共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
高职院校公选课学生对教师课堂教学质量进行评价。是目前高职院校教师教学评价的基本模式之一,但在具体的评教实践中还存在一些问题。文章据此提出了有效开展高职院校公选课学生评教的策略。旨在为完善高职院校公选课学生评价提供切实可行的理论指导。 相似文献
2.
以“自主性-效能感”为标准进行聚类分析,发现学生评教行为偏差可划分为利己顺从型、趋众盲从型、被迫受制型和缺位抗拒型4类。采用因子分析及回归分析发现:评教“定位偏移”对四类评教行为偏差全部产生显著影响,对利己顺从型评教偏差行为产生影响最为显著;除此之外,趋众盲从型评教偏差行为主要受评教“定位不明”“指标所指不清”与“指标区分度低”影响,被迫受制型评教偏差行为主要受“强制性评教方式”影响,缺位抗拒型主要受“信息供给失衡”与“反馈缺失”影响。针对以上4类评教行为偏差,可分别采取回归促学为本制度定位、构建面向学习的制度设计、完善评教协商机制及施行评教信息共享机制等相关制度性举措予以纠正。 相似文献
3.
4.
苏海红 《湖北第二师范学院学报》2008,25(12):92-94
目前国内高校几乎都组织学生对教师进行评教,但由于评价方法本身的不完备性乃至缺乏一定的科学性,它并不能真实而充分地反映出教师的教学水平,也难以真正达到以评促改、以评促教的初衷和目的。基于此,本文提出综合采用模糊评价、抽样调查和访谈等较为科学合理的评教方法,以充分发挥出评教的实效性及应有的实际作用。 相似文献
5.
6.
大学生评教的理性思考与实践策略 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
从学生评教的逻辑起点出发,指出教师的教学情况是学生评教的核心。国内现行的教育法规、教育政策构成了大学生评教的制度依据,哲学、教育学、心理学、统计学等学科为学生评教提供了理论支持。高校开展学生评教活动,应遵循确立学生评教主导价值取向、构建科学的学生评教指标体系和优化学生评教技术路线的策略。 相似文献
7.
在学生评教中,学生的评教态度、评教能力及对评教体系的认同性直接影响评教结果的客观性。调查发现,上述三方面总体上是值得肯定的,但也存在一些问题,影响了评教结果的客观、真实与公正。为了提高大学生评教的客观度,应不断提高大学生对评教的认知水平与评教能力;同时,教学管理部门也要加强对学生的评教指导,并不断优化评教的方式方法和指标体系。 相似文献
8.
文章认为,当前高校大学生评教工作有“四化”现象值得关注,即评教认识的“被弱化”、评教作用的“功利化”、评教过程的“形式化”和评教指标的“简单化”现象。文章对这些现象产生的原因进行分析,并提出改进对策。 相似文献
9.
高校学生评教是提高教学质量的重要手段,能够促进教师改进教学,对于保证学生的学习利益、发挥学生主体性具有重要的现实意义.调查结果显示高校学生评教水平中等偏上,评教的积极性不高,存在一定随意性,客观性难以保证,评教行为存在一定偏差.高校应增强学生评教的主体意识,设计科学的评教指标体系,加强评教工作的管理与监督,积极落实评教... 相似文献
10.
学生评教是学生作为评价主体对教师的教学工作做出的评价,在实际的教学过程中发挥着积极的作用,是学校教学质量监控体系中不可或缺的重要一环。本文阐述了学生评教的意义、作用及影响因素。 相似文献
11.
Romy Lawson Tracy Taylor Erica French Eveline Fallshaw Cathy Hall Shelley Kinash 《高等教育研究与发展》2015,34(3):581-595
Assurance of learning (AOL) is a quality enhancement and quality assurance process used in higher education. It involves a process of determining programme learning outcomes and standards, and systematically gathering evidence to measure students' performance on these. The systematic assessment of whole-of-programme outcomes provides a basis for curriculum development and management, continuous improvement, and accreditation. To better understand how AOL processes operate, a national study of university practices across one discipline area, business and management, was undertaken. To solicit data on AOL practice, interviews were undertaken with a sample of business school representatives (n?=?25). Two key processes emerged: (1) mapping of graduate attributes and (2) collection of assurance data. External drivers such as professional accreditation and government legislation were the primary reasons for undertaking AOL outcomes but intrinsic motivators in relation to continuous improvement were also evident. The facilitation of academic commitment was achieved through an embedded approach to AOL by the majority of universities in the study. A sustainable and inclusive process of AOL was seen to support wider stakeholder engagement in the development of higher education learning outcomes. 相似文献
12.
