北京书虫文化节

三月初,在北京的三里屯正上演着一场极具文化气息的盛会。我们杂志的主编Scott早就对这个国际文学节倾心已久,在真正揭开它那层华丽的序幕时,我们也有幸目睹了中外文学艺术家们对文学的执着以及追求。热爱书籍．热爱文学的人永远都在不断自我追求和促进的道路上互相勉励。     

The AECT Project: Modeling the Effective Use of Technology in Teacher Preparation

Conclusion The AECT Project builds on ISTE’s groundbreaking work in the development of technology standards for teachers. The Project adds specificity and has developed a comprehensive set of tools for pre-service teacher education. Teacher educators can use these tools to ensure that their graduates leave with the technology skills needed for their selected teaching specialty. The commitment and leadership demonstrated by the U.S. Department of Education in offering the Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers for Technology program has earned their leaders our respect. Through this program the AECT Project has been able to develop tools and can now offer them at no cost to institutions of higher education. The PT3 Program has galvanized educators across America, has helped to create important, ongoing collaborations, and has helped to instill an unprecedented mass consciousness valuing educational change. The partners in the AECT Project are proud to have this opportunity to contribute, in important ways, to technology integration in teacher education. We are honored to join with all of the other PT3 Projects from across the Nation in creating teaching and learning opportunities that will shape our educational systems in the 21st century. We welcome other teacher education institutions and professional associations as partners as we move ahead. For more information, please contact us through our Website athttp://aect.org/pt3, or send email to us ataect@psu.edu     

AECT and NCATE

AECT is a committed partner with NCATE in its belief that every child in America has the right to be taught by a well-prepared, qualified teacher. AECT, always a strong proponent of accreditation and licensure, has been a strong ally and supporter of NCATE for over thirty years. In recent action, AECT’s Board of Directors reaffirmed its commitment to, partnership with, and acknowledgement of NCATE as the national organization that authorizes the professional accreditation programs that produce America’s teachers and other education specialists. We call upon all such programs to seek national accreditation     

Employment profiles and compensation

Conclusions The authors’ expectations are that AECT members and other educational technologists will use the information presented to establish or increase their own levels of compensation (or the compensation levels of those they supervise). Knowledge of the education levels, experience, salaries, and work motivation factors of fellow educational technologists may enable you to negotiate more effectively and fairly. The AECT salary survey described in this article was commissioned and conducted prior to James A. Pershing becoming Editor-in-Chief of TechTrends.     

Us and them: Finding irony in our teaching methods

This paper reports a collaborative project to explore our work as teacher educators, an effort to reconstruct a stance for ourselves in relation to our students. Our analysis is aligned with feminist post-modern perspectives, involving a reflexive representation of our teaching identities. To collect these expressions, we kept a real-time dialogue journal, sitting together weekly over the course of a semester, writing to each other in conversation about our ongoing interactions with students. We reviewed these written records looking for contradictions in our talk about our students and our methods of instruction. This paper shares our discovery of the ironic in our desires for authoritative knowledge, effective methods, coherent organization, and harmonic relationships that mirrored our students' requests of us. We suggest the importance of planting seeds of irony alongside our teaching recommendations, so that our students might recognize and embrace the limitations of our authority. I wonder about the value in talking about what concerns us in our teaching. The labels we dredge up get us to the same old places where we win, students struggle, and colleagues don't get it. Well, I don't usually get it either. I mean, I think you can get used to an audience and figure out how to address it, and that might get you good course evaluations. But to what end? (Hinchman, 9 September 1995).     

基于文化的学习设计与研究——AECT 2020年会综述

美国教育传播与技术协会(AECT)2020年国际学术年会(以下简称AECT 2020)于11月2日至7日在网上召开,这也是协会成立97年来第一次全面以网络会议的形式举行。全球各地近1000位教育技术研究人员、教育实践者、教师、教学设计师、教育技术及相关领域的研究生和企业界人士,分享了各自的学术研究成果和最佳教学实践与经验。AECT 2020主题是“基于文化的学习设计与研究”(Towards Culturally-Situated Learning and Research)。围绕这一主题,展开了丰富多彩的学术交流与研讨:共举办了360场次的会议发言,33场次的激灵式讲演,41场小组论坛,99个海报展示,166个圆桌讨论和32场图书分享,13个兴趣小组(Birds of a Feather)和23个工作坊,以及七大门类的特别报道(Special Strands)。AECT 2020先后为参会人员提供了784场次的学术交流机会,研讨内容丰富多彩。国际华人教育技术协会等20多个AECT联谊协会与学术团体也参与本次年会。在大会组织者和124名志愿者的共同努力下,年会圆满成功,继续以众多的研究成果引领教育技术领域的国际学术发展潮流。     

对教育技术定义演变的分析与思考

在介绍教育技术AECT2004新定义的基础上,通过对教育技术定义演变过程的分析以及2004定义与1994定义的比较,对新定义的理解和由此引发的思考。     

对教育技术专业人员职业道德规范建设的思考——美国AECT的工作及启示

职业道德规范是任何一个研究与实践领域都不可回避的问题,也是专业与学科建设的重要课题之一.美国AECT作为教育技术领域重要的学术组织之一,数十年来一直致力于教育技术专业人员职业道德规范的建设探索,从个人、社会、行业三个层次全面阐述了专业人员的职业道德规范.这对于我国如何基于自身独特的发展历史与文化传统,创建中国的教育技术专业人员职业道德规范具有重要的启发与借鉴意义.     

