创建有效的英语合作学习小组之我见

合作学习是一种教学策略,体现了现代教育理念,它以学习小组为基本组织形式,以团体成绩为基本评价依据,通过学生对学习过程的主动参与,培养其自主意识,自主能力和自主习惯,每个学生平等地参与学习,有充分发言和表现自己的机会。它有效地改善了课堂内的学习     

英语写作训练小组合作模式与策略探宄

小组合作学习就是把班级分成若干小组,以小组为单位,开展语言交流和写作实践活动。共同完成课堂上教师布置的各项任务,并完成写作练习,然后以不同的方式展示其成果。小组合作学习是一种教学策略,体现了现代教育理念,它以学习小组为基本组织形式,以团体成绩为基本评价依据,通过学生对学习过程的主动参与,培养其自主意识、自主能力和自主学习习惯。     

浅谈英语教学的形成性评价

新课标提出了以人为本的教育理念,要求教师以学生发展为教学目的,充分发挥学生的自主能动性,从而培养学生的自主学习能力与创新能力。形成性评价是教与学的双向评价,其目的一方面是激励学生学习,帮助学生有效调控自己的学习过程,使学生获得成就感,增强自信心,全     

浅谈初中历史课堂教学的合作学习的教学策略

初中历史课程标准中就历史教学的教学理念这样表述:鼓励自主、合作、探究式学习,倡导教师教学方式和教学评价方式的创新,使全体学生都得到发展。这是其教学理念中的第四条。那么我们在历史课堂教学中就要让这一条教学理念贯穿始终。再者因为学生自主、合作、探究式学习有助于提高学生的学习能力掌握相应的学习方法,在自主探究的过程中享受成功的快乐,培养自己学习的自信心。     

少数民族地区大学生探究式自主学习能力培养刍探

文章以经济法课程的实践教学为例,探讨少数民族地区大学生探究式自主学习能力培养存在的问题,并提出少数民族地区大学生探究式自主学习能力培养措施:加强互动交流,激发学生学习积极性;贯彻创新人才培养理念,创新教学模式;结合多媒体教学,重视学生的个性培养;强化过程评价,重视学生的学习过程。     

自主学习评价:理念、功能、标准和方法

自主学习是当今教育研究的一个重要课题.作为一种学习能力、学习过程和学习方式,它是一个人终身学习和毕生发展的基础.自主学习评价是自主学习过程中不可或缺的一环,它以内外双向评价为主要特征,即教育者代表社会对受教育者自主学习动机、策略和能力等评价与受教育者内部自我监控评价相结合.本文拟从自主学习的理念、功能、主体、标准和方法等角度对自主学习评价进行探索,以期对学生自主学习的健康发展有所裨益.     

学习过程评价的理念

学习过程评价即对学习者的学习过程进行的评价。学习过程评价理念的基础主要有人学理念、文化理念、学习过程规律、学习生活质量观。学习过程评价的重要理念有:以素质发展为核心导向;走进崇高;促进学习;自主性;个性化。体现学习过程评价理念的操作要领有:充分地发展和利用素质文化;让学习者体验学习过程及其评价的崇高;以自我评价为主;构建个性化的评价框架。     

素质文化视野中的中学生学习过程评价要领

中学生学习过程评价需要有素质文化视野,因为中学生学习过程评价需要有文化视野,文化视野的核心应该是素质文化.素质文化视野中的中学生学习过程评价理念有:追求深层公平、多元化、注重自主、体现崇高、促进学习.素质文化视野中的中学生学习过程评价操作思路包括:研制富有弹性的评价标准、构建以自我评价为主的评价机制、展开与学习过程整合的评价过程、开发丰富多彩的评价方式.     

设计教室空间 展示“游戏精神”

一、“以学生为本”与“游戏精神”遥相呼应《语文新课程标准》贯穿于整个语文课程的基本理念是以学生为本,促进学生的发展,明确指出:“学生是语文学习的主人”“学生是学习和发展的主体”。要实现这个教育目标,在语文实践过程中就要尊重学生的个体差异,创造性地开展各类活动,以创设出良好的自主学习情境,借此激发学生在各种场合学语文、用语文的兴趣。培养学生自主学习的意识和习惯,展示“主体”,即学生自主确定学习内容,自主选择学习方法与评价方式,在自主、合作、探究的学习氛围中进行。细细品味“以学生为本”这一理念,竟发现与西方所提倡的“游戏精神”遥相呼应。     

外语自主学习系统的设计理念及其功能模块的分析——以“新理念大学英语网络教学系统”为例

网络教学系统的应用为实现自主学习提供了仿真的环境和便利的途径。文章以"新理念大学英语网络教学系统"为例,探讨了外语自主学习的教学模式及其设计理念,分别从内容的呈现、模式的制定、过程的监控及对绩效的评价等方面入手,分析了基于自主学习模式的外语教学过程中几个重要的功能模块。通过对网络教学系统的研究与应用,体现出以学习者为中心的核心教学理念。在虚拟化互动环境中,提升学生的外语自主学习能力,以适应新时期的个性化教学的需求。     

Approaching assessment from a learning perspective: Elevating assessment beyond technique

Assessment is a key process in assuring quality education but how is it linked to the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL)? How can we join teaching and learning to the assessment process rather than view it as a stand-alone component in course and/or program development? This paper explores the relationship between assessment and the SoTL in an effort to identify a systems approach to program management practices. The goal is not to dismiss the value of mechanics and tools in assessment but to highlight the value of building an assessment process that brings together the respective components of assessment with the scholarship that constitutes teaching and learning and an understanding of assessment as learning. Incorporating the use of curriculum maps and Fink’s taxonomy of significant learning advances a framework-driven practice that supports assurance of learning.     

