关于高校学生评教工作的理性思考

学生评教的最主要目的是帮助教师找出教学中存在的问题并督促教师改进教学,学生评教是提高高校教学质量的一种有效手段.学生评教工作也是一把双刃剑,学生对评教工作重要性的认识不足,评教指标体系和评教方式不科学,对评教结果处理不当,都有可能对教师的工作积极性产生不利影响.学生评教最好采取定量与定性相结合的方案.     

学生评教活动的理论研究与实践

我国高校开展学生评教的时间不长,但发展迅速、影响逐步扩大和深入。一些高校建立了针对每一门教学科目的学生评教制度,每一位教师的教学都被纳入学生评教的范围。很多高校开发了学生网上评教系统,使学生评教更便捷,更有利于对评教结果进行综合统计分析。通过学生评教,改变了长期以来学生只是被动地等待教师评价的状况,转而能够主动地评价教师的课堂教学,增强学生在教学活动中的主体意识。通过评教,为学生提供了与教师交流的平台,有利于教学相长,一方面促进学生对自身学习的思考,同时也促进教师进一步改进教学,增强教师的责任感和危机感,激发师生参与教学改革的积极性和主动性。     

高职院校学生评教的问题与对策

学生评教是教育评价的有机组成部分,高职教育在提升教学质量的过程中,迫切地需要还原学生评教的本质功能,将评价教师与评价教学有机地结合起来,使学生评教为教师专业成长和学校教学质量提升服务.本文从分析学生评教存在问题入手,明确高职内涵建设中学生评教的重要意义,提出了完善学生评教工作应转变评教观念、扩展评教内容、改进评教方法、完善评教反馈四项具体措施.     

高校学生评教有效性的理论探析

教学质量是高校生存与发展的生命线.学生评教是提高教师课堂教学质量的有效手段.课堂教学质量的好坏直接决定着整体教学质量的高低.学生评教有效性的实质在于教师通过参与学生评教,促进教师教学积极性的发挥.通过对高校学生评教有效性问题进行基本理论的辨析,分析学生评教有效性的蕴涵,进一步明晰学生评教有效性的价值和意义.     

学生评教差评教师的有效性研究

通过问卷调查学生对评教制度的认识和态度、学生对指标体系的满意度、影响评教打分的客观因素,并以评教排名靠后的教师为研究对象,通过专家的跟踪听课评价,验证了差评教师的有效性,分析出差评教师的四种类型,提出了学生评教的改进措施和方法.     

关于进一步完善职业院校学生评教制度的思考

学生评教制度对于促进教师教学水平的提高、教学质量监控体系的完善、学生主体地位的提升、学校管理资源的开发具有重要意义。但在实践中尚存在一些问题,应该从转变观念、科学设计评价指标、丰富评教方式、规范评教过程、正确处理评教结果等方面不断加以完善。     

高校教师对学生评教结果使用的实证研究

学生评教是学生对教师教学效果的评价,是学生对教师的教育活动满足自己需要的程度做出的判断.学生评教的目的分为形成性评价与总结性评价.研究发现,形成性评价是学生评教的根本目的.高校在使用学生评教结果时首先要做好政策引导和制度保障工作;在具体的使用过程中要遵循科学原则、人本原则和教师发展原则,以充分发挥学生评教的形成性评价的作用.     

试论信息不对称与高等学校学生评教

学生评教是高等学校教学质量管理的关键举措.在其运作过程中存在诸多信息不时称现象,它会造成学生和教师的逆选择及败德行为.根据信息不对称理论对学生评教的分析,学生、教师的逆选择和败德行为的发生不仅与评教过程中的信息不对称有关,还与目前学生评教制度运作的不科学有关.所以,完善学生评教制度,需要促成教学信息在管理方、教师和学生之间的对称配置,同时应使学生评教制度回归到服务学生和实现学生利益这一基点上.     

