新刊《地质调查与研究》作者队伍建设的经验谈

《地质调查与研究》是2003年新更名的学术期刊,其影响因子的迅速上升主要得益于作者队伍的建设.介绍该刊作者队伍建设的方法、措施和经验.     

Medical librarians' knowledge and practices in locating clinical trials for systematic reviews

Objective:In regard to locating clinical trials for a systematic review, limited information is available about how librarians locate clinical trials in biomedical databases, including (1) how much information researchers provide librarians to assist with the development of a comprehensive search strategy, (2) which tools librarians turn to for information about study design methodology, and (3) librarians'' confidence levels in their knowledge of study design methodology. A survey was developed to explore these aspects of how a medical librarian locates clinical trials when facilitating systematic reviews for researchers.Methods:In this cross-sectional study, a 21-question survey was sent to medical librarians via several email listservs during April 2020. Respondents were limited to librarians who make the decisions on search terms for systematic reviews.Results:Responses (n=120) indicated that librarians were often asked to search for various types of clinical trials. However, there was not a consistent method for creating search strategies that locate diverse types of clinical trials. Multiple methods were used for search strategy development, with hedges being the most popular method. In general, these librarians considered themselves to be confident in locating trials. Different resources were used to inform study types, including textbooks, articles, library guides and websites.Discussion:Medical librarians indicated that while they felt confident in their searching skills, they did not have a definitive source of information about the various types of clinical trials, and their responses demonstrated a clear need and desire for more information on study design methodology.     

Web3.0时代学术期刊开放同行评议的实质和审稿模型构建

为了解决同行评议中不公平、不透明、时效性差的问题,提出改变审稿方式,采用开放同行评议的办法.在分析开放同行评议透明、交互、高效、共享、完整实质的基础上,尝试构建开放同行评议的审稿模型,并指出制订规范的编辑出版政策,构建专业化投稿和审稿平台,调动参与者的积极性,是实施开放同行评议的关键环节.     

科技期刊集团化发展路径探索 ——以煤炭科学研究总院出版传媒集团为例

随着科技期刊发展外部环境的改变和自身发展需要,科技期刊规模化、集团化发展已形成行业共识。但是目前还未找到有效解决期刊布局分散、体制机制不活、市场化程度低、传统固化思想束缚等问题的方法和途径,科技期刊集团化发展仍处于观望探索者多、做实做优者少的尴尬境地。因此,亟需探索出一条适合我国国情的科技期刊集团化发展路径,让我国科技期刊真正走上集团化、数字化、产业化、品牌化、国际化发展的健康可持续发展道路,打造精品科技期刊刊群,争创世界一流。本文总结了煤炭科学研究总院出版传媒集团探索出的集团化管理模式和管理经验、亟需解决的问题及下一步发展规划,以期为同行期刊集团化发展提供参考和借鉴。     

从《亚洲男科学杂志》看我国英文版期刊如何国际化

归纳了<亚洲男科学杂志>在创刊短短6年间走国际化路线的经验:国际化的宗旨和办刊理念,国际化的主编和编委会,国际化的稿源,国际化的审稿人队伍,国际化的运作策略和国际化的网站及服务.     

医学期刊媒体融合出版发展的创新性实施路径——以《中华胃肠外科杂志》为例

出版融合发展是适应时代发展的新需求和新业态,医学科技期刊需顺势而动,抓住机遇,建立具有自身特色的融媒体出版平台。《中华胃肠外科杂志》是胃肠外科专业学术期刊,学科范围较为局限,使得读者群比较单一,在媒体融合出版时代,通过大胆创新,利用自身特色,走出了适合自己的融合出版发展路径。本文首先剖析目前医学科技期刊出版融合发展的研究现状和困境,然后就《中华胃肠外科杂志》的相关经验进行阐述,总结了用心经营自建平台、借船搭建多渠道发布平台、拓展内容呈现形式、强大平台功能、获取新技术支撑以及加强编辑队伍建设6个方面的经验举措,以期能够为医学科技期刊的出版融合之路提供借鉴。     

站在作者立场 做好编辑工作——由科技论文作者向科技期刊编辑角色转变的体会

总结并阐述由科技论文作者向科技期刊编辑角色转变过程中的体会.针对收稿前、初审、退修、编辑加工等稿件处理过程中遇到的问题,从作者的角度出发,分析问题背后的原因;阐明理解作者的必要性,为更高效率、更有针对性地做好编辑工作提出应对措施.     

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews

Background:Literature searches underlie the foundations of systematic reviews and related review types. Yet, the literature searching component of systematic reviews and related review types is often poorly reported. Guidance for literature search reporting has been diverse and, in many cases, does not offer enough detail to authors who need more specific information about reporting search methods and information sources in a clear, reproducible way. This document presents the PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses literature search extension) checklist, and explanation and elaboration.Methods:The checklist was developed using a three-stage Delphi survey process, followed by a consensus conference and public review process.Results:The final checklist includes sixteen reporting items, each of which is detailed with exemplar reporting and rationale.Conclusions:The intent of PRISMA-S is to complement the PRISMA Statement and its extensions by providing a checklist that could be used by interdisciplinary authors, editors, and peer reviewers to verify that each component of a search is completely reported and, therefore, reproducible.     

