美国NAEP科学素养评价新趋向——基于美国2009NAEP科学评价框架的分析研究

2009 NAEP科学评价框架依据学生科学学习的认知发展,构建了清晰明确的4、8、12年级评价内容,结合认知诊断评价学生四类科学能力,并增添组合题、计算机交互式任务、概念图等新的评价项目,深入有效地评价学生科学素养。框架还着眼于评价学生的学习进步,使NAEP科学评价为美国科学课程实施反馈更科学、更有效的信息。     

美国全国教育进步评价(NAEP)中的科学探究

1NAEP简介美国全国教育进步评价(NAEP)是由美国国会授权并赞助,具有全国代表性的,连续评价美国学生在数学、科学、阅读、写作、艺术、美国历史、世界地理以及其他一些学科的成绩的机构。NAEP开展全国性评价工作已有二十多年的历史。目前,NAEP已成为美国国家及其各州政府衡量其教育发展状况的一个重要指标。1996年NAEP推出了新的1996-2000科学学科评价框架,该框架由科学领域与认知要素构     

TIMSS2019与NAEP2019八年级数学测评框架的比较研究

TIMSS和NAEP作为国际上大规模学生评价的典型测评，其成熟的运作体系对我国的数学素养评估有着重要的借鉴意义.本研究从内容框架、认知领域、试题类型与分布、试题评分四大方面对两个数学测评框架进行比较研究，结果表明：TIMSS和NAEP在内容分布、认知水平分类、试题类型与分布和主观题的评价方式上均高度相似，但NAEP所体现的内容深度更高、试题类型更丰富.     

义务教育阶段学生科学学业成就评价框架的初步开发

义务教育阶段科学学业成就监测是新课程改革的重大研究课题.它是客观公正地评价义务教育新课程科学教育改革的整体效果、科学全面地检测学生学习水平的重要工具,也是新课程科学教育改革课程决策的重要参考依据.全面深入地分析与借鉴PISA、TIMSS、NAEP等国际性学生评价项目,吸收认知目标分类理论、教育测量与评价理论的最新成果,厘清新课程科学学业成就监测的设计理念,梳理评价维度,整体设计评价框架,并初步开发试题编制模型与质量保证技术,能为新课程科学教育评价改革提供参考.     

NAEP 2019阅读评估框架分析及启示

NAEP 2019阅读评估框架是美国国家评估理事会为评估特定年级学生的阅读能力而专门建构和不断发展的一个指导性文件。该阅读评估框架不仅明确了包括文本类型、词汇评估、认知目标和试题类型等阅读评估内容,还具体阐明了阅读评估结果的报告规范和使用方法。美国NAEP 2019阅读评估框架能准确客观地衡量学生的实际阅读水平,在文本类型的确立、认知目标的层级细化以及标题类型的构建等方面,都给我国学生阅读素养评价提供了诸多启示。     

美国教育进展评估2009科学评估框架及启示

美国教育进展评估(NAEP)是全国性学业成就评估体系,是美国进行基础教育质量监控的重要手段,它具有较高的国际影响与学术价值。本文通过评析 NAEP2009科学评估框架,并对比其与NAEP2005科学评估框架的区别,试图为我国建立全国性学业成就评估体系、制定教育评价质量保障程序、提升学业成就评价的命题技术等提供借鉴。     

关于三项著名国际学生评价项目的比较

全国教育进展评价 (简称NAEP)、第三次国际数学和科学教育的再研究 (简称TIMSS -R)和国际学生评价项目 (简称PISA)是当前国际间最为著名的学生评价项目 ,本文拟就 2 0 0 0年NAEP的 8年级评估、TIMSS -R的 8年级评估和PISA三项评价项目的数学和科学领域评估做一比较 ,以便我们了解这些评估的实施背景、基本框架和评估内容     

美国NAEP科学探究纸笔测验试题的特点

美国国家教育进展评价(NAEP)是美国目前唯一的也是最权威的全国学生学业成就评价体系.本文主要从NAEP科学探究评价的形式、目标、语言、图表、情境信息及评分标准和原则等方面分析NAEP科学探究试题的特点,并探讨对我国中小学教学中进行科学探究评价的启示.     

美国NAEP地理评价述评

地理学科一直是美国教育进展评估的主要学科之一,属于主评价中的全美NAEP评价。美国NAEP地理评价围绕一个设计严密的评价框架进行,具有组织实施严密、联系教学实际、题型设计多样、评价内容规范、认知维度标准、成绩报告清晰等特征。美国通过重视对国民的地理素养评价来重视地理教育,值得我国反思和借鉴。     

美国NAEP科学测评分析与启示

在介绍美国NAEP科学测评框架的科学内容、科学实践和学业成就水平的基础上,以NAEP科学测评的试题为例,分析其命题特点:题型多样,巧妙命制组合型试题;关注学科本质,考查科学探究能力;创新主观题评价,设计量表式评分标准。     

