管理学CSSCI检索期刊学术影响力分析

CSSCI的研究成功对于人文社会科学文献检索以及促进相关学科核心期刊的形成具有重要意义.针对CSSCI收录的管理学领域25种学术期刊,采用引文分析方法中的影响因子、总被引频次、被引期刊数、5年影响因子、即年指数、被引半衰期、他引率、指数、Web即年下载量、载文量、基金论文比指标对其进行全面的单指标学术影响力分析,根据引文分析评价指标及期刊实际数据,采用层次分析方法对CSSCI收录的管理学领域学术期刊进行综合评价,在此基础上,指出管理学CSSCI检索期刊学术影响力分析中反映出的问题,并给出改进建议.     

对社会学最有学术影响的百家出版社分析——基于CSSCI(2000-2007年度)数据

基于CSSCI(2000—2007年度)数据中社会学期刊引文数据的统计,列出社会学领域内出版社图书被引频次较多的前100家出版社。通过被引情况,分析这些出版社对社会学术研究的影响。     

从CSSCI引文年代分布看中国社会科学期刊影响因子的计算

Garfield等在20世纪60年代提出的期刊影响因子是评价期刊的重要指标之一。对中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源论文之引文年代分布及其与美国社会科学引文索引(SSCI)的比较分析说明两者基本一致,对CSSCI引文中中文期刊、中文社科学术期刊及CSSCI来源期刊的年代分布分析说明:中文社科期刊的被引高峰期与国际期刊被引高峰期相同,均在其出版后的第二年和第三年。国际通用的影响因子算法完全适用于中国的中文人文社会科学期刊。     

The Web impact of open access social science research

For a long time, Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) journal citations have been widely used for research performance monitoring of the sciences. For the social sciences, however, the Social Sciences Citation Index® (SSCI®) can sometimes be insufficient. Broader types of publications (e.g., books and non-ISI journals) and informal scholarly indicators may also be needed. This article investigates whether the Web can help to fill this gap. The authors analyzed 1530 citations from Google™ to 492 research articles from 44 open access social science journals. The articles were published in 2001 in the fields of education, psychology, sociology, and economics. About 19% of the Web citations represented formal impact equivalent to journal citations, and 11% were more informal indicators of impact. The average was about 3 formal and 2 informal impact citations per article. Although the proportions of formal and informal online impact were similar in sociology, psychology, and education, economics showed six times more formal impact than informal impact. The results suggest that new types of citation information and informal scholarly indictors could be extracted from the Web for the social sciences. Since these form only a small proportion of the Web citations, however, Web citation counts should first be processed to remove irrelevant citations. This can be a time-consuming process unless automated.     

高校人文学科馆藏资源的保障与结构优化——基于CSSCI的引文分析

以CSSCI收录的2006-2010年之间上海师范大学人文学科教师和学生论文引文为研究对象,通过对中文引文数量、类型、年代、保障情况等方面的统计分析,了解人文学科中文引文特点以及馆藏资源的满足情况,为馆藏资源的发展与建设提供优化思路,即合理布局人文学科馆藏,纸质资源和数字资源合理搭配;扩充人文学科文献建设的广度;加快民国报刊资源的建设。     

人文社会科学研究中的互联网利用状况研究——基于CSSCI1998-2006年

以中国社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)9年来的网络引文数据为基础,从人文社会科学学术用户学术研究中高频利用的网域、网站、网页、作者或机构、高频关键词以及网络社区多个角度系统地分析了9年来人文社科学术用户利用互联网的情况,根据统计的结果给出相应的解释。同时认为中国的网络尤其是教育科研网信息资源建设有待加强。     

国内图书情报学期刊网络引文的类型、分布与可追溯性分析

通过对我国图书情报学期刊网络引文的实证分析,得出如下结论:HTML格式网络引文的比例在逐年下降,PDF格式和动态类网络引文的比例在逐渐上升,维基、博客、论坛等新型网络学术信息正日益得到我国图书情报学者的认可和接受;动态类网络引文的可追溯性略高于静态类网络引文,但二者可追溯率都介于50%-51%之间;分布在.edu域名的网络引文的可追溯性相对较差。     

