基于人种志视角的课堂观察理论与实践

课堂人种志运用文化教育人类学的教育人种志研究方法对课堂教学活动及其主体进行研究，试图真实、自然地认识、解释课堂文化共同体中主体的行为方式、实践意义、价值观念和交往模式等。基于课堂人种志视角的课堂观察应坚持“离我远去”的原则。其实施过程包括观察的准备、资料的收集与整理、分析与解释以及课堂人种志的撰写。     

课堂志:一种草根化田野式的课堂研究范式

课堂志是研究团队针对课堂田野中的直观现象、事件或行为,进行详细、动态和情境化的观察、访谈和深描,以求探究特定课堂文化背景下的课标要求、学生学习、教学行为和课堂文化的一种定性研究方法。在研究中宜遵从人种志研究倡导的原则,建立科学的资料编码体系,加强定性与定量研究的结合,规避其作为一种研究方法的缺陷。     

课堂志：一种草根化田野式的课堂研究范式

课堂志是研究团队针对课堂田野中的直观现象、事件或行为,进行详细、动态和情境化的观察、访谈和深描,以求探究特定课堂文化背景下的课标要求、学生学习、教学行为和课堂文化的一种定性研究方法。在研究中宜遵从人种志研究倡导的原则,建立科学的资料编码体系,加强定性与定量研究的结合,规避其作为一种研究方法的缺陷。     

课堂志:作为课堂研究的专门方法——《课堂研究方法》书评

课堂志源于民族志或人种志,但又不同于民族志和人种志,它是课堂研究的专门方法,是将民族志的方法与课堂研究的对象结合而产生的研究课堂的专门方法。从课堂人种志或课堂民族志发展到课堂志,从《课堂研究概论》到《课堂研究方法》,王鉴教授做了大量的方法论及方法的研究,最终形成国内独成一体的课程与教学论的实践研究理论与方法。《课堂研究方法》一书的出版,标志着课堂志作为课堂研究专门方法的成熟。     

基于人种志视角的英语课堂观察建构

基于人种志视角的"田野工作"的方法论逐渐渗入教育研究的微观领域(课堂)发挥着重要的作用,教育人种志的深入开展提供了与英语课堂活动相结合的机会,并因此补充和发展了英语课堂观察的方法和手段。基于人种志视角下的英语课堂观察善于对课堂行为的局部的分析与诊断,相对于传统听评课,它不仅引入了课堂研究的人本性特质,还关注了教育中的边缘化对象,突出了教师合作的重要性。     

教育人种志浅探

人种志是一种源自人类学的研究方法,教育人种志的研究兴起于20世纪末,在我国对教育人种志的研究尚处于起步阶段.本文试图对教育人种志的定义、特征、信度、效度,以及教育人种志研究的意义进行一些阐述.     

浅析我国教师实施教育人种志研究的利与弊

教育人种志是教育学与人类学结合的产物,它是一种质的研究方法,有其自身的优缺点。教师实施教育人种志研究的意义在于可以提高其教育智慧、科研能力和教学水平。但是,教师实施教育人种志研究也存在一定的弊病,表现在：教师的理论素养影响教育人种志研究的整体性;伦理道德认识掩蔽教育人种志研究的部分真实性;教师的认识观禁锢教育人种志研究的研究视角。     

教育人种志浅探

人种志是一种源自人类学的研究方法，教育人种志的研究兴起于20世纪末，在我国对教育人种志的研究尚处于起步阶段。本文试图对教育人种志的定义、特征、信度、效度，以及教育人种志研究的意义进行一些阐述。     

教育人种志探析

教育人种志是一种源自于人类学的研究方法,关于它的研究兴起于20世纪末。明确教育人种志的内涵与特征及教育人种志的方法论基础,了解教育人种志研究的基本原理及其实施步骤,将会对我们科学地运用教育人种志有所裨益。     

教育人种志探析

教育人种志是一种源自于人类学的研究方法,关于它的研究兴起于20世纪末。明确教育人种志的内涵与特征及教育人种志的方法论基础,了解教育人种志研究的基本原理及其实施步骤,将会对我们科学地运用教育人种志有所裨益。     

Children writing ethnography: children's perspectives and nomadic thinking in researching school classrooms

This article makes a connection between narrative ethnography, childhood studies and new materialist theories in studying children's perspective on school. It presents ‘children writing ethnography’ as an approach based on complexity and involving participatory research. The question of ‘what is happening in the classroom’ is explored through writings produced in class by 10-year olds. The ‘messy’ ethnographic data are examined within the framework of narrative ethnography using the idea of ‘small stories’ that capture everyday interaction. Furthermore, both material and embodied meanings in the writings are discussed. New materialist theories and the idea of nomadic make it possible to account for the connectivity between the writings, the classroom reality, the child-ethnographers and the research, which are seen as mutually producing one another. The author suggests that engaging with children's free-flowing ethnographic writing serves as a productive way to conduct participatory ethnographic research, as well as to investigate contemporary childhoods in all their complexity.     

