我国职业足球运动员薪酬问题的研究

从经济学和管理学的角度对球员的薪酬问题进行了分析,指出由足协直接干预球员薪酬问题做法的不合理性.目前造成我国球员超高薪酬的主要原因是,后备力量的严重不足和俱乐部国有企业背景的存在.建议迅速组成中超职业联盟来管理球员薪酬这一问题.在球员薪酬管理上,可借鉴NBA工资帽的做法.     

职业足球运动员薪酬问题探析

从经济学和管理学的角度对时下热点的球员薪酬问题进行分析，指出由足协直接调节球员薪酬的做法的不合理性；造成目前我国球员超高薪酬的主要原因是后备力量的严重不足和俱乐部国有企业背景的存在。建议迅速组成中超职业联盟来管理球员薪酬。在球员薪酬管理上，可借鉴NBA工资帽的做法。     

NBA与NFL联盟工资帽应用比较研究

通过文献资料法、逻辑分析等方法对美国两大职业联盟（NBA与NFL）工资帽制度的应用进行比较研究。结果表明;NBA采用“硬”工资帽与“软”工资帽两种制度。而NFL只采用“硬”工资帽制度。NFL联盟球队通过签约福利与“延缓”球员工资来摆脱工资帽的约束。NFL联盟工资帽所占（PGR）比例保持在65％左右,高于NBA工资帽额度所占（BRI）比例（50％左右）。伴随联盟总收入的增涨,工资帽额度也随着上升。在工资帽的监控手段上,NBA主要采取托管工资、奢侈税等措施,而NFL主要采用直接罚款和取消选秀对违背工资帽的球队进行处罚。     

NBA球员交换的研究

结果与分析1.NBA球员交换的原则合同期内的球员交换不涉及球员工资的更改或合同期限的变更等事宜,只涉及交换球队的工资是否遵守工资帽或工资帽特例的约束和交换球员间的工资是否满足球员交换条款的制约。如果某球队的球队工资低于工资帽,那么,该球队可以按照自己的意愿自由地进行球员交换,只要该球队完成球员交换后其球队工资不高于工资帽的＄10万以上。2.NBA球员交换的条款及运用方式(1)球员交换条款;(2)球员交易条款;(3)最少工资条款;(4)选秀权;(5)基年补偿;(6)交换津贴。3.球队间现金补偿的限制当球队间进行球员交换时,某球队可以为…     

杰克·拉姆齐咨询网(十)

问：现在的自由人市场很是热闹,球队和自由人都在寻找着自己的“意中人”,但我对于球员交换和签约中的一些“奢侈税”“工资帽”以及“工资空额”之类的术语不太明白,请解释一下。答：ＮＢＡ有关工资和签约的理论非常复杂,在此只能简要解释。“工资帽”是一支球队给本队球员工资总额的最高上限,这个最高上限是上下浮动的,它的高低取决于ＮＢＡ２９支球队这一年的平均收入,１９９９年为３４００万美元,今年估计约为３５５０万美元。如果一支球队所发给球员的工资总额超过了当年度的“工资帽”,那么他要上交与超出工资同等数目的税额…     

每月足坛盘点忙与盲

到了年关,忙活了一年的足协、俱乐部和球员仍旧难得清闲。足协留了一大堆“官司”等着解决;俱乐部忙着选教练和球员,遇上本队的核心球员提出转会,还得忙着做说服工作;而球员则忙起了转会,与新俱乐部联系或是和原俱乐部讨价还价,目的无非是想实现自身价值。但是笔者发现,这些大忙人普遍带有盲目性。     

数字

8一名荷兰业余球员因为亲吻了当值主裁判,遭到了停赛处罚。 在荷兰东部小城亨格卢的一场比赛中,这名业余球员因为累计两张黄牌被主裁判逐出场外,他乘主裁判不备,亲吻了他的嘴唇。为此,荷兰足协纪律委员会以其行为不当为由进行了处罚,对其停赛8场。68.6 乌拉圭国家队前教练普阿日前提出警告说,如果乌拉圭足协在近日内不支付欠他的68.6万美元的债款。他将起诉足协。 根据普阿与足协签订的台同,乌拉圭队挺进韩日世界杯赛决赛圈,足协将向他颁发60万美元的奖金。但是足协至今未兑现诺言,并且连最后两个月总计8.6万美元的工资都没有发给他。     

