漫谈器乐教学

器乐的种类很多,各有其独特的音色和表现力,教师应该根据学生所学的乐器特点,教给学生基本的器乐知识与器乐演奏技巧,并根据学生各自特点的不同,因材施教。另外,为了提高学生的综合素质,有必要调整音乐文化课、基础文化课及专业技巧课之间的比重,培养学生的人文素养,为学生完美的器乐演奏奠定基础。     

Range effects using instrumental choice procedures

Pigeons were trained to discriminate visual flicker-rate stimuli using two types of instrumental choice procedures. One experiment used a free-operant concurrent schedule with multiple schedule components. Two additional experiments used a two-alternative, discrete-trial procedure. In all experiments, the range of training stimuli was manipulated across conditions. Results from all three experiments showed typical range effects on discrimination performance. That is, performance declined with increases in the overall range of variation of training stimuli. These range effects occurred with either continuous response rate measures or discrete choice measures. Moreover, range effects appeared with relatively high or low levels of overall discrimination accuracy and with either symmetrical or asymmetrical extensions of stimulus range. The results of these experiments suggest that increasing stimulus range influences both perceptual sensitivity and bias to response alternatives.     

Spontaneous recovery of instrumental discriminative responding

In six experiments, rats received discriminative training in which making a response (R) during a stimulus (S) produced a particular outcome (O). In Experiment 1, that outcome was replaced by a second outcome and responding was tested either immediately or after a delay. More substantial responding was observed with the delayed test. In Experiment 2, a test of transfer to new responses suggested that the growth in performance was not attributable to greater use of particular S-O associations. However, in Experiment 3, the growth in responding was found to be specific to particular S-R combinations. Experiment 4 replicated that specificity and demonstrated the importance of using two different outcomes for obtaining the growth in responding with time. Experiments 5 and 6 repeated these observations for the case of extinction, in which O was replaced by nonreinforcement. These results are interpreted as suggesting that an outcome-independent inhibitory S-R process develops, both with extinction and with the use of a second outcome, but dissipates with time.     

Motivational control after extended instrumental training

Hungry rats were trained to press a lever for food pellets prior to an assessment of the effect of a shift in their motivational state on instrumental performance in extinction. The first study replicated the finding that a reduction in the level of food deprivation has no detectable effect on extinction performance unless the animals receive prior experience with the food pellets in the nondeprived state (Balleine, 1992; Balleine & Dickinson, 1994). When tested in the nondeprived state, only animals that were reexposed to the food pellets in this state between training and testing showed a reduction in the level of pressing during the extinction test relative to animals tested in the deprived state. The magnitude of this reexposure effect depended, however, on the amount of instrumental training. Following more extended instrumental training, extinction performance was unaffected by reexposure to the food pellets in the nondeprived state whether or not the animals were food deprived at the time of testing. A second study demonstrated that the resistance to the reexposure treatment engendered by overtraining was due to the animals’ increased experience of the food pellets in the deprived state during training rather than to the more extensive exposure to the instrumental contingency. In contrast to the results of the first two experiments, however, a reliable reexposure effect was detected after overtraining in a final study, in which the animals were given greater reexposure to the food pellets in the nondeprived state.     

Temporal integration and instrumental conditioned reinforcement

Stimuli associated with primary reinforcement for instrumental behavior are widely believed to acquire the capacity to function as conditioned reinforcers via Pavlovian conditioning. Some Pavlovian conditioning studies suggest that animals learn the important temporal relations between stimuli and integrate such temporal information over separate experiences to form a temporal map. The present experiment examined whether Pavlovian conditioning can establish a positive instrumental conditioned reinforcer through such temporal integration. Two groups of rats received either delay or trace appetitive conditioning in which a neutral stimulus predicted response-independent food deliveries (CS1→US). Both groups then experienced one session of backward second-order conditioning of the training CS1 and a novel CS2 (CS1–CS2 pairing). Finally, the ability of CS2 to function as a conditioned reinforcer for a new instrumental response (leverpressing) was assessed. Consistent with the previous demonstrations of temporal integration in fear conditioning, a CS2 previously trained in a trace-conditioning protocol served as a better instrumental conditioned reinforcer after backward second-order conditioning than did a CS2 previously trained in a delay protocol. These results suggest that an instrumental conditioned reinforcer can be established via temporal integration and raise challenges for existing quantitative accounts of instrumental conditioned reinforcement.     

