课堂展示性评价:学生学习评定的新探索

新课程改革是全面推进素质教育和教育改革的需要,是我国目前基础教育的一项重要工作。《基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)》对新课程评价改革提出“改变课程评价过分强调甄别与选拔的功能,发挥评价促进学生发展、教师提高和改进教学实践的功能”的目标,这为新课程的教育评价改革指明了方向。我们以多元智能理论、元认知理论、智力的动态测量观及脑科学的最新研究成果为主要理论依据,以我国有关基础教育改革和新课程改革的一系列文件为政策依据,根据国际教育、教学测量和评价的新趋势,借鉴国内外评价改革的有益经验,结合我国实际,提出了“学生学习展示性评定”的研究思路。学习展示性评定是指“通过学生自己给出问题的过程与答案和展示的各种作品来判断和评价学生所获得的知识、技能和情感态度等各方面”。学习展示性评定的核心是允许被评估者以各种合适的方式向公众展示他们的实力和对课程的理解。近几年来,我们在浙江省的几所中小学开展“学习展示性评定研究”,采用“课堂展示性评定”、“档案袋展示性评定”、“作业展示性评定”、“学习分项评定”等多种措施对学生的学习进行评定。在学习展示性评价中,课堂展示性评价是其中的重要内容之一,本文是“课堂展示性评价”的总结。     

语文课在“展示评价”环节中的有效方法及策略

如何开展有效学习已成为当前语文课程改革实施过程中教师普遍关心的问题。通过课堂实践,我感觉较难把握和操作的就是“展示评价”这个环节。从课堂效果和学生发展来看,“展示评价”这一环节既可以检查学生对知识的理解、掌握情况,又可以检查各小组的合作互助情况,同时也给学生的素质发展提供了一个锻炼展示的平台,它应当是课堂中最精彩最关键的一环。但如果操作不好就会耗时、费力,不仅不能在课堂上完成学习任务,反而会直接影响学生的学习兴趣和学习效果。因此．我就开展“展示评价”的有效策略谈一些看法。     

小组合作学习环境下初中英语“读报圈”报刊阅读教学实践探究

本文主要探究小组合作学习环境下初中英语“读报圈”报刊阅读教学实践。该模式能激发学生积极阅读和思考,将个体的读与思、小组讨论和课堂小组展示、评价结合起来,让学生在“阅读——思考——讨论——联系自身——分享展示——评价反馈”中提升自己的学习能力。     

作文讲评ABC

一、多用激励,让学生展示自我《语文课程标准》指出“,语文教学应激发学生的学习兴趣”,“鼓励学生选择适合自己的学习方式”。针对以往作文讲评课存在的弊端,我们提出了“以赏析为主,以评改为主”的作文评价方式,学生学得主动,课堂呈现勃勃生机。1.在赏析中展示自我以往的作文     

“善”用展示激活政治课堂

展示是高效政治课堂的核心环节,学生因展示而自信,课堂因展示而精彩.在实际政治课堂中,要坚持“以学生的发展为中心”,科学合理地运用展示,调动学生的主体功能,激发学生的学习兴趣和热情,促进学生自主学习,实现高效政治课堂.     

让数学课堂成为引力场、思维场和展示场

优化课堂教学过程是当前实施新课程改革的重点和关键.教师在教学中要以生为本,让数学课堂成为“引力场”,激发学生学习数学的兴趣,尊重学生,及时采用激励性评价;让数学课堂成为“思维场”,训练有效倾听,强调深度思维,难点质疑,重视知识生成;让数学课堂成为“展示场”,鼓励学生充分展示,大胆表现.     

