共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
专家办刊结合专业办刊双管模式的实践和成果 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
以《中国科学:物理学力学天文学》(英文版)[Science China:Physics Mechanics&Astronomy》(SCPMA)]期刊为例,结合办刊模式的转变,介绍编委会工作重心的调整,以及编辑在稿件审理中的作用.通过将专家办刊调整为专家办刊结合专业办刊的双管模式后,编委的更多工作侧重于约稿和宣传,而编辑部在稿件的评审过程中,尤其是初筛过程中的作用更为明显.模式转变后,期刊的约稿比例明显上升,约稿质量带动期刊的影响力提升,影响因子由2013年的0.864提升至2015年的1.575.同时,编委的宣传带动期刊的品牌效应,使期刊越来越多地展示于各大学术会议,为期刊带来更多关注和高水平投稿.由此可以看出,新形势下模式的转变可促进期刊的更快发展,提升期刊的稿源质量. 相似文献
2.
我国数字出版标准化现状及对策 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
数字出版标准化是数字出版各个环节和相关行业为了实现最佳秩序而对数字出版发展中实际的或潜在的问题制定共同的和可重复使用的条款的活动.数字出版标准化有利于数字出版链条上的参与各方实现利益均衡,分工合作,整体降低成本,用有限的资源实现效益的最大化,实现技术兼容、数字内容的互联互通和共享. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
L W McClure 《Bulletin of the Medical Library Association》1986,74(2):166-167
7.
Sally Morris 《Learned Publishing》2003,16(3):171-176
There is increasing pressure from academia to make the results of publicly funded research freely available to all. Preprint archives have grown up in some disciplines, and institutional archives are now being developed. While openly accessible preprints seem to have damaged publishers less than was originally feared, the final published versions of articles – when combined with sophisticated retrieval software – may turn out to be a different matter. Publishers have already done much to make their content more accessible through bundling, consortia licensing, access for less‐developed countries, more liberal customer and author agreements, and collective licensing. Some are experimenting with open access journals, although this may not work in all disciplines. It seems clear, however, that there are elements of value in journals themselves, and in the functions performed by journal publishers, which should survive. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
学术出版商是学术专著的供应者,高校图书馆是学术专著的购买者和使用者.学术出版与高校图书馆是学术出版链上的两个重要组成部分.高校图书馆学术专著采购经费的紧缩对学术出版商及自身都造成严重影响.双方必须正确认识各自角色与职责,共同保障学术出版生态链的平衡与活力. 相似文献
16.
David SHOTTON 《Learned Publishing》2009,22(2):85-94
Recent developments in Web technology can be used for semantic enhancement of scholarly journal articles, by aiding publication of data and metadata and providing ‘lively’ interactive access to content. Such semantic enhancements are already being undertaken by leading STM publishers, and automated text processing will help these enhancements become affordable and routine. Publisher, editor, and author all have primary roles in that process; an incremental approach is needed. Publication of data and metadata to the Web make possible added‐value ‘ecosystem services‘; semantic publishing will bring substantial benefits to scholarly communication. 相似文献
17.
Surveys were carried out to learn more about authors and open access publishing. Awareness of open access journals among those who had not published in them was quite high; awareness of ‘self‐archiving’ was less. For open access journal authors the most important reason for publishing in that way was the principle of free access; their main concerns were grants and impact. Authors who had not published in an open access journal attributed that to unfamiliarity with such journals. Forty per cent of authors have self‐archived their traditional journal articles and almost twice as many say they would do so if required to. 相似文献
18.
Bernard Donovan 《Learned Publishing》1998,11(2):91-107
Electronic publishing techniques are introducing inevitable changes in scholarly publishing as a whole and in the academic journal publishing business in particular. What will be the effect of the changes on the function and role of learned societies? 相似文献
19.
20.