BE FRIEND

小包服务台新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市的李旭琛同学问:1.工资帽和奢侈税是怎么回事?2.NBA现役球员中,有谁的得分突破了20000分?答:1.工资帽(Salary cap):工资帽的概念在1984年被引入,这个制度意味着每支NBA球队一个赛季球队所有球员的薪资总和的最大值不得超过一个额度。不过NBA执行的是弹性工资帽制度,有各种例外条款来让球队薪资总额超过工资帽限额。工资帽是根据NBA前一年总     

谁来监督足协?

新出台的转会细则显示了足协的一个决心:把大权抓在自己手中,决不旁落。队员能够去哪一支队伍踢球构成了转会的核心,而中国足协规定该结合由自己完成,即控制了整个转会,并名曰:为防止幕后交易。权力没有监督就会被滥用,因此,要有权力的制约和平衡。阅读转会细则,我没发现什么地方可以监督足协。足协将如此之大的权力抓在手中,谁敢保证不被滥用?谁又能保证,中国足协的官员在糖衣炮弹面前能够拒腐蚀永不沾,一尘不染?该细则出台后,俱乐部球员之间幕后交易倒是可以避免了,但又该怎样避免俱乐部与足协之间、球员与足协之间的幕后交易? 法律都是建立在对人的不信任的基础上的,因为人性本恶,所以才要用法律加以规范,既然要立法,既然要体现法治而不是人治,那么就应该对所     

NBA球员工资的限制制度

研究表明NBA联盟已经步入人力资本稀缺阶段,球队老板和球员共同承担球队的运营风险,同时分享球队的利润。为了保障劳资双方对联赛收入的分享,NBA联盟制定了一系列工资限制制度。这些限制制度包括直接限制和间接限制制度,直接限制制度主要包括如契约限制、额度限制等;间接限制制度主要包括工资帽限制、工资帽特例限制等。     

中国职业足球运动员纠纷解决机制的现存问题与优化路径

职业足球运动员与俱乐部、足球协会等主体之间法律关系的特殊性,决定了此类体育纠纷解决机制的多样性。分析英国、德国足球运动员纠纷案例及其纠纷解决机制的特点,结合中国职业足球运动员在合同型和技术型纠纷等领域的实践,从纠纷性质、法律适用以及执行等方面进行探讨。认为：目前中国职业足球运动员纠纷解决机制缺乏独立体育仲裁机构与相应的监督和审查,内部仲裁、外部仲裁、调解与诉讼之间衔接不畅。基于中国职业足球现状和《体育法（修改草案）》,提出根据不同类型纠纷建立相应解决机制,并建立独立体育仲裁机构,完善程序衔接整合：(1)运动员与俱乐部的劳资纠纷,双方适用普通仲裁程序;(2)技术型和管理型纠纷由足球协会内部仲裁庭裁决;(3)运动员的纪律处罚以及不服内部仲裁的纠纷,在穷尽足球协会的内部救济后适用上诉仲裁程序;(4)运动员与赞助商的合同纠纷,在确定违约或侵权的合同责任后,可直接向法院提起诉讼或向独立体育仲裁机构提起普通仲裁。     

职业体育联赛中竞争性平衡战略应用的国际经验及启示

对国外优秀职业体育联赛中竞争性平衡战略的运用进行研究,探讨了国外优秀职业体育联赛中竞争性平衡战略应用的成功经验。研究表明,职业体育联赛中俱乐部球员的流动和资金的流动是影响体育职业联盟竞争性平衡的关键因素。收入分享制度、选秀制度、转会制度及"工资帽"制度等构成国外职业体育联赛竞争性平衡战略的主要内容。考虑到中国的基本国情及中国职业体育联赛发展的现实,从竞争性平衡战略的2个核心要素为基础,提出缩小俱乐部收支差距、有效推进选秀活动、合理限制过高收入、全面推动球员转会等发展路径。     