Frustrative nonrelief in instrumental escape conditioning

The generality of the frustration effect in an aversive stimulus conditioning procedure was examined by training and testing 40 rats in a double cold-waterway escape conditioning apparatus. Experimental and control procedures analogous to appetitive conditioning experiments (e.g., Amsel & Roussel, 1952; Wagner. 1959) indicated that frustrative nonrelief (i.e., reinforcement omission) in the first goal tank yielded significant increments in swimming speed in the second waterway, and that these increments in performance were dependent upon initial training with continuous relief (i.e., reinforcement) in the first goal tank. Extensions of the generality of the frustration effect are discussed.     

Response-outcome versus outcome-response associations in instrumental learning

In three experiments with rats as subjects, instrumental training procedures were used to study the format of encoding of the reinforcing outcome (O). At issue is the relative contribution of response-outcome (R-O) associations between responses and their earned outcomes and of O-R associations between anticipated outcomes and responses reiaforced in their presence. In Experiments 1 and 2, R earned one O during a stimulus that controlled the anticipation of another O. Devaluation and transfer tests suggested that the earned O was more critical than the anticipated O in controlling behavior. In Experiment 3, a differential-outcomes procedure was used, with consistent R-0 relations arranged in groups that differed in the consistency of O-R relations. Subsequent devaluation of O produced similar selective depression of R, regardless of the O-R relations. These results suggest that an R-O association can contribute to instrumental performance more than does an O-R association.     

关于化学仪器分析课改革的研究

分析了目前《仪器分析》课程中存在的问题。不能把学生学习了《仪器分析》课程以后，仍然缺乏仪器分析的基本常识，归结于学生不努力。原因分析如下：从教学方面来说，由于部分教师本人没有使用仪器的经验，教学目标定的过高，讲得太杂，仪器原理的比重过高等影响了教学的效果；应试教育造成的学生思维方式僵化，学生重知识的掌握，轻思维方式的训练。从目前仪器管理机制方面来说，不合理的体制，限制了教师和相关的研究人员对于仪器的使用和研究。本研究将根据以上相应的弊端给出相应的改进措施。     

Overexpectation in appetitive Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning

In three experiments that used appetitive preparations with rats, we examined the effects of reinforcing a compound consisting of two previously reinforced stimuli on subsequent responding to those stimuli. Experiment 1 showed that a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus given this treatment evoked fewer magazine entries when presented alone than did a reinforced stimulus that did not receive the compound treatment. Experiment 2 examined inhibition of delay and generalization decrement accounts for the results of Experiment 1. Experiment 3 extended this finding to an instrumental learning paradigm.     

Evidence for the hierarchical structure of instrumental learning

In three experiments using rats, we examined the role of a discriminative stimulus (S) in governing the relation between a response (R) and an outcome (O) in an appetitive instrumental learning paradigm. In each experiment, we attempted to distinguish between a simple S-O association and a hierarchical relation in which S is associated with the R-O association. We used three variations on discriminative training procedures and three different assessment techniques-for revealing the hierarchical structure. In Experiment 1, we employed a training procedure in which S signaled a change in the R-O relation but no change in the likelihood of O. Although such an arrangement should not produce an excitatory S-O association, it nevertheless generated an S that controlled responding and transferred that control to other responses. In Experiment 2, we used a discrimination procedure in which two Ss each had the same two Rs and Os occur in their presence but each S signaled that a different R-O combination would be in effect. This design provided the opportunity for equivalent pairwise associations among S, R, and O but unique hierarchical relations. The subjects learned the hierarchical structure, as revealed by the specific depressive effect of a subsequent lithium-chloride-induced devaluation of O on responding only in the presence of the S in which that response had led to that outcome. In Experiment 3, one S signaled two different R-O outcomes. Then, two new stimuli were presented with the original S; the R-O relations were retained in the presence of one of the added stimuli but were rearranged in the presence of the other. The added S came to control less responding when it was redundant with respect to the R-O relations than when it was informative. Although all of the results were of modest size and each has an alternative interpretation, together they provide converging evidence for the hierarchical role of S in controlling an R-O association.     

