《第三军医大学学报》拟刊用稿件查重结果分析

利用现有全文数据库对<第三军医大学学报>1300余篇经撊髷定稿后待发表的稿件进行查重,发现43篇稿件的内容与已发表的论文重复或主要结果和结论重复.通过分析43篇重复发表的文章题名、作者及所属单位的相同情况、拟刊用稿件投稿时间与已刊登论文发表时间的间隔分布后发现:1)大部分重复稿件的题名相同或基本相同;2)重复稿件多属同一作者或同一课题组不同作者所投;3)重复稿件刊登的时间间隔多在1年以内.认为编辑应在查重中发挥主动作用,以期在今后办刊工作中杜绝稿件重复发表.     

Altmetrics热点论文传播特性及影响力分析

[目的/意义] 研究Altmetrics热点论文的传播特性,阐释学术内容的学术影响力和社会影响力。[方法/过程] 以www.altmetric.com热点论文的数据为基础,双向分析热点论文的Altmetrics分值与Web of Science被引次数的相关性,并讨论其传播渠道的多样性、传播主体的分布以及学术内容在社交媒体的传播影响。[结果/结论] 学科的差异影响Altmetrics与传统引文分析的相关性。公众为学术内容社交传播的主体,科学家利用社交媒体推广学术内容的比例呈逐年增长趋势。热点论文在Twitter上的传播一般在10-30d达到峰值,影响其传播的因素主要包括：学术传播内容的显著性和新奇性、学术传播的内需、开放获取、学术内容的营销途径等。虽然Altmetrics有速度和广度的优势,但也存在理论方法缺失、认知程度不高、数据质量较低、商业驱动浓厚、容易博弈等缺点。     

国际化视野下医学论文亮点挖掘和展示策略探析

近年来我国科技期刊发文量不断上升,但学术影响力与发达国家相比仍有较大差距。本文借鉴国外著名医学期刊的成功经验和做法,对医学论文亮点的挖掘和展示策略进行梳理和总结。在编辑过程中,编辑可帮助作者在题名、摘要、图表、正文等各个方面将体现文章创新性、重要性、前沿性的地方充分挖掘和展示出来。而在论文编辑完成之后,则可以通过期刊本身、官方网站、社交媒体、邮件推送、会议专辑或宣传页以及新闻媒体等多种途径和渠道来全方位展示论文的亮点,以提高科技成果的传播效果和期刊的核心竞争力。     

Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime

Can altmetric data be validly used for the measurement of societal impact? The current study seeks to answer this question with a comprehensive dataset (about 100,000 records) from very disparate sources (F1000, Altmetric, and an in-house database based on Web of Science). In the F1000 peer review system, experts attach particular tags to scientific papers which indicate whether a paper could be of interest for science or rather for other segments of society. The results show that papers with the tag “good for teaching” do achieve higher altmetric counts than papers without this tag – if the quality of the papers is controlled. At the same time, a higher citation count is shown especially by papers with a tag that is specifically scientifically oriented (“new finding”). The findings indicate that papers tailored for a readership outside the area of research should lead to societal impact.If altmetric data is to be used for the measurement of societal impact, the question arises of its normalization. In bibliometrics, citations are normalized for the papers’ subject area and publication year. This study has taken a second analytic step involving a possible normalization of altmetric data. As the results show there are particular scientific topics which are of especial interest for a wide audience. Since these more or less interesting topics are not completely reflected in Thomson Reuters’ journal sets, a normalization of altmetric data should not be based on the level of subject categories, but on the level of topics.     

