图书馆应如何拓展公益性服务的空间

表文认为,我国图书馆公益性服务处于萎缩状态,其原因可以从公益性服务的需求和供给两个方面来寻找;图书馆不应放弃而应继续坚持以公益性服务为主,并通过优化馆藏结构、缩小服务半径、引导潜在需求和改进服务质量来拓展公益性服务的空间.     

公共服务均等化与农民图书馆权利的实现

公共图书馆是人类社会对民主、自由、人权不懈追求的成果在政府职能上的反映,因而公共图书馆服务均等化是基本公共服务均等化的重要内容之一.就我国的实际而言,实现基本公共图书馆服务均等化,首先要解决的重大问题便是落实农民群体基本的图书馆权利,应采取必要的对策,切实使广大农民的图书馆应然权利转变为实然权利.     

加强和改进对弱势群体的服务——基本公共服务均等化视野下的公共图书馆服务

弱势群体已经成为我国现阶段备受关注的群体,基本公共服务均等化政策对弱势群体起到了保护和照顾的作用,图书馆要抓住我国当前大力推行基本公共服务均等化这一历史机遇,加强和改进对弱势群体的服务,提升自身的价值和影响.     

浅论公共图书馆服务均等化

从公共服务均等化与公共图书馆服务均等化的关系出发,分析了我国目前公共图书馆服务均等化的现状和原因,提出了公共图书馆服务均等化实现的路径。     

浅议图书馆均等化服务

“普遍平等”“惠及全民”是图书馆服务的基本原则与目标追求,均等化服务体现了图书馆精神。而以读者为中心,拓宽服务范围,规范图书馆人职业道德,实行以人为本的人性化服务是均等化服务的深化服务。     

对公共图书馆公益性服务的思考

探讨了公共图书馆公益性服务的含义和由来,阐述了公共图书馆推行公益性服务面临的难题和可实行的策略,指出了公共图书馆在市场经济条件下应坚持公益性服务为主的发展方向。     

我国公共图书馆基本服务均等化研究综述

通过对公共图书馆均等化服务研究论文进行阅读和梳理,从图书馆均等化相关内涵研究、图书馆均等化服务构建模式、图书馆均等化服务的理念和措施、图书馆均等化服务面临的主要问题和解决对策等方面,对近年来我国公共图书馆基本服务均等化研究取得的主要成果进行了总结和分析.     

关于图书馆事业公益性原则的思考

图书馆是一项公益性事业 ,追求公共利益曾是发展图书馆事业的基本目标。只是 ,图书馆的公益性并不决定于办馆方式 ,非国办图书馆同样具有公益性。图书馆的公益性并不反对追求功利价值和效率价值 ,它的公共利益之中也含有物质利益。图书馆的公益性与市场经济机制及原则并不矛盾 ,相反当代图书馆的公益性是以市场经济为基础的     

城市图书馆公共服务体系均等化的实现——以东莞图书馆实践为例

以图书馆公共服务体系实现均等化服务内涵为依据,通过对国内外在图书馆公共服务体系实现均等化方面的现状对比,分析我国图书馆公共服务体系实现均等化服务存在的问题。最后,以东莞图书馆公共服务体系实践为例,从资源建设、服务体系和社会成员享受公共服务权力等方面探讨完善城市图书馆公共服务体系均等化的实现途径。     

东莞图书馆公共服务体系均等化实现策略

介绍党的十八届三中全会提出的构建现代公共文化服务体系的时代任务,指出其中一个重要任务就是促进公共文化服务均等化。以东莞图书馆公共服务体系的实践为例,通过对国内外图书馆公共服务体系在实现均等化方面的现状对比,针对东莞图书馆公共服务体系均等化服务的现状和存在问题,探讨如何促进图书馆公共服务体系均等化的实现策略。     

