英国高等教育评估中的学生参与机制研究

英国高等教育部门在总结国内外经验的基础上,建立了学生参与高等教育评估的机制。学生不仅参与质量管理与决策、参加院校内部定期评估,还在外部评估中提交学生报告、出席学生会议,甚至还参加院校的审核或审查。英国高等教育部门在高等教育评估中树立了以学生为中心的评估理念,构建了全面和全过程的学生参与机制,确立了广泛的合作伙伴关系,建立了积极的国际合作机制。     

有效教学中的学生参与及评估

新一轮的基础教育课程改革要求对课堂教学进行改革,提出了有效教学的理念。有效教学的基本目标是改变学生的学习方式,促进学生主动参与,进行有效的学习。有效教学的核心是学生参与。学生参与可分为认知参与、行为参与和情感参与。学生参与水平的高低,直接影响着教学的有效性。评估学生参与教学水平的高低可以借助于自我报告、考核量表、直接观察、案例研究等方法。为提高教学的有效性,应加强对学生参与水平的研究。     

爱尔兰高等教育评估中的学生参与机制

爱尔兰高等教育部门在博洛尼亚进程的推动下,积极建立学生参与高等教育评估机制。学生不仅可以加入质量评估部门、外部评估组和参与院校内部自评过程,甚至还能以评估组成员的身份参加评估考察,撰写评估报告,参与评估后续行动程序。尽管爱尔兰高等教育部门已经确立了全面全过程的学生参与模式,构建了多元利益相关者的网络组织,建立了积极有效的国际合作机制,但是学生参与机制中还存在一些问题亟待解决,譬如法律制度的完善、活动经费的保障以及重新定位问题等。     

英国高等教育质量评估学生参与机制理论及参与途径分析

高等教育质量一直是英国高等教育发展历程中最卓越的资本。英国高等教育一直秉承"以学生为中心的办学理念",确保学生在高等教育教学评价中的主体地位。本文在理论层面探讨了学生参与教育质量评估的必要性,对学生参与教育质量评估的途径进行了分析。     

西班牙高等教育评估中的学生参与机制研究

西班牙在博洛尼亚进程的推动下,积极建立学生参与高等教育评估机制。学生不仅可以参与质量评估管理与决策,参与外部评估委员会,参与院校自评报告研读及外部考察准备,甚至还参与院校实地考察以及外部评估报告的撰写。总之,为了满足学生的利益诉求,西班牙确立学生全面参与评估的制度框架,构建多元化利益相关者的参与平台,建立积极有效的国际合作机制。     

学生参与:高校教学质量内外部评估的结合点——基于欧美学生参与机制的探讨

我国新发布的普通高校本科教学评估工作方案强调了学生参与评估的重要性。欧洲和美国学生以不同的方式参与评估。欧洲学生在外部评估中作为评估主体直接参与教学评估,美国学生被当成内部评估的对象,通过衡量学生的参与度对教学质量进行评估。欧美的学生参与实践为构建我国普通高校本科教学评估工作学生参与机制提供了借鉴样本。     

高校教师教学质量学生评估模型的实证研究

通过自编学生评教问卷对436名大学生进行无记名调查,数据运用SPSS11．50软件进行探索性因子分析,结果表明大学生对教师教学质量的评价有五个维度：内容组织、师生沟通、为人师表、课堂吸引力和教学实践性,累计贡献率54．67％;根据因子负载及每个因子的标识项目数确定五个维度在评教中的权重,从而构建大学生评教体系及计分方法,即学生评教模型。     

高等教育质量评估中的学生参与——以北欧五国为例

当前,教育评估的部分责任从教师转向了学生,学生正在成为高等教育质量评估的重要参与者。冰岛、丹麦、芬兰、挪威与瑞典等北欧五国高等教育质量评估注重学生参与,产生了良好效果。北欧五国的评估机构与被评高校采用各种办法,使学生参与评估计划制定、外部评估小组、院校自我评估、现场考察与评估报告发布。国家通过立法,保证学生参与权;让学生全程参与,发挥学生参与的主体性;方法多样,确保学生参与度。学生参与高等教育质量评估,要有一个参与度,把握好度,才能发挥其优势、克服劣势。     

欧洲高等教育评估中学生参与机制的主要特征与启示

目前,欧洲地区高等教育评估中学生全面全过程的参与制度框架、多元文化利益相关者的持续合作框架以及学生联合组织的回应与参与,有利于对我国现行教育评估制度的思考.我国应树立主体参与的质量理念,建立多元合作的平台,同时积极发挥学生自治组织的作用.     

参与模型：英国特殊教育需要学生评价的新进展

“参与模型”是英国面向处于国家课程标准之下,且未能参与特定学科学习的特殊教育需要学生而推出的新评价工具。该工具在横向上包括五个平行“参与指标”,在纵向上不设置等级与量化评分。“参与模型”的有效使用依赖于教师的定期观察与反思性教学。它注重学生的参与过程、横向进步、个性化需求及潜在的发展优势。借鉴“参与模型”的经验,特殊需要学生评价要求教育者改变传统的评价观念,聚焦学生参与;提升评价素养,强化实践反思;重塑评价功能,注重学生的过程性发展。     

指向大规模测量建构的学生参与研究评析

以往研究者对学生参与的概念、建构、测量工具、影响因素和影响后果做了较为细致的研究.为了在中国语境下延续这一话题研究,需要对学生参与及其相关概念进一步做出明确区分,结合我国实际数据研发本土化检测工具,并且开展影响因素和影响后果的实证研究,为提高广大学生的参与水平做准备.     

