谈谈建构主义指导下计算机课的教学模式

建构主义学习理论认为,知识不是通过教师传授得到,而是学习者在一定的情境即社会文化背景下,借助其他人（包括教师和学习伙伴）的帮助,利用必要的学习资料,通过意义建构的方式而获得。学习环境中的情境必须有利于学生对所学内容的意义建构。在建构主义学习环境下,教学设计不仅要考虑教学目标分析,还要考虑有利于学生建构意义的情境的创设问题,并把情境创设看作是教学设计的最重要内容之一。这种学习理论强调以学生为中心,     

浅谈建构主义理论对中专电工电子课程教学的启示

建构主义学习理论认为,教师为主导,学生为主体,知识由学生意义建构,关注学生如何学习;在中专电工电子课程教学中得到了启示,并从创设建构知识的学习环境,让学生在问题中学习和激发学生求知欲望三个方面,进行了实践和探索,得到了较好的教学体会。     

基于建构主义学习理论的支架式教学模式探讨

建构性学习是一种自我调节的学习。建构主义学习理论强调在教学中应以学生为中心,教师是意义建构的帮助者,在课堂教学实践中利用情境、协作、对话、意义建构等要素充分发挥学生的主动性、积极性和创新精神,使学生能有效地实现对所学知识的意义建构。根据建构主义学习理论,对支架式教学方式方法进行了深入探讨。     

建构主义学习理论与化学课堂教学

建构性学习是一种自我调节的学习，建构主义学习理论强调在教学中应以学生为中心，教师是意义建构的帮助者，在课堂教学实践中利用情境、协作、对话、意义建构等要素充分发挥学生的主动性、积极性和创新精神，使学生能有效地实现对所学知识的意义建构。根据建构主义学习理论，对化学教学方式方法进行探讨。能使化学教学更好地适应时代和社会的要求。     

提高课堂教学有效性策略浅析——建构主义在自我成长课堂中的应用

建构主义主张教学应以学生为中心,学生是积极主动建构知识的认知主体.建构主义强调学习是学生对当前所学知识意义主动建构的过程,而教师是教学过程的组织者、指导者、意义建构的帮助者.本文阐述了建构主义学习理论及教学模式,并从学生学习实际情况出发,结合切身教学体验,提出提高大学生自我成长课堂教学有效性的教学策略.     

初中英语课堂教学师生互动的教学设计

根据建构主义和社会互动理论，我们将建构主义学习理论和与建构主义学习环境相适应的教学模式概括为：“以学生为中心，在整个教学过程中由教师起组织者、指导者、帮助者和促进者的作用，利用情境、协作、会话等学习环境要素充分发挥学生的主动性、积极性和首创精神，最终达到使学生有效地实现对当前所学知识的意义建构的目的。”在这种模式中，学生是知识意义的主动建构者；教师是教学过程的组织者、指导者、意义建构的帮助者、促进者；教材所提供的知识不仅是教师传授的内容，而是学生主动建构意义的对象；     

建构主义理论在聋校数学教学中的应用

建构主义理论认为,知识不是通过教师传授得到,而是学生通过意义建构的方式获得的,建构主义理论在聋校数学教学中同样适用.在聋校数学教学中,教师可以创设情境,让学生借助资源建构知识;教师可以充分利用学生的"数学经验",让学生同化或顺应新的数学知识;教师也可以设计一些活动,让学生在活动中学习,在活动中思考,在活动中探究,在活动中建构数学概念.     