美国国家教育进展评价NAEP及其借鉴意义

美国国家教育进展评价,即"国家教育报告卡",是美国一个全国性的教育进展评价项目,旨在测量全美中小学生在阅读、写作、数学、科学、社会等学科领域的学术表现及发展趋势。NAEP是美国目前唯一定期在各个学科领域持续测评学生学业的全国性评价项目,它提供了大量有关美国中小学生学业表现的基础数据。NAEP在编制、抽样、组织、报告等方面的一些做法和经验,对于我们研制中小学各科学业评价标准及开展基础教育质量监测,具有借鉴意义。     

Development and validation of an instrument to assess secondary school students’ perceptions of assessment tasks

Research aimed at developing and validating an instrument to assess secondary school students’ perceptions of assessment tasks was conducted. Following a review of literature, a five‐scale instrument of 40 items was trialled with a sample of 658 science students in 11 English secondary schools. Based on internal consistency reliability data and exploratory factor analysis, refinement decisions resulted in a five‐scale instrument called the Perceptions of assessment tasks inventory (PATI). The scales of the PATI are Congruence with planned learning, Authenticity, Student consultation, Transparency and Diversity.     

Relationship between affective determinants and achievement in science for seventeen-year-olds

Data collected in the 1976-1977 NAEP survey of seventeen-year-olds was used to reanalyze the hypothesis that there are affective determinates of science achievement. Factor and item analysis procedures were used to examine affective and cognitive items from Booklet 4. Eight affective scales and one cognitive achievement scale were identified. Using stepwise multiple regression procedures, the four affective scales of Motivation, Anxiety, Student Choice, and Teacher Support were found to account for the majority of the correlation between the affective determinants and achievement.     

NAEP2010公民教育评估框架述评

全国教育进步评估（NAEP）是由美国国会授权的一项调查,以便收集和报告学生各门学科的成绩信息。自1969年以来,公民教育就是其评估项目之一,为了进一步了解4、8、12年级学生公民教育情况,NAEP2009年制订了2010年公民教育评估框架,计划于2010年对全美学生进行公民教育评估。文章主要介绍了2010年公民教育评估框架产生的背景、评估框架设计中考虑的问题以及评估框架的组成部分,以便为我国公民教育评估框架的研制提供借鉴。     

Simulation-based performance assessment: an innovative approach to exploring understanding of physical science concepts

This paper illustrates the use of simulation-based performance assessment (PA) methodology in a recent study of eighth-grade students’ understanding of physical science concepts. A set of four simulation-based PA tasks were iteratively developed to assess student understanding of an array of physical science concepts, including net force, acceleration, velocity, and inertia. Illustrative examples drawn from the administration of these simulation-based PA tasks to a sample of eighth-grade students (n?=?74) highlight the potential of simulation-based tasks for revealing conceptual understanding of science concepts and for informing curriculum development within the context of design-based implementation research. The paper also describes a variety of challenges encountered over the course of the development, administration, and analysis of the PA data that may be informative for researchers and educators as they consider implementing simulation-based PAs.     

Performance of students in project‐based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement

Reform efforts in science education emphasize the importance of supporting students' construction of knowledge through inquiry. Project‐based science (PBS) is an ambitious approach to science instruction that addresses concerns of reformers. A sample of 142 10th‐ and 11th‐grade students enrolled in a PBS program completed the 12th‐grade 1996 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) science test. Compared with subgroups identified by NAEP that most closely matched our student sample, White and middle class, PBS students outscored the national sample on 44% of NAEP test items. This study shows that students participating in a PBS curriculum were prepared for this type of testing. Educators should be encouraged to use inquiry‐based approaches such as PBS to implement reform in their schools. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 39: 410–422, 2002     

Reliability and Validity of Bookmark‐Based Methods for Standard Setting: Comparisons to Angoff‐Based Methods in the National Assessment of Educational Progress

Historically, Angoff‐based methods were used to establish cut scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). In 2005, the National Assessment Governing Board oversaw multiple studies aimed at evaluating the reliability and validity of Bookmark‐based methods via a comparison to Angoff‐based methods. As the Board considered adoption of Bookmark‐based methods, it considered several criteria, including reliability of the cut scores, validity of the cut scores as evidenced by comparability of results to those from Angoff, and procedural validity as evidenced by panelist understanding of the method tasks and instructions and confidence in the results. As a result of their review, a Bookmark‐based method was adopted for NAEP, and has been used since that time. This article goes beyond the Governing Board's initial evaluations to conduct a systematic review of 27 studies in NAEP research conducted over 15 years. This research is used to evaluate Bookmark‐based methods on key criteria originally considered by the Governing Board. Findings suggest that Bookmark‐based methods have comparable reliability, resulting cut scores, and panelist evaluations to Angoff. Given that Bookmark‐based methods are shorter in duration and less costly, Bookmark‐based methods may be preferable to Angoff for NAEP standard setting.