共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 26 毫秒
3.
上矶,竿长2米~3米,属于矶竿中的轻武器,用于堤坝、码头、船桥等地,目标是海洋中的中小型鱼类,讲究近距离快速起鱼,所以厂家往往把小矶竿设计成轻巧的材质、敏锐的调性、强韧而弹性十足的竿身。 相似文献
4.
一、何为“手竿置底钓法” 在溪河中钓鱼,有两种最基本的钓法——静水钓与流水钓。静水钓与池塘中的钓法基本相同,都用漂来反应鱼情;流水钓,则分为用漂的流水钓和不用漂的手竿置底钓。用漂的流水钓只适于缓流,而手竿置底钓则可以在急流中施钓。 相似文献
5.
6.
8.
从南京参赛归来已两个多月未钓鲫鱼,原因是盛夏高温出不了远门,近处又无处可钓鲫。周五晚上在渔具店打探到距城15公里的破山江与新建的中横公路相交处鲫鱼较多,是台钓免费练竿的好地方,所以第二天厂休日前去过瘾。早起出发本想抢一个最好的钓位,然而到达钓场才知有人早已稳坐第一把“交椅”——坐东向西的桥下正中位置,我只能退而求其次,钓位在他正对面。 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research - 相似文献
15.
16.
鉴于体育纠纷的多元性及专业性、技术性特点,对构建多元的体育纠纷解决机制进行探讨,为及时、有效、合理的解决体育领域中的争端与纠纷,提出了建立替代性体育纠纷解决机制 相似文献
17.
This paper illustrates the use of a Scheffé-like multivariate post hoc procedure known as the Roy-Bose or simultaneous confidence interval procedure. This method is contrasted with the use of Bonferroni or planned linear combinations for the one- and two-sample cases. The Roy-Bose procedure also is compared to the more frequently employed univariate F tests for post hoc analysis. 相似文献
18.
19.
通过对两个无差异组分别采用“另类”分层分组教学法和传统教学法两种不同教学方法进行跨栏跑教学实验,经对其结果分析表明:“另类”分层分组教学法优于传统教学法,主要体现在:“另类”分层分组教学法更有利于提高学生学习的自尊心和自信心,提高竞争意识,增加练习密度等,更能体现以学生为主体,老师为主导的教学原则,更符合教育学发展规律。 相似文献
20.
Marilyn A. Looney Jennie Gilbert 《Measurement in physical education and exercise science》2013,17(4):268-283
The purpose of the study was to determine if currently used FITNESSGRAM® cut-off scores for the Back Saver Sit and Reach Test had the best criterion-referenced validity evidence for 6–12 year old children. Secondary analyses of an existing data set focused on the passive straight leg raise and Back Saver Sit and Reach Test flexibility scores of 87 boys and 91 girls. The reliability and validity evidence was determined for Back Saver Sit and Reach Test cut-off scores of 7, 8, 9, and 10 inches for the boys and girls separately. Reliability evidence for passive straight leg raise and all Back Saver Sit and Reach Test cut-off scores was good to excellent. The most valid cut-off scores had the highest proportion of correct decisions associated with sensitivity ≥.67, and false-positive rate ≤.24. Based on moderate validity evidence, the best Back Saver Sit and Reach Test cut-off scores for 6–12 year olds are 8 and 9 inches for boys and girls, respectively. These findings should be cross-validated with other samples. 相似文献