毛泽东新民主主义民意机关思想探讨

毛泽东新民主主义民意机关思想是其新民主主义宪政思想的组成部分。毛泽东新民主主义民意机关思想的基础包括原则性与灵活性相统一理论和目的与手段辩证统一理论。毛泽东新民主主义民意机关思想蕴含了实行真正普遍平等选举产生民意机关、真正反映民意的民意机关、有权法律化民意的民意机关等具体内容。毛泽东新民主主义民意机关思想具有民意机关坚持共产党领导特质、民意机关的技术属性特质等特点。     

毛泽东新民主主义文化思想形成的过程探析

毛泽东新民主主义文化思想,是毛泽东新民主主义思想的重要组成部分。本文将毛泽东新民主主义文化思想的形成过程的三个阶段即萌芽、初步形成和系统形成作以探析,力争反映出毛泽东新民主主义文化思想形成的全貌。     

毛泽东放弃新民主主义社会论辨析

1953年过渡时期总路线的提出并不标志着毛泽东放弃了他所创立的新民主主义社会理论,二者有内在的一致性。毛泽东在酝酿过渡时期总路线时就认为新民主主义社会就是过渡时期,把应有的新民主主义社会同向社会主义的过渡时期统一起来了;过渡时期总路线强调以工业化为主体是新民主主义社会必须以工业为基础思想的延伸和发展;过渡时期总路线所坚持的社会主义目标与九月会议后毛泽东所认为的新民主主义社会即为社会主义社会是一致的。     

毛泽东在新民主主义革命时期的宪政思想探析

毛泽东是我国新民主主义宪政的伟大开拓者.在新民主主义革命时期,毛泽东对新民主主义宪政进行了五次积极的探索和实践.国民革命时期,毛泽东的新民主主义宪政思想就具有了雏形.土地革命时期,毛泽东的新民主主义宪政思想和实践有了初步模式--<中华苏维埃共和国宪法大纲>和"中华苏维埃共和国临时中央政府".抗日战争时期,毛泽东在许多著作中深刻阐述了关于新民主主义宪政的思想,在实践中建立了抗日民主政权,制定了抗日民主政权的施政纲领.抗日战争胜利后一段时期,毛泽东与中共中央对和平宪政作了有益的探索.解放战争时期,毛泽东的新民主主义宪政思想已经成熟,突出标志就是<论人民民主专政>的发表和<中国人民政治协商会议共同纲领>的制定和实施.毛泽东的新民主主义宪政思想发展了马克思主义宪政学说,是中国宪政史上的一个里程碑.     

毛泽东新民主主义文化思想的渊源

毛泽东新民主主义文化思想是马克思主义与中国革命、中国文化相结合的产物.马克思主义的文化理论为毛泽东新民主主义文化思想提供了科学的理论基础和方法论原则,是毛泽东新民主主义文化思想的理论基础.毛泽东新民主主义文化思想是马克思主义文化理论在中国革命中的运用和发展,同时也是继承和发展中国优秀传统文化的产物.中国优秀传统文化是毛泽东新民主主义文化思想的历史渊源.     

坚持并发展毛泽东建设新中国的经济纲领——纪念《论联合政府》发表六十周年

摘毛泽东提出的新民主主义经济纲领，是把马列主义中国化的科学构想。建国后在毛泽东的领导下，顺利实现了由新民主主义向社会主义的历史性转变。改革开放以来，党中央坚持并发展了毛泽东的建设新中国的经济纲领。我们应当以此来统一思想和行动。     

毛泽东新民主主义共和国国体与政体思想的内在精神探析

毛泽东新民主主义共和国国体与政体思想是新民主主义革命理论的重要内容之一。这一思想所折射出来的内在精神也是多方面的，其中最主要的应是：首先，毛泽东对新民主主义共和国国体与政体的设计着眼于寻求中华民族的独立和国家主权的完整；其次，毛泽东新民主主义共和国国体与政体思想体现着一种民主宪政精神．代表着中国政治发展的方向；再次，毛泽东新民主主义共和国国体与政体思想是马克思列宁主义国家学说在中国的发展，具有一种马克思主义与时俱进的理论风格。     

毛泽东新民主主义文化思想论析

本文主要从创新、民族、科学、大众、建设等五个方面论述了毛泽东关于中国新民主主义文化的基本思想 ,说明这一思想对当今先进文化的建设仍然具有特殊的指导意义。同时 ,对孙中山和毛泽东的“文化立国”思想进行了比较。     

新中国建立以前毛泽东的德治思想轨迹

新中国建立以前,围绕启蒙救国这个历史性主题,毛泽东的德治思想先后经历了改良主义、新民主主义演化过程,具有鲜明的科学性和开放性。毛泽东的德治思想,对于今天的德治建设具有深远的指导意义。     

对毛泽东新民主主义社会理论几个问题的认识

新民主主义社会是一个过渡性的较长时期的社会发展阶段，其社会主要矛盾具有交叉性，社会主要任务具有二元性。毛泽东新民主主义社会的理论是马克思列宁主义关于“过渡时期”思想的中国化；而新民主主义社会理论很快被过渡时期总路线所取代，则反映了毛泽东在“什么是社会主义”根本问题上认识的局限性。     

