试探“135教学模式”的数学课堂教学

"135教学模式"是临沧市耿马县勐撒中学经过多年的教学尝试和改革后产生的。这种教学模式改变了传统的教学模式,使学生由被动接受者变为学习的主人,教师由灌输者变为引导者。通过学生的自主学习、合作探究,使学生的自学能力、解题能力、分析能力得到了提高。     

教学中的诠释与理解

学校教学是以文本为中心的，在传统的教学模式中，对文本的理解是以教师为中心的；教师的理解直接决定了学生的理解，而教师受到他的知识和教学方法的影响。由于学生对文本的理解依赖教师的理解，因此学生在整个学习过程中成为一个被动的接受者，他的学习积极性很难调动起来，这种以教师为中心的教学方法不利于学生牢固地掌握知识，也不利于学生独立人格的培养。现代解释学的方法论在教学中的运用可以改变这种以教师为中心的教学模式，将教学过程转到以学生为中心的教学模式上来。新的教学模式关注教学过程，强调学生对知识的自我理解，强调教师在学生自我理解中的启发和引导作用。在这种新的教学模式中，问题情景的设置是教学过程的关键，学生在教学过程中自我理解所出现的错误对学生能力的培养具有同样的价值，学生认识上的错误不仅是学生能力培养的必经阶段，而且也是学生的基本权利。     

语文课堂教学设计的观念基础

传统的语文课堂把语文学习看作是一种获取“知识”的过程,而不是一种习得“能力”的过程。教师主要担当着一个语文知识传授者的角色,学生则成为被动的语言知识的接受者。这种单向传导式的、以注重语言知识传授而忽视语言能力和态度情感培养为特征的语文课堂教学模式,极大地挫伤了学生学习语文的积极性。课堂教学的转型,需要教师把语文教学更多地视为一个学生主动进行言语实践活动的过程。因此,语文教师应从知识传授者变为语文教学活动的设计者和组织者。而要成为有效的教学设计者,语文教师必须深入地理解和把握语文教育的本质规律,树立全新…     

构建“从学会到会学”化学教学模式的实践与思考

“从学会到会学”教学模式给学生规定了先学后教,自主学习,合作学习,探究学习,给教师规定了以学定教,从学生已有知识和能力的基础上去教,以教导学,对学生的学习进行指导。该模式的实施实现了从教师带着书本走向学生,变为教师带着学生走向书本,学生带着问题走向教师的转变。     

中学语文探究性教学模式的特点及应用

正传统的语文教学采用的是教师传授课本知识,学生被动接受的一种教学方式。这种只重视知识传授,忽视对学生创造性思维和学生学习能力培养的教学模式不利于学生对中学语文知识的学习和掌握。近几年来,中学语文教学模式也在进行不断的改革,探究性教学模式在中学语文教学中被广泛应用,有效增强了学生的学习兴趣,培养了学生自主学习的能力,本文对中学语文教学中探究性教学模式的应用进行了探讨。一、探究性教学模式的概念探究性教学模式就是一种以探究为基础的教学活动     

“三段四步”教学改革的实施

传统的教学方法是以教师为中心讲授知识,而学生只能被动地接受知识。其表现方式是;“教师讲,学生听;教师写,学生抄;教师考,学生背。”这样注入式的学习方法压抑了学生学习的主动性和积极性,造成了学生被动接受知识的懒惰性,严重的束缚了学生的智力和能力的发展。为改变以上这种情况,我们从1992年秋季以来,进行“三段四步”教法实验.这种教学方法是启发式教学,把学生视为认识活动的主体,使学生由被动接受知识变为主动探索知识,教师在教学中起着引导,点拨的作用,注重培养学生科学的思维方法和能力,从而提高了学生的学习兴趣和学习成绩,取得了较好的学习效果。     

英语互动与观察式教学模式研究

教学是教与学双方的活动,其中学生是主体,在教学过程中要充分发挥学生的学习主体作用,提倡学生独立探索。在这样的理念指导下,教师使用互动与观察式教学模式,教学过程变为在教师的主导下,学生通过主动探究获得知识、发展能力的过程。本文以仁爱版教材为例,对互动式及观察式教学模式的特点进行分析,并探讨在初中英语教学中如何运用。     

