论高校学生社团组织的建设

高校社团已成为高校学生活动的主要阵地，也是校园精神文明建设和第二课堂教育的重要载体，本文从高校社团建设的重要性入手，分析社团建设中的问题，并提出相应的思路。     

关于高校大学生作弊的几点思考

高校学生作弊不仅是一种欺骗行为，而且是一种严重的失范和失信行为，它破坏了高校正常的教学秩序，影响了高校的声誉，玷污了高校这一神圣殿堂，因此，对作弊应严加管教，纠正其不良行为，杜绝作弊行为。     

对大学生考试作弊的思考

作弊是大学生考试中的一种常见现象，它不仅毒害了学生的心灵，还影响到学生心理的健康状况，更不利于其整体的发展与成长。结合学生的实际，分析考试作弊的原因及造成的后果。提出从学生自身、考试管理、教师试题角度进行防治考试作弊的一些措施。     

对当前大学生考试作弊问题的思考

论述了高校学生考试作弊现状,分析了引起学生考试作弊的五种心理,即侥幸心理、虚荣心理、从众心理、赌博心理和同情心理,从加强思想教育、加强考试管理、加强教风学风建设、加大对考试违纪学生处理力度等方面提出防治考试作弊的措施.     

Cheating Behaviors among Undergraduate College Students: Results from a Factorial Survey

Using a factorial survey administered to college students at two Universities, this study examines students’ tendencies to engage in academic misconduct. The relation of strain, self-control, and deterrence theories to likelihood of cheating are further explored. The results suggest that increasing the severity of the punishment for cheating does not deter academic misconduct; however, several variables indicating an increased certainty of being caught did decrease the likelihood of cheating behaviors. Only the strain variables that indicated a student had an ill family member or that the student found the course difficult significantly increased academic misconduct. Although self-control did not have a direct effect on cheating it indirectly affected cheating behaviors through students’ perceptions of getting caught and their perception of wrongfulness of the cheating behavior. Policy and future research implications of the findings are further discussed.     

美国大学生学术欺骗行为及其对策研究

大学生的学术欺骗行为可分为考试欺骗和书面作业欺骗。美国大学生的学术欺骗行为比较普遍,但建立荣誉准则制度的高校发生学术欺骗的百分比明显偏低。学生们认为,对于不同的欺骗行为应给予不同程度的惩罚。影响美国大学生的学术欺骗行为的因素可以分为学生个体特征因素、态度/信仰因素、行为因素和外部因素等。高校可以采用建立荣誉准则制度、重视学生的参与等对策来减少大学生的学术欺骗行为。     

大学生视野中的作弊心理

目的:分析大学生作弊的心理原因.方法:采用自编问卷随机取样.结论:总体上当代大学生的学习目标是明确的、也是积极的,不过遗憾的是时下大学生考试作弊泛滥也是一个不争的事实.而大学生作弊既受来自学生方面考试态度、功利心态及个性等的主观心理因素的影响,也强烈的受到来自教师、学校管理及社会风气等客观环境因素的影响.     

Academic Outcomes Among a Sample of Learning Support Community College Students

This research examined the relationship between placement in a learning support college program and subsequent academic outcomes. The sample consisted of 275 entering freshmen students who were enrolled in the Learning Support reading courses in the fall of 2005. Data were collected from the Gordon College Office of Institutional Research. The data showed that of the 275 students who enrolled in a Learning Support reading course in the fall 2005 semester, 189 returned for the spring 2006 semester. Data also showed that 58% of the 275 students enrolled in Learning Support reading during fall 2005 successfully completed a basic reading intensive course upon completion of their remedial reading class. One hundred eighty seven students who had previously completed Learning Support reading enrolled (spring 2006 or later) in Introductory English 101 and 121 passed. Fifty-five students who had completed Learning Support reading enrolled (spring 2006 or later) in History 1121, Western Civilization, and 20 students passed. Six of the 205 students who completed Learning Support reading graduated Gordon College within a three-year period. The results of the present study indicate that the Learning Support Reading Program in place at Gordon College has proven to be a beneficial tool for at-risk college students. It is assumed that programs such as the Learning Support Program described here may help students build a foundation that will aid them throughout their college career.     

大学生考试作弊的经济学分析

章主要对大学生在校学习期间考试作弊的一般原因和具体原因进行了分析，提出了治理考试作弊的若干对策。     

对大学生考试作弊问题的审思

考试是检测学生对知识掌握的情况、了解教师的教学效果的重要途径。但目前高校存在着严重的考试作弊问题。考试作弊的手段不仅多种多样,还产生了许多危害和不良影响。大学生考试作弊的主要原因与大学生自身、学校、社会有着密切的关系。遏制大学生考试作弊,可从五个方面来着手:加强对大学生的诚信教育;完善考场监督管理机制;改革考试方法;有关部门严厉打击社会上以帮助考试作弊来盈利的人员;利用现代科学技术防止大学生作弊。     

试析高校学生考试作弊成因及对策

分析高校学生考试作弊的成因及产生的危害，提出预防和杜绝学生考试作弊的对策。     

大学生弱势群体探析

大学生弱势群体普遍存在于各高校中,了解大学生弱势群体的种类、形成原因及支持策略,采取有效措施给予教育和疏导,是教育者的当务之急.     

