台湾地区公共图书馆网站用户隐私权政策研究

用户隐私是图书馆在数字化建设中必须重视的问题。台湾很多公共图书馆都制定了用户隐私权政策,在政策的适用范围、网站收集个人信息的声明、个人信息收集的内容和目的、公开个人信息的条件、Cookies的使用、修改或删除个人数据的情形、免责声明、政策修订说明等方面,既存在着相同之处也各有差异。用户隐私权政策的有效实行还依赖于信息安全政策的实施。     

美国州立公共图书馆网站用户隐私政策探微

笔者利用网站调查法对美国各州立公共图书馆网站的隐私保护政策的现状进行分析,以了解国外图书馆服务中用户的隐私保护研究状况,有助于我们认识图书馆用户隐私保护的重要性,并对我国图书馆开展用户隐私保护起到借鉴作用。     

信息安全视域下国内档案网站隐私政策合规性研究

隐私政策作为档案网站建设的重要内容,在档案信息服务安全保障中发挥着至关重要的作用。因此,本研究以我国78个档案网站为研究对象,对其是否设有隐私声明,隐私声明的名称、位置以及内容等方面进行调研。结果显示,我国档案网站隐私声明定位有待提高、形式有待规范、内容有待健全,可从提升隐私保护意识、明确用户体验导向、实现多元研制主体以及出台专项法律制度等方面促进档案网站隐私政策的体系化和人性化,增强其民主科学性和社会影响力。     

澳大利亚、新西兰、新加坡和丹麦国家图书馆网站隐私政策比较研究

澳大利亚国家图书馆、新西兰国家图书馆、新加坡国家图书馆和丹麦皇家图书馆网站的隐私政策涉及用户信息收集的内容与目的、收集方法、个人信息的共享性、用户的权利、儿童隐私、信息安全与免责声明。经过比较分析,发现其有许多可取之处,也存在一些不足,但仍对我国图书馆界保护用户隐私具有借鉴意义。     

港澳台高校图书馆用户逾期行为处理政策探析

港澳台高校图书馆用户逾期行为可分为借出逾期行为和归还逾期行为。逾期行为类型不同,其处理政策也不同。条款清晰具体、蕴含人文关怀和培养诚信意识是港澳台高校图书馆用户逾期处理政策的亮点;但在保护图书馆用户的平等权利、基于图书馆根本属性来制定用户逾期行为处理政策方面,还大有商榷的余地。     

美国三大国家图书馆网站隐私政策比较研究

美国国会图书馆、国家医学图书馆和国家农业图书馆网站的隐私政策涉及用户信息收集的内容与目的、收集方法、个人信息的共享性、用户的选择与拒绝权、儿童隐私、网站链接以及网络交通安全,具有许多可取之处,也存在一些不足,但仍对我国图书馆界保护用户隐私具有借鉴意义。     

对我国政府网站隐私政策的评价与分析——基于50家政府网站的调查

以国内政府网站隐私政策为评价对象,从个人信息收集的目的、内容、途径、信息利用例外情形、用户权利、未成年人隐私保护、信息安全保护、免责声明等几个方面,对国内50个政府网站进行了调查,系统分析了我国政府网站隐私政策制定现状和存在的问题。     

美国研究型大学图书馆读者隐私政策调查及启示

以56所美国研究型大学图书馆读者隐私政策为研究对象,从读者个人信息收集内容、收集目的、公开条件、读者权利、免责声明、儿童隐私、信息安全技术保障等9个方面对美国研究型大学图书馆隐私政策进行分析解读.从法律基础、图书馆组织作用、政策内容、馆员自律、读者权利意识和技术保障等角度得出美国研究型大学图书馆尊重读者隐私、健全读者隐私保护政策的方法和途径,为我国高校图书馆提供几点启示.     

亚洲国家顶级图书馆网站版权政策比较研究

本文选取亚洲7国10个顶级图书馆网站,围绕受保护的作品类型、版权归属及权利声明、用户使用权限、外部链接免责声明、技术保护措施和权利管理信息政策六个方面,对其版权政策进行全方位的分析比较,直陈其得失,并指出图书馆网站版权政策建设的努力方向。     

美国专业图书馆个人信息保护政策研究

文章选择了30个具有代表性的美国专业图书馆进行调查,通过对各个图书馆网站上的读者隐私声明的分析与比较,归纳出美国专业图馆在读者(包括儿童)个人信息保护方面的基本政策和一般做法.     

Are library vendors doing enough to protect users? A content analysis of major ILS privacy policies

While privacy is a core value of librarianship, privacy standards differ by library and library vendor. These types of guidelines are necessary and useful, but understanding them can be overwhelming. Academic libraries increasingly rely on third-party, cloudbased vendors to manage their systems and to provide access to their collections. When selecting library systems, library staff must understand privacy issues and be aware of how vendors use data. However, libraries do not always have the staffing, time or knowledge, and vendors are not always interested in upholding library values. The project examines the content of privacy policies for popular library systems used by Canadian academic libraries. The research aims to help librarians better understand the policies, to help them make informed decisions about their own library systems. The process used to code the privacy policies and the results of the coding are included alongside recommendations for vendors and library employees. Building on two seminal privacy studies, the methodology is revised for a Canadian context and updated with today's terminology and context, making it adaptable for other libraries and context around the world.     

