倡导学术宽容促进学术繁荣

学术宽容是对学术思想、学术行为的包容、容忍,它是有边界、有限度的.学术宽容建立在真理的多维性、或然性以及人的有限性的理论基础之上.学术宽容能够点燃智慧之光,展现学术自由,提高学术水平,因此,我们应该通过豁达大度、对话交流、理解尊重、宽容失败等途径来倡导学术宽容,促进学术繁荣.     

学术宽容：大学学术管理的基本价值取向

学术宽容应该是大学学术管理的基本价值取向.在大学中倡导学术宽容不仅有利于大学的生存和发展,还有利于学术管理的顺利进行,有利于教师研究水准的提升.在大学中倡导学术宽容,应该弘扬宽容精神,形成宽容氛围;加强学术管理,构建宽容体制;鼓励学术争鸣,宽容"异端"观点.     

学术自由与学术宽容

学术自由本质上是个学术干预问题。学术干预有内、外干预之分,内部干预主要发生在学术自由权利主体之间;外部干预主要表现为学术共同体外部力量对学术共同体的干预。针对学术干预的特点,法律应对的"有限性",学术自由权利保护不可避免地要诉求于道德规范。减少学术干预其实就要求干预者保持学术宽容。不宽容有人性基础,学术不宽容往往基于竞...     

论大学学术管理制度氛围构建的基本价值取向

在构建大学学术氛围的过程中,大学学术管理的基本价值有学术宽容、学术自治、学术自由、学术自律等。在学术管理中应该有一种宽容的态度,学者在评价别人的学术时也应该持有宽容的态度和做法。学术宽容是指社会和个体在学术方面对待异己的观念和信仰持公正、理智的态度,这是学术管理中非常重要的价值取向。学术自治是大学学术管理的重要价值取向之一,在学术管理中学术自治会主要表现为学术群体的自治;学术自由是学术管理的首要价值,学术管理的目的就是要保障学术自由;学术自律是指学术管理不仅要运用法律、政策、规章等外在的强制性的制度,也要依靠学者的学术道德的建设。     

学术之宽容

学术界的同仁们总是提出要学术自由，这自然没错；但人们往往不知不觉或有意无意忽视了：学术的宽容是导致学术自由的必要条件。打一个比方，一条鱼在鱼缸、池塘、大海里的自由度是不同的，原因就在于它所处的环境在宽容上有相当大的差别；至于鱼在沙漠里，沙漠虽然广袤，但它就根本得不到所谓的自由。     

教是为了不需要教——如果我是研究生导师

要实现“教是为了不需要教”的理念,就要培养学生拥有坚实的知识基础、宽阔的学术视野和宽容的学术态度。     

大学教师的学术品质

学术的本质决定了大学教师应具有求是、执着、宽容、勤奋的学术品质,它有利于完善教师人格、促进教师专业发展、提高教师学术水平。当下的学术浮躁、学术不端、学术霸权与学术邪气,对教师品质及其学术发展带来了不利影响。大学教师学术品质的培育需要通过教师的自我生成及其外部制度予以保障。     

大学教师的学术品质

学术的本质决定了大学教师应具有求是、执着、宽容、勤奋的学术品质,它有利于完善教师人格、促进教师专业发展、提高教师学术水平。当下的学术浮躁、学术不端、学术霸权与学术邪气,对教师品质及其学术发展带来了不利影响。大学教师学术品质的培育需要通过教师的自我生成及其外部制度予以保障。     

现代大学是混序的——谈研究生创新的体制与文化障碍

认为现代大学是个混序的复杂体系,混序也是现代大学的生命力。提出大学应允许混序,分清行政权力和学术权力,注重制度创新,营造良好的氛围。指出大学要建立创新的制度文化,就要宽容天才,宽容质疑,宽容失败。     

让每个学生都成为“真正的人”

我觉得,中国历史上学术最繁荣的时代是春秋战国、诸子百家时期.我发现学术繁荣至少要满足三个条件:自由的空间、宽容的精神和真诚的愿望.     

高等学校学术氛围营造

学科建设是高等学校建设和发展的重心,学术氛围是学术生长的基本条件。树立"学术至上"的观念应当视为高等学校学科的立足之基、力量之源。要积极为学术研究和学科发展营造良好环境氛围,并扫清障碍。学术民主、学术自由、学术道德、学术责任、学术规范和学术生态构成了不可或缺的学术氛围。     

Academic promotion in Malaysian public universities: a critical look at issues and challenges

The expansion and transformation of Malaysian universities have generated major changes in the nature of academic employment and the structure of academic promotion in higher education institutions. These changes have considerable implications, in particular for the policy and practice of academic promotion in the public universities. We argue that despite sharing one common grade and salary system, distinct and significant differences exist in the academic promotion systems of the public universities. Drawing on one recent study on the academic promotion process in Malaysian public universities to contextualise our discussion, this paper highlights the complexity in the promotion process in these institutions. It also discusses and articulates the attendant issues and challenging aspects of the academic promotion process. We argue that the interrelated issues and challenges, and certain academic practices and habits stemming from the pressure to gain a promotion are pervasive, and that they affect the academic value system and work culture. We conclude by asserting the importance of applying a consistent standard for promotion within a single salary system and that the academic promotion system in the public universities should ultimately affirm and communicate core academic values, and also aim at obtaining evidence of excellent accomplishments.     

