校长应正确发挥非权力性影响力

作为一名校长,要提高自身的影响力,必须辩证地看待权力性影响力和非权力性影响力的关系,不断提高自身的非权力性影响力。提高自身的非权力性影响力,要与学校的整体奋斗目标相结合。     

论非权力性影响力在高校管理中的协调作用

现代领导理论认为,领导是一种影响力,是领导者有目的、有成效地对被领导者进行思想行为沟通的过程。在领导者的领导活动中,既有权力性影响力,又有非权力性影响力,而随着时代的发展和社会的完善与进步,非权力性影响力的地位和作用已越来越占据着主导地位。本文力图通过对非权力性影响力的深入研究,来揭示其对高等教育中学术权力和行政权力的协调作用,也就是说重点阐述非权力性影响力与现代教育管理工作内在的、必然的因果关系与互不可分性,引导我们从更深的层次来分析非权力性影响力积极的、正面的对学术权力和行政权力的协调作用。这对加强高校领导者影响力水平,激发下属的工作能动性,提高教育管理工作水平有着积极的作用。     

浅谈教练员领导行为与运动训练的结果

一个优育运动队水平的高低,在很大程度上取决于教练员的领导行为,不少教练员仅仅满足于权利和职位对运动训练的控制和指挥,忽视了自身领导行为的影响力,不注意去激发运动员的主体作用,降低了教练员领导行为的有效性,不同程度地影响运动训练的质量。教练员的问题日渐显露,是我们教练员队伍面临的一个亟待解决的重要问题。     

管理权威与学校管理

管理权威由权力性影响力和非权力性影响力构成。权力性影响力是管理权威的基础,非权力性是管理权威的保障,在学校管理过程中,应协调好这两种影响力。     

学校管理要以柔性为主 刚柔相济

学校管理工作的核心就是要充分调动全体教职工的积极性，提高学校的整体办学水平。要做到这一点，关键是校长要充分发挥非权力性影响力，以柔性管理为主，刚柔相济，带出一支优良的教师队伍。一、领导者要发挥非权力性影响力领导对教职员工的影响力分为权力性影响力和非权力性影响力两种。要创设一个能充分调动人的积极性的环境，学校领导必须自觉运用和发挥自身的非权力影响力，努力使自己不光是一个行政上的领导者，而且也是人格上的引导者，在管理过程中做到公正、尊重教师并起榜样作用。公正。学校管理者公正地处理问题，会使教师产生信…     

社会学视角下高校辅导员非权力性影响力的思考

社会学认为人的影响力有两种,权力性影响力与非权力性影响力。社会学认为非权力性影响力指的是源自其政治素质、学识能力、人格魅力、心理素质、人文关怀、仪表形象等。作为高校辅导员非权力性影响力,就是建立在这些基础上、使学生崇敬和信服基础上的而形成的影响力。本文认为与权力性影响力相比,非权力性影响力更能发挥高校思政工作的实效;高校辅导员必须充分重视和提高非权力影响力,促进高校学生工作发展的新局面。     

管理权威与学校管理

管理权威由权力性影响力和非权力性影响力构成.权力性影响力是管理权威的基础,非权力性是管理权威的保障,在学校管理过程中,应协调好这两种影响力.     

小议非权力性影响力

小议非权力性影响力歙县北岸中学黄宝聚校长要领导好一所学校，就必须努力提高自身的影响力。所谓影响力，是指一个人在与他人交往的过程中影响与改变他人心理与行为的能力。就其性质可分为权力性影响力和非权力性影响力。校长的权力性影响力是外界给予的，它靠法定的手段...     

社会学视角下高校辅导员非权力性影响力的思考

社会学认为人的影响力有两种,权力性影响力与非权力性影响力.社会学认为非权力性影响力指的是源自其政治素质、学识能力、人格魅力、心理素质、人文关怀、仪表形象等.作为高校辅导员非权力性影响力,就是建立在这些基础上、使学生崇敬和信服基础上的而形成的影响力.本文认为与权力性影响力相比,非权力性影响力更能发挥高校思政工作的实效;高校辅导员必须充分重视和提高非权力影响力,促进高校学生工作发展的新局面.     

浅论高校思想政治工作者的非权力性影响力

影响力是指一个人在与他人交往中,影响和改变他人心理和行为的能力。它包括两个方面:一是基于职位因素的权力性影响力,二是基于个人特质的非权力性影响力。高校思想政治工作者在对教育对象施加影响和作用的过程中,固然要借助于本身的职责与权力,但教育的最终结果怎样,则主要取决于与其个人特质紧密相关的非权力性影响力发挥得如何。为此,我们对高校思想政治工     

A review of the research on student evaluation and a report on the effect of different sets of instructions on student course and instructor evaluation

An extensive review of the research concerning the effect of different variables on student ratings is presented. A study is then reported comparing the effects of different sets of instructions on student evaluations of the course and instructor. The results indicated that the students who were informed that the results of their ratings would be used for administrative decisions rated the course and instructor more favorably on all aspects than students who were informed that the results of their ratings would only be used by the instructor.The authors are indebted to Professor Robert A. Waller for cooperating in obtaining the data on his two history courses.     

