among educational theories and practice. In contrast, to merit the label "comparativist," it is sufficient for the educator to make frequent use of the comparative method in his investigations, or to import or export educational theories and practice. This "educational traffic," if we may call it so, occurs above all in the stage that historians of our field generally call "the borrowing period."     

《教育心理学》课程"3L"教学模式的实践与研究

"3L"教学模式是上海电视大学经过不懈的探索所构建的一种适合现代远程教育的教学模式.本文重点阐述了<教育心理学>课程在操作层面上对"3L"教学模式进行的探索和尝试,提出了适合该课程特点的导学策略、自学措施和助学手段,分析了其在实际运作中的成效及问题,并给出了解决问题的一些建议.     

Early Research in Educational Psychology

Twenty-one schools active in training educational psychologists early in the century have been identified. Three major journals publishing educational psychology research between 1910 and 1925 were studied to determine the nature and extent of research performed in the institutions. Productivity ranged from high to low, with about one third of studies devoted to intelligence and its measurement, and one third devoted to other aspects of measurement. Educational psychologists professed to be concerned primarily with learning, but only about 10% of their research focused on learning. Examination of textbooks of the period revealed that authors' sources of evidence primarily came from traditional education (mostly methods) books, secondarily from traditional general psychology books, and very little from educational psychology research. However described, early educational psychologists were primarily psychometrists, depending on traditional education and psychology for the data they espoused.