初中英语课堂教学师生互动的教学设计

根据建构主义和社会互动理论,我们将建构主义学习理论和与建构主义学习环境相适应的教学模式概括为:“以学生为中心,在整个教学过程中由教师起组织者、指导者、帮助者和促进者的作用,利用情境、协作、会话等学习环境要素充分发挥学生的主动性、积极性和首创精神,最终达到使学生有效地实现对当前所学知识的意义建构的目的。”在这种模式中,学生是知识意义的主动建构者;教师是教学过程的组织者、指导者、意义建构的帮助者、促进者;教材所提供的知识不仅是教师传授的内容,而是学生主动建构意义的对象;媒体也不仅是帮助教师传授知识的手段、方法…     

浅谈物理概念的教学策略

<正>按照建构主义学习理论,情境、协作、会话、意义建构被认为是知识形成的四个决定性因素。因此,在物理教学中,教师应该深入了解和研究学生现有的认知水平和知识结构,同时为学生提供丰富的学习资源,在倡导合作式学习和研究式学习中完成知识意义的建构。对中学物理概念教学而言,所要建构的意义是指概念的内涵和概念间的联系。物理教师在教学过程中要创造多样化的物理环境,帮助学生对当前物理概念     

信息技术课堂教学模式初探

建构主义学习理论强调以学生为中心，不仅要求学生由外部刺激的被动接受者和知识的灌输对象转变为信息加工的主体、知识意义的主动建构者；而且要求教师要由知识的传授者、灌输者转变为学生主动建构意义的帮助者、促进者。这就意味着教师应当在教学过程中采用全新的教学模式。建构主义学习理论提倡教师指导下的、以学生为中心的学习；建构主义学习环境包含情境、协作、会话和意义建构等４大要素。这样，我们就可以将与建构主义学习理论以及建构主义学习环境相适应的教学模式概括为：以学生为中心，在整个教学过程中由教师起组织者、指导者、…     

构建“适境”课堂提高数学教学质量探究

所谓"适境"课堂,就是指在数学教学过程中,教师要创设一定的问题情境,激发学生学习兴趣,培养学生探究意识,调动学生学习的积极性和主动性,提高教学效率,提升学生数学核心素养。文章从创设猜测问题情境、生活问题情境、创设趣味问题情境、创设开放问题情境等方面,对构建"适境"课堂提高数学教学质量进行探究。     

农村代课教师归属感问题及对策

教师是决定教学质量的重要因素,是学校发展的中坚力量。农村代课教师归属感的缺乏,影响到农村学校的教学效果、教学进度和教师队伍稳定。国家政策保障缺失、学校管理不善和教师个人素养不高是农村代课教师归属感缺乏的主要原因。需要从完善国家政策保障、营造良好工作环境和提高教师个人素养三个方面寻求农村代课教师归属感的建构。     

专业学习共同体与教师合作文化

作为高校教师专业学习共同体三种主要形式的教研组、学科组及课题组,是集教学、科研及日常管理于一体的教师基层组织,是教师专业发展的现实载体,具有自愿性、同一性及发展性的特征,呈现出完善知识建构、实现知识共享、提升教师效能感、改善心智模式、建立共同愿景及生成学习动态环境等诸多价值功能.教师共同体合作文化是教师在教育教学活动中形成与发展起来的职业群体的思维方式、价值取向与行为方式的综合反映.建立完善开放的校本研究制度、建构人文化的发展性评价体系、实施师徒教师教育模式、营造开放的学校环境氛围及确立"共识"的核心价值,对于构建和培育教师专业学习共同体合作文化,促进教师专业发展具有十分重要的意义.     

Assessing the Quality of University Teaching in Croatia

Abstract

Although there has been a growing literature which explores the thinking of teachers at the school level, no such parallel literature exists for university teachers. In this paper, interviews with four academics who received awards for ‘excellent teaching’ are used to explore the way these university teachers view their teaching. The themes which emerged include: a clear sense of what they were on about at teachers and a willingness to manipulate the learning environment accordingly; an emphasis on student learning and the importance of students learning the subject matter; an enjoyment of teaching; and a lack of perceived constraints to change their teaching and experiment with new ideas.     