高等学校学生评教行为偏差研究——基于南京仙林大学城若干大学的分析

学生评教是高校教学质量保障体系的重要组成部分.目前,学生在评教过程中存在评教行为偏差,主要表现为引致评教、恶意评教、随意评教和放弃评教.其直接原因在于高校在学生评教管理中的若干强制规定和院系对学生评教的不当引导;根本原因则是由学生评教定位偏差以及学生评教运作无关学生利益造成的.因此,高校需要科学定位学生评教,极力完善学生评教的制度设计,构建学生评教和学生利益紧密关联的基点,以便促成教师根据学生评教改进教学和服务学生、满足学生学习需要这一根本目的的实现.     

是什么影响了高校学生评教的信度和效度

学生评教作为高校了解教师教学情况、促进教师改进教学的一种手段,正日益受到我国高校的高度重视并已广泛开展.然而,许多学校学生评教的实践也显现,学生评教中存在的诸多问题,影响了其信度和效度.高校必须认真分析和研究学生评教中存在的问题,采取切实有效的措施,改善学生评教的环境和条件,为提高学生评教的可信度和有效度提供保障.     

“互联网+”背景下的职业院校教师知识管理:内涵、困境、过程、评价及策略

"互联网+"背景下的知识来源途径不断得到拓展、知识数量在不断增长,如何促进职业院校教师高效地、科学地知识管理具有重要的研究价值。通过对知识分类、知识管理内涵以及相关研究现状的剖析,梳理了职业院校教师知识管理面临的困境,并给出了职业院校教师知识管理过程分析:基于工具及互联网平台的知识获取、基于知识库的知识评估与组织、线上线下知识的整合和创造以及基于真实情境的知识应用与创新。基于对职业院校教师知识管理过程分析,给出学生评教和教师教科研创新两个教师知识管理评价指标,并进一步提出促进教师知识管理的策略:建立特色知识库平台、建立教研共同体、建立教师知识管理中心和知识管理评测中心,以期能为促进职业院校教师知识管理水平提升提供参考。     

对基层电大基于网络课程考核的思考

网络课程考核,具有强化＂形考＂、调控学生、增进交流等功能。基层电大通过网络课程考核可以转变学习态度、增强学习主动性、促进考试公平、提升教师责任感、提高教学水平。同时,基层电大网络课程考核在教学难度、教师、学生和网络课程建设还存在一些问题,可以采取做好考前培训、建立课程改革试点、规范管理的形成性考核措施。     

Observing the Indicators of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Classrooms: Video-Based Research

The purpose of the study was to observe the indicators of science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) using a video-based research method. The study was conducted with four in-service science teachers who taught at a school that offered tablet-based education in primary and secondary levels. Data sources included video-recorded classroom teaching sessions and pre- and post-video teacher interviews. In addition to the in-depth contextual information provided, the findings from the qualitative analysis of teacher cases revealed indicators of teachers’ TPACK in their lesson design and actual teaching processes. Design indicators included technology selection, curriculum planning, lesson preparation, and assessment. Actual teaching indicators included lesson entry behaviors, teaching methods and strategies, technology-enhanced classroom management, troubleshooting, and assessment.     

Validating a model of effective teaching behaviour of pre-service teachers

Although effective teaching behaviour is central for pupil outcomes, the extent to which pre-service teachers behave effectively in the classroom and how their behaviour relates to pupils’ engagement remain unanswered. The present study aims to validate a theoretical model linking effective pre-service teaching behaviour and pupil’s engagement, incorporating the role of context and teacher characteristics. The study included a sample of 264 pre-service teachers from 64 secondary schools throughout the Netherlands. Pre-service teachers were observed using the International Comparative Analysis of Learning and Teaching to measure effective teaching behaviour and pupils’ engagement. We used multilevel modelling to account for the hierarchical structure in the data. Results show that the quality of teaching behaviour of pre-service teachers is below that of experienced teachers. Class size and (partly) teacher gender explain differences in the quality of teaching behaviour. All domains of teaching behaviour are related to pupil engagement, with classroom management and clarity of instruction showing the strongest relationships with academic engagement compared to the other domains. The results make it plausible to approximate minimum standards for the assessment of pre-service teachers based upon a normative criterion based on the impact on pupils’ academic engagement.     