小组合作学习的“有效性”研究——对导学用大课堂教学模式的思考

导学用大课堂教学模式是由本校王校长等领导提出并大力倡导的一种教学模式,它是以导学案为载体,以教师为主导,以学生为主体,由师生合作共同完成教学任务的一种课堂教学模式。“小组合作学习”是指以学习小组为基本单位,通过小组成员的分工合作而共同完成学习任务的一种模式。导学用课堂中的小组合作学习,就是要通过教师精心设计的“导”,促进学生主体的“学”。这是导学用课堂小组合作学习的精髓。这种模式对学生而言,从“要我学”变为“我要学”,是一个凤凰涅槃式的蜕变,学生通过自主探究、合作学习,学习积极性得到充分发挥;对教师而言,从“教师主体”变为“教师主导”,是一种浴火重生的转变,有利于教学能力的提高。这是一种双赢的教学新模式。     

激趣阅读,让学生遨游快乐阅读之旅

阅读是语文教学的重要环节,同时是搜集处理信息、认识世界、发展思维、获得审美体验的重要途径。教师在教学中要打破传统的教学模式,从知识的传授者变为学生学习的参与者、指导者,激发学生的阅读兴趣,让学生爱上阅读,享受阅读的快乐,不断提高学生的阅读能力。     

如何创设高中生物教学情境

苏联教育家赞可夫认为:"智力活动是在情绪高涨的气氛里进行的."这种气氛会给教学带来好处,同时也有助于完成教育任务.传统的教学模式以教师为中心,教师讲,学生听;教师写,学生抄.学生是被动接受知识,信息的传递是单向的.情境教学体现以学生为中心,让学生由被动学习变为有指导、有目的的主动学习,这一教学模式是传统教学的一种突破和飞跃.它能充分发挥学生的主观能动性,学生在自我探索、师生互动、生生互动中获取知识.它是一种开放的双向过程,是一种充分体现"以学生为主体,教师为主导"的创新的教学方法.在高中生物教学中,如何创设有效的教学情境呢?     

科研促进教学的思考

以科研促进教学质量的提高是一项行之有效的举措．科学研究促进了教师自身知识结构的不断更新和研究水平的提高,打造优秀的教学团队;科学研究培养学生探究意识,创新精神和实践能力,促进其学习方式的改变,激发其自主学习的热情;科学研究活跃了学术气氛,推进优良学风的形成,为教学活动提供旺盛的活力,促进学生知识、技能和素质的和谐发展．     

Teaching as creating space for participation – establishing a learning community in diverse classrooms

The relationships between teacher and students are interdependent and rely on their mutual interaction. In the classroom, teaching involves daily face-to-face encounters between students and teachers and therefore could be considered a moral as well as an academic issue. A central question is how the teacher can establish and support a learning community in diverse classrooms where the different learners are recognized as participants, not just as recipients. In this article, a situation from a science lesson has been selected as a case to highlight/illuminate teaching as creating space for participation. The theoretical framework used in this discussion underlines participation as intersubjectively dependent. This perspective points to the ambiguity and uncertainty embedded in teaching and learning situations. It also emphasizes the importance of the teacher's role in inviting students into meaning-making processes. Special attention is paid to essential features of teaching as creating space for participation; 'the act of holding back', 'the act of passing on' and 'the act of non-valuing'. Teaching as creating space for participation is also discussed as an issue that needs greater attention in teacher education.     

历史学科内开展研究性学习的探索

历史学科教学中采取研究性学习 ,就是让学生提出问题并依据教材查找相应史实材料 ,同时教师为学生提供有关材料 ,然后师生共同分析 ,并依据“中心问题”,分组研讨 ,撰写小论文 ,最后学生进行成果汇报 ,互相交流论文。在研究性学习的过程中 ,学生的主动性得到淋漓尽致地发挥 ,既拓展了视野 ,也加强了学科知识渗透 ;使学生的各种能力都得到锻炼。同时它促进了历史学科教学观念的变革 ,也对教师教学设计、教学能力提出了更高的要求。     

Academics' identity development as teachers

ABSTRACT

Teaching development programmes in Higher Education aim for a learning-centred teaching culture. In a shift from teaching-centeredness to learning-centeredness the teacher’s role changes from a bearer of knowledge to a facilitator of learning. This, in turn, influences the academic’s professional identity as teacher. Insights into this process of identity development are, however, scarce. The present study explores changes in the teacher identity of eight academics enrolled in a teaching development programme by means of episodic interviews and teaching portfolio entries. Data was thematically analysed. The eleven recurring topics were clustered into thematic fields reflecting three phases of the identity development of academic teachers: ‘Taking on the teacher role’, ‘Settling into the teacher role’ and ‘Finding a new role as a teacher’. This study suggests that the process of identity development is highly significant for the individual academic and influences teaching development programmes’ impact on the quality of teaching.     

