高职生职业生涯规划探析

高职生职业生涯规划应在确立明确的职业目标,准确地进行自我分析和职业分析基础上,根据社会需求,充分发挥自己的能力和特长来设计。在具体的职业生涯规划中,高职生必须对自己进行全面分析和评估,在此基础上将职业理想与社会需要结合起来,制定每一学期的职业目标并付诸行动,在行动中对规划进行评估并根据实际情况作出调整。     

高职生职业生涯规划探析

职业生涯规划指的是一个人时其一生中所承担职务的相继历程的预期和计划。高职生职业生涯规划应在确立明确的职业目标。准确地进行自我分析和职业分析基础上,根据社会需求,充分发挥自己的能力和特长来设计,在行动中时规划进行评估并根据实际情况作出调整。     

学法指导实验的自我检测与评估

学法指导实验的自我检测与评估黄勇教师在实施学法指导实验过程中，需要对自己所指导的学生进行检测与评估，以便准确地了解学生，掌握学情，使学法指导更具针对性和实效性。学生也要对自己的学习能力进展情况进行自检与自评，及时总结目己的学习经验，正确认识目己的氏处...     

自我评估——培养学习者自主学习能力的有效策略——欧洲各国实施《欧洲语言档案》的启示

通过对《欧洲语言档案》的产生、发展和实施的阐述,结合我国高职院校外语教学实际,就如何通过培养学习者的外语自我评估能力,进而提高他们的自主学习能力提出自己的建议。     

大学生英语听力能力的自我评估

本文通过问卷调查和听力试题研究了湖北某高校148名大学生英语听力自我评估的可靠性和有效性。结果显示:①学生能对自己的听力能力作出比较可靠、有效的评估,评估任务越具体,自我评估准确性越高;②学生对听力能力的自我评估受到自身英语语言水平的影响,语言水平越高则自我评价的可靠性就越高;③大多数学生对自我评估持肯定态度,认为自我评估有益于英语学习。     

实施自我评估 培养学生反思能力

反思能激发学习者思考自己的学习经历,总结学习经验,提高学习效率。反思能力是学习者可持续发展的能力之一。自我评估是一种进行性评估,它能激发学习者对自己的学习过程进行监控,能反馈学习者多方面的发展情况,并引导学习者对自己的学习过程、学习态度进行反思。实施自我评估能逐步培养学习者的反思能力,同时也提高教师的反思能力。     

高职高专院校发展定位探析

高职高专院校的建设与发展,离不开先进、准确、合理的发展定位.一个学校的定位准确与否,关系到学校能否健康发展.发展定位对学校办学行为起着规范、约束和自我评估的作用,有利于提高办学过程中的自我监控能力和反思能力,及时纠正办学实践中的失误.     

高职高专院校发展定位探析

高职高专院校的建设与发展,离不开先进、准确、合理的发展定位.一个学校的定位准确与否,关系到学校能否健康发展.发展定位对学校办学行为起着规范、约束和自我评估的作用,有利于提高办学过程中的自我监控能力和反思能力,及时纠正办学实践中的失误.     

如何培养和提高体育学习的自我效能

自我效能是个体对自己能力和能力可能产生的效能的认知 ,自我效能信念具有认知、动机和情感三个功能 ,是一种特定情境中的自信心 ,依特定时间和环境产生变化 ,更强调主体的元认知。那么体育学习的自我效能就是学生对自己是否能够成功地进行体育学习的主观判断。这种判断包括两个相对独立的构成要素 :1、学生对自己的学习能力能否完成体育学习任务的主观判断 ,即体育学习能力的自我效能感。 2、学生对自己的学习行为能否完成体育学习任务的主观判断 ,即体育学习行为的自我效能感。由于是主观判断 ,所以就存在准确和不准确之分 ,当判断与客观…     

浅议数学教学成绩的检查与评定

学生成绩的检查与评定是测试教学效果的重要手段,是教学工作的重要组成部分.对教师来讲,通过检查评定可以了解教学效果,及时自我评估及改进教学方法;对学生来说,可以了解自己在掌握知识和技能方面还有哪些差距,借以调整今后的努力方向.同时,通过检查与评定,还可以促使学生增强独立地评定自己的学习的能力,从中获     

Self and teacher assessment as predictors of proficiency levels of Turkish EFL learners

Although self-assessment of foreign language skills is not a new topic, it has not yet been widely explored in the Turkish English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context. The current study investigates the potential of self-assessment of foreign language skills in determining proficiency levels of Turkish learners of EFL: 239 learners participated in the study. Their receptive language skills were tested with an objective placement test, and the results were compared with the grades assigned by their instructors and the results of criterion-referenced self-assessment scores. Multiple regression analysis revealed that teacher and self-assessment scores were significantly correlated with each other; however, teacher assessment, compared to self-assessment, appeared to be a much stronger predictor of the actual proficiency levels of the participants. In addition to this, participants at lower level of proficiency revealed a common tendency of overestimating their language skills, while with the higher level learners there were clear signs of underestimation.     

