素质教育与教育评价

反思应试教育的弊端,不难发现形成应试教育模式的一个重要原因,是基于一种落后的人才观和教育质量观所建立的教育评价体系及主平价标准和评价方式,这也正是实施素质教育所面临的最大障碍。树立科学的现代人才观和教育质量观,建立起符合教育发展规律、有利于学生素质形成和完善的教育评价体系和评价标准,是实施素质教育的根本保证。     

中小学教育信息化基础设施和公用管理平台评价模型研究——以佛山市为例

基础设施和公用管理平台是中小学教育信息化的基础,但对其评价缺乏相应的标准和规范。本文提出一种基于主成分分析的方法,首先建立评价指标体系,再随机选取佛山市52所中小学进行采样,最后利用主成分分析方法进行综合评价。     

理解与对话：从解释学视角解读教师评价

理解与对话是哲学解释学的中心话语，其理解现、视域融合、主体同性等思想为我们解读教师评价提供了新视角。以理解和对话为基础的教师评价，其价值由一元走向多元，评价双方由主-客对立走向主体间性，评价方法由实证走向人文，评价标准由预定走向生成，评价过程由静态走向动态，达到评价双方视域融合。     

美国NAEP地理评价述评

地理学科一直是美国教育进展评估的主要学科之一,属于主评价中的全美NAEP评价。美国NAEP地理评价围绕一个设计严密的评价框架进行,具有组织实施严密、联系教学实际、题型设计多样、评价内容规范、认知维度标准、成绩报告清晰等特征。美国通过重视对国民的地理素养评价来重视地理教育,值得我国反思和借鉴。     

高校本科毕业生质量评价方法研究

高校本科毕业生质量如何评价，用什么标准评价，采用什么方式方法评价，是高等教育管理者和高等教育工作者十分关注的问题，也是社会普遍关注的问题，教育部为此下发了《建立完善的高校毕业生评估体系》文件。本科毕业生是高等学校培养的主“产品”，“产品”的质量直接关系到高校的生存和发展。从这一点来讲，它同企业一样，产品质量是企业的命脉，企业的产品质量评价有完善成熟的评价标准和方法，     

让有效评价催开每一朵音乐花

正《音乐课程标准》指出:"音乐课程评价应充分体现全面推进素质教育的精神,贯彻《标准》所阐述的课程理念,着眼于评价的诊断、激励与改善的功能。通过科学的课程评价,有利于学生了解自己的进步,增强学习的信心和动力,促进课程教学质量的不断提高。""对学生的评价是课程评价的主要方面,应以《标准》中各教学领域的课程内容为基本依据,全面考查课程内容所涉及的情感态度与价值观、过程与方法、知识与技能方面的要求。"由此可见,音乐教师要关注课堂评价,追求有价值的评价方式,提高课堂教学评价的有效性,努力让评价成为课堂教学的催化剂,调动学生积极性、主     

国外教师评价素养标准及评价工具研究述评

教师评价素养是教师专业素养的重要组成部分,是提升教师素质的基本要求。通过对国外相关专题文献梳理,分析国际上有较大影响的教师评价素养标准和评价工具的主要特点及其发展脉络,其中：评价标准包括美国1990年标准、美国InTASC标准和欧洲AEA标准;评价工具包括TALQ和ALI等客观知识测试工具、API和CoA等自我诊断工具及ACAI等评价工具。借鉴国际经验,我国应在深化新时代教育评价改革的总体框架下,深入挖掘教师评价素养内涵,加强教师评价素养标准建设,注重开发原创性评价工具,尽快转变教师评价素养研究薄弱状况。     

大学生思想政治教育实效性评价及其标准探析

大学生思想政治教育实效性评价的标准主要包括政治标准、知识标准、能力标准、心理健康标准、品德标准和行为标准等六大评价标准,每一种标准既是科学的、理性的,又是发展的、动态的,体现了实质性评价和动态性评价的统一。这六大标准彼此紧密相连、不可分割,共同构成大学生思想政治教育实效性评价的标准体系。这一评价标准体系的确立,为大学生思想政治教育实效性评价提供了依据,使得大学生思想政治教育实效性评价成为可能。     

课程评价改革趋势探微

以目标为取向的传统课程评价越来越无法适应评价对象的个性解放和社会需要,而要促进个性解放和适应社会需要,我国现行课程评价必须进行相应的合理性变革:从刚性标准走向弹性标准,即采用多元化和模糊性的评价标准;从工具性手段走向人文化手段,即用质性评价代替量化评价,体现课程评价的人文关怀;从等级化关系走向民主化关系,即评价对象参与评价以及评价者和评价活动的对象化。     

新课程标准下的小学美术学生评价

新课程标准实施后,本人围绕＂学生评价方式改革＂这一主题展开了多种实践,创造了许多新的课程评价方式,开拓了美术课程资源。但美术课始终没有像语文数学那样引起过学生和家长的重视,认为美术不是主科学好学不好学不学都行,甚至有的小学校在考试时把美术课改成自习课。新课程改革的关键点是观念的改革,因此,如何从更深层次改进学生评价方式,通过评价促进学生发展,促进课堂教学才是小学美术学生评价的重要意义。     

建立学业评价标准 促进课程教学改革

为解决课程标准和学生评价存在的问题、促进课程教学改革,建议建立学业评价标准。学业评价标准对教师进行教学与评价、提高日常学生评价的信度和效度、促进高利害考试的改革、国家教育质量监测、教材编写都具有积极意义。在综合分析借鉴表现标准和国际大型学业评价项目研究成果的基础上,提出研制我国学业评价标准的构想,并简要介绍了学业评价标准研制的初步成果。     