论票据权利的善意取得

票据权利的善意取得制度在于化解原票据权利人与最后善意持票人之间的冲突。善意取得票据权利必须符合严格的条件方能得到法律的认可和保护。     

The influence of context-reinforcer associations on instrumental performance

In each of two experiments, rats were trained to press the lever in a Skinner box, food reinforcement being available on a variable-interval 60-sec schedule (VI 60). There followed an “exposure phase” for which the levers were removed from the boxes, and then a final test with the levers replaced to assess the effects of the intervening treatment on instrumental responding. Experiment 1 showed that simple exposure to the box reduced the vigor of instrumental performance in comparison with a condition in which food was made available during the exposure phase. Animals which received no exposure treatment also showed a relatively high rate of response. Experiment 2 demonstrated that an exposure treatment in which the occurrence of food is signaled by a light stimulus also leads to a decline in instrumental responding. These results are held to support the notion that associations between the context and the reinforcer serve to energize appetitive instrumental behavior.     

仪器分析实验课程改革探索

仪器分析实验课程围绕应用型、创新型人才培养目标对教学中的教学模式及成绩评定等问题进行了探讨。通过开设开放式实验教学课程、采取更加全面和科学的实验考核制度、引入实验奖励机制及加强实验教师队伍建设等改革措施,激发学生的学习积极性、实践能力、创新能力,有利于培养应用型、创新型人才。     

Resurgence of instrumental behavior after an abstinence contingency

In resurgence, an extinguished instrumental behavior (R1) recovers when a behavior that has replaced it (R2) is also extinguished. The phenomenon may be relevant to understanding relapse that can occur after the termination of “contingency management” treatments, in which an unwanted behavior (e.g., substance abuse) is reduced by reinforcing an alternative behavior. When reinforcement is discontinued, the unwanted behavior might resurge. However, unlike most resurgence experiments, contingency management treatments also introduce a negative contingency, in which reinforcers are not delivered unless the client has abstained from the unwanted behavior. In two experiments with rats, we therefore examined the effects of adding a negative “abstinence” contingency to the resurgence design. During response elimination, R2 was not reinforced unless R1 had not been emitted for a minimum period of time (45, 90, or 135 s). In both experiments, adding such a contingency to simple R1 extinction reduced, but did not eliminate, resurgence. In Experiment 2, we found the same effect in a yoked group that could earn reinforcers for R2 at the same points in time as the negative-contingency group, but without the requirement to abstain from R1. Thus, the negative contingency per se did not contribute to the reduction in resurgence. These results suggest that the contingency reduced resurgence by making reinforcers more difficult to earn and more widely spaced in time. This could have allowed the animal to learn that R1 was extinguished in the “context” of infrequent reinforcement—a context more like that of resurgence testing. The results are thus consistent with a contextual (renewal) account of resurgence. The method might provide a better model of relapse after termination of a contingency management treatment.     