Teaching Cybersecurity to Criminal Justice Majors

Responses to breaches in cybersecurity are increasingly reliant on criminal justice practitioners. However, while the demand for criminal justice participation in cybersecurity increases daily, most universities are lagging in their educational and training opportunities for students entering criminal justice agencies. This paper discusses the need for cybersecurity programs in criminal justice, and examines how the evolution of this “new crime” has become an issue for criminal justice professionals in addition to computer science experts. A review of existing cybersecurity programs in Texas suggests that most four-year universities have yet to develop courses/programs in criminal justice. Course recommendations, sample syllabi for cybersecurity courses in criminal justice, and recommendations for development of these programs are included.     

Continuity and discontinuity in competing models of criminal justice education: Evidence from illinois

Competing models of criminal justice education have been conceptualized to exist for many years. Relevant empirical data to support this notion can be identified in the literature, especially data derived from early surveys of criminal justice educators and content analyses of criminal justice curricula as found across institutions of higher education. Using contemporary survey data from criminal justice faculty members in the state of Illinois, the authors attempt to assess whether the evolution of criminal justice education has resulted in contemporary demarcations and models of criminal justice education that differ from those identified in the earlier literature. The survey data suggest strong patterns, some of which differ from those identified previously. Four models of criminal justice education emerging from the data are discussed, and their implications for criminal justice education are highlighted.     

Does majoring in criminal justice affect perceptions of criminal justice

Research continues to show that the public holds misperceptions about crime and criminal justice. The media influences the public in many of these misperceptions, often shaping beliefs and ideologies. Higher education gives criminal justice majors the opportunity to gain much more accurate knowledge than the general public. Nonetheless, it is the public that heavily influences the development of the criminal justice system. It is important, therefore, to examine the influence of criminal justice education. Criminal justice majors and non-majors in a Midwestern university were surveyed with regard to demographics and perceptions of crime and criminal justice. Results indicate that criminal justice majors have significantly different perceptions about criminal justice issues than non-majors. Implications for educating the public are discussed.     

Social Work and Criminal Justice: Are We Meeting in the Field?

Social workers are needed but infrequently involved with criminal justice systems. One way to increase the number of social workers in the criminal justice system is by exposing students to work in these settings. This study examined the number, types, and utilization of criminal justice field placements in MSW programs by surveying field education directors. On average, 7.73% of field placements were in criminal justice settings. When asked about barriers to criminal justice placements, the most frequently identified challenge was a lack of MSW supervisors. Implications for future research and education are discussed.     

Restorative justice in the criminal justice curriculum

A perennial challenge for criminal justice educators is deciding which reform movements in criminal justice are worthy of coverage. Restorative justice is one such new movement that has made significant inroads in both criminal justice policy and practice. In this article, we argue that there are numerous benefits to including coverage of restorative justice in a criminal justice curriculum. We also offer a number of concrete suggestions for helping students learn about this radically different approach to dealing with crime.     

The Specter of Authoritarianism Among Criminal Justice Majors

Authoritarianism has been an influential concept in social science research. Furthermore, researchers have long been concerned about the potential dangers of authoritarianism within the criminal justice system. The current study uses Altemeyer’s RWA Scale to measure and compare levels of authoritarianism between criminal justice majors and non‐criminal justice majors in a sample of undergraduate students. Results indicate that criminal justice majors, males, and lower‐division students have higher mean RWA scores than non‐criminal justice majors, females, and upper‐division students. However, it is male criminal justice majors who demonstrate the highest levels of authoritarianism. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.     

Curriculum Implications of Anti-Gay Attitudes Among Undergraduate Criminal Justice Majors

To examine attitudes towards gays and lesbians in an undergraduate criminal justice sample and to test previous research suggesting that law enforcement students hold higher levels of homophobia, we surveyed 453 undergraduates. Results indicated higher levels of anti-gay attitudes in criminal justice majors compared to a small sample of non-criminal justice majors and similar levels of anti-gay attitudes between law enforcement and other criminal justice students. Gender, race, religion, gay/lesbian friends, patriarchal attitudes, and completing a social science minor outside of criminal justice were found to be significant predictors of attitudes toward gays and lesbians; while the number of courses in which homosexuality issues were included in discussion was not. These findings are discussed and we offer suggestions for criminal justice curriculum that may assist our students in maintaining and upholding a fair and just criminal justice system.     

How Will They Understand if We Don’t Teach Them? The Status of Criminal Justice Education on Gay and Lesbian Issues

Inclusion of race and gender in criminal justice education has, to some degree, been prompted as a result of perceived bias by criminal justice system professionals. Utilizing the race and gender experience as a template, interactions between the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered (GLBT) community and the criminal justice system are explored. This study surveyed criminal justice undergraduate degree programs to ascertain course content on gay and lesbian issues. Results indicate that an extremely small number of programs have such a course or alternatively incorporate GLBT issues within existing race and gender courses. Implications for criminal justice education are discussed.