企业技术创新评估的方法论思考

目前我们国家正大力提倡企业通过创新求发展,通过创新提高企业的经济效益,而对于企业技术创新评估方法的研究无疑是衡量企业创新水平,提高创新能力的重要一环。本文试图对企业技术创新评估的指标体系和方法进行归纳整理,进而对每一类方法从几种不同角度对评估的方法进行评述,以期从不同的视角来探讨企业技术创新评估的方法,对提高企业技术创新评估的水平有所裨益,进而使企业在此基础上进一步提高技术管理水平,推动我国的创新型国家的建设。     

Gender and the evaluation of research

This study examines if and how gender relates to research evaluation via panel assessment and journal ratings lists. Using data from UK business schools we find no evidence that the proportion of women in a submission for panel assessment affected the score received by the submitting institution. However, we do find that women on average receive lower scores according to some journal ratings lists. There are important differences in the rated quality of journals that men and women publish in across the sub-disciplines with men publishing significantly more research in the highest rated accountancy, information management and strategy journals. In addition, women who are able to utilise networks to co-author with individuals outside their institution are able to publish in higher-rated journals, although the same is not true for men; women who are attributed with “individual staff circumstances” (e.g. maternity leave or part-time working) have lower scores according to journal ratings lists.     

Gender diversity in the management field: Does it matter for research outcomes?

This study examines the relationship between gender diversity and research outcomes. Existing research on the topic primarily focuses on how team gender diversity influences scholarly productivity in terms of citations and publication rates. Far less attention has been devoted to the question of how the intellectual contents of research disciplines change as they become more gender diverse. Drawing on a global sample of more than 25,000 management papers, we use natural language processing techniques, correspondence analysis and regression models to illuminate impact-, content- and status-related dimensions of gender diversity in management research. In regression models adjusting for geographical setting, institutional prestige and collaboration patterns, we find no discernable effects of team gender diversity on per-paper scientific impact. In contrast, our analyses converge to yield a broadly consistent pattern of gender-related variations in research focus: women are well-represented in social- and human-centered areas of management, while men comprise the vast majority in areas addressing more technical and operational aspects. Our findings corroborate recent sociological research suggesting that cultural norms and expectations are channeling women and men towards different areas of work and study. We argue that the broadened repertoire of perspectives, values and questions resulting from gender diversity may render management research more responsive to the full gamut of societal needs and expectations.     

Altmetrics指标在科研评价与管理方面的应用——争议、评论和评估

通过总结近年来有代表的相关活动和评论、科学共同体宣言、权威出版物评论文章、科研人员的应用实践以及美国国家信息标准组织(NISO)和英国高等教育基金会(HEFCE)的大规模考察报告,分析新兴科技评价指标altmetrics是否可以同其他文献计量指标一起应用到科研评价与管理领域。     

基于质量评价与改进的企业流程再造研究

针对目前国内外流行的质量评价方法只注重识别强项而忽视改进弱项的问题,依据全面质量管理和流程再造的基本理论,提出了面向质量改进的企业流程再造的基本思想和原则,以及进行企业流程再造的基本过程,使质量评价在解决实际问题中得到应用。     

Knowledge management and communication in Brazilian agricultural research: An integrated procedural approach

The great contemporary organizational challenge for enterprises is to create a conceptual and methodological framework allows the management of knowledge by means of networks designed for social interaction. This statement is based on the premise that the competitive drive and sustainable success of the company depend on the introduction of new forms of production innovative processes, which can only be ensured through integrated approaches to knowledge management and the incorporation information technologies (IT). This is a reality that has already been accepted by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa, its acronym in Portuguese), a Brazilian research, development, and innovation (RD&I) institution supporting agricultural sector. For some years now, Embrapa has been incorporating what it has learned about knowledge management into its strategic planning process. In this paper, we present a new approach to managing knowledge and information, and we analyze the need for research institutions to administer the knowledge they produce through an RD&I management model based multi- and inter-disciplinary teams, and multi-institutional research networks.     

Using the h-index to measure the quality of journals in the field of business and management

This paper considers the use of the h-index as a measure of a journal’s research quality and contribution. We study a sample of 455 journals in business and management all of which are included in the ISI Web of Science (WoS) and the Association of Business School’s peer review journal ranking list. The h-index is compared with both the traditional impact factors, and with the peer review judgements. We also consider two sources of citation data – the WoS itself and Google Scholar. The conclusions are that the h-index is preferable to the impact factor for a variety of reasons, especially the selective coverage of the impact factor and the fact that it disadvantages journals that publish many papers. Google Scholar is also preferred to WoS as a data source. However, the paper notes that it is not sufficient to use any single metric to properly evaluate research achievements.     