Attitudes and practices of Canadian academic librarians regarding library and online privacy: A national study

Libraries have always been places where individuals feel free to explore new ideas and seek out information in the pursuit of creative and intellectual growth. Fear of exposure or surveillance could threaten an individual's inclination to search for and access information. Understandably then, privacy is understood to be a core professional responsibility of librarians. This study builds on a national report and a qualitative study, completed in the United States, which explored librarians' attitudes on privacy. Adding a Canadian voice to the literature, this study examines survey results from academic librarians in Canada on their perceptions and attitudes related to library practices and online privacy behaviors. Overall, Canadian academic librarians believe that protecting patron privacy and educating patrons about issues related to online privacy is important. However, many Canadian academic librarians doubt that libraries are doing all they can to protect patron privacy. Academic librarians stand to gain knowledge and understanding of peer attitudes toward online privacy, as well as how patron privacy is being advocated for and protected on university campuses across Canada. The results will guide future library policies and programming aimed at creating an environment where privacy rights are protected and patrons can make informed choices about their online actions.     

若干国家和地区图书馆协会隐私政策的内容分析

图书馆素有保护用户隐私权的历史,许多国家和地区的图书馆协会伦理准则也确认了对这种权利的支持,而且还制定了隐私政策。但是图书馆协会隐私政策的具体内容尚不清楚。该文以Pnina Shachaf教授对伦理准则的内容分析为基础,调研了在伦理准则中提到隐私原则的国家和地区图书馆协会的隐私政策,通过内容分析法考察隐私政策的描述性特征、政策的可读性和政策的内容。图书馆协会隐私政策中最经常提到的内容类别包括实施和救济,选择和同意;不经常出现的内容类别依次是通知和开放,用户访问,信息安全,隐私政策的实施以及特殊群体或活动的隐私。希望通过这些图书馆协会隐私政策的内容分析,对我国内地制定图书馆隐私政策有所启示。     

A Content Analysis of 3D Printing Policies at Academic Libraries

Many academic libraries are adopting 3D printing programs and researching, writing, and implementing policies for these programs. This article analyzes the content of 50 academic library 3D printing policies looking for commonalities. Five major themes emerged from the analysis: the policy's purpose, potential users of the 3D printers, 3D printing procedures, the acceptable uses of the 3D printers, and user privacy considerations. This article provides a breakdown of these five major themes.     

When the bureaucrat promises to safeguard your online privacy: Dissecting the contents of privacy statements on Dutch municipal websites

Various studies show that the display of a privacy statement on an organization's website can be a potent, but simple way of acquiring clients' and users' trust, which results in the completion of transactions with the organization through its website. Empirical studies that analyze the contents of privacy statements on commercial websites are profuse, while privacy statements posted on the websites of non-commercial organizations have been largely ignored by researchers. In this study, the contents of privacy statements on Dutch municipal websites are analyzed. Using the important provisions of the Wet Bescherming Persoonsgegevens (WBP) or the Dutch Personal Data Protection Act, the study also looked into the conformity of the contents of privacy statements with the existing law on privacy protection in the Netherlands. We also looked into the availability and findability of privacy statements on Dutch municipal websites. Three important findings resulted from this study: first, not all municipal websites bother to post privacy statements on their websites; second, most municipalities do not ensure that their online privacy statements are findable; and third, privacy statements on Dutch municipal websites emphasize diverging assurances and promises—with some privacy policies containing all the important provisions of the WBP, and others offering only general, and sometimes rather vague, guarantees.     

Service Philosophy Statements in Academic Libraries: A Qualitative Content Analysis

Some academic libraries use service philosophy statements to strengthen the quality of their service culture. A service philosophy statement communicates directly to users what they can—and should—expect from the library. This article describes a study in which the authors applied qualitative content analysis to service philosophy statements. The objective was to examine the form and content of these statements and identify themes, trends, and ideas in order to determine how and what they communicate about a library’s commitment to service. The results of the study found that statements in the sample varied significantly in strength and purpose.     

高校图书馆服务的公共性与用户需求私有性的博弈分析———以占座为例简

占座是高校图书馆用户需求私有性的一种表现形式。文章以占座为例,分析了高校图书馆服务的公共性和用户需求私有性之间的博弈,指出高校图书馆与其用户之间并不存在不可调和的矛盾,其利益宗旨是相同的。在高校图书馆服务公共性与用户需求私有性二者博弈的过程中,应利用高校图书馆的长处,并结合用户的合理需求,实现二者的双赢。     

Why library cards offer more privacy rights than proof of citizenship: Librarian ethics and Freedom of Information Act requestor policies

This paper demonstrates the divergent requestor privacy policies of professional librarians and the administration of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), and urges the federal government to adhere to librarian ethics in order to protect FOIA requestors. Section 1 of the paper provides information about the origins and purpose of the FOIA. Section 2 offers an overview of the philosophical and historical origins of library patron privacy ethics, discussing both the ethical basis for patron privacy and actual instances where library records have been sought for government surveillance of private citizens. Section 3 describes the state library laws that protect library requestors, as well as federal laws that protect non-FOIA requestor privacy rights, including the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), which protects video rental records. Section 4 of the paper warns that, in the digital era, it is more important than ever to safeguard personal information like that contained in FOIA requests to prevent the stifling of information seeking activities in the United States. By modifying laws tomeet the needs of the “information age,” the United States government can embrace and utilize the ethical standards that are at the foundation of librarianship, and protect the principle that information should be free and available to the American populace.     

Privacy and Library Public Services: Or,I Know What You Read Last Summer

SUMMARY

The privacy and confidentiality of library use are often at odds with efficiency in and customization of library public services. When librarians make decisions about services and privacy, they should consider strategic approaches to defining and discussing privacy and become familiar with the law of library privacy and their ethical commitment to privacy in library use. A wide range of library services and efficiencies threaten privacy and introduce the potential for secondary uses of personally identifying information collected by the library. Market failure for privacy weakens the value of consumer surveys and consent as substitutes for librarians' choices between privacy and services. Compromises such as those outlined by the ALA Intellectual Freedom Committee offer reasonable approaches to libraries and librarians struggling with the uncertainties that characterize the challenge of meeting both service and privacy interests.