学业评价中的试卷设计及试题例析

从学业评价中的目标、考试内容及试卷中各项内容权重的确定分析了学生评价中试卷的设计;从选择题及非选择题的使用与编写分析了学业评价中试题的编制与使用;并对学业评价中的试题进行了举例分析。     

生物试题的难度与调整技巧

生物试题的难度与调整技巧广东深圳南头中学（５１８０５２）张南荣，杨朝珍教学过程中，通常把各种测试成绩作为评价学生学业水平的重要指标。为了使测评较准确地反映学生的学习是否达到教学大纲规定的目标要求，教师在编制测试题时，必须考虑的问题之一就是如何调控试题...     

基于学业质量标准的单个试题的命制与评价

学业质量标准反映了2017年版高中数学课程标准的最新成果,是学生学习数学课程后学业成就的表现。基于学业质量标准对单个试题的命制与评价进行探讨,从单个试题命制的背景与过程、单个试题评价以及数学关键能力赋分等角度展开,反思命题评价:命制试题离不开知识,忌空谈素养;评价要凸显过程性,遵循素养达成规律;评价要注重"双原则",创新评价形式。     

学业评价中的试卷设计与试题命制技术研究

学业评价体系的建立是课程建设的重要环节,而考试则是学业评价中最常用也是最核心的方法和手段。掌握基本的试题命制技术,设计符合规范的学业评价试卷,是客观全面地评价学生学业,精确了解学生在知识、技能和品德等方面的状态,诊断教学问题的前提和基础。本研究借助中学物理、化学学科考试的案例,对学业评价中的试卷设计以及试题命制技术进行探讨。     

在动手实验中拓展学生的探究思维——江苏省历年学业水平测试必修生物实验试题分析及复习策略

自从2008年江苏省实施“3+学业水平测试+综合素质评价”普通高考模式以来,学业水平测试越来越被学校重视,由于必修生物的学生在各校学生中占比较大,在学业水平测试中生物学科备受关注.生物学科是一门建立在实验基础上的自然学科,所以学生要想提高生物素养,掌握生物学科知识,生物实验尤为重要.认真分析近几年江苏学业水平测试有关实验的试题,对2015年学业水平测试复习具有指导性作用.     

数学学业成就评价试题编制研究

学业成就评价是基础教育质量监测的重要组成部分,试题编制技术是学业评价的关键,须遵循能力导向、发展促进、科学规范、公平适切的原则。通过实例,阐释数学学业成就评价试题编制的标准化程序,重点描绘试题编制的方法、策略和技术关键,为基础教育质量监测体系建设提供参考,为考试改革提供借鉴,有益于基础教育质量的提高和我国教育的健康发展。     

美国NAEP2009科学课程评价试题编制研究

美国教育进展评估是持续进行并不断发展的全国性基础教育学生学业成就评价体系。在分析 NAEP2009科学课程评价体系的基础上,本丈着重研究了该评估体系试题编制技术的一般框架和具体细则,旨在为国内的试题编制提供技术借鉴。     

2007年学业水平测试(必修)生物试题浅析

江苏省2008届“3＋学业水平测试＋综合素质评价”高考模式已经确定，按照要求，2007年4月首届学业水平测试（必修）考试已尘埃落定，其中生物试题能结合我省实际，既突出基本知识考查，又注重能力考核，并兼顾理论联系实际；知识面分布广，选题灵活，分量适中，是一份全面检验我省在生物新课程实施下的学生学习水平和教师教学质量的好试卷。     

对提高学业评价试题编制质量的思考

"对学生学习成效的测验是学业评价的基础工作,只有保证测验的工具--试题的质量,才能充分发挥测验的功能,促进教学质量的提高.确立评价目标是提高试题编制质量的根本前提,讲究评价艺术是提高试题编制质量的关键所在,凸显评价内涵是提高试题编制质量的切实保证.     

如何命制情境化的语文学业评价试题

情境化试题越来越多地出现在语文学业评价考试中。如何命制情境化试题,使其发挥应有的功能,需要不断探讨。依据《普通高中语文课程标准（2017年版2020年修订）》,语文学业水平评价试题的情境要围绕学生个人体验、社会生活和学科认知三个维度设计;情境化设计要凸显语文学科特征,以“语境”作为“情境”设计的核心,不仅提供社会生活、学习生活等背景,也要规定语言运用的条件或限制,让试题切实为考查学生运用语文解决现实生活中的具体问题服务。     

Ask Questions to Encourage Questions Asked

Abstract

We delineate some types of structured practice (modeling, requests, feedback, and space-making) that help students learn to pose appropriate questions and to initiate exploration of those questions. Developing skills requires practice, so we suggest ways to embed structured practice into existing class sessions. Including structured practice is nuanced, instructor-specific, and depends on context. Therefore, we give examples of implementation in an inquiry-based learning (IBL)-influenced calculus class, in a partially IBL mathematics for liberal arts class, and in a completely IBL class for gifted high school students.     

问题逻辑新区探赜：连问逻辑

问题逻辑的研究是百花齐放、千姿百态的。问句实质上是题设加问式构成的，预设理论对鉴定问题性质和探讨问题间关系有重要作用。问题逻辑新区对问题的考察与以往的问题逻辑研究不同，不再对问句进行孤立的挖掘分析，也不再解剖至微，而是把问题放入系统中，前后连接起来考察。在发问与回答、再问与再答的链条延续里分理出Q-Q关联问题（Qn→Qn+1）、A-Q关联问题（Ａn→Ｑn+1）和A-A关联问题（Ａn→Ａn+1）三种不同情形来考察和探赜。     

Questions of Choice

The fact that education is, and must be, a process of enculturation for those being educated gives us some, but by no means enough, guidance as to what we would expect to see going on in our schools. For given that our educational institutions are part of our culture and, given that anything that is part of our culture will transmit cultural messages, if we put children in school and let them play all day, or simply asked teachers to explain their hobbies to the children, then some processes of enculturalisation would be going on. But no one with any real concern for either our children or their education would think such things fulfil a proper role for schools. Certainly if, as Arnold thought, education is a question of passing on, or trying to pass on, the features from our culture that we value, then any such reliance on random processes must be ruled out. Instead we have to select those aspects of our culture which we wish our children to partake of and insist that our educational establishments make sustained and intentional efforts to ensure such participation.     

Questions of Assessment

Using SATs in their present form meets the requirements neither of individual assessment nor of the monitoring of standards, writes Professor Klaus Wedell, Department of Educational Psychology and Special Educational Needs, Institute of Education, London University.     

Questions of chemistry

The research reported here derives from the general field of learner-centred teaching and learning, with specific reference to undergraduate chemistry. It documents the use of student-generated questions as diagnostic of their willingness to engage in classroom interactions. It explores four ways of gathering students' written questions and their relative effectiveness. It examines students' capacity to design and present 'quality questions' during phases of their learning and the extent to which these questions are indicative of particular styles of interaction in the classroom, both with tutors and with other students. The results are drawn from data collected through written questions posted into a question box, the 'hits' recorded on a computer software system, and through one-to-one interviews with a sample of 32 students. The results provide an opportunity to discuss the quality of interactions within fairly formalized systems of teaching and learning of chemistry in a university setting and to suggest further research required in this field.     

Funny Questions

1.When does eleven plus two equal one？ On a watch face. 2.A police officer has a brother, but the brother has no brother How can this be？