在展示性评价中收获成功与快乐

课程评价对学校课程起着重要的导向和质量监控作用,是课程实施的指挥棒。我校基于校情与学情,构建了适合学生发展的“快乐课程”体系,称之为“F—U-N课程”,并确立了“展示即评价”的理念。我校以展示为主线,将学生成长手册、课程评价手册《智慧学分卡》、“摘星”评价机制进行有机统整,并通过梦舞台、主题节展示、游园活动、小主持等一系列展示平台,让更多在“摘星”评价、学分评价中表现优秀的学生拥有展示其个性与才能的舞台。     

语文课堂即时评价策略例谈

课堂即时评价,是指在课堂教学过程中,教师针对学生的语言、思维等学习行为,作出及时的价值判断。课堂即时评价与教学过程紧密结合,没有严格意义上的评价方案与评价绪论,强调对具体行为的评判。它渗透于教学流程的每一个环节、每一个细节,应该充满生命活力,以“真情”打动学生,以“魅力”感染学生,在“过程”中引领,在“平等”中商榷。精彩的语文课堂评价．     

马克思主义基本原理概论课专题式“演讲课堂”设计方案

专题式“演讲课堂”是在马克思主义基本原理概论课堂上开展的与教师专题讲授相呼应的实践教学模式，它秉持着“以学生为主体、以时代为引领、以原理为支撑、以问题为导向、与专业相结合”的设计理念，既具有科学性，又具有可行性。专题式“演讲课堂”实施的侧重点是教师引导学生以小组为单位，对特定专题进行研学，并通过演讲比赛的形式展示研学成果，其效果的评价要通过形成性评价改革来体现，通过合理而周密的程序设计，能够很好地发挥学生的创造力，从而实现立德树人的效果。     

学生“主持主讲”课堂的建构与实践——以莱州市双语学校为例

在培养学生综合能力、倡导课堂多样化的背景下,莱州市双语学校作为一所九年一贯制学校在十年的合作学习研究与实践的基础上,实施了学生“主持主讲”课堂的实践探索。通过研究“主持主讲”课堂基本流程、制定课堂教学规范和学生学习规范、创新评价方法、实施“两清”策略,促进了教师课堂教学研究,进一步推动学生的主体性发展,建构并丰富了以小组为单位的学生“主持主讲”课堂模式。在具体实践中,通过给学生提供展示自我的时间和空间,满足了学生学习主体的需要,提高了学习的自觉性和乐趣,进一步提高了学生的学科能力、社会能力等。     

特殊儿童评估的新进展

本文总结了特殊教育中评估方法的新进展.分析了团队评估的形式以及合作型团队的特征;介绍了行为表现评估、以课程为基础的评估与产品集评估等评估方法;探究了特殊化智力测验在特殊教育评估中的重要作用.     

有效学生课业考评与高师公共心理学教学改革

公共心理学在高等师范院校中是一门重要的基础课程,对于培养合格的师范生有重要的意义。然而,目前我国高师公共心理学教学现状是不尽如人意的。引进有效的课业考评的方式可能是促进高师公共心理学教学的有效手段。本文介绍了目前在教育界几种引人注目的新兴的评价方式在公共心理学教学中的应用。     

Technology-based assessment in science: Issues underlying teacher advocacy of testing policy

The theme of this article is that the development of informed teacher advocacy for new advancements in technology-based assessment is an essential requirement if such advancements are to contribute toward the systemic improvement of the quality of school science instruction. The potential for advocacy involvement by teachers is considered a natural reaction toward the increasing tendency for classroom practices to be affected by local, state, or national assessment policy initiatives. In support of such an advocacy process, this article provides an awareness of the principles of good measurement practices in conjunction with the qualitative characteristics of technology-based assessment that together are sufficient to serve as a foundation for teachers whose concerns may motivate them to raise relevant questions regarding assessment policy. Based upon such implied standards of testing practice, the article suggests key evaluative questions for teachers to ask about any forms of science assessment that would have the effect of amplifying the potential value of new technology-based forms of assessment applications to enhance ongoing classroom processes of science teaching.     