PlumX评价指标对促进中国科技期刊国际传播的启示

利用各种社交网络平台,进行科学论文的获取、分享与传播已成为当前学术交流的重要形式,为此研究社交网络对科技期刊国际传播的影响。利用Elsevier数据库整合的替代计量学指标PlumX,分析PlumX与论文被引频次的关系及其学术特征。基于《中国天然药物》单刊及药理学/毒理学学科分析,均发现高被引论文的PlumX评分显著高于低被引论文,且学科高被引论文的被引频次和PlumX评分呈正相关,此外,高质量的综述和国际论文更易获得社交网络关注。研究结果发现PlumX指标能够对单篇论文的学术影响力进行快速评价,非国际权威期刊中的热点论文也可能获得较高关注,指出英文科技期刊应重视约组社交网络平台发达和应用广泛的相关主流国家优秀稿件,合理利用社交网络平台有助于获得较高的PlumX评分,进而提升发展中国家科学家的话语权。     

科技学术期刊发文后档案的建立

科技学术期刊建立发文后档案有利于更全面地评价已发表的论文,规范编辑部的管理,指导组稿与约稿和遴选审稿专家,等等.档案的内容主要包括文摘信息、引文信息、读者反馈信息、社会效益和经济效益.科技学术期刊编辑部应将发文前档案与发表后档案综合起来,建立适合于本刊的论文评价体系,努力提高刊物的学术水平.     

Social Science Research in India

An analysis of 393 papers published by Indian social scientists and included in Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) indicates that most of these papers are published in Indian journals. Some of the papers are directly related to problems faced by Indian society. A major share of the papers are in low impact journals and have a low citation rate. Anthropology, psychology and psychiatry are the strong areas in social science research in India.     

中国高校学报“垃圾论”辨析——基于农业高校与非高校学术期刊影响力的比较

通过分析我国农业高校学报与研究院所、学会主办学术期刊之间的差别,论证高校学报并非垃圾产品。将农业类学术期刊分为省属高校类、省级学会类和国家级学会类3种不同类型,综合分析比较3种不同类型农业类期刊在影响因子、基金论文比等5项指标上的差异。统计结果表明:国家级学会学术期刊总被引频次、影响因子、他引影响因子、基金论文比4个指标极显著地高于省级学会学术期刊(P<0.01);省属高校学报的影响因子、他引影响因子、基金论文也极显著地高于省级学会学术期刊(P<0.01),而且基金论文比、他引总引比略高于国家级学会学术期刊,差异不显著(P>0.05)。综合分析表明:国家级学会学术期刊的大部分指标高于省属高校学报,而省属高校学报均高于省级学会学术期刊,部分指标接近国家级学会学术期刊;近3年,农业类学术期刊总体上的各项评价指标正在逐年提高,农业高校学术期刊的综合影响力较高。     

National vs. international journals: views of medical professionals in Croatia

Scholarly journals, especially in non‐English‐speaking countries, may perform very different functions depending on whether they are published for national or international audiences. Four hundred and sixty‐six academic physicians and non‐academic general practitioners in Croatia were surveyed on their knowledge about two Croatian medical journals: Lije?ni?ki vjesnik (published in Croatian) and Croatian Medical Journal (published in English). The physicians were also surveyed about the importance of all national and international journals published in Croatia, and the types of articles they thought should be published in these journals. More respondents rated national (n = 329, 72.6%) than international journals (n = 275, 63.5%, P < 0.001, Wilcoxon test) as very important for the medical profession. On the other hand, publishing in international journals was more often rated as important than publishing in national journals (n = 184, 42.5% vs. n = 125, 27.8%; P < 0.001, Wilcoxon test). Guidelines for clinical practice were rated as the most important publication item in national journals, and original scientific articles in international journals.     

Bibliometric Analysis of Gold Open Access in India

This study analyzes the current state of gold Open Access (OA) in India based on papers published in the Web of Science indexed journals. It specifically focuses on research output published in OA journals and examines the difference between gold OA and general research output for papers authored by Indian researchers. In order to analyze the Indian contribution of gold OA literature and compares with other countries, Web of Science?-Core Collection was used. There is an increasing trend of contributing research papers in OA journals by Indian researchers. Among the top 20 publishing countries India ranks 10th place in terms of the general research output, but secures 8th place in terms of gold OA papers. However, India's position in terms of share of gold OA publications is relatively higher than other leading countries of the world. Researchers in India mostly prefer to contribute their gold OA papers in Indian journals rather foreign journals and the proportion of gold OA research output in Clinical, Preclinical, Health, Life Sciences and Physicals Sciences is much higher than other disciplines such as Arts &; Humanities and Social Sciences. Since most of the research output in India is published in local journals, the study suggests further analyses of publications which are not published in Web of Science indexed journals.     

