论教师学科教学知识及其养成

教师学科教学知识(Pdagogical Content Knowledge)简称PCK,它是教师通过学科内容知识和有效教学策略交互作用(intersection)帮助学生有效学习的知识;这种知识要求教师在完全理解所教内容,了解和掌握学生的文化背景、先前知识和经验的基础之上,运用多种方式进行教学.教师学科教学知识是教师知识的核心,它是保持教师知识复合性、动态性的原动力,并且拓宽了教师专业发展的知识基础.教师可以通过教育叙事、教学反思和树立动态的课程观在教育实践中养成学科教学知识.     

课目教育学知识的译名与概念辨析

Pedagogical content knowledge(PCK)自1985年舒尔曼正式提出以来,经过多年的研究与开发,已被公认为是教学与教师教育领域的核心概念。国内很多人都使用译名"学科教学知识",但是其中的"学科"和"教学"内涵过于狭窄,前者未能涵括"content"所泛指的学校教育中的"学科"和"活动"内容,后者未能表达"pedagogical"的"教育学的"涵括面。斟酌而将其译为"课目教育学知识"较为贴切。课目教育学知识实质上是课目知识的一种特殊形式,即教育学化了的课目知识,奠基了教学作为专业的认识论。它已经形成了二因素结构模型、三因素结构模型、五因素结构模型和六因素结构模型,而凸显了生成性。它启动了教师教育重建,整合了学习环境设计、学生先在概念的实证研究、课目知识分析、教师课目教育学知识研究和教师教育设计五大维度,并使这些维度紧密相连且相互影响,从而表现出超越性。     

A Comparison Between Reported and Enacted Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) About Graphs of Motion

Research in Science Education - This paper reports a case study of four grade 10 physical sciences teachers’ PCK about graphs of motion. We used three data collection strategies, namely...     

Dancing with Maggots and Saints: Visions for Subject Matter Knowledge,Pedagogical Knowledge,and Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Teacher Education Reform

Journal of Science Teacher Education -     

英语师范生实习期间学科教学知识(PCK)发展研究

师范生学科教学知识(Pedagogical Content Knowledge)相关研究引起国内学者广泛关注,研究成果也比较多。但目前国内与英语师范生实习期间学科教学知识发展相关研究还有待进一步研究。根据Cochran等研究者对学科教学知识分类,利用话语分析方法,对英语师范生学科教学知识发展进行了研究。结果发现,实习生学科教学知识在学科知识、教学知识、关于学生知识和关于教学环境知识等四个方面都有所发展,影响因素包括导师指导、小组讨论、个人观察和反思等。希望研究对职前英语教师教育课程的进一步改革提供参考。     

Documenting Science Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge Through PaP-eRs

This paper examines science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and ways in which that knowledge might be captured, articulated and portrayed to others. The research from which this paper is drawn has involved interviews with experienced science teachers in an attempt to make the tacit nature of their practice explicit. Initially, case methodology was envisaged as being a way of documenting these teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. However, over time, the form of knowledge and information that we were gathering and attempting to portray extended beyond that which could reasonably be described as being case-based. Hence we have developed an approach to articulation and portrayal based on what we call the CoRe (Content Representation) – which represents the particular content/topic of the science teaching – and PaP-eRs (Pedagogical and Professional experience Repertoire) – which help to illuminate specific aspects of the CoRe and therefore offer insights into pedagogical content knowledge itself. The results of this study offer new ways of conceptualising what pedagogical content knowledge is and how it might be captured, documented and disseminated.     

Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Elementary Science Teacher Educators: Knowing our Students

Journal of Science Teacher Education -     

Science Trainee Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge and its Influence on Physics Teaching

This study examined Malaysian science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of selected physics concepts. The two components of PCK investigated were (i) knowledge of students' understanding, conceptions and misconceptions of topics, and (ii) knowledge of strategies and representations for teaching particular topics. The participants were 12 trainee teachers from various academic science backgrounds attending a one-year postgraduate teacher-training course. They were interviewed on selected basic concepts in physics that are found in the Malaysian Integrated Science curriculum for lower secondary level. The findings showed that trainee teachers' PCK for promoting conceptual understanding is limited. They lacked the ability to transform their understanding of basic concepts in physics required to teach lower secondary school science pupils. The trainees' level of content knowledge affected their awareness of pupils' likely misconceptions. Consequently, the trainees were unable to employ the appropriate teaching strategies required to explain the scientific ideas. This study provides some pedagogical implications for the training of science teachers.     

Developing Science Pedagogical Content Knowledge Through Mentoring Elementary Teachers

Elementary teachers are typically hesitant to teach science. While a limited knowledge of science content is a reason for this, limited science pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) has emerged as another reason in recent research. This study constitutes two case studies of a professional development program for elementary teachers involving mentoring by a university professor. The mentor took the role of a critical friend in joint planning and teaching of science. The study examines the nature of the mentoring relationship and reports the type of teacher learning that occurred, with a particular focus on the teachers’ development of science PCK.

