Prurient Interests: Sexuality,Ideology, and Popular Communication

The popular communication media provide a site where the contradictions between conservative and progressive cultural ideologies about sexuality (and concomitantly about power, gender, and social control) are enacted within an endless series of narratives. These narratives fulfill the economic requirements of the culture industries by an increasing focus on the sexual, including sexualities outside the mainstream. This seemingly progressive move is undermined by a variety of strategies, either within narrative outcomes or at the level of production. Such strategies offer a conservative reading that highlights the negative consequences of sexual insubordination. In the meantime, the popular press provides a platform for conservative ideologues who write about sexuality in the media without the benefit of serious research or expertise. They influence public policy while we in the academy are reluctant to seek a popular venue to discuss our work.     

Intercultural communication competence: Theory,measurement, and application

This brief article focuses on issues or concerns about the current state of intercultural communication competence (ICC) research. Theoretical issues include problems with ICC terminology and with conceptualizations of ICC. Measurement issues include problems with the use of self-reports to assess the “appropriateness” dimension of ICC and with the domain of skills and traits that make one more likely to be perceived as competent. Application issues center on the desirability for increased attention to practical uses of researched-based theory. We suggest that accounts of positive exemplars – those who are widely perceived to be competent in specific intercultural encounters and relationships – would be a welcome and useful addition to the ICC literature.     

Muslims and others: anecdotes,fragments, and uncertainties of evidence

Abstract

Against the intensified communalization of civil society and the emergence of new modes of racism in contemporary India, this essay juxtaposes different histories of the Other through critical insights into the construction and demonization of the Indian Muslim. Working through anecdotes and fragments, bits and pieces of history, this disjunctive discourse on the Other attempts to trouble liberal assumptions of cultural identity by calling attention to the uncertainties of evidence by which ethnic identities are politicized in diverse ways. While critiquing the exclusionary mode of 'othering', the essay also calls attention to more internalized modes of disidentification and the double-edged benefits of political identity for the underprivileged and dispossessed, whose own assertions of the self invariably complicate official identitarian constructions. The enigmas of the self are perhaps most vivid in the brutal evidence of genocide, where the apparent 'dead certainty' of killing the Other has been interpreted as a means of making 'persons out of bodies' (Arjun Appadurai). Countering this position, the essay argues that ethnic violence is facilitated by the 'dead certainty' of (in)justice, reinforced by the 'banality of violence' legitimized through state-sponsored ethnic cleansing.     

Participation Studies and Cross-National Comparison: Proliferation,Prudence, and Possibility

Over the last three decades the practice of surveying a country's population to gauge participation in various arts and cultural activities has spread. This paper considers twenty different contemporary participation studies, which cover thirty-five countries (thirty-six if you distinguish the study for the United Kingdom from the study for England) plus the Canadian province of Québec. The paper is restricted to what might be described as “traditional” participation studies—random surveys of the adult population to ascertain the participation of various demographic groups in one or another cultural behavior in the previous twelve months. Typically, the results of these surveys are summarized in a participation rate—the percentage of the demographic group that has reported a particular form of participation. Collectively, the studies summarized here provide forty-five different sets of participation rates.

That so many participation studies now exist for so many countries invites comparison. But what sort of comparison is possible? The paper begins with a consideration of the various definitions of “participation” and looks at the history of participation studies. I then address the issue of comparability, particularly with respect to variation in the design of participation studies. I also address the issue of facilitating the interpretation and use of participation data, which inevitably leads to the question of the extent to which the results of participation studies actually impact policy choices. Comparable data are not necessarily usable data, but neither are usable data necessarily comparable data.

Differences in methodology, it turns out, severely restrict one's ability to compare responsibly. Nevertheless, it does seem possible to articulate some broad hypotheses across countries. Still, the primary conclusion is that while one should be wary of ex post harmonization of participation studies, one should also be wary of ex ante harmonization. What has been created, in the end, is a research terrain in which (cross-national) comparability is traded off against (local) usability.