人种志方法与课堂研究

人种志方法在课堂研究中的应用日益广泛 ,参与观察是它的基本特征 ,人种志方法的最大长处在于它的描述能力 ,并可对所获得的信息作细致、重复分析。研究过程中应尽可能采取客观的资料收集方法 ,多现场进行研究 ,以提高人种志研究方法的有效性     

课堂观察研究:进展与趋势

我国学者主要从课堂人种志、教师专业化和师生合作共同体三个视角对课堂观察进行研究,在课堂观察的定义、特征、类型、程序、量表、技术和记录方式七个方面形成了一定的认识。在今后的研究中,应着重在研究视角、研究内容和研究应用等方面加以改进。     

Multi-sited global ethnography and travel: gendered journeys in three registers

This paper joins a barely begun conversation about multi-sited and global ethnography in educational research; a conversation that is likely to intensify along with growing interest in the links between education, globalisation, internationalisation and transnationalism. Drawing on an ongoing multi-sited global ethnography of elite schools and globalisation, this paper explores the role of travel in multi-sited global ethnography and offers a feminist engagement with it. It considers the idea of fieldwork as a travel practice through three different travel registers; the traveller’s tale, critical travel studies and travel as exile. In so doing, it illustrates the reflexive affordances each register offers with regard to the directions of our feminist inquiries into elite schools and our feminist ethnographic practices.     

‘It’s never okay to say no to teachers’: Children’s research consent and dissent in conforming schools contexts

This article examines the limits to children giving research consent in everyday school contexts that emphasises their conformity to comply with adult expectations, and highlights children’s competence and agency in navigating this conformity through different practices of dissent. It draws on research into children’s agency, using a multimodal ethnography of Year 1 classrooms in two English primary schools. The article includes a reflexive methodological focus, exploring the extent to which I counter the schools’ emphasis on conformity. This includes creating visuals for children to practice consent; positioning myself as the researcher in a non-teacher role, as ‘least adult’ and the one who ‘least knows’; and designing interview spaces markedly different from classrooms. The article examines how children navigate conforming discourses by finding different ways to dissent in the research. Firstly, children demonstrate a sophisticated awareness of the cultural norms of indicating refusals beyond saying the word ‘No’. Secondly, children achieve unnoticeability, by which they absent themselves from the ‘on-task’ classroom culture, and by extension the research process. Thirdly, they engage in playful dissent, demonstrating their political knowingness of the classroom social order. The article discusses the implications for educational research when the values of consent are in conflict with a schooling focused on conformity. This includes emphasising the limits of consent procedures, paying closer attention to how researchers recognise and respond ethically to children’s multiple practices of dissent, and using research to disrupt problematic power structures in education settings that limit possibilities for children’s consent.     

Articulating choice and deliberation in conducting research – researchers ‘working in the interpretive zone’

In recent years, there has been a significant growth in the volume of research production in education ethnography in Scandinavia due partly to a regionally financed network. The present article makes some comparisons between Scandinavian and other education research contexts in relation to aspects of general ethnographic design to try to analyse this production. It suggests some typical points of identity for Scandinavian educational ethnography, such as a distinct role for theories in fieldwork. But it also suggests that these characteristics are even apparent outside Scandinavia. Some blind-spots in ethnography are also suggested around quantitative aspects, but again, these are not unique. Scandinavian ethnographic research in education is broadly influenced by a range of different traditions in different parts of the region that have travelled with key people and from place to place, but it is also noted that there is seepage between ethnography and other traditions.     

教育俗民志研究对教师专业发展的意义

教育俗民志是俗民志研究范式应用于教育情景的一种研究方法和类型.教育俗民志研究强调研究过程的自然性,注重对微观问题的整体把握,强调定性分析和研究程序的弹性化.教育俗民志研究对于教师的专业发展具有重要意义.教育俗民志研究适用的范围有:学校组织的结构和文化、组织成员的角色行为、学校课程理论与实践、教学评价问题等.     

课堂教学行为分析引论

课堂教学行为本身是一个包含多种互动要素的系统,而且具有层级性结构。课堂教学行为分析就是运用行为理论和教学原理对其构成要素及各个要素之间的关系进行分析,即要素论分析,同时对其实现单位及各个实现单位之间的内部转化关系进行分析,即过程论分析,从而进一步探明课堂教学行为在学生发展中的独特规律。进行课堂教学行为分析有三个方面的原因:教学论学科建设的需要、教学设计的需要和转化教学观念的需要。课堂教学行为分析的主要方法有课堂观察法、课堂语言行为互动分析法和人种志方法。