公正的追寻与思考——关于公共服务体系中的图书馆服务均等化

作为公共服务体系中的图书馆均等化是关注民生、重视民生的热点问题。公共图书馆作为公共物品,实质上是政府以整个社会的名义向每一位读者提供的文化、教育的公共空间。它保证了每一个人接受知识和教育的权利的实现,人们通过对图书馆的免费知识和教育资源的占有,获得分享社会文明成果的机会,参与知识经济的资本和核心竞争力,从而获得发展的能量。     

A taxonomy for proactive public services

In light of the increasing importance of citizen-centricity in public services, one approach technologically advanced public organizations take is to integrate proactivity into their services. Scholars agree with the potential for proactivity in public services and study some aspects of the topic, and some publications deal with the concept of proactivity itself. However, opinions regarding the characteristics of proactive public services diverge in both research and practice, and despite—or maybe because of—the growing body of research, the literature still lacks conceptual clarity. We address this issue by developing a taxonomy for proactive public services using Nickerson, Varshney, and Muntermann's (2013) taxonomy-development method. Using eight empirical and conceptual iterations that draw on a structured literature review, two semi-structured interviews, investigation of 67 real-world objects, and an evaluation with nine potential users, we propose a taxonomy of eight dimensions and 23 characteristics. The outcome of this work enriches scientific knowledge about digital government by detailing the concept of a proactive public service and serving as a basis for further research. Moreover, practitioners can be inspired by the 23 characteristics of proactive public services to identify possible next steps in the design of their services, such as determining which proactive public services are feasible and in what form. In addition to the taxonomy, our collection of 67 practical examples of proactive public services from a variety of countries contributes to digital government research and practice.     

Principles for archival information services in the public domain

In 2010, in response to the Australian Government’s November 2009 apology to Forgotten Australians and former child migrants, a scoping study was undertaken by the Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) to assess the options for a national ‘Find and Connect’ service to allow people to locate and access relevant records and have recourse to support services. The scoping study noted that Pathways, a web-based public knowledge space and a product of the Victorian ‘Who Am I?’ research project, was a community-based information resource without equal in the out-of-home care sector in Australia or indeed internationally. The scoping team made the observation that Pathways, due to its quality of content and coherent structure, appeared to be based on a set of principles and wondered what they were. In response the research team set about articulating the principles that underpinned their approach to archival documentation and the use of digital technologies – principles that had emerged through more than two decades of public domain, archive-focussed projects. This paper presents those ten principles and discusses them within the context of Pathways and the ‘Who Am I?’ project. The principles played a key role in FaCHSIA adopting Pathways as the model for the national Find and Connect database and web resource, launched on 15 November 2011. The principles underpin community knowledge building in the fourth or pluralised dimension of the Records Continuum. The paper ultimately argues that all stakeholders (all people and organisations connected with records) should have the ability to contribute to the utilisation of those records through the improvement of documentation and that some archival systems do have a duty of care to ensure they can inter-operate with community-generated knowledge.     

多种服务方式并存 营造良好的学习环境--温州市图书馆外文阅览室纪实

通过对温州市图书馆外文阅览室服务方式的介绍，论证了基于传统服务的多种服务方式中的定位服务、互动服务的重要作用。     

Publishing,copyright, and the public good

For centuries publishers have acted as intermediaries between author and audience. Copyright, like freedom of expression, is an essential element of freedom in this role, because without it authors' rights are not fully protected. Only when they are protected against theft and other economic or moral infringements are authors free to express themselves without fear. Publishers, too, rely on copyright to protect their investments and their freedom Paul Nijhoff Asser has been secretary of the International Group of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers (STM), Amsterdam, since 1970. He has been active in publishing and bookselling for more than forty years. This article was adapted from a presentation at the seminar “East Meets West: Copyright and the Publisher in a Market Economy”, Hamburg, March 1991.     

图书馆均等化服务与读者权益保障探究

图书馆服务均等化,其核心乃是以服务均等化为目标保障读者的权益.最大限度地保障读者权益是图书馆均等服务的立足点.