职业足球联赛中假球问题的博弈模型分析

运用经济博弈论原理与方法,针对我国职业足球联赛中假球日益严重的问题,从足球俱乐部与足协的角度,建立博弈模型,通过分析,提出了打击假球的具体措施,即加大惩治力度,使假球行为不敢发生;提高调查概率,使假球行为不能发生;降低调查取证的费用,增大足协打假的决心;利用新闻媒体的监督作用,加强对假球行为的追踪报道。     

College basketball governance in the Philippines: actors,stakeholders, issues,and challenges

Collegiate basketball is one of the most popular and most watched forms of amateur sport in the Philippines. Like any sport, collegiate basketball is governed by actors and stakeholders and characterized by issues and challenges. Employing a policy-capacity and synthesis integrative review approach, this article identifies the actors, stakeholders, and institutions of the Philippines two leading college basketball leagues, namely, the Universities Athletic Association of the Philippines and the National Collegiate Athletic Association and analyses the critical issues that confront these leagues in the context of college basketball governance. Issues include an overly powerful board of directors in relation to league commissioners, a lack of accountability mechanisms, alleged piracy of coaches and players, recruitment of players and coaches, the two-year residency rule, and parity in media coverage. Accordingly, the article assesses necessary on-going policy capacities and reforms which college basketball leagues undertake to achieve sound governance.     

Grassroots Football Development in Japan

Abstract

The history and issues surrounding elite football in Japan have been addressed by a number of scholars. However, grassroots football, although fundamental to the development of the code, has rarely been explored in the academic literature. In Japan, the importance of grassroots football has received heightened attention by the Japanese Football Association (JFA) since 2003, with 20% growth in the number of registered players under 12 years old from 2003 (262,956 players) to 2014 (315,178 players) a result of the JFA’s initiatives in this area. Japan is currently one of the most successful countries in Asia in terms of grassroots football development and the JFA won the Asian Football Confederation’s award, namely ‘The Best Member Association of the Year 2013 for Grassroots Football’. This paper explores the key driver behind the development of grassroots football development, namely the 47 Prefectural Football Associations, which provide programmes and technical, physical and promotional services which include activities to increase opportunities, facilities, coach education, elite pathways, and competitions for grassroots football. The paper concludes that the factors which have resulted in the success of Japan’s grassroots football revolve around governance of Prefectural Football Associations, coach education programmes, increased opportunities by clubs, leagues and schools, and collaboration with stakeholders within and outside of Prefectural Football Associations.     

美国NBA选秀制度之“四年规则”研究

"四年规则"废除与Haywood v.NBA案有千丝万缕的联系。本文通过Haywood v.NBA案件的评述,分析了"四年规则"废除对美国职业体育的影响。"四年规则"的废除动摇了NCAA人才输入的垄断地位,促进了人才市场的自由流通,赋予了更多人参加选秀的公平竞赛权,保护了非大学生球员的权利。     

中国足球俱乐部"限薪"决策的博弈分析

本应在市场经济环境下发展的中国职业足球产业,却在地方政府非市场手段干预下,形成了足球俱乐部各种行为的扭曲,其中之一便是“限薪”难以贯彻实施;球员的高薪成为一种失真的信号,进而造成激励机制的缺失和分配性努力的加剧。     

The Development of Gaelic football and Soccer Zones in County Donegal, 1884–1934

This article examines the geography of Gaelic and Association football zones in Donegal between 1884 and 1934. It will illustrate where these sports were initially played and will show how, by the early twentieth century, soccer was the number one team game in the county. With the decline of competitive soccer in Donegal after 1915, a vacuum existed for the organisation of competitive structures for Gaelic football and the Donegal Gaelic Athletic Association county board was refounded in 1919, having run initially from 1905–1907. County championships were soon organised and these provided a competitive form of football on a regular basis as players could adapt to each code fairly easily. However, many local sports organisers in the north-east of the county were eager to continue with soccer and it was through the organisation of local leagues and cup competitions that they managed to do this. A deep tradition of soccer and strong connections with Derry city and Scotland also meant that association football received priority there. In contrast, by 1934, Gaelic football had become firmly entrenched in the south and south-west. The importance of local organisers within the county and the failure of both the Irish Football Association and the Football Association of the Irish Free State to develop soccer in this peripheral area will also be outlined.