13.
对学生创新能力的培养是我国高等教育的薄弱环节.培养学生的创新能力,需要转变教学观念,改革教学模式和教学方法.培养学生的创新能力,要树立学习自由的思想,并将学习自由思想体现在教学中,体现在学习中,这样才能激发学生的学习动力,使学生的身心自由、和谐地发展,才能提高学生的素质和创新能力. 相似文献
14.
15.
作为一种基础性的宪法权利,学生享有表达自由权.本文首先探讨了表达自由权的概念及其必要性.其次,本文认为学生的表达自由具有多种形式,主要包括言论自由、发型自由、着装自由、集会及结社自由.最后,本文强调指出,学校管理者应尊重并保护学生的表达自由,促进学生权利与学校管理权力的和谐发展. 相似文献
16.
17.
Ines Dužević 《Tertiary Education and Management》2013,19(1):66-79
The notion that ‘customer satisfaction’ should be the ultimate measure of quality provision of any service organization is often accepted in the higher education context. However, measuring the quality of an educational institution based on students’ satisfaction is insufficient as it diverts the focus from student development, advancement and growth to an affective evaluation of the service. More appropriate measures of quality of higher education institutions are student engagement and learning. This study describes the likely impact of perceived overall quality of higher education institutions on student engagement. The contribution of this study is twofold. First, it draws attention to the importance of higher education institution quality as the main institutional-level determinant of student engagement and, second, it suggests a comprehensive multilevel conceptual framework for its empirical testing. 相似文献
18.
《College Teaching》2013,61(1):202-207
Abstract. By creating a space for fun, interaction, and trust, teachers and students together can build a learning environment that promotes engagement, deep learning, and meaning. Such a space emphasizes process, not product, personalizes learning, and contributes to whole person development. To facilitate the creation of this space, the teachers show respect for students as individuals, encourage original thinking, and expand the boundaries of the classroom through field trips and guest speakers, and the students share written reflections on critical issues that link to personal experience and conviction, contribute to dynamic class dialogues, and develop and present creative responses to environmental and social complexities. 相似文献
19.
Undergraduate Student Socialization and Learning in an Online Professional Curriculum 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Using data collected from a qualitative case study of an online baccalaureate nursing program, we examined the influence of online degree programs on undergraduate student socialization and learning. We considered how components of socialization—knowledge acquisition, investment, and involvement—are influenced by the online context. The findings suggest the importance of considering non-academic influences in regards to nontraditional student experiences. The theoretical intersection of online learning and undergraduate student development offers new and significant areas of research, specifically related to the pedagogical role of faculty and the impact of social engagement. Implications for future research and practice are offered. Karri A. Holley received her Ph.D. from the University of Southern California. She is Assistant Professor at the University of Alabama. Her research interests include graduate/professional education, interdisciplinary curricula, and qualitative inquiry. Barrett J. Taylor is a Ph.D. student at the University of Georgia. His research focuses on religious colleges and universities. 相似文献
20.
Huw Charles Davies 《European Journal of Engineering Education》2013,38(5):485-496
Formula Student (FS) is a multi-university student design competition managed by the UK Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Students are required to demonstrate and prove their creativity and engineering skills through the design, manufacture and financing of a small formula style race car. This paper seeks to explore the educational value that derives from the FS activity through a series of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Through the analysis of the interview data, it was found that the FS activity supported development of student skills and competencies in the following areas: use of engineering knowledge to support the application of existing and emerging technology; application of theoretical and practical knowledge to the solution of engineering problems; development of technical and commercial management skills; development of effective interpersonal skills, including communication skills; and demonstration of personal commitment to professional development. In addition, a number of areas for implementing ‘good practise’ have been identified. The information herein supports educators in their responsibility to help meet the needs of the engineering industry for high quality graduates. 相似文献