An international online survey of the practices and perceptions of higher education professors with respect to the assessment of learning in the classroom

In a context where public action must demonstrate its effectiveness and efficiency, and where the links between teaching and the quality of learning are regularly highlighted, it seems relevant to identify the trends and logic that govern university professors’ decisions with respect to the modes of learning assessment favoured within the framework of their delivery of teaching services. Moreover, given that university teaching practices are changing rapidly due to the introduction of different views of the learning process, one might conclude that the same holds for assessment practices. Through our research work, we led to the development of a trilingual (English, French and Spanish) online survey devoted to an international investigation into the classroom assessment practices of higher education teachers. This survey proposes an online platform that will allow institutions of higher learning to document some of their current practices and to compare observed trends with what is happening elsewhere, in accordance with differing missions and traditions. These research notes are thus intended to describe the survey itself and to show how the questionnaire and individual items were structured, in addition to providing an overview of treatments within and between institutions that followed the testing.     

The development process for the optional teacher assessment materials for English for use in Wales at the end of Key Stage 2

This paper outlines the development process that took place for the production of assessment materials to be used by teachers in Wales now that statutory testing at the end of KS2 has been abolished. The aim was to provide teachers with a free, but rich, optional resource that would allow for assessment of pupils' abilities in a wide range of skills and competencies embedded in the English curriculum and demonstrate how teacher assessments could be used both summatively and formatively.     

History and Background of Nebraska's School-based Teacher-led Assessment and Reporting System (STARS)

Nebraska's approach to standards, assessment, and accountability, the School-based Teacher-led Assessment and Reporting System (STARS) is based upon local control and the belief that classrooms and teachers must be at the heart of student learning and accountability. STARS relies on locally-developed assessment systems to accurately measure and report student performance on state content standards. Each local system in Nebraska's 500+ school districts is reviewed for technical quality, and districts are publicly rated for assessment quality and student performance. The purpose of this article is to establish the historical background.     

Using computer simulations to assesss hands-on science learning

Two methods of assessing student learning of a hands-on instructional unit are compared. One method involves manipulation of concrete materials, and the other method involves manipulation of icons on a computer to solve an electric circuits problem. Sixth-grade students in an inquiry-based science program completed both assessments separated by three weeks. Results indicated that although mean performance was the same for each method, individual student performance varied considerably. Implications for use of computer simulations as an alternative to hands-on assessment are discussed.This research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and the Office of the Vice President, University of Michigan. Opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily the supporting agencies.     

Formative assessment of procedural skills: students’ responses to the Objective Structured Clinical Examination and the Integrated Performance Procedural Instrument

Assessment of clinical skills is a critical element of undergraduate medical education. We compare a traditional approach to procedural skills assessment – the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) with the Integrated Performance Procedural Instrument (IPPI). In both approaches, students work through ‘stations’ or ‘scenarios’ undertaking defined tasks. In the IPPI, all tasks are contextualised, requiring students to integrate technical, communication and other professional skills. The aim of this study was to explore students’ responses to these two assessments. Third‐year medical students participated in formative OSCE and IPPI sessions on consecutive days. Although performance data were collected in both assessments, quantitative data are not presented here. Group interviews with students were conducted by independent researchers. Data were analysed thematically. The OSCE and the IPPI were both valued, but for different reasons. Preference for the OSCE reflected the format of the summative assessment. The IPPI was valued for the opportunity to practise patient‐centred care in a simulated setting which integrated technical, communication and other professional skills. We posit that scenario‐based assessments such as the IPPI reflect real‐world issues of patient‐centred care. Although the limitations of this study prevent wide extrapolation, we encourage curriculum developers to consider the influence of assessments on what and how their students learn.     

合理运用形成性评价 促进教学效果最优化

评价是英语课程的重要组成部分,在对学生进行终结性评价的同时,我们还应更注重对学生的形成性评价。形成性评价能使学生增强自信,使他们从被动接受评价者,转变成为评价的主体和积极参与者。在评价时,注意遵循一定的原则,并且合理利用评价策略。