The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance

In the last decade, with the increased attention to learner-centred curricula, the topic of self-assessment and peer assessment has become of particular interest in testing and evaluation. The present study explores the role of self-assessment, and peer assessment in promoting writing performance of language learners. To do this, 157 intermediate TEFL (Teaching English as Foreign Language) students were assigned to five different treatments in five groups: four experimental groups and one control group. The first experimental group did journal writing as a self-assessment technique, the second group self-assessed their own writings, the third group employed peer assessment, and the fourth group had both self- and peer assessment. Moreover, there was teacher assessment in all experimental groups, except the fourth group, i.e., the self- and peer assessment group. In the control group, there was only teacher assessment. Also, at the beginning and end of the semester, all participants took a writing test. The design of the study was quasi-experimental, non-randomised control group, pre-test–post-test design. The results revealed that in the second and third groups, in which the students employed self-assessment and peer assessment, together with teacher assessment, we observed the maximum improvement in writing.     

Roles of definitional and assessment models in the identification of new or second language learners of English for special education

This article examines the efficacy of current definitional perspectives on learning disabilities (LD) and related assessment models to support appropriate instructional and support services for learners of English with learning-related difficulties. A revised framework for defining LD and an associated assessment model, curriculum-based dynamic assessment (CDA), are proposed. The results of a teacher assessment study are reported to exemplify how this revised framework may be studied. The study examined the following questions: (a) Can curriculum-based dynamic assessments of authentic learning tasks help educators to differentiate between the work of students with limited English proficiency and their peers identified as having LD? (b) What are the characteristics of curriculum-based work samples of limited English proficient students with LD that may predictably differentiate them from their peers without LD?     

英语专业阅读课程的评价体系建构研究

形成性评价模式因其注重学生学习过程中的态度、策略、进展和师生间的及时反馈而被较多地应用于学习评价中。为建构一套以形成性评价为主的英语专业阅读课的评价体系,进行了为期一年的实证研究,结果表明新闻共享与互评、课堂测试与自我反思和教学互动等环节的形成性评价活动能够快速有效地提高学生的英语阅读能力。     

影响学生口语能力发展的教师因素

造成我国英语专业大学生口语能力普遍偏低的原因是多方面的。其中教师因素十分关键。教师在教学过程中未能重视学生程序性知识的发展以及文化能力的培养，忽视了教师情感因素对口语教学活动的巨大促进作用是制约学生口语能力发展的三大教师因素。找出外语教学中的薄弱环节，有助于英语教师采取相应措施加以克服。     

非英语专业学生英语听力焦虑调查报告及启示

通过使用SPSS18.0统计软件,调查天津职业大学314名学生英语听力焦虑程度及其与英语课堂焦虑、学习观念和性格类型的之间的关系。研究结论为:学生英语听力焦虑呈中等程度,听力语料难度性、听力水平自我认知以及听力自信度成为构成听力焦虑的主要因素;听力焦虑与英语课堂焦虑、学习观念呈正相关;听力焦虑与听力成绩、性格类型呈负相关。鉴于此,在日常英语听力教学中,英语教师应该采取有效对策,缓解学生听力焦虑感,提高英语听力成绩。     

形成性评价在英语写作教学中的应用探微

英语写作教学借助形成性评价可以激发学生写作兴趣,提高学生写作能力和写作水平。形成性评价的形式丰富多样,在课堂教学活动中,教师应结合学生英语水平和学习规律,采取分值评价、语言评价、自我评价、相互评价等方式,优化学生的英语写作活动,提高写作教学效率和质量。     

三级评价体系在英语专业写作教学中的实施与管理

近年来一些评估新法在外语写作教学领域得到采用,但是教师操作新法的能力有限,实施过程缺乏连续性.文章基于Huot的"启发式评估"新型评价理论和过程写作理论,运用文献法和问卷调查法,在英语专业写作教学中引入自我评价、同级评价和教师评价三级评价体系,将评价手段作为推进学生每稿写作有效提高的工具,着重论述该体系在实施过程的课堂管理、培训内容等问题以及三级评价体系的实施后效,旨在建立一个促进写作能力发展的评价机制.     

Building and Supporting a Validity Argument for a Standards‐Based Classroom Assessment of English Proficiency Based on Teacher Judgments

Using an argument‐based approach to validation, this study examines the quality of teacher judgments in the context of a standards‐based classroom assessment of English proficiency. Using Bachman's (2005) assessment use argument (AUA) as a framework for the investigation, this paper first articulates the claims, warrants, rebuttals, and backing needed to justify the link between teachers' scores on the English Language Development (ELD) Classroom Assessment and the interpretations made about students' language ability. Then the paper summarizes the findings of two studies—one quantitative and one qualitative—conducted to gather the necessary backing to support the warrants and, in particular, address the rebuttals about teacher judgments in the argument. The quantitative study examined the assessment in relation to another measure of the same ability—the California English Language Development Test—using confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait‐multimethod data and provided evidence in support of the warrant that states that the ELD Classroom Assessment measures English proficiency as defined by the California ELD Standards. The qualitative study examined the processes teachers engaged in while scoring the classroom assessment using verbal protocol analysis. The findings of this study serve to support the rebuttals in the validity argument that state that there are inconsistencies in teachers' scoring. The paper concludes by providing an explanation for these seemingly contradictory findings using the AUA as a framework and discusses the implications of the findings for the use of standards‐based classroom assessments based on teacher judgments.     

影响互动性交际中意义磋商的主要因素

在外教英语口语课上影响美籍教师和中国学生在互动性交际过程中意义磋商的主要因素有：师生间不平等的地位,师生间英语水平的差异,师生间文化背景的差异以及学生较低的动机。