中小学校长负责制失真的原因分析及对策

校长负责制自实施以来,对深化学校内部管理体制改革起了极其重要的作用,但在许多方面仍然存在一定的问题,存在种种失真现象。其主要表现是:政策残缺,政策表面化,政策扩大化。政策失真的主要原因是: (1)政策本身存在缺陷,即缺少配套的法律法规,政策目标笼统不具体; (2)社会方面存在政治体制的影响、传统文化思想的影响和经济水平的影响; (3)政策执行者自身素质的影响。避免校长负责制政策失真的做法主要是:制定相应的法律法规,改革教育管理体制,提高教育行政领导特别是校长的思想认识水平,培养教师的民主意识。     

对“中小学校长负责制”政策调整的分析与建议

政策调整是政策运行过程中的必要环节。现行的“中小学校长负责制”应该做出适当的调整,主要原因在于“中小学校长负责制”面对的政策问题、环境都发生了较大的变化．政策方案以及执行过程中也凸现出诸多问题。只有实施必要的政策调整,才能够使政策过程适应环境、解决问题,确保政策的有效落实。当前需要明确政策调整的基本思路,采取积极的政策调整措施．优化“中小学校长负责制”政策过程。     

完善中小学校长负责制之我见

中小学校长负责制是带有民主监督和民主管理成分的一长制.从总体上说,这种体制科学合理,行之有效.从发展的眼光看,还需要不断改进和完善.改进和完善校长负责制是一项涉及到教育、人事、劳动、财政等有关部门的综合改革,是一项系统工程,需要政府及其教育行政部门和学校共同推进、整体运作、配套实施.其重中之重是深化校长管理体制及校长选拔制度的改革,改进校长培训方法、完善校长激励机制,加强校长监督机制,从而加强校长队伍建设.     

浅析我国的中小学校长负责制

我国中小学校实行校长负责制,其内涵包括:校长全面负责,党支部保证监督,教职工民主管理三个要素。为逐步完善中小学校长负责制应在法律上,完善相关法律法规的建设;制度上,推进民主建设,构建多方参与的学校管理机制;文化上,提倡终身教育理念,提高校长的专业素质;发展上,推进校本管理,调动全校师生的能动性;评价上,注重多元价值的整合。     

中小学校长负责制改革思路

我国各级各类中小学校普遍实行校长负责制。校长负责制在调动了校长办学积极性、增加了学校办学自主权、取得了一定积极效果的同时,也显现出一定的弊端。如使学校处于外控的模式之下,英雄校长观被不断强化,学校民主管理机制远未健全等。要坚持和完善校长负责任制应处理好校长行政权力与教职工民主管理权利的关系,并规范中小学校长的选拔任用制度,使校长的选拔、任用、考评、培训等工作逐步规范和完善,促进中小学校长负责制健康发展。     

健全制度 切实贯彻中小学校长负责制

试行中小学校长负责制,对于调动校长办学积极性,扩大学校自主权,促进学校民主化进程起到了积极的作用,但在试行过程中,我们发现还存在如下五个倾向性的问题:一是有些人认为校长负责制就是校长一人说了算,忽视党组织和教代会在学校管理中的地位和作用;有的校长我行我素,独断专行;个别校长因此犯了错误,甚至犯了法。二是少数党支部书记工作放不开手脚,片面地认为试行校长负责制后,学校工作主要是校长的工作,有怕越位的顾     

中小学校长负责制的改革思路

科学合理的管理体制必须体现民主精神,现代学校制度的实质应该是民主管理制度。实践证明,目前实行的校长负责制是比较合理的领导体制,应该坚持。但是,随着时代的进步,它的种种弊端也逐一显现,甚至阻碍了教育进一步发展的脚步。本文在分析现行中小学校长负责制的基础上提出了改革和完善中小学校长负责制的思路和策略。     

对中小学校长负责制的思考

自改革开放以来,我国中小学实行了校长负责制,随着国家经济的不断增长,基础教育领域也发生了天翻地覆的变化。进入21世纪,知识经济初见端倪,原有的一些教育管理机制与现代学校的管理和发展出现了一些不相适应的情况。如何进一步全面落实校长负责制,提高学校的办学效能,完成党的十六大提出的“办人民满意的教育”的任务,已摆在每一个教育管理者的面前。     

中小学校长负责制三十年回顾与现实问题分析

校长负责制的形成、演变和发展,体现了学校领导体制和管理体制的进步。在近三十年来中小学校长负责制发展历程回顾的基础上,以及在义务教育管理体制、国家财政体制、人事制度改革以及推崇教育家管理教育理念的背景之下,发现校长负责制运行的问题,在现代学校制度要求下重构校长负责制。     