Exploring and evaluating differentiated assessment practices of in-service teachers for components of differentiation

Classroom assessment is central to effective teaching and learning, making assessment literacy a core component for teacher education. The present study explores self-reported, differentiated assessment practices of Malaysian in-service teachers. The practices were evaluated using an analytic framework that was developed based upon the existing literature on components of differentiation. Data were collected from 32 in-service teachers using open-ended survey questionnaires. Twelve of the teachers also participated in in-depth interviews. Documents provided by the teachers were also analyzed. Data from the open-ended survey were analyzed using NVivo11 to develop codes for the analytic framework. The findings offer insights into teachers’ knowledge, application, and interpretation of differentiated assessment practices. The discussion explores teachers’ explanations of their own practices and, further, recommends ways to improve knowledge and application of differentiated assessment. The implications of the findings are discussed for assessment literacy-related professional development for teachers, school management and policies to facilitate implementation of differentiated assessment.     

谈高校课堂教学质量改革之教师管理

课堂教学质量作为提高高等教育教学质量的重要因素之一,教师在其中发挥着重要的作用。当前高校的课堂教学面临教师教学水平不高、缺乏课堂评价监督、课堂中重教学轻管理等问题。因此,应改变传统教学模式,从教师教学管理入手,完善教师评价制度,辅以全面课堂评价,加强教师课堂管理,提倡教学教改建设,切实提高高校教学水平。     

高师院校英语师范生微格教学管窥

微格教学前应复习语言教学理论与实践知识,确定微格教学实施方案,撰写教案并开展课前研讨;微格教学中应注意教师教态与角色转变、课堂用语与指令的准确性以及教学决策的合理性;微格教学后应开展评价与反思。微格教学存在的诸如管理不够完善、指导教师认识模糊、评价标准缺乏系统性等问题应引起注意。     

CDIO标准在旅游管理本科专业人才培养中的应用探讨

成都信息工程学院是CDIO国际组织正式成员,学校在全面推进CDIO教育教学改革中,借鉴了CDIO标准,对旅游管理专业人才课程体系、教学目标、教学方法、学生能力评价及教师CDIO素质等方面进行了改革探索,构建了基于"知识—能力—素质"协调发展的"知识综合化、课程模块化、实践体系化"课程体系,率先在全省高校中创建了旅游管理专业人才能力培养标准模块,建立了具有集成化教学过程特征的多样化教学方法以及有利于增强学生自主学习能力的全程化学习考核方法,并从提高教师CDIO能力角度探索了教师角色转变的有效性,对提升旅游管理专业人才培养质量产生了积极作用。     

安徽省中小学教师远程继续教育绩效评价与反思

开展基于网络的教师远程继续教育培训是发挥网络优势、提高教师继续教育实效的需要。目前安徽省中小学教师网络远程继续教育在实施过程中还存在着教师信息素养不高、培训活动过程管理缺失、资源配置单一、考核与评价体系不健全等问题。为提高这一工程的实效,必须加强宣传与制度建设,重视教师信息化培训工作,整合网络课程资源建设,发挥辅导教师的引领示范作用,建立网络教学过程监控和科学的评价体系。     

Science and Language Teachers’ Assessment of Upper Secondary Students’ Socioscientific Argumentation

Researchers and policy-makers have recognized the importance of including and promoting socioscientific argumentation in science education worldwide. The Swedish curriculum focuses more than ever on socioscientific issues (SSI) as well. However, teaching socioscientific argumentation is not an easy task for science teachers and one of the more distinguished difficulties is the assessment of students’ performance. In this study, we investigate and compare how science and Swedish language teachers, participating in an SSI-driven project, assessed students’ written argumentation about global warming. Swedish language teachers have a long history of teaching and assessing argumentation and therefore it was of interest to identify possible gaps between the two groups of teachers’ assessment practices. The results showed that the science teachers focused on students’ content knowledge within their subjects, whereas the Swedish language teachers included students’ abilities to select and use content knowledge from reliable reference resources, the structure of the argumentation and the form of language used. Since the Swedish language teachers’ assessment correlated more with previous research about quality in socioscientific argumentation, we suggest that a closer co-operation between the two groups could be beneficial in terms of enhancing the quality of assessment. Moreover, SSI teaching and learning as well as assessment of socioscientific argumentation ought to be included in teacher training programs for both pre- and in-service science teachers.