快速审稿 赢得作者——《稀有金属材料与工程》作者服务体系建设

作者资源是办好科技期刊的基础。本研究探索以作者为中心,围绕投稿前指导、便捷投稿、快速审稿、及时退修、数字化出版、快速推送、引用反馈等7方面创新调整传统的编辑出版流程,建设科技期刊作者服务体系。从作者服务体系建设层面,推动科技期刊质量控制与规范化建设。同时从作者服务体系建设层面,培育优秀作者群,吸引优秀论文回归。本文重点介绍其中快速审稿环节的建设成果,通过快速送审、快速审稿、快速退修、免收审理费、短信即时通知来实现快速审稿。通过流程再造,已经实现数分钟内送审、退修,初审周期1d,复审周期10d,终审周期5d。     

基于期刊管理及作者调查的一稿多投解决策略探索——以审稿周期和出版周期为切入点

以药学期刊为例,将审稿周期和出版周期作为切入点,采用官网、数据库等公开途径查询与作者问卷调查相结合的方式了解目前期刊对审稿周期和出版周期的管理现状以及作者的真实投稿意愿。结果发现,造成“一稿多投”始终“禁而不止”的原因可能在于多数期刊没有按照《著作权法》规定完成审稿或明确约定审稿周期,有些期刊即使约定了审稿周期也没有认真执行,且期刊的实际审稿周期和出版周期超过了作者的心理耐受阈值。在此基础上,本文提出期刊应正确领会《著作权法》精神,尊重作者的投稿利益,明确、细化稿约中对审稿周期、出版周期的约定,提高期刊的出版伦理规范意识等建议,旨在为合理解决一稿多投问题提供参考。     

创办高品质医学电子学术期刊的实践探索——以《中华重症医学电子杂志》为例

建设高品质学术期刊是科技界和期刊界义不容辞的责任,高品质的学术期刊对于提升国家科技竞争力和文化软实力,构筑中国精神、中国价值、中国力量具有重要作用。医学电子学术期刊作为我国医学期刊的重要组成部分之一,对我国的医药学术交流起到举足轻重的作用。《中华重症医学电子杂志》创刊之初立足学科建设需要,办刊过程中协同学科发展,发挥学术媒体的社会责任与担当,发挥多媒体技术支撑作用,丰富优质内容展现形式,同时传承期刊办刊理念,夯实内容建设基础,经过8年的实践探索,取得了优异成绩。本文总结《中华重症医学电子杂志》的办刊经验,以期为我国创办高品质学术电子期刊提供借鉴与思考。     

Criteria for the selection,evaluation and application of traditional knowledge in contemporary health practice,education, research and policy: A systematic review

Background

Traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) is highly utilised and draws on traditional knowledge (TK) as evidence, raising a need to explore how TK is currently used.

Objectives

Examine criteria used to select, evaluate and apply TK in contemporary health contexts.

Methods

Systematic search utilising academic databases (AMED , CINAHL , MEDLINE , EMBASE , SSCI , ProQuest Dissertations Theses Global ), Trip clinical database and Google search engine . Citations and reference lists of included articles were searched. Reported use of TK in contemporary settings was mapped against a modified ‘Exploration-Preparation-Implementation-Sustainment’ (EPIS) implementation framework.

Results

From the 54 included articles, EPIS mapping found TK is primarily used in the Exploration phase of implementation (n = 54), with little reporting on Preparation (n = 16), Implementation process (n = 6) or Sustainment (n = 4) of TK implementation. Criteria used in selection, evaluation and application of TK commonly involved validation with other scientific/traditional evidence sources, or assessment of factors influencing knowledge translation.

Discussion

One of the difficulties in validation of TK (as a co-opted treatment) against other evidence sources is comparing like with like as TK often takes a holistic approach. This complicates further planning and evaluation of implementation.

Conclusion

This review identifies important criteria for evaluating current and potential contemporary use of TK, identifying gaps in research and practice for finding, appraising and applying relevant TK studies for clinical care.     

A Methodical Approach to Legal Research: The Legal Research Plan,an Essential Tool for Today's Law Student and New Attorney

This article lays out an approach to teaching legal research through an examination of historical and contemporary approaches to legal research and research instruction. It discusses creating a research plan and reviews the most commonly used legal research texts. It concludes with sample research assignments and assessment tools.     

服务国家重大战略需求,争夺论文全球首发权——以《中国航空学报(英文版)》为例

为服务国家重大战略需求,争夺论文全球首发权,《中国航空学报(英文版)》进行了一系列创新的探索,包括创办Fast Track新栏目、快速出版专刊/专栏及为重磅约稿论文开辟绿色通道,并采取全媒体联动宣传,及时推送优质原创性论文,增加社会关注度.前期的快速审稿加上后期及时广泛的宣传,不仅提升了期刊的学术影响力,也形成了良性循...