The effect of perceived class mean on the evaluation of instruction

A total of 232 college students in six different courses in three departments participated in a study to examine the effect of perceived course mean on course and instructor evaluations. Following a midsemester exam, students were given their actual earned exam scores and a manipulated class mean that was either ten percentage points higher or lower than the actual class average on the exam. Participants then completed an evaluation of the course and instructor. It was hypothesized that students scoring above the manipulated mean would rate the course and instructor more highly than students scoring below the manipulated mean. It was further hypothesized that students who were told that the class mean was higher would rate the course and instructor more highly than students who were told that the mean was lower. Results supported the first hypothesis. However, hypothesis two was not supported. Students receiving the lower manipulated class mean rated instructors more favorably. Results suggest the need to consider both individual exam scores and class averages in understanding the grade-teaching evaluation relationship.     

北航男排培养模式对高校培养学生运动员的启示

对北航男排学生运动员的培养目标、招生录取、文化教育、运动训练以及管理过程进行分析,并对厦门理工学院学生运动员的培养作对照思考,为高校培养高水平学生运动员提供理论与实践指导。     

Sources of variance in end-of-course student evaluations

Abstract

Evaluation of college instructors often centers on course ratings; however, there is little evidence that these ratings only reflect teaching. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative importance of three facets of course ratings: instructor, course and occasion. We sampled 2,459 fully-crossed dyads from a large university where two instructors taught the same two courses at least twice in a 3-year period. Generalizability theory was used to estimate unconfounded variance components for instructor, course and occasion, as well as their interactions. Meta-analysis was used to summarize those estimates. Results indicated that a three-way interaction between instructor, course and occasion that includes measurement error accounted for the most variance in student ratings (24%), with instructor accounting for the second largest amount (22%). While instructor - and presumably teaching - accounted for substantial variance in student course ratings, factors other than instructor quality had a larger influence on student ratings.     

Instructor Reputation and Student Ratings of Instruction

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between instructor reputation, as perceived by students, and student evaluations of the instructor and course. A total of 754 students from 39 classes participated in the study. Based on what students claimed to have heard about the instructor prior to enrolling in the course, they were classified into one of three groups: positive reputation, no information, and negative reputation. Using these groupings, two analyses were performed. In the first, mean overall ratings for the instructor and course were calculated and presented by class. In the second, both instructor and course ratings were modeled using multilevel regression. Results show large mean differences in both instructor and course ratings between the positive and negative reputation groups. More specifically, students who heard positive information regarding the instructor's reputation rated both the instructor and course higher than students who heard negative information about the instructor.     

Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks

This article applies the concept of classroom community to asynchronous learning networks (ALNs) by taking on the issue of how best to design and implement a course that fosters community among learners who are physically separated from each other. The following factors that can influence sense of community among distant learners are examined: student–instructor ratio, transactional distance, social presence and instructor immediacy, lurking, social equality, collaborative learning, group facilitation, and self-directed learning.     

The Attitude of Universities and Colleges Toward the Problems of Childhood

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to assess the extent to which the college instructor is able to influence the opinions of his students in evaluating a familiar task. The Ss were enrolled in seven college classes of a standard course in science methods and materials. The “familiar task” to be evaluated was a television lesson in science. By introducing the lesson with positive or negative comments, the instructor was able to exert a significant influence on the students’ evaluations of the lesson. The instructor’s influence, positively and negatively, was enhanced through the support of a student confidant. The findings of this study point to the relative ease with which a college instructor can manipulate the judgments of his students.     

Relationships between students' and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course

The author discusses the results of a study about the effect of students' and instructional variables on satisfaction and achievement in a Web-based course. Results indicated that gender, age, learning styles, time spent on the course, and perceptions of student–student interactions, course activities, and asynchronous Web-based conferences were not related to satisfaction and learning outcomes. Those students who entered the course with better Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) scores achieved higher final grades in the course, but did not express more satisfaction with the learning environment. Computer experience did not influence achievement but experienced computer users were more satisfied with the course. Students who perceived the student–instructor interactions positively felt that their discussion group had performed well during the conferences, and viewed the learning materials used in the conferences positively improved grades and were more satisfied with the course. Students expected instructor-led learning. There is a need to explicitly design an organising strategy to assist students in completing the problem-based learning processes during the Web-based conferences.     

IMPACT OF FULL-TIME VERSUS PART-TIME INSTRUCTOR STATUS ON COLLEGE STUDENT RETENTION AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN SEQUENTIAL COURSES

The primary purpose of this study was to examine the relation between full - time or part - time instructor status and college student retention and academic performance in sequential courses . Results indicate that for either developmental or regular courses, college students who take the first course in a sequence from a part - time instructor , and who take the second course in the sequence from a full - time instructor seem underprepared for the second course. By contrast to students experiencing other instructor status combinations (part - time / part - time , full - time / part - time , or full - time / full - time), these students are significantly less likely to either complete or achieve a grade of "C" or better in the second course. Sequential course instructor status, therefore, seems to be a predictor of college student success. Implications for practice pertaining to further research, college students, and institutions are discussed.