对中小学实施校长负责制的思考

校长负责制这一学校领导体制自产生以来对我国的中小学教育发展起到了积极作用。但是随着市场经济体制的建立,这一体制在实施中出现了一些问题,如校长无能、保守、专制甚至是腐败。这些问题的解决需要完善校长的任用制度、改革现有的考评制度、建立有效的监督机制、建立合理的奖惩机制。     

Instructional leadership and the charter school principal

Few studies have investigated what occurs inside charter schools with respect to instructional leadership, teaching, and learning. To address this gap in the literature, this case study examines two major issues: how the principals at four charter schools enact instructional leadership in their respective schools, and what barriers the principals encounter when enacting instructional leadership at their school sites. The results highlight three main categories of instructional leadership practices: developing a school mission, managing curriculum and instruction, and promoting school climate and culture. In addition, the data reveal that while the principals attempted to engage in instructional leadership, they encountered barriers related to budgeting and staffing. The paper broadens the scholarly understanding of instructional leadership in schools with high levels of autonomy.     

浅析高等学校领导体制运行效能

在高等教育快速发展的背景下,高等学校为完善和创新现行领导体制及运行机制,应从现行领导体制及运行机制的基本结构和制度规范入手,分析领导体制运行的整体效能,指出完善和创新现行领导体制的基本途径。     

我国中小学校长遴选制度的缺陷分析

随着基础教育改革和发展对中小学校长素质要求的不断提高,中小学校长遴选制度的创新已成为人们日益关注的教育课题。进行遴选制度创新首先必须把握既有遴选制度的缺陷。中小学校长遴选制度相对于其他领域领导人员选拔任用制度具有明显的滞后性;重培训轻遴选,难以形成校长遴选的竞争激励机制,不利于中小学校长的专业化发展,不能适应基础教育发展的要求,无法保障实体规定的充分实施。     

运用激励机制提升校长团队领导力

校长团队领导力的核心是激励。准确理解需求理论、双因素理论、期望理论、目标理论等一系列激励理论概念,遵循公平、坚持和系统原则,正确实施物质激励与精神激励、及时激励与目标激励、正面激励与负面激励、个体激励与团队激励相结合的方式,必将促进校长团队领导力的提升。     

The association between principal leadership and student achievement: A multivariate meta-meta-analysis

A multivariate random-effects meta-meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the association between principal leadership and student achievement. A total of 12 prior meta-analyses with 18 effect sizes were included in this meta-meta-analysis. The quantitative analysis showed that principal leadership has a statistically significant positive relationship with student achievement (Cohen's d = 0.34). The qualitative analyses revealed that: (a) with the accumulation of knowledge, there appears to have been a trend toward more consistent and precise estimates of principal leadership's effect on student achievement; (b) there was still not enough evidence to argue a specific leadership model or practice is more effective in improving student achievement than others; and (c) the educational contexts seem to moderate the effect of principal leadership. The significance and limitations of the current study, as well as the recommendations for future research, are discussed.     

Examining integrated leadership systems in high schools: connecting principal and teacher leadership to organizational processes and student outcomes

Research on school leadership suggests that both principal and teacher leadership are important for school improvement. However, few studies have studied the interaction of principal and teacher leadership as separate but linked systems in how they relate to student outcomes. In this study, we examine how leadership pathways are related in the context of high schools and compare findings to research in elementary schools. Using survey and administrative data from high schools in a large urban context, the paper explores direct and indirect pathways from leadership to student achievement growth. The results indicate that there are 2 pathways through which principal leadership is related to student learning in high schools. One pathway is mediated by teacher leadership, whereas the second pathway does not include teacher leadership. We find that similar to elementary schools, the learning climate is the only organizational factor that links principal and teacher leadership with student achievement.     

The ‘punk rock principal’: a metaphor for rethinking educational leadership

ABSTRACT

This paper advances an alternative leadership metaphor of ‘punk rock leadership’. I work through the usefulness of a metaphor of punk rock leadership as a way of exploring one principal's vision of leadership and his efforts to work outside of system expectations in his quest to achieve the school's goals. In doing so, I contribute to our wider understanding of the methodological process, affordances, and challenges of using metaphors to theorise empirical data. Empirically, this paper contributes to critical research into principals’ practices in times of change, and to notions of power and leadership discourses in schools.