论直觉思维与逻辑思维的相互关系

在人们解决问题的思维活动中，直觉思维和逻辑思维都发挥着作用，并且相互联系、相辅相成。如果把直觉思维和逻辑思维割裂开来或对立起来，对于解决问题、科学研究是不利的。通过对人们在解决问题的思维活动和科学研究活动中常见的三种解决问题的模式的分析，我们可以看到直觉思维和逻辑思维所起的作用以及它们之间的相互联系。     

The development of inventive thinking skills in the upper secondary language classroom

The given paper presents the results of an empirical study into the efficacy of the Thinking Approach (TA) to language teaching and learning which is aimed at the development of students’ inventive thinking skills in the context of foreign language education, namely learning of English. The study was conducted among upper secondary students of two schools in Latvia and aimed to answer whether students working with the Thinking Approach demonstrate an increase in their inventive thinking skills. An inventive thinking test was employed as the research instrument. The results of the study suggest that students working with the TA demonstrate a significant increase in their inventive thinking skills in comparison with the control group (t = 3.32, p = 0.001). At the same time a number of limiting factors that appeared in the process of the study due to its naturalistic setting call for further research that could increase the reliability of the findings.     

Creative and logical thinking in adolescents

Conclusion In general terms the study indicates for the three schools examined the relationship between the academic grade of junior secondary advanced science students and creative right hemispheric thinking is weak, but the relationship between the student's grade and rational logical thinking is much stronger. It may be that such relationships are a natural consequence of maturation and not related to the work done in the school. Most educators would feel that the school system has some effect. If each child is going to realise one's full thinking potential, it is important that the creative and holistic modes of thinking be developed. In a future world which will be immersed in rapid change the need for this type of thinking is even more acute.     

论体育语言与逻辑思维

体育语言因逻辑思维不同而导致观点和结论各异．鉴于当今逻辑学的最新发展和国内外学术研究的共识，文章指出：自然语言逻辑是研究体育语言问题的最佳方法论基础，应大力开展自然语言逻辑研究．     

评述高校外语教学中思辨力培养存在的问题

本文讨论了目前思辨力培养中急需解决的两大问题: 1) 如何处理思辨力与外语语言能力培养之间的关系; 2) 怎样才能使思辨力培养与外语语言教学有机地融为一体? 在此基础上,我们运用真实案例,分析高校外语教学思辨力培养现状,同时指出教学中的优点和不足之处,并提出改进建议。     

低迷与提升:研究生自主发展的理性思考

研究生自身因素是影响研究生培养质量的主要原因之一。研究生自身因素突出表现在自主发展意识、自主发展目标和自主发展能力三个方面。为此,形成正确的自我图式、合理的认知图式和科学的创新图式是促进研究生自主发展、提高研究生教育质量的理性选择。     

论创造性思维与逻辑的关系

创造性思维的四个阶段与人的逻辑思维过程是相吻合的,逻辑在创造性思维的整个发展过程中,潜性或显性地发挥着强大功能,创造性思维在本质上具有逻辑性。逻辑对于创造性思维的重要作用在于为思维提供一个基本的框架,当思维主体可以自由出入于该框架时,也便有了创造性思维。     

创新思维是逻辑思维与非逻辑思维的辩证统一

随着我国社会、经济、科技、文化的日益发展,创新思维和创新思维方法的研究越来越受到人们的广泛关注.就目前对创新思维的研究而言,还只是处于对创新思维及其方法的进一步认识阶段.在这个阶段,人们的认识并未完全达到一致.笔者对"创新来自非逻辑思维"的观点不敢苟同,认为创新思维既不排斥逻辑思维又不满足于逻辑思维,创新思维的根本方法--想象与灵感均是逻辑思维与非逻辑思维的对立统一.     

英语课堂思维取向:学生主体思维

英语课堂中要有思维的存在,思维体现在整体课堂当中。学生主体思维是学生在全面参与英语课堂活动的过程中发挥着自己主体地位,在参与过程中学生挖掘自己的思维点,主动、自觉地发展自己。     

关于信息技术课堂教学的思考

信息技术课堂必须让学生提高在信息技术的帮助下解决实际问题的能力，利用信息技术培养创新人才；把信息技术课与其他学科整合起来，在培养学生综合应用信息技术的同时达到教育学生的目的，努力让学生在一个较高的水平上思考，并且启用新的评价体系．     

大学语文课堂教学中的一些思考

大学语文是高校大学生文化教育中的重要一环,但由于各种主客观因素的影响,该课程在教学实际中长期处于尴尬状态。本文结合教学实践过程中碰到的问题,有针对性的提出一些改良建议,希望能够为大学语文教学效果的提升有所助益。     

课堂教学中数学思维能力的培养

目前,讲行课堂教学改革的呼声越来越高,可现实中,绝大多数课堂教学还是老样子.平时,老师整堂课一人讲到底的现象还普遍存在,究其原因不外乎在两个方面:一是受传统课堂教学模式的影响.老师在课堂教学中处于绝对的主导地位,学生处于被动地位,一切跟着老师的指挥棒转.二是为了在考试中取得好的分数,老师似乎成了解练习题的"机器",学生成了练习题的"俘虏";老师在处理一些基本概念、法则、定理等内容时,只是大量地"抛售"结论.要求学生死记硬背,而蕴藏在这些概念、法则、定理等内容之中的数学思想和方法无法体会,更缺乏对基本的数学思维能力的培养.而数学是人类思维的体操,思维能力是智力的核心.数学课堂教学应围绕揭示思维过程、培养学生思维能力为目的而展开,引导学生从不同角度、不同途径、不同层次去考虑问题,使得学生在学习中能举一反三、闻一知十.本文结合教学实践谈谈数学课堂教学中思维能力的培养.     

Preservice teachers' thinking about classroom events

Recent inquiry about the role that experience plays in learning to teach is prevalent in a number of expert-novice studies. This study explored variations in preservice teachers' thinking about classroom events. Comparisons of interview data from 36 preservice teachers revealed differences in the way they recalled, interpreted, and made judgements about classroom events. Results suggest differences and similarities in the way teachers at different stages of a preservice program view the class environment. Results challenge the unitary view of preservice teachers and the way many teachers are currently prepared for the profession.