大学生考试作弊现象的理性主义透析

随着科技的发展,大学生考试作弊的手段也不断翻新,呈现出高发、频发的态势,涉及学生、教师、高校管理部门等多个主体.从理性主义视角来看,大学生考试作弊是学生、教师和高校从自身利益出发最终选择的一种结果.只有加快建立学生、教师、高校间平等的监督体系,引入多元化的评估方法,注重人才的综合评价才能有效地应对大学生考试作弊.     

高职院校学生考试作弊动机分析及原因探讨

对部分高职院校学生的学习动力不足、学习目标不明确、学习成绩一般、主动性较差、个人诚信缺失等问题在高职院校学生中表现得尤为突出.本文主要就考试作弊这一学生个人诚信缺失的突出问题进行分析和原因探讨,预防和减少学生考试作弊行为的发生.     

Predictors of Cheating among Early Adolescents: Academic and Social Motivations

This study examined the relations between middle school students' self-reported cheating and several indicators of academic and social motivation. It was hypothesized that students' academic self-efficacy and personal and classroom goal orientations would predict cheating. Social motivations were presumed to predict cheating above and beyond achievement motivation. Four dimensions of relationships within schools were measured: participation structure, teacher commitment and competence, teacher respect, and sense of school belonging. Logistic regression analyses were used to predict classification as a cheater or noncheater. Although academic motivation variables predicted cheating, the addition of the relationship variables significantly improved the classification rates. The final model included grade in school, academic self-efficacy, extrinsic goal orientation, participation structure, teacher commitment, and teacher respect. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.     

对高职学生学业评价改革的探讨

本文通过高职学生学业评价体系的重要意义的研究,对现有问题进行了分析,提出了高职院校建立正确而有效的高职学生学业评价体系的设想。     

同伴关系对大学生考试作弊决策的影响：性别差异的调节作用

目标:考察同伴关系及性别差异对大学生考试作弊行为的影响,意在了解影响大学生考试作弊的行为机制。方法:设置两种考试情境(高他人作弊情境与低他人作弊情境)对520名大学生进行施测,收回有效问卷514份。结果:同伴关系的主效应显著F(1,501)=476.25,p<0.001;性别主效应显著F(1,501)=33.154,p<0.001;同伴关系与性别的交互作用显著F(1,501)=35.48,p<0.001。进一步简单效应分析结果表明:高他人作弊情境下,男生作弊意向显著高于女生F(1,501)=38.65,p<0.001;而低他人作弊情境下,男生与女生的作弊意向差异不显著F(1,501)=3.76,p=.053。结论:性别与同伴关系共同影响大学生考试作弊行为,男生风险寻求的特点使得他们在面临"损失"时比女生表现出更多的作弊倾向。     

Group Differences in California Community College Transfers

This study explores the extent to which community colleges succeed in assisting students to transfer to four-year colleges. The study uses data from the California Community College system to test hypotheses about overall transfers and transfers of underrepresented students, It utilizes a framework based upon social reproduction theory (Bowles & Gintis, 1976) that also includes institutional factors. First, transfer rates differed significantly between groups, with African-American transfer rates being the lowest. Some of our hypotheses were supported, particularly those on the significance of communities with younger students and higher levels of education for transfer levels. A critical mass of students of underrepresented groups is also important for institutions that wish to transfer higher numbers of these students. Institutional effectiveness and level of funds spent on transfer programs did not appear to make any difference in transfer levels. One of the most important findings is that transfer dynamics are very different for each group, suggesting that administrators and policy-makers need to develop more detailed strategies to encourage higher rates of transfer.     

澳大利亚大学师生对学术不诚实的看法及其启示

“学术不诚实”作为高等教育机构中的一个基本问题,在国内外引发了越来越多的关注。澳大利亚昆士兰4所大学1206个学生和190个老师对学术不诚实的看法表明：教育机构和学校有关部门高度重视;学校应设立专门的课程;学生自身应该提高学术诚实意识;加强对学术不诚实行为的制裁等。     

Change in Academic Distress: Examining Differences Between a Clinical and Nonclinical Sample of College Students

The purpose of this study was to examine academic distress over the course of a semester for both a clinical and nonclinical sample of college students by administering the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS‐62 and CCAPS‐34) to students at a single university. Results revealed that students who were in counseling showed a significant decrease in academic distress scores, whereas students who were not in counseling showed no significant change in academic distress scores. Implications of these results on future practices for university counseling centers are discussed.