Foreseeing a Religious Educational Program for a Local Church

The members of the Editorial Staff and Committee invite the readers of Religious Education to participate in the Forum. Let us know what you think about the articles appearing in the journal. If you feel we are over‐emphasizing some fields and under‐emphasizing others — tell us. If you feel that we are failing to get at some of the things we should be handling, discuss them through this section of the journal. We will welcome your cooperation and participation.     

遥远的回响永久的记忆——昭通交通地名的历史透视

万山阻隔,群峰环绕,使得昭通开门见山,出门是坡,昭通人民以无比坚强的毅力,在崇山峻岭之中、从悬崖绝壁之旁,开凿出了一条条通向区外的驿道、马路,留下了数以千计的道路、桥梁、渡口、险关、方位等交通地名。延伸在崇山峻岭中的条条马帮小道,不仅过去是,现在仍然是部分山区人民重要的生命线。那崎岖路上人背马驮的艰辛,在地名中留下了难以抹去的记忆。人们已经用遍布全市的数百个带“马”字的地名,在昭通大地上给马铸造了一座无形而又传之久远的纪念碑!     

THE POLITICS OF DECLINE‐CATASTROPHE OR OPPORTUNITY

My challenge to those that use Derrida or Bey or Adorno or Bourdieu within their disciplinary frameworks to advance our understanding of new media, is can you enact the ideas of these thinkers in a sophisticated way through new media, or can it only be done through writing books about books? I challenge cultural studies and new media theorists to produce a Derrida engine or a Bourdieu database or a Bey GIS map. I am not aware of any major contribution that cultural studies has made within this medium beyond using it as a publishing and networking mechanism, and beyond writing innumerable valuable books to critique it from a distance. We need more people engaged in building academic resources on-line that help us to look at things in new ways.

Craig Bellamy, “The Milk Bar Challenge,” posted on the fibreculture mailing list on 22 July, 2002     

Be Ready To Change——A New Interpretation of “Who Moved My Cheese”

to state the theme that"sometimes,things change and they are never the same again,this looks like one of those times.That's life,Life move on,and so should we"Dr Spencer Johnson depict a story about change in a maze where four amusing characters look for"cheese"—cheese being a metaphor for what we want to have in life,whether it is a job,a relationship,money,a big house,freedom,health,recognition spiritual peace,or even an activity like jogging or golf.Each of us has our own idea of what cheese is,and we pursue it because we believe it makes us happy.If we get it,we often become attached to it.And if we lose it,or it’s taken away,it can be traumatic The maze in the story represents where you spend time looking for what you want.It can be the organization you work in,the community you live in,or the relationship you have in your life.     

新时期学习型班级建设与学生领导力研究简

学习型班级是以班级成员为中心,以班级成员管理自治为运行机制的新型班级组织。它是开放的组织管理体系,其动力机制和运行机制是一种“竞争力匹配与调和”模型。实践中,可以通过重新树立学生领导力权威、营造“可以犯错”的学生领导力执行氛围、重新确立学生领导力执行的目标等途径和手段来实现班级组织转型和学生领导力变革。新时期,提升学生领导力水平,树立学生自治意识是首要前提,维护学生领导权威是重要保障,变革班级组织架构是关键步骤,完善班级纪律规定是基础环节。只有改变传统“德育式”和“法治化”的教育实践方式,才能实现“通过教育的纪律”、学生个体的纪律化和“美化集体的纪律”。     

Action is the Beginning of Knowledge (June 1927)

Mr. [Wang] Yang ming says, "Knowledge is the beginning of action; action is the completion of knowledge." I do not agree. Action is the beginning of knowledge, and knowledge is the completion of action. Let us begin with children. They know that fire is hot only after they have felt the heat. They know that snow is cold only after they have chilled their hands. Only after they have tasted sugar do they know it is sweet; only after they have run into a rock do they know that rocks are hard. When you have lived for awhile in a sunny place, when you have gone into a kitchen a few times when food is being cooked, and when you have lived through several summers, then you have an abstract idea of heat. When you have made a few Bodhisattvas out of snow, when you have breathed the frosty wind a few times, and when you have had a few dishes of ice cream, then you have an abstract knowledge of cold. When you have eaten white candy, red candy, sesame candy, sugar cane, and licorice, then you have an abstract idea of sweetness. When you have run into iron, copper, and wood several times, then you have an abstract knowledge of hardness. When you first burn your hand and then freeze your face, you understand hot and cold even better. When you eat licorice and then bitter herbs, you can understand sweet and bitter even better. When you run into a rock then touch a ring of cornflowers, you know the difference between hard and soft even better. In all of these things, we can see clearly that action is the beginning of knowledge and knowledge is the completion of action. Only after Franklin flew a kite did it become known that electricity could be attracted from the atmosphere to earth. When Watt heated water and saw that steam could move the teapot cover, he knew steam could also move machines. When Galileo dropped balls of unequal weight from the tower of Pisa, he knew that balls of unequal weight fall to earth at the same speed. In these scientific examples, we can again see that "action is the beginning of knowledge and knowledge is the completion of action."     