How far does scientific community look back?

How does the published scientific literature used by scientific community? Many previous studies make analysis on the static usage data. In this research, we propose the concept of dynamic usage data. Based on the platform of realtime.springer.com, we have been monitoring and recording the dynamic usage data of Scientometrics articles round the clock. Our analysis find that papers published in recent four years have many more downloads than papers published four years ago. According to our quantitative calculation, papers downloaded on one day have an average lifetime of 4.1 years approximately. Classic papers are still being downloaded frequently even long after their publication. Additionally, we find that social media may reboot the attention of old scientific literature in a short time.     

2000-2009年SCI收录期刊刊载的我国中医药高校论文的情况分析

目的：通过对2000—2009年国内12所较有影响的中医药高等院校科研人员在SCI收录期刊上发表论文和论文被引情况的分析,了解国内中医药院校的科研方向、科研实力和科技影响力。方法：从发文数量、学科分布、发表期刊和被引情况4方面对12所中医药高等院校近10年在SCI收录期刊发表的论文进行分析。结果：发文数量以上海中医药大学为最高,中药学论文最多,并以中药化学、中药药理学论文最多。2006年以后各院校发文呈快速增长趋势。发文期刊多为中国出版的SCI收录期刊,论文的篇均被引次数为3．04。在高影响因子期刊上发表的论文较少。1篇发表在Lancet上,影响因子最高,为30．758。结论：国内中医药院校在SCI收录期刊发表论文虽呈上升态势,但明显比西医院校低。应加大中医药院校优势学科的培育力度,加强研究生和教师外语阅读和写作能力的培养,同时了解SCI的特点、定位、投稿方法和技巧。     

高校自然科学学报编辑系统中的平衡关系

高校自然科学学报编辑系统中诸因素之间呈现平衡与不平衡之间相互联系和相互转化的系统辩证关系,体现在学报社会效益与经济效益之间的关系、学报面向社会与局限于本校之间的关系、提高学报信息量与提高学报影响因子之间的关系、出版时滞与稿源之间的关系、编委会与编辑部之间的关系、追求核心期刊与学报栏目设置之间的关系等等诸方面,各种关系处于平衡状态与不平衡状态的动态变化之中.学报编辑要增强平衡意识,及时调控平衡关系,促使学报编辑系统保持平衡、稳定状态,促进学报可持续发展.     

国内外土壤-植物营养学期刊论文发表时滞的统计分析

通过比较国内外土壤一植物营养学主要期刊论文的发表时滞,发现国内期刊发表时滞相对较长,二者的差距主要体现在待发时滞上,在定稿时滞上差别不大.针对这一问题,并结合我国该领域科技期刊的现状,提出了切实可行的缩短发表时滞的措施.     

基于出版参数与文献计量学统计的医学核心期刊编辑出版策划

通过分析比较我国医学核心期刊、统计源期刊和一般期刊的出版参数和主要文献计量学指标,为医学中文核心期刊的编辑出版策划提供参考依据.结果显示: 中文核心期刊的论文平均长度、有英文摘要论文比、影响因子、总被引频次和基金论文比均显著高于统计源期刊和一般期刊.而中文核心期刊的出版频率、年总页码数显著高于统计源期刊,但低于一般期刊.在办刊实践中,必须采取综合措施,根据自身情况合理设置出版周期,在保证稿件质量的前提下适当扩大信息容量,多发表学术水平高的研究原著,论文尽可能附英文摘要,刊登论文适当向基金论文倾斜,以提高期刊的学术水平和影响力.     