检验检疫科技立项评价指标体系的研究

本文阐述科技项目的立项评价现状,提出了检验检疫科技项目立项评价机制及指标体系、评价标准,并建立起通过两轮专家咨询,确定评价指标及相应权重的方法,为提高检验检疫科技立项的科学性、规范性提供了切实可行的方案,对在源头上控制科技项目的质量,提高科技成果的适用度具有一定的帮助。     

浅谈人力资源管理在事业单位中的实际运用

人力资源管理因其独特的优势,在经济社会中的地位日渐凸显,现代人力资源管理的思想已被越来越多的事业单位所接受,传统意义上的事业单位更多的是出于上传下达的阶段,更多的是针对任务去单一性完成,现代化的事业单位在践行党的十八大精神的同时,还应理顺工作思路,顺应时代潮流,与时俱进,不断创新,乘改革之机,及时与时代接轨,以保证组织目标的实现,最大限度地满足职工发展的需要,更好的促进本单位的良好运行,以科学有序的规划,使单位各个阶层,各个部门之间人力资源配置达到最优。目前,事业单位由于其自身的特殊性,在这一方面还不够完善,虽然取得一定成绩,有所创新,但整体上还相对薄弱,在选人、用人、制定决策,编制规划、绩效考核、及时改进等方面才存在不少漏洞,工作环境缺乏活力,人力资源管理的介入迫在眉睫。     

规范医院科研经费管理与提升科研课题绩效研究

通过对广西壮族自治区人民医院历年规范管理与科研课题绩效的考察,结果表明,规范管理对科研绩效的提高有重要促进作用。应遵循科技发展规律,建立科学,高效的科研管理机制,完善科研管理制度体系,提高科研管理水平,保证科研总目标的顺利实现,使管理行为产生最大的经济效益和社会效益。     

管理案例研究的信效度分析:以AMJ年度最佳论文为例

通过对传统实证研究的信效度形式进行一些改造,就能够将信效度评估这一经典的方法应用到管理案例研究中,从而推动管理案例研究规范性的发展。案例研究的信效度包括可信任性、内部效度、外部效度。其中可信任性包括描述的准确性、完整性和客观性3个维度;内部效度包括解释效度、理论效度、归纳的广度、归纳的深度4个维度;外部效度包括理论饱和度、适用性与启发性3个维度。     

2001-2010年我国科技支撑经济发展方式转变的效果评价

从科技支撑要素结构重组、产业结构升级、需求结构优化的过程入手提出我国科技支撑经济发展方式转变的指标体系,并对2001—2010年我国科技支撑经济发展方式转变的效果进行评价。结果表明,2001—2010年间我国科技支撑经济发展方式转变的效果不断增强,且显著高于整体经济发展方式转变的步伐。科技在加快推动要素结构重组和需求结构优化的同时,在近5年来支撑产业结构升级中的作用有所弱化,这主要归因于我国高技术产业、知识和技术密集型服务业发展的滞后,而这些也对科技引领投资、创造消费需求等产生重要影响。     

管理学新视角:实验管理学

本文对管理实验的历史、发展和现状进行了深入的分析研究 ,归纳了管理研究中实验方法的体系与分类 ,详细分析了管理实验发展的四阶段与运用领域 ,深入地讨论了目前国内外关于管理实验的研究现状及限制其发展的若干因素 ,最后提出了一个基于方法论的实验管理学构想 ,指出随着管理实验的进一步发展和人们对于管理研究中实验手段的日益重视 ,实验管理学必将作为管理学的重要分支得到发展和完善。     

商业模式创新研究演化过程、 热点与主题探析 ——CSSCI（2000-2016） 文献计量分析

基于CNKI数据库,采用共词分析和社会网络分析法,通过CSSCI高级检索,共检索出709篇文献,根据年发文量阈值的设定,将商业模式创新的研究划分为3个阶段。研究发现,商业模式创新受到越来越多学者的关注,发文量逐年增长;研究内容上受互联网+等新形势的影响,在传统领域关注度保持稳定增长的趋势下,具有时代特征的问题也会成为研究热点。     

国外学科评价及其文献计量评价指标研究

学科评价相关理论和方法的系统研究在国内还基本空白,这与其在科学评价中的重要地位是不适应的.笔者以国外科学评价机构的学科评价实践为研究对象,归纳学科评价的内涵、分类、内容、方法,并重点介绍了国外用于学科评价的3部代表性文献计量指标集.此外,分析国内相关研究,给出了促进我国学科评价发展的建议.     

China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’

This paper aims to provide an integrated bibliometric analysis of the knowledge base of nanoscience and nanotechnology in the Chinese research community. For comparative purposes, the results are benchmarked against the findings from four other major nations: France, Germany, Japan, and the USA. It is found that China is productive in nanoscience as far as publication activity is concerned. The analyses of collaboration and institutional patterns enable us to identify the active collaborative networks and productive research institutions among the five countries. Finally, analysis of the citation share and certain surrogate indicators shows that the Chinese scientific community needs to work on improving its research impact.     

FTA知识产权保护强度评价体系设计研究与试用

自由贸易协定知识产权保护强度的定量实证分析是FTA知识产权规则的影响判定及对策研究的前提条件,但目前相关研究成果极少呈现。以TRIPS协议作为衡量基准,引入最能反映FTA知识产权结构要点及保护强度的一系列特有指标,设计了一种对自由贸易协定知识产权保护强度进行量化测评的方法和评价体系。选取近期中、日、韩各自签订的代表性自由贸易协定为样本,对评价指标体系进行试用,定量分析的结果与相关定性评价结论一致。