共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Heather E. Canary Kris May Marc D. Rinehart Jahn B. Barlow 《Journal of Applied Communication Research》2018,46(2):202-222
Organizational communication scholars are increasingly called upon to use theoretical knowledge to address problematic processes in public institutions. This article reports a process improvement project focused on a university conflict of interest (COI) policy as an example of how scholars can engage theory to improve ongoing policy processes. The project team included communication scholars and research administration staff who designed, implemented, and evaluated the mixed-methods project guided by structurating activity theory. Baseline survey results were used to design the process improvement project. Results of the follow-up survey indicate that researchers who participated in some aspect of the process improvement project (i.e. attending a policy café, using the redesigned website, or reading the new Quick Reference Guide) reported higher levels of policy communication and knowledge and more positive attitudes toward the COI policy than researchers who had not engaged with process improvement efforts. We offer theoretical and practical implications of results for organizational communication scholars and practitioners. 相似文献
2.
团队 技术 创新 ——清华大学图书馆参考咨询工作进展与思考 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
介绍近年来清华大学图书馆在参考咨询工作方面的实践与进展,包括参考咨询平台的应用与团队服务、值班日志制度、电子资源责任馆员制度、实时咨询服务转变、馆长咨询等,并结合本领域一些热点问题,例如Library2.0技术的应用、实时咨询服务发展的前景等,总结该馆的经验与思路,强调应结合本馆实际,积极而理性利用新技术创新参考咨询服务,最后提出需要进一步研究的问题,希望对同行有一定参考意义。 相似文献
3.
4.
Rebecca Purtell Megan E. Cullinan Heather E. Canary 《Journal of Applied Communication Research》2013,41(4):381-400
Competent communication practices among healthcare providers are a key factor in maintaining patient safety during transfers of patient care. Research shows that the majority of errors in patient care are related to communication problems, and a majority occur during patient hand-offs. This project is a qualitative study exploring the facilitators and barriers of structured hand-off at a pediatric hospital. Our data analysis indicates that while the hand-off process is facilitated by structure, clarity, and adequate time, it is hindered by lack of time, distractions, human factors, and a number of social and organizational factors that complicate physicians’ roles. Using structurating activity theory (SAT) to frame findings, analysis points to a structural tension between worker autonomy and organizational control as the primary cause of poor adherence to structured hand-off among pediatric residents. We draw on constructs of SAT to identify practical strategies for managing this contradiction at a system level. 相似文献
5.
图书馆如何制定知识共享战略 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
在简要明确图书馆知识共享战略含义的基础上,指出图书馆知识共享需要战略的原因,分析图书馆知识共享战略提出的现实背景。图书馆知识共享战略的核心在于确定图书馆知识共享的方向、目标和计划;制定图书馆知识共享战略需要遵循两个基本法则:独特法则和简单化法则;确定图书馆知识共享方向,一要清晰;二要正确。最后提出图书馆知识共享目标确定的注意事项以及图书馆知识共享计划制定的步骤。 相似文献
6.
国内外组织内部知识共享影响因素研究综述 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
知识共享是知识管理理论中的重要组成部分。近年来,关于知识共享影响因素的研究已成为学术界热点。按照普遍观点,知识共享的影响因素主要分为知识共享主体(知识)、知识共享客体(知识源和接受者)与知识共享情境3个方面。目前,在对组织内部知识共享影响因素的研究上,国内外学者在理论研究与实证研究方面都取得了丰富成果,推动着知识共享理论向纵深发展。 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
运用社会资本理论从结构、关系、认知三个维度分析网络社区中影响成员知识共享的主要因素。从信息技术的推进、学习动机的生成、激励机制的完善和协作文化的培养四个方面阐述促进网络社区群体成员知识共享的策略。 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
隐性知识挖掘利用是知识管理的重要环节。阐述了隐性知识的含义以及图书馆员隐性知识的表现形式。提出了图书馆员隐性知识挖掘利用的主要措施。 相似文献
16.
图书馆联盟知识转移制度安排研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
首先分析图书馆联盟知识转移相关理论,包括图书馆联盟、历史发展、图书馆联盟知识转移障碍及其解决方法等,重点探讨图书馆联盟知识转移制度安排建设,分别从制度保障、管理机构、人力资本、沟通机制、监督和评估机制等几个方面来探讨。 相似文献
17.
知识共享的可能性:一个博弈分析 总被引:13,自引:2,他引:13
将组织的知识共享实践理解为员工之间在提供和保留知识的选择中相互博弈最终达到均衡的过程。首先分析知识共享的博弈特征,然后运用不完全信息动态博弈理论对知识共享的可能性进行阐述,并得出组织的知识共享行为是可能发生并有效维持下去的结论。 相似文献
18.
介绍了知识博客的概念和特性,分析了知识博客在数字图书馆中应用的必要性和数字图书馆应用知识博客的优势,阐述了国内外图书馆界知识博客的应用现状和管理中面临的问题并提出解决办法。 相似文献
19.
Ramlee Abdul Rahman 《International Information and Library Review》2011,(4):207-214
The main objective of this study was to investigate the perception of the researchers and officers within the National Institutes of Health Malaysia (NIH) about their understanding of knowledge sharing practices in their respective environment. Questions included: what are the perceptions of the respondents with regard to the knowledge sharing practices in their respective institutions? What are the benefits for knowledge sharing practices as perceived by them? What are their perceived organisational knowledge sharing practices motivating factors? Also, what are the hindering factors? The survey of the researchers and officers of the NIH was distributed to 400 respondents from the six research institutes under NIH: Institute for Medical Research (IMR), Institute for Public Health (IPH), Network for Clinical Research Centres (CRC), Institute for Health Management (IHM), Institute for Health Systems Research (IHSR) and Institute for Health Promotion (IHP). The responses indicated that knowledge sharing depends on the context of encouraging and rewarding the practices of organisational knowledge sharing. The findings suggest four factors – Environment and Infrastructure, Management Support, Culture and Technology – as significant determinants in influencing the organisational knowledge sharing practices among the employees. The study was limited to the perceptual aspect of the issue, specifically from the individuals’ opinions and sentiments. 相似文献
20.
Ramlee Abdul Rahman 《International Information and Library Review》2013,45(4):207-214
The main objective of this study was to investigate the perception of the researchers and officers within the National Institutes of Health Malaysia (NIH) about their understanding of knowledge sharing practices in their respective environment. Questions included: what are the perceptions of the respondents with regard to the knowledge sharing practices in their respective institutions? What are the benefits for knowledge sharing practices as perceived by them? What are their perceived organisational knowledge sharing practices motivating factors? Also, what are the hindering factors? The survey of the researchers and officers of the NIH was distributed to 400 respondents from the six research institutes under NIH: Institute for Medical Research (IMR), Institute for Public Health (IPH), Network for Clinical Research Centres (CRC), Institute for Health Management (IHM), Institute for Health Systems Research (IHSR) and Institute for Health Promotion (IHP). The responses indicated that knowledge sharing depends on the context of encouraging and rewarding the practices of organisational knowledge sharing. The findings suggest four factors – Environment and Infrastructure, Management Support, Culture and Technology – as significant determinants in influencing the organisational knowledge sharing practices among the employees. The study was limited to the perceptual aspect of the issue, specifically from the individuals’ opinions and sentiments. 相似文献