新课程背景下英语教学理念的转变

实现“以教师为中心”向“以学生为中心”教学角色的转变，以及实现“以结果为中心”向“以过程为中心”的评价方式的转变，是新课程环境下建构全新的英语教学理念，实现英语语言教学改革之必由之路。     

Differences in pedagogical understanding among student–teachers in a four-year initial teacher education programme

As teacher educators, preparing student–teachers who are able to address diverse student needs is our main concern. It has been suggested in the literature that teachers who are adaptive to students’ needs are those who possess adequate pedagogical content knowledge or pedagogical understanding. However, it is not uncommon for teacher educators to find student–teachers with diverse pedagogical understandings even at the point of graduation from the teacher education programme. This paper aims to explain and analyse the development of pedagogical understanding among student–teachers in an initial teacher education programme. The findings are drawn from a study conducted at the Hong Kong Institute of Education where in-depth interviews were carried out during the four-year programme. The findings from the three selected cases provide an explanation for why some individual student–teachers show continuous development, whereas others remain confused in their pedagogical understanding throughout the teacher education programme. While acknowledging individual differences in pedagogical understanding, we attempt to explain such differences by investigating the relationship between different dimensions of the student–teachers’ learning such as the integration of pedagogical understanding with the teaching contexts, integration of feedback from lecturers and supporting teachers, and their focus of concern. The findings reveal that the three cases demonstrate different levels of pedagogical understanding and possess varying ‘senses of agency’. Of the three cases, the first one, Peggy has the strongest sense of agency. Despite influences related to classroom management, diverse learning ability among pupils, and the teaching methods which pupils were accustomed to previously, she actively introduced rhythmic movements into her lessons, developed pupils’ ability to learn gradually and achieved an impact on pupils’ learning which was also recognized by her supporting teacher. The analysis suggests that the second case, Lilian has a weaker sense of agency as she was severely limited by influences in the teaching context in her first teaching practice and resorted to teacher-centered teaching strategies. She improved later on in the programme and started to plan her own learning, drawing on the feedback she received as well as learning from other taught modules, from feedback from various sources, and from her pupils’ responses to her teaching and her own evaluation of her teaching. The third case, Stephanie remained confused throughout the programme and struggled with the implementation of student-centered teaching strategies. The ability to practice one’s own convictions and demonstrate an active sense of agency distinguishes the student–teacher who achieves better pedagogical understanding. Drawing on the findings, the paper concludes that it is crucial for teacher educators to identify ways to nurture a sense of agency among student–teachers. Implications for teacher education programmes are discussed, including providing opportunities for student–teachers to be able to articulate and integrate their pedagogical understandings, as well as negotiate how to accomplish their learning and teaching targets despite complex classroom situations.     

小学教师教学效能感与其归因反应模式的关系

以155名小学教师为被试，探讨了不同教学效能感水平的教师对于不同特点学生学业失败后的反应模式。结果表明，在学生考试失败后，高教学效能的教师对于高努力的学生以及学习困难学生的生气程度较低，给予学生更多的奖励，预期学习困难学生在将来更容易失败；低教学效能教师对于高能力学生和学习困难学生的生气程度较低，给予学生更多的惩罚，预期低能力学生耷将来更容易失败。中教学效能教师的反应模式更接近于低教学效能教师。     

An overview of learning analytics

Learning analytics, the analysis and representation of data about learners in order to improve learning, is a new lens through which teachers can understand education. It is rooted in the dramatic increase in the quantity of data about learners and linked to management approaches that focus on quantitative metrics, which are sometimes antithetical to an educational sense of teaching. However, learning analytics offers new routes for teachers to understand their students and, hence, to make effective use of their limited resources. This paper explores these issues and describes a series of examples of learning analytics to illustrate the potential. It argues that teachers can and should engage with learning analytics as a way of influencing the metrics agenda towards richer conceptions of learning and to improve their teaching.     

建构主义学习观和教学论及其对大学英语教学的启示

本文简要介绍了建构主义理论框架下的学习观和教学论,它认为学习是积极主动的建构过程,教学的目标与任务是发展学生的主体性.因此,建构主义强调教学的理解性,重视活动与主体交往,重视教学情境的构建,构建新的师生观.本文在此理论基础之上,并结合实际,论述了建构主义理论对我国目前高校英语教学的实践指导意义