优质教学的教学论解读

有效教学是对教学的基本要求,优质教学是追求的目标,新课程呼唤优质教学。优质教学坚持三维目标整合的整体发展观,秉承注重思维过程、生活经验、开放建构和整体联系的知识观,倡导主动性、交往性、创新性和体验性学习的学习观,要求教师由传授者走向促进者,由拥有知识到拥有智慧。优质教学的核心是学生的优质发展,而促进学生的优质发展则需要优质的知识、优质的学习和优质的教师。     

情境教学法在英语教学中的运用策略研究

情境教学法运用于英语教学,能让学生产生身临其境之感,切实体验知识、感受知识。文章从语言、音乐、游戏、图画四方面入手,对情境教学法在英语教学中的运用策略进行研究,以激发学生学习兴趣,调动学生学习的积极性,提高英语教学效率和教学质量,提升学生英语学科素养。     

论建构主义对英语教学改革的启示

传统教学法的机械性限制了学习者的创造性思维。建构主义强调以学习者为中心,教师的作用是引导和辅助,学习的环境要有充分的沟通、合作和交流。建构主义认为学生的积极性、主动性和创造性是至关重要的,教师要努力创造一种学习环境,在这一环境中,学习者能主动地建构自己的知识,从而积极学习,以这种方式建立的新知识结构不仅不会退化,相反能给学生以主动学习的机会,培养他们的创造性思维。     

Investigation of chemistry graduate teaching assistants' teacher knowledge and teacher identity

Graduate students play an integral role in undergraduate chemistry education at doctoral granting institutions where they routinely serve as instructors of laboratories and supplementary discussion sessions. Simultaneously, graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) balance major research and academic responsibilities. Although GTAs have substantial instructional facetime with large numbers of undergraduate students, little is known about their conceptions of teaching or their identities as teachers. To investigate the knowledge that GTAs have regarding teaching in this unique context, their teaching identities, and how these developed, we conducted 22 interviews with graduate students from several universities at various levels in their graduate school career using a modified Teacher Beliefs Interview. Interviews were analyzed for two overarching teacher learning constructs: teacher knowledge and teacher identity. We characterized chemistry GTAs' teacher knowledge and identity and determined major influencing factors. We found that chemistry GTAs often identified as a tutor or lab manager, which hindered their self-investment in developing as teachers. The results presented herein contribute to an understanding of GTAs' teacher knowledge, teacher identity, and their teaching context, from which training can be designed to best support GTA development.     

Knowledge and teaching

The paper addresses a major fissure in the sociology of knowledge with respect to the theories of knowledge which inform teaching and learning. Instructional teaching, or ‘teaching knowledge to the child’, is compared to facilitation teaching, the ‘teaching the child’ approach to show the extent to which their differences are the result of very different understandings of how knowledge is constituted. In turn, these understandings about knowledge are implicated in major differences about the purpose that education serves in modern society. It is argued that the link between the way knowledge is structured and the way it is organised for teaching justifies instructional teaching as the more effective way to develop students’ learning. This learning is demonstrated in the subject mastery acquired as students connect propositional knowledge to practice knowledge. The facilitation approach is considered to be weak because it is primarily a pedagogical approach concerned with motivating students and fails to account for the type of knowledge that constitutes academic subjects. The paper makes a further claim for the importance of instructional teaching in modern society to argue that the identity of the modern, rational individual depends upon the direct teaching of abstract epistemically structured knowledge to successive generations. These collective representations which constitute the symbolic sphere, support the moral cohesion of democratic pluralistic societies.     

Analyzing service-learning reflections through Fink's taxonomy

Reflection is an increasingly essential component of experience-based learning in higher education to encourage students to draw connections between theoretical and practical knowledge and experiences. This qualitative study examines the reflections of undergraduate students in a service-learning course for secondary English teacher candidates. The authors use Fink's taxonomy of significant learning as a lens through which to examine the learning within and critical natures of students’ reflections. Findings from this study suggest that to consider and extend students’ academic content knowledge and to move students toward new and critical understandings of their service work, reflections should direct students toward more explicit considerations of academic course content over a period of time. To help students write critical reflections that achieve both academic and personal growth learning goals, the authors recommend explicitly teaching the reflective mode, introducing students to Fink's taxonomy, and instructing students to include course content in their reflections.