澳大利亚全国读写计算能力考评计划述评

全国读写计算能力考评计划是澳大利亚学业成就评价改革的重要举措。其旨在促进澳大利亚课程标准的统一,提高学生学业成绩跨州跨地区的可比性,提升澳大利亚教育体质的透明度。其启示在于:作为全国性的学业成就考试必须公正、透明;学业成就评价的信息来源应该是多渠道的,不应将考评结果作为惟一的参考依据;全国性的学业成就评价的考评报告内容应翔实,应充分反映学生具体的学业水平;学业成就考评报告应立足多元化。     

美国堪萨斯州小学成绩报告单及其启示

美国堪萨斯州小学成绩报告单包括教师评估和标准化测验两个组成部分。在分析成绩报告单的基础上总结出堪萨斯州学业成就评估的特点即以课程标准作为评估内容、将学习目标的达成程度作为等级评分的依据、评估结果具有可比性以及对特殊儿童实施评估调整。最后为我国学业评估尤其是减负背景下的学业评估提供了一些参考性的建议。     

论学业评价伦理的内涵、生成原则及路径

学业评价伦理是学业评价的重要组成部分,对学业评价标准的制定,评价活动的实施以及学生的发展都具有积极的促进作用。鉴于当前学业评价中对伦理重视不够的情况,论文在界定了学业评价伦理内涵的基础上,探讨了学业评价伦理的生成原则及路径。     

Engaging the wider academic community in a postgraduate certificate in academic practice: the issue of standards

This paper critically reflects on the challenges associated with academic standards in a postgraduate certificate in academic practice, which involved the wider academic community of the institution. It is underpinned by a socio-cultural constructivist view that suggests standards do not exist independently of assessors, but are co-constructed by participation in communities of practice through the process of making assessment judgements. Following an outline of the programme design, the discussion focuses on the uncertainties around standards arising from the fragility and fragmentation of a nascent community of practice comprised of a multiplicity of personal standards frameworks and disciplinary perspectives.     

Academic standards and regulatory frameworks: necessary compromises?

Assessment regulations in higher education, which are important for assuring threshold academic standards, reflect institutional cultures and histories, and are shaped by pragmatic concerns about quality indicators such as retention and progression rates, as well as principles of equity. This paper articulates some of the tensions that confront higher education institutions in the development and revision of regulatory frameworks, and describes a survey of assessment regulations from a sample of UK higher education institutions for the first year of undergraduate study. The survey identifies key variations in regulatory policy and practice that challenge assumptions about comparability of academic standards between higher education institutions. These findings imply that student success and progression may not be a simple reflection of academic attainment, and raise questions about notions of equity. It is intended that this research will contribute to informed discussion in the sector about academic standards and the regulatory frameworks underpinning first-year assessment policy and practice, and thus potentially lead to more transparent and consistent practice.     

Using the Joint Standards to Design Postsecondary Assessments With Evidence of Validity and Reliability: An Approach to CAEP Accreditation

Validity and reliability are a major focus in teacher education accreditation by the Council for Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). CAEP requires the use of “accepted research standards,” but many faculty and administrators are unsure how to meet this requirement. The Standards of Educational and Psychological Testing abbreviated Joint Standards, are the implied accepted research standards. The purpose of this study was to test empirically the extent to which the Joint Standards could serve this purpose. The primary outcome of this study is a pragmatic set of implementation strategies organized into assessment specifications connecting CAEP requirements to the Joint Standards. An example set of assessment specifications is provided. Use of this process can improve assessments in any academic discipline for any accreditation agency, become a faculty professional development tool, raise assessment literacy, and potentially impact instruction of future educators.     

A model for conducting and assessing interdisciplinary undergraduate dissertations

This paper presents an effort to create a unified model for conducting and assessing undergraduate dissertations, shared by all disciplines involved in computer game development at a Swedish university. Computer game development includes technology-oriented disciplines as well as disciplines with aesthetical traditions. The challenge has been to create a unified process and assessment procedure while maintaining the individual disciplines’ academic standards. The unification has been achieved through the development of the Interdisciplinary Dissertation Model – a shared model where the assessment is focused on fundamental academic principles, and there is a clear separation between summative and formative assessment and well-defined interaction loops between examiners, supervisors and students. Examiners from all involved disciplines have regular meetings focusing on creating an interdisciplinary view on the summative assessment of undergraduate dissertations. The model developed has been successful in that it allows for a unified process for disciplines from fundamentally different academic traditions. The quality of the examined dissertations has been evaluated in a national evaluation. The result shows that all participating disciplines meet the requirements from their respective communities. This shows that the proposed model successfully unifies disciplines without sacrificing the quality in any discipline.     

浅议专业技术人员职务评聘工作改革

目前,我国的专业技术人员的职务评聘办法,存在着诸多弊端,严重阻碍了专业技术人员队伍的建设。专业技术人员职务评聘办法需要改革,取消评聘指标,制定新的专业技术人员职务晋升标准,已迫在眉睫。     

Academic misconduct in teaching portfolios

Within academia, clear and standardised communication is vital. From this point of departure, we discuss the trustworthiness of teaching portfolios when used in assessment. Here, misconduct and fraud are discussed in terms of fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, following the literature on research fraud. We argue that the portfolio’s unclear academic status and confusing standards makes it difficult to define misconduct. We see a risk that the practice of portfolio writing for assessment can lead to misconduct, including downright lies about accomplishments. We conclude that the trustworthiness of teaching portfolios is a responsibility for the academic community as a whole.