俄罗斯媒体理论回归服务国家社会

从苏联时期开始,媒体的职能与属性就被定位在如何协助振兴经济与发展国力.苏联解体之后,俄罗斯媒体的定位集中在新闻自由与媒体集团等概念上面,倡导公共媒体与公共利益.本文简要论述俄罗斯媒体理论回归服务国家社会的内因要素与思想形成的理论基础,发现俄罗斯媒体仍循着一条既定的规律在运行.     

社会转型语境下俄罗斯传媒话语建构的修辞批评

俄罗斯自上个世纪末进入社会转型期以来,大众传媒从形式到结构都发生了巨大的变化。传媒话语作为媒体影响和说服受众的主要手段成为现代修辞学研究的对象。俄罗斯学者运用修辞学理论对传媒话语的建构和表达进行了分析研究,指出了当前主要存在的话语道德、"极端受众中心论"等问题,并呼吁通过传媒话语恢复和建构受众的民族认同感,从而增强媒体的社会功能。对俄罗斯传媒话语修辞批评的分析和总结对我国的大众传媒研究有着借鉴的意义。     

广电媒体资产管理

2005年是我国广电领域媒体资产管理的推进年。从概念到应用,从理想到现实,媒体资产管理已成为我国当今数字化改造的热门话题,广电系统乃至各媒体、社会各行业均已拉开了建设媒体资产管理系统的帷幕。     

广电媒体资产管理

2005年是我国广电领域媒体资产管理的推进年。从概念到应用，从理想到现实，媒体资产管理已成为我国当今数字化改造的热门话题，广电系统乃至各媒体、社会各行业均已拉开了建设媒体资产管理系统的帷幕。     

西方突发事件报道及其对中国的借鉴意义

近年来,随着信息化和一体化的逐步深入,突发事件已经成为社会的常态,席卷着整个世界：从“9．11”特大恐怖袭击事件到俄罗斯人质事件,从东南亚非典到印度洋海啸,从“苏丹红”食品危机到“卡特里娜”飓风灾害,各种突发公共事件严重影响着人类的生活和社会的稳定,如何处理突发公共事件并对其进行有效的报道,已经成为世界各国媒体共同关注的焦点。     

俄罗斯大众传媒发展研究

本文从俄罗斯整个社会制度的变化视角来审视俄罗斯大众传媒的历史演变过程,从俄罗斯社会政治体制变革、俄罗斯传媒所有制的变更、外来势力对俄罗斯传媒的渗透、俄罗斯强化国家对媒体的管控等多个方面来揭示俄罗斯大众传媒变革的动因。在经历了百年变革后,随着普京新政策的实施及科学技术的发展,俄罗斯大众传媒发展逐渐走上正轨,大众传播媒介也愈加多样化。     

变化中的俄罗斯传媒

本文从俄罗斯整个社会制度的变化视角入手,全方位审视俄罗斯传媒的演化过程,试图从俄罗斯社会政治体制转型、俄罗斯传媒所有制的变更、国际资本对俄传媒领域的渗透以及俄罗斯现政权力图用法律调控媒体的社会地位,强化国家媒体的作用等诸方面去揭示其深刻动因。在经历了转型期的动荡起伏后,随着俄罗斯经济状况的逐渐好转,普京政府新闻政策的日见明朗以及新技术和网络媒体的兴起,俄罗斯传媒发展日臻稳定,未来走向也渐趋清晰。 俄罗斯传媒的变迁历经20年,它表象复杂,涵义深刻,为新闻传播学研究提供了弥足珍贵的案例实证,也为我国传媒的健康发展留下重要启示和思索。     

我看俄媒体发展转型这十年

作为一名常驻俄罗斯的记者,翻阅与精读俄当地每日报刊是每天必做的功课,其中《独立报》《导报》《生意人报》《共青团真理报》《俄罗斯报》和《消息报》等属于必读之列.而总结过去10年间两次在俄工作体会,尤其对俄报刊在当地政治、经济、社会、文化等方面的作用变化留有深刻印象,即在过去超过10年时间里,俄罗斯媒体基本完成了从社会转型开始时的"助推器"角色到信息载体角色的转换.受众亦从原本通过媒体感受社会转型带来的思想对立与心理不安,转为大量获取有益于参与社会进步的各类信息.     