A Theory-Driven Model of Community College Student Engagement

This mixed-methods study develops, operationalizes, and tests a new conceptual model of community college student engagement. Themes emerging from participant observations and semistructured interviews with 30 adult students enrolled at a Large Best Practices Community College (LBPCC) over the 2005–2006 academic year are used to guide selection of Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985 Deci , E. L. & Ryan , R. M. ( 1985 ). Intrinsic motivation and self-direction behavior . New York : Plenum .[Crossref] , [Google Scholar], 2000 Deci , E. L. & Ryan , R. M. ( 2000 ). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions . Contemporary Educational Psychology , 25 , 54 – 67 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 2002 Deci , E. L. & Ryan , R. M. ( 2002 ). Handbook of self-determination research . Rochester , NY : University of Rochester . [Google Scholar]) to frame the new conceptual model. Structural equation modeling techniques confirm that variables and relationships proposed by the new model represent a good fit with data from over 1,000 students surveyed in the Community College Survey of Student Engagement. Findings from this study suggest that community college engagement and related outcomes can be fostered by tuning campus policies, practices, and climates to promote students' senses of belonging, competence, and autonomy.     

基于NSSE-China调查的高校学生学习投入研究综述

本研究对NSSE-China的产生、本土化、理论化过程中的相关研究文献进行梳理,运用文献分析法,综述学习投入的概念与内涵、学习投入的测量工具NSSE-China的发展,分析中国高校学生学习投入状况,对影响大学生学习投入的各方面因素进行梳理,最后构建了基于NSSE-China调查的各因素对学习投入的影响路径图。     

Student Engagement and Student Learning: Examining the Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Revised National Survey of Student Engagement

The present study examined the relationships between student engagement, represented by two versions of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and self-reported gains in learning. The study drew on institutional-level data from participating institutions in 2011 and 2013. The objective of the research was to compare evidence of convergence and discrimination for the two versions of NSSE using canonical correlation analysis. Results indicated that both versions of NSSE provided clear evidence of convergence in that student engagement measures were significantly and positively related to perceived gains in learning. However, only the most recent version of NSSE provided strong evidence of discrimination (i.e., differential relationships between engagement measures and self-reported learning outcomes). Thus, the revised NSSE appears to offer substantial advantages for institutions interested in more nuanced understandings of the relationships between student engagement and perceived learning outcomes. Implications for educators, with goals of enhancing student learning, and for researchers, who often compare complex sets of data, are included.     

Student Engagement: A CCSSE Follow-Up Study to Improve Student Engagement in a Community College

This qualitative case study at a two-year community college investigated the reasons behind a persistent gap in the college students’ engagement level in several key areas such as active and collaborative learning and student-faculty interaction as demonstrated in the longitudinal Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) and the Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (CCFSSE) results. Using the maximal variation purposeful sampling method, 63 students participated in the study. Results suggested that students’ own perception and behaviors, faculty’s expectations and characteristics, the course characteristics, and institutional level support all played an important role in engaging students. There was a disparity between students’ high perception of the importance of engagement and low level of effort and a disparity between faculty’s perception of student engagement and students’ own perception of engagement. Community college students welcomed high expectations and high standards from their faculty and also desired more challenging courses despite all the obstacles in their lives. Discussions and recommendations for strategies to close the gap in the two disparities and, thus, improve student engagement level are provided.     

Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages*

This study examines (1) the extent to which student engagement is associated with experimental and traditional measures of academic performance, (2) whether the relationships between engagement and academic performance are conditional, and (3) whether institutions differ in terms of their ability to convert student engagement into academic performance. The sample consisted of 1058 students at 14 four-year colleges and universities that completed several instruments during 2002. Many measures of student engagement were linked positively with such desirable learning outcomes as critical thinking and grades, although most of the relationships were weak in strength. The results suggest that the lowest-ability students benefit more from engagement than classmates, first-year students and seniors convert different forms of engagement into academic achievement, and certain institutions more effectively convert student engagement into higher performance on critical thinking tests. *A version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April 2004.     

国外学生教学参与的影响因素研究述评及启示

学生参与是实施有效教学的前提,也是学生学业进步和健全人格养成的关键。学生在教学活动中的不参与会阻碍学生的健康成长和课程的顺利实施。因此,近年来,学生参与的影响因素研究成为国外教育工作者们关注的焦点。学生的个人背景,学习环境中的心理体验、教学表征和教育政策都能够影响学生在教学活动中的参与程度。     

网络课程学习的参与度研究

专业课程的全英文授课常因阅读量较大、专业词汇难记而使得学生对课程学习的参与度低,学习效果不佳。本研究探索了利用互联网讨论组功能以及英文专业网站论坛来提高学生学习参与度的方法,同时利用Archer提出的反思性模型来研究学生参与教学活动的一系列反思模式。通过讨论内容的统计分析和与参与者面谈的方式,我们考察并提高了网络辅助学习环境中学生对全英文专业课程学习的参与效果。