Internationalization of scientific publishing over time: Analysing publishers and fields differences

The changes in journal internationality in mainstream science were examined using 1,398 journals and 2,557,229 papers during 1991–2014. The authors’ country of affiliation in journals’ papers and references of multinational and national publishers were analysed. The results showed that journals’ papers and references have become more globalized over time. On average, older journals are more international than the newer ones. Although multinational publishers publish more international journals than the national ones do, journals from national publishers have internationalized faster than those from multinationals. The difference between these two groups of publishers is much greater in authoring compared to referencing. For both groups of publishers, the most changes in journal internationality occurred between the fourth and sixth year of indexing in Web of Science. Journals and papers in Humanities journals have the highest rate of increase of internationality although Natural Sciences and Engineering and Technology have the most international papers. Agricultural Sciences has the least international papers; however, these papers cite a wider range of countries’ papers compared to other fields. Journals in Medical and Health Sciences, Natural Sciences, and Agricultural Sciences have the most international references.     

The Croatian national open access journal platform

Until recently, Croatian scientific journals were accessible only in print form and only to a relatively small audience. A national online journals platform was therefore planned to offer publishers a simple tool for building online versions of their journals and to make them open access. The platform, named Hr?ak, was launched in 2006, supported by governmental funds. It currently includes 170 open access (OA) journals. Most journals include backfiles from 2006 onwards; the average archived period is 6.3 years. 56.5% of the journals come from the fields of social sciences and humanities. Metadata from the Hr?ak platform are regularly harvested by OA repositories. To increase the number of Croatian journals covered by relevant bibliographic and full‐text databases, Hr?ak has forged links with Elsevier, Thomson Reuters and EBSCO. So far, the main achievements include assisting publishers in the process of electronic publishing, and improving accessibility to Croatian scientific output.     

我国图书馆学期刊研究（1979～1993）的回顾与思考

我国图书馆学期刊研究（１９７９～１９９３）的回顾与思考谷玉萍Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：Ｔｈｅｒｅｈａｄｂｅｅｎ２６３ｐａｐｅｒｓｂｙ１７９ａｕｔｈｏｒｓｏｎｔｈｅｓｔｕｄｙｏｆｌｉｂｒａｒｙｓｃｉｅｎｃｅｊｏｕｒｎａｌｓｐｕｂｌｉｓｈｅｄｉｎ４７ｍａｇａｚｉ...     

Understanding writing styles of scientific papers in the IS-LS domain: Evidence from abstracts over the past three decades

To some extent, written academic discourse represents the knowledge and practices of the academic community. Studies investigating writing styles in various disciplines have flourished, but fewer studies have leveraged multi-perspective linguistic indices to analyze academic writings, especially in the information science and library science (IS-LS) domain. This study attempts to provide an overview of how writing styles have evolved over the past 30 years across various subfields in IS-LS from multiple perspectives, that is, lexical complexity, cohesion, syntactic complexity, and readability. Based on a large set of abstracts of academic papers published in IS-LS, the empirical findings showed that the readability, cohesion, and lexical sophistication of abstracts in the IS-LS domain have increased over time, indicating that abstracts tend to contain more information but become less accessible. The gradual improvement in cohesion suggests that academic writing logic has increased, and the rigor of knowledge construction of scientific papers has improved. Furthermore, considerable linguistic variations emerged between subfields in the IS-LS domain, particularly at the lexical level. This study suggested that different subfields had various writing styles due to their research topics, methodologies, orientations, etc. The study also found that papers published in top quartile journals and those that gained higher citations typically had larger lexical density, lexical sophistication, cohesion, and readability. This suggests that influential papers tend to carry more information, address more complex scientific issues, and exercise caution in knowledge construction and presentation.     

中外医学期刊栏目比较

对国内外优秀医学期刊栏目的设置进行比较,认为医学期刊均有按专业学科设置栏目的趋势.国内医学期刊内容单一,专业性强;国外期刊内容丰富,形式多样,互动性好:因此,国内医学期刊应注重构建互动性的栏目,增设研究快报栏目,减少首报论文外流,提高中国医学期刊的质量及影响.