Formative and shared assessment in higher education. Lessons learned and challenges for the future

Formative assessment is the process by which teachers provide information to students during the learning process to modify their understanding and self-regulation. An important process within this is shared assessment, which refers to student involvement in the assessment and learning practice, a process of dialogue and collaboration between teacher and students aimed at improving the learning process, both individually and collectively. The purpose of this paper is to review the current state of affairs in depth. This paper therefore highlights, on the one hand, the lessons learned through research and development in higher education (i.e. providing clear learning goals and feedback, guiding learning, involving students in learning and assessment, promoting feedback as a process of dialogue, and making processes viable). On the other hand, these lessons also suggest some challenges and difficulties that must be addressed in the future in order to further improve formative and shared assessment in higher education. These include the need for more research on its effects, further conceptual clarification, the intersubjectivity of the process, recognition of the divergent processes and ethical principles, students’ involvement not only in assessment but also in determining academic grades, and broading learning goals and objetives in FA & SA.     

高师本科教育学教学“过程评价”的尝试

过程评价是指教师对学生在教育过程中的表现与阶段性学习效果所作的及时评价。学生平时成绩的评定是一种过程评价,结合某一学科学生平时成绩的评定改革来研究过程评价是一种有益的探索。高师本科教育学教学可从出勤、规范上课和记笔记、课堂讨论、作业等几个方面来评定学生教育学的平时成绩。     

基于e-Portfolio的过程性评价系统设计与实现

过程性评价是指在课程实施过程中对学生学习进行评价的方式,e-Portfolio作为一种评价的工具与载体,能够有效促进过程性评价的实施。文章在分析过程性评价理念的基础上,提出一种基于e-Portfolio的过程性评价系统设计模型,并结合项目任务研发了相应系统,进行了初步应用。     

Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features

This paper reports a systematic literature review examining empirical studies on the effects of peer assessment for learning. Peer assessment is fundamentally a social process whose core activity is feedback given to and received from others, aimed at enhancing the performance of each individual group member and/or the group as a whole. This makes peer assessment an interpersonal and interactional process. Using this social perspective in order to study learning effects, we focus on the impact of the structural arrangement of peer assessment on learning, and the influence of interpersonal variables.The literature search, focusing on empirical studies measuring learning outcomes in a peer assessment setting, resulted in 15 studies conducted since 1990 dealing with effects (performance or perceived learning gains) of peer assessment. Our analysis reveals that, although peer assessment is a social process, interpersonal variables have hardly been studied; more specifically, they were measured in only 4 out of 15 studies. Moreover, they are not used to explain learning gains resulting from peer assessment. Finally, comparing the studies with respect to structural features reveals that, although the differences between the studies are significant, there seems to be no relation with the occurrence of learning benefits. The results of this review seem to indicate that research on peer assessment from a social perspective is still in its infancy and deserves more attention.     

How to assess for improvement of learning

This review summarizes and builds on a seminar about assessment of student learning in higher education. Assessment can be looked upon as simply something that has to be done at the end of a course. During the course of discussions at the seminar the participants became more aware of how assessment can have an impact on learning. This means that assessment can be used as a means to improve learning. This realization is not a new one, but it is highlighted here in a more coherent and concise way than usual. Many alternative methods of assessment are possible. Some instructional design rules will be presented here for designing assessment sessions in such a way that learning can be improved. When designing an assessment method, one can be guided by the following considerations. The content of assessment should be chosen in accordance with the learning outcomes one hopes to achieve. The organization of assessment can be designed in such a way that the desired learning process is promoted. The outcome of assessment can provide feedback to many of the stakeholders: to the students on their learning process; to the faculty on its outcomes; and to the teacher by pointing out the following steps to be taken in improving assessment, learning and teaching.     

Improving teaching and learning in engineering education through a continuous assessment process

This paper presents the effects of a continuous assessment process on mechanical engineering education at Kuwait University. This process has been in place for the last five academic years and is producing results. Efforts to educate faculty and students about the process are beginning to produce accurate and consistent measurements of student learning. Although another assessment cycle is needed to make a better judgement, there is evidence that assessment is effective in improving teaching and learning in the programme. There is also an increased constituent awareness of the utility of assessment, which helps in instilling an institutional culture and therefore assuring a sustainable process.     

现代远程教育考试应是过程而非环节——一种考试改革的理论与行动框架

现代远程教育考试到底是过程还是环节,理论界没有明确说法。本文试图以新的思维回答这一问题,并期望由此建立符合现代远程教育规律的考试理论框架。在总结实践经验和理论分析的基础上,作者得出了现代远程教育的考试应是过程而非环节的结论。在论证过程中,其着眼点也始终放在落实学习过程上,认为学习过程难以落实才是远程教育考试改革的根本动因,进而认为在自主学习条件下,落实学习过程不仅是考试改革成败的关键,也是保障和改善现代远程教学质量的根本途径。作者强调,把考试由环节转化为过程不仅是技术问题,更是思想方法问题。     

基于Weblog的学习评价

学习评价作为学习系统的反馈调节机制,在学习和教学过程中起着重要作用。Weblog是网络时代的一种个人学习与反思工具,将其引入学习评价,能够发挥资源、信息发布与采集、实施评价等方面的优点。     

大学英语自主学习形成性评估实证研究

自主学习要求学习者监控学习进程和评价学习效果,传统的终结性评估不适用于自主学习。构建了适用于自主学习的形成性评估模式,该模式由"学习档案袋评价""教师评价"及"学生自评和他评"构成。经过在两个教学班级一学期的教学实验,结果表明:通过对学生自主学习过程的监控和管理,形成性评估激发了学生语言学习的动机和兴趣,促进了学生学习策略形成,有效培养了学生自主学习能力。