基于CSSCI的中国社会科学文献引文实证研究

文章以CSSCI为统计源,基于1999-2006年CSSCI数据库收录论文的引文情况,分别对篇均引文、篇均被引、各类文献被引、自引、各年文献被引、文献半衰期及期刊论文被引频次进行了计量统计分析,研究并探讨了近8年社科文献自身的发展状况及其发展规律.     

社会科学期刊引文现状的调查

社会科学文献引文的不规范一直是困扰学术发展的问题.笔者进行了文献调查,初步得到了一些必要的数据,以期引起社会科学界的师长及同仁的重视,使学术研究得以上档次、上水平,更好地与国际接轨.     

人文社会科学评价的复杂性与引文评价指标的修正

人文社会科学评价虽然具有一定的主观性和复杂性,但评价过程及评价标准仍以客观的事实结果和由此产生的效果与影响作为依据。在此论述基础上,就人文社会科学评价中存在的引文模糊性和时空影响力问题进行深入分析,并提出引用时间因子和引用范畴因子两个指标,用以解决人文社会科学领域普遍存在的跨学科、长时段影响力问题,实现对现行评价方法和体系的补充和完善。     

《中国人文社会科学引文数据库(CHSSCD)》的建设、应用与发展

文章较详细地介绍了《中国人文社会科学引文数据库》的研制、应用及功能、意义 ,并对其发展取向进行了探讨     

引文评价中的引文方式与力度因素

本文从引文内容、引文方式、引文深度及引文力度的角度分析不同引文对文献的支持作用。     

《中文社会科学引文索引》来源期刊的选择

电子版<中文社会科学引文索引>的出版填补了我国社会科学引文索引的空白.来源期刊的选择是研制引文索引的重要基础工作,本文阐述了该索引来源期刊选择的原则、依据和选刊方法.     

中文社会科学引文索引的不足与改进

文章从期刊选取、用户支持、系统功能、系统性能、系统规范性五个方面讨论了由南京大学中国社会科学研究评价中心研制的中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)数据库的一些不足,并提出了改进建议。     

《中文社会科学引文索引》认识与应用偏差分析

根据使用《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)的实践，结合对CSSCI的系统分析，剖析了当前利用引文分析进行学术评价时普遍存在的一些认识上的偏差甚至错误，特别分析了在使用CSSCI过程中各种可能的数据误差，并提出了解决问题的方法。     

Distributions of citations of papers of individual authors publishing in different scientific disciplines: Application of Langmuir-type function

The distribution of cumulative citations L and contributed citations L_f to individual multiauthored papers published by selected authors working in different scientific disciplines is analyzed and discussed using Langmuir-type function: y_n = y₀[1 − αKn/(1 + Kn)], where y_n denotes the total number of normalized cumulative citations l_n* and normalized contributed citations l_nf* received by individual papers of rank n, y₀ is the maximum value of y_n when n = 0, α ≥ 1 is an effectiveness parameter, and K is the Langmuir constant related to the dimensionless differential energy Q = ln(KN_c), with N_c as the number of papers receiving citations. Relationships between the values of the Langmuir constant K of the distribution function, the number N_c of papers of an individual author receiving citations and the effectiveness parameter α of this function, obtained from analysis of the data of rank-size distributions of the authors, are investigated. It was found that: (1) the quantity KN_c obtained from the real citation distribution of papers of various authors working in different disciplines is inversely proportional to (α − 1) with a proportional constant (KN_c)₀ < 1, (2) the relation KN_c = (KN_c)₀/(α − 1) also holds for the citation distribution of journals published in countries of two different groups, investigated earlier (Sangwal, K. (2013). Journal of Informetrics, 7, 487–504), and (3) deviations of the real citation distribution from curves predicted by the Langmuir-type function are associated with changing activity of sources of generation of items (citations).     

社科信息资源建设研究的学科性质和相关学科探讨

从图书馆文献资源建设到信息资源建设的发展脉络来看,社科信息资源建设研究的学科性质是现代图书馆学,其相关学科是社会科学和信息资源管理学.探讨这个问题,将有利于推动社科信息资源建设的进程.     

Open access publications in sciences and social sciences: A comparative analysis

In this paper, we conduct a comparative analysis to examine the characteristics and evolutionary trends of open access (OA) publications in natural and social sciences. We use data recorded by Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Journal Citation Reports during 2001–2015 as the main source. We then comparatively analyse the characteristics of natural and social sciences in terms of historical evolution, main contributors, and distribution of OA journals and publications across different languages, disciplines, and impact factor quartiles. Our results suggest that both natural and social sciences experienced dramatic growth of OA journals since 2009, but the share of social science OA journals within journal impact factor quartile 1 is much lower than that of natural sciences. While natural and social sciences share some similarities in OA publishing activities, such as main countries of contribution, they differ greatly in dimensions such as OA ratio across specific disciplines, countries, and publishing languages. We acknowledge that OA publishing offers a level playing field for traditionally disadvantaged languages, countries, and scientific disciplines, but meanwhile, the advancement of high‐quality OA publishing needs more targeted and sophisticated approaches to tackle differences in natural and social sciences.     

我国人文社会科学研究成果评价研究进展

文章针对目前我国人文社会科学研究成果评价规范之间存在着矛盾与冲突,各种评价理念与具体的评价操作很不一致的现状,对我国人文社会科学研究成果评价的发展历程、探索轨迹与各种研究观点进行了归纳述评,并从超越观点、创新观点、计量观点、管理操作观点与综合观点的角度做了系统分析,力求反映国内相关研究的新进展。     

试析中国社会科学生产力

论文基于《中文社会科学引文索引》(2000)，以发表学术论文为指标，对我国社会科学生产力及其结构、分布作了系统研究。论文给出了我国社会科学生产力的学科结构、地区结构、机构结构，以及地区——机构分布和地区——学科分布。论文最后对我国社会科学生产力作了较为深入的分析。     

再析中国社会科学生产力--社会科学论文的学科、地区结构(2001年)

本文以<中文社会科学引文索引>(2001)所发表的学术论文为指标,对我国社会科学生产力及其结构、分布作了系统研究,并给出了我国社会科学生产力的学科结构、地区结构,以及地区--学科分布.文章最后对我国社会科学生产力作了较为深入的分析.     

关于社会学文献分类的研究

文章研究了社会学文献分类的三个问题社会学文献的分类标准;社会学文献分类的体系;社会学文献的分类方法.