中国英语学习者英语习得过程中的零主语习失

文章着重阐述中国英语学习者英语学习过程中的零主语初始习失现象（initial unlea-rn-ing）旨在论证在中国英语习得者的中介语中,是否存在零主语的初始习失。研究发现,中国英语习得者的中介语中并不存在零主语的初始习失现象,二语习得者会把母语中的零主语参数迁移到二语的中介语中,而且在所测试的所有句子结构中,这一迁移无一例外地存在。     

Unlearning,critical action learning and wicked problems

This paper explores the idea of unlearning in Critical Action Learning (CAL) as applied to the wicked problems of organisations and societies. It draws on data and ideas developed during a research project conducted for Skills for Care by Pedler, Abbott, Brook and Burgoyne (Skills for Care 2014) and from experiences on development programmes for social workers on action learning facilitation in 2012 and 2013 with Christine Abbott of the Centre for Action Learning Facilitation (C-ALF).     

试谈研究性学习课程中合作的类型及其意义

文章通过对研究性学习课程中出现的合作的类型及其意义作出了分析介绍 ,为中学教师及教研工作者研究和开展研究性学习课程提供一些理论依据 ,为中学生进行研究性学习课程提供一些思想指导     

Planning and presenting career development seminars

Summary An overview of the seminar planning process that includes needs assessment, program planning, implementation and evaluation has been presented. In addition, necessary platform skills have been identified to help staff members move from the role of planner to that of presentor. With training, either in counselor education programs or as a part of staff development, career counselors can provide a higher quality service to a larger number of students by learning more about the science and art of seminar planning and presentation.     

迈克尔·奥克肖特的自由观

奥克肖特是一位保守主义的代表，其自由观不正面阐述自由是什么，而是从自由存在的条件和自由的对立面来反衬他所要追求的自由——自由亲和制度和自由友善的传统。     

Special education under the modernity. From restricted liberty,through organized modernity,to extended liberty and a plurality of practices

The philosophers of the Enlightenment formulated a set of new ideas and visions about access to knowledge and education for all citizens. The main discourse of modernity is linked to liberty, democracy and equality, but modernity is also an ambiguous project, characterized by an ongoing conflict between individual freedom and discipline. Modernity has been transformed through different phases and the related crises that have marked the transition between them. In this conflicting history the ideological and socio‐political conditions for special education during modernity is also described. The article uses examples from Norwegian special education policy and practice in describing and discussing developments and discourses in the field through different phases of modernity, from the early rise of the field within the frames of the charity institutions to the discourses on integration and inclusion in the latest decades.