利用CSSCI对我国高等院校人文社科研究状况的分析

据南京大学研制的《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)对全国各地区、各高校在人文社会科学各领域的发文情况的统计分析 ,可以了解全国人文社会科学发展概况 ,为人文社会科学研究的发展提供决策依据。参考文献 3。表 6。     

Contributing factors to long‐term citation count in marine and freshwater biology articles

Researchers have investigated factors thought to affect the total number of citations in various academic disciplines, and some general trends have emerged. However, there are still limited data for many fields, including aquatic sciences. Using papers published in 2003–2005 (n = 785), we investigated marine and freshwater biology articles to identify factors that may contribute to the probability of citation and for cumulative citation counts over 10 years. We found no relationships with probability of citation; however, we found evidence that for those that were cited at least once, cumulative citations were related to several factors. Articles cited by books received more citations than those never cited by books, which we hypothesized to be indicative of the impact an article may have in the field. We also found that articles first cited within 2 years of publication received more cumulative citations than those first cited after 2 years. We found no evidence that self‐citation (as the first citation) had a significant effect on total citations. Our findings were compared with previous studies in other disciplines, and it was found that aquatic science citation patterns are comparable to fields in science and technology but less so to humanities and social sciences.     

基于CSSCI对《中国图书馆学报》的载文被引情况分析及专家评价

基于《中文社会科学引文索引》的分析表明 ,《中国图书馆学报》在图书情报学研究领域具有很大的社会影响 ,其论文被引次数、影响因子 ,以及同行专家的评价结果 ,在我国图书馆学、情报学期刊群中均名列第一。表 12。参考文献 6     

对民族学最有学术影响的百家出版社分析——基于CSSCI(2000-2007年度)数据

借助《中文社会科学引文索引》2000—2007年度民族学论文的引文数据,对民族学领域论文引用的图书所属出版社进行归并、分类与统计,得到对民族学研究最具影响力的百家大陆出版社,对中国港澳台地区出版社及国外出版社的影响力也做了探讨。     

网络参考文献著录质量及可追溯性研究——基于CSSCI 1998～2006年网络参考文献数据分析

本文以中国社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)1998～2006年收录的全部网络参考文献数据为基础,跟踪了历年作者字段、题名字段、来源字段、时间字段的规范程度以及四个关键字段的完整性及变化趋势,最后选取题名字段和来源字段均完整的记录作为样本,考查在当前时间点上,历年数据的可追溯性.研究发现,网络参考文献著录质量较差,可追溯率也很低, 从时间序列上看,著录质量并没有特别显著的变化.此外,博客等网络社区的兴起,给网络参考文献的著录及统计带来新的问题.     

A citation analysis of the quantitative/qualitative methods debate's reflection in sociology research: Implications for library collection development

This study examines how the social sciences' debate between qualitative and quantitative methods is reflected in the citation patterns of sociology journal articles. Citation analysis revealed that quantitative articles were more likely to cite journal articles than monographs, while qualitative articles were more likely to cite monographs than journals. Quantitative articles cited other articles from their own quantitative-dominated journals but virtually excluded citations to articles from qualitative journals, while qualitative articles cited articles from the quantitative-dominated journals as well as their own qualitative-specialized journals. Discussion and conclusions include this study's implications for library collection development.     

Characterizing references from different disciplines: A perspective of citation content analysis

Multidisciplinary cooperation is now common in research since social issues inevitably involve multiple disciplines. In research articles, reference information, especially citation content, is an important representation of communication among different disciplines. Analyzing the distribution characteristics of references from different disciplines in research articles is basic to detecting the sources of referred information and identifying contributions of different disciplines. This work takes articles in PLoS as the data and characterizes the references from different disciplines based on Citation Content Analysis (CCA). First, we download 210,334 full-text articles from PLoS and collect the information of the in-text citations. Then, we identify the discipline of each reference in these academic articles. To characterize the distribution of these references, we analyze three characteristics, namely, the number of citations, the average cited intensity and the average citation length. Finally, we conclude that the distributions of references from different disciplines are significantly different. Although most references come from Natural Science, Humanities and Social Sciences play important roles in the Introduction and Background sections of the articles. Basic disciplines, such as Mathematics, mainly provide research methods in the articles in PLoS. Citations mentioned in the Results and Discussion sections of articles are mainly in-discipline citations, such as citations from Nursing and Medicine in PLoS.     