Self-Efficacy,Stress, and Academic Success in College

This paper investigates the joint effects of academic self-efficacy and stress on the academic performance of 107 nontraditional, largely immigrant and minority, college freshmen at a large urban commuter institution. We developed a survey instrument to measure the level of academic self-efficacy and perceived stress associated with 27 college-related tasks. Both scales have high reliability, and they are moderately negatively correlated. We estimated structural equation models to assess the relative importance of stress and self-efficacy in predicting three academic performance outcomes: first-year college GPA, the number of accumulated credits, and college retention after the first year. The results suggest that academic self-efficacy is a more robust and consistent predictor than stress of academic success.     

Testing interest and self-efficacy as predictors of academic self-regulation and achievement

We examined whether individual interest, as an affective motivational variable, could predict academic self-regulation and achievement, above and beyond what academic self-efficacy predicted. We tested the relationships between academic self-efficacy, individual interest, grade goals, self-regulation, and achievement of Korean middle school students (N = 500) in four different subject areas. Consistent with previous findings, self-efficacy predicted achievement both directly and indirectly via grade goals. Self-efficacy also predicted self-regulation, but only when grade goals mediated the relationship. Supporting our hypothesis, individual interest functioned as a correlated yet independent and direct predictor of self-regulation. It also predicted achievement, but only when self-regulation mediated the relationship. We thus suggest that academic self-regulation could be encouraged through the promotion of two distinct motivational sources, academic self-efficacy and individual interest. We further suggest that the pathways linking individual interest to academic self-regulation and achievement may differ from those linking academic self-efficacy to the same variables.     

学术危机与学术问责制

学术问责制是在学术危机的大背景下应运而生的。由于自身体系的不完善,它在现实的运用过程中陷入了困境,如内在学术问责制度供给不足,学术法律制度供给不足,学术评价制度供给不足等等,应通过加强内在学术问责制度建设,完善学术问责的法律法规,建立多元的学术评价机制等措施来解决。     

Fresh thinking about academic development: authentic,transformative, disruptive?

We highlight three ways of conceptualising and enacting academic development: firstly as authentic, practice-based activity, secondly in terms of a new transformative paradigm for academic development units (ADUs), and thirdly as a space for disruption. We illustrate these conceptualisations through our investigation of the practice of internal secondment of faculty to ADUs. We report our findings from a sector-wide survey of Scottish higher education institutions and a series of in-depth interviews with secondees and their managers in two Scottish universities. We recommend further investigations to identify new ways of enacting authentic, practice-based, transformative, and disruptive academic development.     

Managing ‘academic value’: the 360-degree perspective

The raison d'etre of all universities is to create and deliver ‘academic value’, which we define as the sum total of the contributions from the 360-degree ‘angles’ of the academic community, including all categories of staff, as well as external stakeholders (e.g. regulatory, commercial, professional and community interests). As a way to conceptualise these complex relationships, we present the ‘academic wheel’ to illustrate the structural nature of them. We then discuss the implications of the different – and sometimes difficult – perspectives of academic, professional and administrative groups in the context of a number of important social psychological processes. We ask whether it is possible to reconcile, what is sometimes perceived as, managerial Taylorism with the academic freedom of (Laurie) Taylorism. We conclude that recognition and active management of these processes are required for each university to optimise its own brand of core academic value.     

学术期刊与学术生态的构建

当前的学术腐败和学术丑闻事件时有发生,学术生态危机已呈不争的事实。在学术生态的构建中,学术期刊具有重要作用。因此,学术期刊要加强编辑人员的自律,加大对编辑的学术道德教育;完善期刊学术评价制度,杜绝学术腐败的发生;强化著作权法意识,恪守学术规范;在当下不宜走“以刊养刊”之路。     

Conceptualizing impact in academic development: finding a way through

This paper explores the notion of impact in the context of academic development programs and considers how it can be described and understood. We argue that impact has a range of meanings and academic development programs such as graduate certificates have a broad group of stakeholders and hence the impact is different for each group depending on how the program aims and objectives are defined and understood. In finding a way through the difficulties of evaluating impact in academic development we point to the importance of clearly conceptualizing the notion of impact, a careful identification of the assumptions underpinning any program and an understanding of who academic development will benefit and how. We suggest that impact in academic development cannot be understood without taking account of the range of possible impacts and the difficulty of attributing simple cause and effect to a complex environment.     

Multidimensional aspects of parental involvement in Korean adolescents’ schooling: a mediating role of general and domain-specific self-efficacy

This study examined the relation of parental involvement with Korean adolescent academic achievement and self-efficacy, and the mediating role of academic self-efficacy in this relationship. We investigated the effects of parental involvement in both overall and domain-specific self-efficacy and academic achievement across three academic subjects (reading, English and mathematics). We conducted structural equation modelling analysis with the responses of 6,334 students from the Korean Education Longitudinal Survey. Our results were that first, academic self-efficacy partially mediated the relation between parental involvement and academic achievement. Specifically, domain-specific self-efficacy mediated the relations between parental involvement and academic achievement across three academic subjects (reading, English and mathematics), but these relations varied across subjects. Second, among multidimensions of parental involvement, parental participation and parental supervision had significant effects on adolescent academic achievement compared to parental expectation. This indicates that higher parental participation and parental supervision increased academic self-efficacy in Korean youth, which in turn, improved their academic achievement.