Pedagogical Transformations of Science Content Knowledge in Korean Elementary Classrooms

While a solid understanding of science content knowledge is important in developing expertise in science teaching, it is not necessarily a sufficient condition to teach science effectively in elementary schools. Teachers need to have the ability to transform their knowledge into forms learnable by students. Based on this perspective, the current study explored how science content knowledge was pedagogically transformed in Korean elementary classrooms. Data sources included video-recorded science lessons of five elementary teachers in a metropolitan city of Korea. The analysis of the data revealed that the Korean teachers often engaged in transforming science content knowledge by means of different semiotic modes, including language, pictures, materials, actions, and their complex combinations. Further, their representations of scientific knowledge were in diverse forms, such as personifications, analogies, quiz questions, pictorial models, diagrams, animations, real-life examples, hand demonstrations, videos, flash tools, and songs-and-dances. Future research involving a wider range of participants, such as students, content specialists, and teachers with weak and strong content understanding, was suggested to confirm the findings of this study and find more various ways of pedagogical transformation of science subject matter knowledge.     

信息技术支持下的学科教学知识:缘起、演化、结构模型及其教育意蕴

信息技术支持下的学科教学知识(TPACK)是学科教学知识(PCK)在信息化时代的发展。技术知识(TK)、教法知识(PK)和内容知识(CK)是TPACK结构模型中的基础成分;学科教学知识(PCK)、技术支持下的内容知识(TCK)、技术支持下的教学知识(TPK)和技术支持下的学科教学知识(TPACK)是TPACK结构模型中的互动成份。TPACK框架在理论上、在教师教育、在教学实践上等诸方面为信息技术与学科课程整合提供了新思路,将有助于我们推动学科教学知识发展,将为学科教育的信息化提供有力的教学知识基础。     

Interaction Between Science Teaching Orientation and Pedagogical Content Knowledge Components

The purpose of this case study is to delve into the complexities of how preservice science teachers’ science teaching orientations, viewed as an interrelated set of beliefs, interact with the other components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Eight preservice science teachers participated in the study. Qualitative data were collected in the form of content representation, responses to an open-ended instrument, and semi-structured interviews. Preservice teachers’ orientation and PCK were analyzed deductively. Constant comparison analysis of how their orientation interacted with other PCK components revealed three major themes: (1) one’s purpose for science teaching determines the PCK component(s) with which it interacts, (2) a teacher’s beliefs about the nature of science do not directly interact with his/her PCK, unless those beliefs relate directly to the purposes of teaching science, and (3) beliefs about science teaching and learning mostly interact with knowledge of instructional strategies. Implications for science teacher education and research are discussed.     

技术—教学法—内容知识(TPACK)研究议题及其进展

“技术-教学法-内容知识”（TPACK）是信息技术与课程整合、教师知识与教学学习研究的热点之一。本文从TPACK框架的提出、主要研究议题与进展、以及有待解决的问题和未来研究方向等方面,系统报道与评论了“技术-教学法-内容知识”这一整合技术进行教学的教师知识框架。     

Observing the Indicators of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Classrooms: Video-Based Research

The purpose of the study was to observe the indicators of science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) using a video-based research method. The study was conducted with four in-service science teachers who taught at a school that offered tablet-based education in primary and secondary levels. Data sources included video-recorded classroom teaching sessions and pre- and post-video teacher interviews. In addition to the in-depth contextual information provided, the findings from the qualitative analysis of teacher cases revealed indicators of teachers’ TPACK in their lesson design and actual teaching processes. Design indicators included technology selection, curriculum planning, lesson preparation, and assessment. Actual teaching indicators included lesson entry behaviors, teaching methods and strategies, technology-enhanced classroom management, troubleshooting, and assessment.     

幼儿教师科学教育知识的类型及其特征

教师科学教育知识是当前科学教育与教师教育研究的重要问题。对幼儿教师科学教育知识类型的探讨为近年来国内外研究者所关注。本研究通过对20所不同等级幼儿园321名教师所进行的问卷调查、观察、访谈与聚类分析,较深入地揭示了幼儿教师科学教育知识的四种类型：开放系统型、探究零散型、保守贫乏型、传统丰富型,及其各自所具有的特征,并指出需从动态发展的角度促进教师科学教育知识类型的优化。     

初中数学教师TPACK结构的探索研究

21世纪信息技术的发展对数学教育的价值、目标、内容以及教学方式产生了很大的影响.基于国外已有研究成果,以685位初中数学教师为对象,经因素分析探析出TPACK的5个主要因素:整合技术的教学表征与设计知识、关于学习者的知识、教学组织与实施知识、整合技术的课程内容知识和数学专题知识.最后,建构了符合中国数学教师特质的3层5因素的初中数学教师TPACK结构模型.     

技术-教学法-内容知识:对教师的新要求

基于对教育技术、一般教学法和学科内容交互作用的分析,研究者提出当前教师应具有技术一教学法一内容知识,善于利用教育技术有效表征和呈现学科内容以利于教学和学生理解。可通过基于问题解决的训练模式帮助教师获得技术一教学法一内容知识。该理论是对教师知识研究的拓展,对教师的职业素质提出了新要求,也对当前我国教师教育的研究和实践具有重要启发意义。     

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Literature Using Confidence Intervals

The validity and reliability of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) as a framework to measure the extent to which teachers can teach with technology hinges on the ability to aggregate results across empirical studies. The results of data collected using the survey of pre-service teacher knowledge of teaching with technology (TKTT) were synthesized using confidence intervals (CIs). Mean pre-service teacher TPACK point estimates were characterized by graphing CIs across studies from 2009 until 2011. The results present approximations of TPACK population parameters and implications for researchers and teacher educators.