中文引文索引主题图的构建及其实现

引文索引既可以作为一种检索工具,同时又具备一定的信息精选和学术评价功能,这两个方面的功能决定引文索引在科学研究工作中所发挥的重要作用。将主题图技术应用于引文索引数据库的构建中,选取《中文社会科学引文索引》（CSSCI）中的部分数据为实验对象,通过主题图软件工具OKS Samplers的使用,完成引文索引主题图的构建,并实现其可视化,总结引文索引主题图的优点,对主题图应用于引文索引数据库提出建议。     

The Citation Cloud of a biomedical article: a free,public, web-based tool enabling citation analysis

Background:An article''s citations are useful for finding related articles that may not be readily found by keyword searches or textual similarity. Citation analysis is also important for analyzing scientific innovation and the structure of the biomedical literature. We wanted to facilitate citation analysis for the broad community by providing a user-friendly interface for accessing and analyzing citation data for biomedical articles.Case Presentation:We seeded the Citation Cloud dataset with over 465 million open access citations culled from six different sources: PubMed Central, Microsoft Academic Graph, ArnetMiner, Semantic Scholar, Open Citations, and the NIH iCite dataset. We implemented a free, public extension to PubMed that allows any user to visualize and analyze the entire citation cloud around any paper of interest A: the set of articles cited by A, those which cite A, those which are co-cited with A, and those which are bibliographically coupled to A.Conclusions:Citation Cloud greatly enables the study of citations by the scientific community, including relatively advanced analyses (co-citations and bibliographic coupling) that cannot be undertaken using other available tools. The tool can be accessed by running any PubMed query on the Anne O''Tate value-added search interface and clicking on the Citations button next to any retrieved article.     

我国林业电子政务网站信息分类模式研究

通过对我国国家林业局和28个省林业厅网站进行实证研究,证实：主题、原型、功能、实现、对象、角色、地域、时间8种网站信息分类模式是网站常用的信息分类模式;其使用频率的递减次序是主题、原型、功能、实现、对象、角色、地域、时间;主题、原型、功能是最常用的模式,实现模式也越来越受重用;与美国农业部等美国电子政务网站相比,角色模式在我国林业电子政务网站中使用较少。     

我国四大引文数据库比较分析

本文针对目前最常用的四个引文数据库 :《中国科学引文数据库》、《中国科技论文与引文数据库》、《中文社会科学引文索引》、《中国学术期刊全文数据库》 ,从数据库收录数据、检索途径、检索功能等方面进行了比较分析 ,并针对使用中存在的一些问题 ,对数据库的改进提出了建议。     

数字人文研究领域的知识图谱构建与分析——基于WoS文献关键词和引文上下文的实证

[目的/意义]引文是施引文献与被引成果的纽带，反映了后继者的借鉴和肯定。本研究在传统题录关键词网络的基础上，创新地将引文上下文关键词作为研究材料，所构建知识图谱不仅能揭示文献主题的深层次信息，也能够反映受众主观筛选和利用文献的知识过程。[方法/过程]选取数字人文为研究领域，获取3个文献集和两个引文文本集，构建两个无向的关键词共现网络和两个有向的基于文献引证的关键词网络。通过共现网络，观察数字人文领域知识的吸收与扩散；通过引证关键词网络，观察数字人文的形成与转化。[结果/结论]研究揭示数字人文的研究重点、核心领域与核心技术，从受众的角度为数字人文领域未来研究提供借鉴和参考。     

2009年以来国外引文分析研究进展

引文分析是指采用各种数理统计和逻辑方法对文献的引用频率、模式和图像进行计量研究。该文综述2009年以来国外在引文分析的基础理论、研究方法、研究前沿探测应用、引文指标四个方面的研究进展。