Science teaching in science education

Reading the interesting article Discerning selective traditions in science education by Per Sund, which is published in this issue of CSSE, allows us to open the discussion on procedures for teaching science today. Clearly there is overlap between the teaching of science and other areas of knowledge. However, we must constantly develop new methods to teach and differentiate between science education and teaching science in response to the changing needs of our students, and we must analyze what role teachers and teacher educators play in both. We must continually examine the methods and concepts involved in developing pedagogical content knowledge in science teachers. Otherwise, the possibility that these routines, based on subjective traditions, prevent emerging processes of educational innovation. Modern science is an enormous field of knowledge in its own right, which is made more expansive when examined within the context of its place in society. We propose the need to design educative interactions around situations that involve science and society. Science education must provide students with all four dimensions of the cognitive process: factual knowledge, conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and metacognitive knowledge. We can observe in classrooms at all levels of education that students understand the concepts better when they have the opportunity to apply the scientific knowledge in a personally relevant way. When students find value in practical exercises and they are provided opportunities to reinterpret their experiences, greater learning gains are achieved. In this sense, a key aspect of educational innovation is the change in teaching methodology. We need new tools to respond to new problems. A shift in teacher education is needed to realize the rewards of situating science questions in a societal context and opening classroom doors to active methodologies in science education to promote meaningful learning through meaningful teaching.     

AECT2004''''教育技术目的新界定及其启示

文章翻译了AECT2004＇教育技术新定义,比较了1994＇定义和2004＇定义对教育技术目的的不同界定,谈了2004＇定义教育技术目的对中国教育技术的四点启示,即应将促进学生的深度学习作为教育技术的努力方向;应将增强效率作为教育技术的目标;应加强对绩效技术的研究和应用;应该对中国的教育技术专业课程体系进行改革.     

在全球一体化的时代里学习——AECT 2012年会述评与思考

2012年美国教育传播与技术协会（AECT）国际年会,10月31日至11月3日在美国肯塔基州的路易威尔市召开,来自世界各地的学者、专家900多人参会。年会在“在全球一体化的时代里学习”这一主题下,共为参会者提供了628场不同主题发言以及学习交流和研讨机会。本届年会通过大会的主题演讲、主席专场报告、分会论坛发言、圆桌专题论坛和论文等形式,涉及与展示了全球化学习、研究方法、创造性、新型媒体、移动技术等诸方面的研究进展与变化．充分体现了教育技术蓬勃发展的态势。     

R. E. A. FORUM

The members of the Editorial Staff and Committee invite the readers of Religious Education to participate in the Forum. Let us know what you think about the articles appearing in the journal. If you feel we are over‐emphasising some fields and under‐emphasising others — tell us. If you feel that we are failing to get at some of the things we should be handling, discuss them through this section of the journal. We will welcome your cooperation and participation.     

AECT新定义的特色与启示

美国教育传播与技术协会(AECT)在2008年出版的《教育技术定义与评析》一书中正式发布了新的教育技术定义。为使广大中国教育技术工作者、教育技术专业师生了解新定义的内容和与其相关的全面理论观点,中国教育技术协会组织专家翻译了这本著作。该书即将由北京大学出版社出版。新书出版之际,该文作者作为新定义的主要译者,通过AECT新定义与AECT94定义的比较,从学习、创造和职业道德规范等要素入手,阐述了新定义的主要特色以及对我国教育技术领域的启示。     

Using micros for test development

Conclusion Which is the better choice: general item bank software or a word processor program? Your answer is dependent upon your computer skills, the amount of test development work you do, and the nature of investment your school is willing to make for software. Both have their relative strengths and weaknesses. The trade-offs between the two approaches are real, important, and in time will probably favor the item bank software. At the moment, however, we recommend a good word processing program for most teachers. What can you expect the future to bring? At a minimum, test preparation options will continue to expand and improve. We suggested earlier that the technology is changing rapidly. For example even now you can place a printed copy of test items into an optical character recognition (OCR) scanner (similar to a photocopy machine) and read the items into a digital form which either a word processor or a test generator can use. Instead of having to type your collection of test items before selecting, editing, and printing them, the computer will read them from the paper. This new scanning technology, unfortunately, requires expensive software, powerful microcomputers, and the scanner itself costs over $1000. In addition, the accuracy of the character recognition is not perfect—especially with less than the ideal printed copy from which to work. It will be years before most of us have ready access to this technology. Even better options will be available, however, don’t wait for the next major breakthrough. There will always be another breakthrough on the horizon. You can start improving your test development process now