Recent scholarship around teaching elementary mathematics supports the learning of early algebra with 5- to 12-year olds. However, in spite of the recognition of the affordances of early algebra, issues about how to introduce it remain open. Within this context, Davydov’s work is often cited as a source of impressive demonstration of young learners’ capacity for algebraic thinking. This work requires further exploration in order to yield a clearer picture of a very particular teaching approach, which focuses on early abstractions and symbolic language. We argue that in order to fully understand how Davydov’s work contributes to current conversations and what Davydov was trying to do, we need to shed light on the context- and time-specific discourse of the 1960 Soviet educational reforms that made it possible for Davydov to develop his vision about algebraic thinking and to set in motion appropriate teaching approaches for young learners. In this paper, we look back to the Soviet debates that unfolded in Russia on the integration of early algebra in elementary school word-problem solving. Drawing on these debates and the results of Davydov’s school experiments, we lay out the developmental axes of capacity building. This can be done by emphasizing ascent from the abstract to the concrete using a variety of representational modeling tools to support the emergence of algebraic thinking while targeting particular habits of mind within carefully designed learning activities. We conclude with some insights about current arithmetic-algebra debates, and how these could be enriched and deepened by Davydov’s work, which yet remains open to future discussion and reflection.
相似文献In this paper, we share details of a South African early grades’ number intervention informed by aspects of Davydov’s writing on early number teaching and learning. A key part of Davydov’s approach to early number teaching involves starting with attention to relationships between quantities rather than with counting. The Structuring Number Starters (SNS) intervention focused—over a nine-year period—on supporting early grades’ students to move beyond the calculating-by-counting approaches that are prevalent in South Africa. In attending to this focus, the intervention shifted increasingly towards an emphasis on relationships between quantities, though not in the same format or task sequence as advocated by Davydov. The contextual and cultural features that led to our adaptations—or shape-shifting—are highlighted in this paper. We interrogate key aspects of Davydov’s approaches to early number teaching in relation to key features typical of South African classroom mathematics teaching in order to understand the evolution of the SNS initiative. Quasi-longitudinal interview-based assessment data available from a cross-attainment sample of students in 2011, 2014 and 2018 indicate shifts over time from calculating-by-counting to calculating-by-structuring. These outcomes point to successes with moves into increasingly structured ways of working with early number, but suggest also that these successes may be contingent on some fluency with forward and backward number word sequences. The outcomes suggest that it is feasible to explore interventions directing attention to early number structure from the outset in larger scale studies.
相似文献