俄罗斯媒体环境变化对新闻传播的影响

自苏联解体始,俄罗斯政治经济发生激烈变革,传媒领域也随之产生重大调整,社会变革推动媒体环境发生根本性变化:俄罗斯大众媒体从解体初的绝对自由到上世纪九十年代中期渐渐为寡头所垄断,直至本世纪初在政府传媒新政的推动下重又回到国家的控制之下。而俄罗斯媒体环境的变迁也直接决定并影响着新闻传播实践,使大众传媒在不同阶段呈现出不同的传播特点。     

内容为王、技术赋能、多元形态、跨界合作——2018俄罗斯世界杯融媒体报道新生态

本文重点梳理盘点了2018年俄罗斯世界杯期间,以三大央媒为主的媒体推出的优秀融媒体产品,以及打造报道内容新生态的新举措、新玩法。作者认为,从智能技术的创新应用到独家内容的组织策划,再到产品形态趋于多元、交互设计成为主流,俄罗斯世界杯融媒体报道得到丰富和延展。     

艰难的转身:从宣传本位到新闻本位——共和国60年新闻媒体

以1978年底召开的党的十一届三中全会为界,新中国前后30年的新闻业有着巨大的差异。后30年中国新闻业发生意义深远、成果显著的巨大变化。前后30年中国新闻业带有根本性的变化是从前30年的宣传本位转向后30年的新闻本位。正是这一带根本性的变化推动了其它一系列变化。     

STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND JOURNALISM PRACTICE

This paper examines structural changes to Chinese news organisations in the new millennium and their impact on journalism practice, with a particular focus on the Xinhua News Agency. The paper attempts to understand the complexity of these changes and their implications for journalism, media and communications studies.     

The effects of media commercialization on journalism and politics in Greece

This paper tries to describe the effects of media modernization and commercialization in journalism and politics, taking as example the case of contemporary Greece. This paper is organized into two parts. The first deals essentially with the effects that the new structure of the Greek media system has imposed on professional journalism, while the second deals with the changes that this new media environment has caused in the political world. It argues that these changes have led to a new battle between the media owners and politicians over who will control the public and political agenda and a new relationship between them.     

Cultural Journalism and Cultural Critique in a changing Media Landscape

This special issue addresses a topic of journalism studies that has previously been somewhat neglected but which has gained increasing scholarly attention since the mid-2000s: the coverage and evaluation of art and culture, or what we term “cultural journalism and cultural critique.” In this introduction, we highlight three issues that serve to frame the study of cultural journalism and cultural critique more generally and the eight articles of this special issue more specifically: (1) the constant challenge of demarcating cultural journalism and cultural critique, including the interrelations of “journalism” and “critique”; (2) the dialectic of globalisation’s cultural homogenisation, on the one hand, and the specificity of local/national cultures, on the other; and (3) the digital media landscape seen in terms of the need to rethink, perhaps even redefine cultural journalism and cultural critique.     

Managing Social Media Use: Whither Social Media Guidelines in News Organizations?

Fears exist that social media use by news media and journalists may affect basic journalistic tenets such as objectivity, gatekeeping, and transparency. As a result, more and more news media organizations are issuing guidelines to manage employee use of social media. In this article we discuss the complex relationship of a selection of market-leading news media organizations with prescribed use of social media. Applying content analysis to 12 existing social media guidelines, we elaborate on the various types of rules linked with the basic principles of journalism. A key intention of this research is to provide insights for media management and journalism scholars to better understand the use of social media by journalists and the implementation of guidelines by media organizations. More practically, this article can aid media organizations who are shaping their own set of rules regarding use of social media by their staff.     