An associative analysis of instrumental biconditional discrimination learning

Three different techniques were employed to analyze the associative structures mediating performance on an instrumental biconditional discrimination. In all three experiments, rats were trained concurrently on two tasks in which different stimuli signaled which one of two responses would be followed by reward. In each task, one response was rewarded in one stimulus and the other response was rewarded in the other stimulus. Correct responses earned pellets in one task and sucrose in the other task. The transfer procedure was used in Experiment 1A to identify whether or not an association developed between a biconditional discriminative stimulus and its instrumental outcome. Evidence was obtained that a biconditional cue elevated preferentially a new response trained with the same outcome. Experiments 1B and 3 examined the potential contribution of this stimulus-outcome association to biconditional performance by training the biconditional cues as signals (S-s) for the nonreinforcement of a different response. There was no evidence that this operation interfered with the ability of a biconditional cue to control performance of its correct response. In Experiments 1B and 2, the value of the instrumental outcome was reduced in an attempt to assess the contribution of stimulus-response associations to performance on the biconditional discrimination. The results of Experiments 1B and 2 reveal that correct responses were depressed following devaluation of the outcome used to train them, suggesting that learning about the response-outcome relation occurs. The implications of these results for binary and hierarchical models of instrumental learning are discussed.     

Transfer between Pavlovian facilitators and instrumental discriminative stimuli

Two experiments assessed the degree to which Pavlovian facilitators were interchangeable with instrumental discriminative stimuli (S^ds). In Experiment 1, rats were trained in a Pavlovian paradigm in which one stimulus (i.e., a facilitator) signaled the reinforcement of another stimulus (i.e., a target). Next, the rats were given instrumental discrimination training in which an S^d signaled the reinforcement of barpressing. A transfer test then assessed the capacity of the Pavlovian facilitator to promote barpressing. The results showed that the facilitator promoted significant barpressing, both when it was presented alone and when it was presented in compound with the S^d. Reliable transfer was not obtained with a “pseudofacilitator” control stimulus that, during training, was uninformative about the reinforcement of its target. Experiment 2 showed that a stimulus trained as an instrumental S^d reliably augmented responding to a stimulus previously trained as a target in a Pavlovian facilitation paradigm. A “pseudo-S^d” that, during training, was uninformative about the reinforcement of barpressing failed to promote such transfer. These results show that Pavlovian facilitators and instrumental S^ds are interchangeable to a significant degree, and suggest that facilitators and S^ds may act via similar mechanisms.     

Note taking and student verbalization as instrumental learning activities

Note taking and verbalization are considered as instrumental student activities which influence the relationship between the learning task and the learning outcomes. Research has demonstrated no significant relationships between the type of test anticipated and the amount of notes taken. The time interval between the presentation of the instructional stimuli and the criterion test does influence the amount of notes taken with a delayed test expectancy resulting in more note taking activity than immediate test expectancy. The probability of a student recalling an item on a test is greater if that item is present in the notes than if it is not present. Studies which compared note taking to no note taking conditions have shown a facilitative effect for note taking, but the effect is influenced by type of review condition and the time interval between note taking and criterion test. Research on the effects of verbalization in instructional settings has failed to show any clear benefits for methods which involve greater student verbalization. Controlled laboratory studies have shown that overt verbalization positively influences associational learning, serial learning, and discrimination learning. Alternative theoretical explanations for the effects of note taking and verbalization are discussed, and a structure for future research on these topics is provided.     

Statistical modeling processes through the lens of instrumental genesis

Educational Studies in Mathematics - Digital technology is indispensable for doing and learning statistics. When technology is used in mathematics education, the learning of concepts and the...     

Associations with anticipated and obtained outcomes in instrumental learning

In four experiments, we investigated encoding of the reinforcer in instrumental learning. We contrasted the view that the reinforcer is encoded as a consequence of the response with the position that the expectation of the reinforcer serves as an antecedent stimulus for the response. In all four experiments, a response was followed by one reinforcer in the presence of a stimulus known to elicit an expectation of a different reinforcer. In Experiments 1 and 2, we found that devaluing the consequent reinforcer reduced performance of the response more than did devaluing the expected reinforcer. In Experiment 3, we found no evidence at all for a detrimental effect of devaluing the expected reinforcer. Experiment 4 showed that a stimulus associated with a reinforcer will preferentially promote a response that has the same-consequent reinforcer rather than the same-antecedent reinforcer. These results provide further support for the view that response-reinforcer associations are the crucial product in instrumental learning situations.