ONLINE FEATURE JOURNALISM

Although online journalism is still dominated by breaking news coverage, new genres are emerging that differentiate it more and more from old media journalism. This article explores the emergence of feature journalism in online newspapers. Through comparative qualitative text analysis of feature journalism in the US online newspaper palmbeachpost.com and the Norwegian online newspaper dagbladet.no, two widely different approaches to the production of feature journalism on the Web are uncovered and a critical perspective on the remediation of journalistic genres in online newspapers is elaborated. The analysis shows that both these approaches display a clash between discourses of traditional feature journalism and discourses of online communication. It further reveals that genre development in online journalism is a complex process marked by contradictions and inconsistencies and that online newsrooms are struggling to find solutions on how to differentiate online journalism from old media journalism.     

RE-EXAMINING “GATEKEEPING”

Journalists in the “new media” era confront important questions as to whether, or how, they adapt their professional practices to a new interactive on-line form that allows citizens to become involved in the news-making process. This paper seeks to re-establish the relevance of traditional journalism practices in the modern era and suggests that they will remain very much a part of the “new journalism” beyond the digital divide. It does so through examining how broadcast journalism interviews challenge authorities in the “public interest”, and suggests, in conclusion, that such practices remain undiminished by the technical, and accompanying social, changes that are driving the “new media”.     

Changes in U.S. Journalism

During the past decade, great changes have occurred in journalism, many of them due to the rapid rise of social media. What has happened to American journalists in the decade since the early 2000s, a time of tumultuous changes in society, economics, and technology? What impact have the many cutbacks and the dramatic growth of the internet had on US journalists’ attitudes, and behaviors—and even on the definition of who is a journalist? To answer the questions raised above, in late 2013 we conducted a national online survey of 1080 US journalists. The survey is part of the American Journalist project, which conducted similar surveys of US journalists in 1982, 1992, and 2002. We found that US journalists use social media mainly to check on what other news organizations are doing and to look for breaking news events. A majority also use social media to find ideas for stories, keep in touch with their readers and viewers, and find additional information. Thus, journalists use social media predominantly as information-gathering tools and much less to interview sources or to validate information. Our findings also indicate that most journalists consider social media to have a positive impact on their work. Of particular value, it seems, was the fact that social media make journalism more accountable to the public. However, only about a third of the journalists also think that social media have a positive influence on the journalistic profession overall. One of the most common negative perceptions was that online journalism has sacrificed accuracy for speed. Overall, then, it appears that most journalists do see the benefits of social media, but fewer are convinced that these new forms of digital communication will benefit journalistic professionalism.     

The Political in Cultural Journalism

This article explores how nine Swedish cultural editors and managers in mainstream media institutions define cultural journalism and its political dimensions during times of increased digitization and media convergence. Swedish cultural journalism is aesthetic and political critique applied to subject areas (music, literature, etc.) and contemporary societal and ethical issues. Drawing on Zelizer we ask whether there is a common interpretive community of cultural journalists in different media regarding: (1) how they define their scope, (2) how they understand “the political” in cultural journalism and its implications for democracy, and (3) how they view media convergence and digitalization. We find that although editors/managers from different media share a basic understanding of cultural journalism as an alternative perspective to news, “the political” in cultural journalism is approached differently in the press and the public service broadcast media. Furthermore, due in part to structural conditions, they also see the effects of digitization differently, forming sub-communities on two counts. This study thus contributes new knowledge to a field previously focused almost exclusively on newspapers.     

From Pink Slips to Pink Slime: Transforming Media Labor in a Digital Age

This paper examines some of the labor processes involved inthe expansion of digital journalism to comment on the nature and implications of transformations in journalistic work in a digital age. Specifically, I survey four practices that stand out as putting pressure on traditional journalism production: outsourcing, unpaid labor, metrics and measurement, and automation. Although these practices are unevenly incorporated into mainstream news production (and in some cases are still marginal), they demonstrate viable options for media corporations seeking to streamline production. Drawing on labor process theory, I emphasize that media corporations use strategies of efficiency and rationalization to lower labor costs. Unpaid labor, robot reporters, algorithms, and outsourcing demonstrate that changes in the media production process are not the inevitable results of technology but, as the long history of journalism and technological change demonstrates, strategies for lowering labor costs.