关于学生评教的几点思考

学生评教是教师教学水平评估的重要内容和高校教学管理的重要环节,也是促进高校教学质量提高的重要手段.本文针对学生评教中出现的问题,探讨了如何有效地组织评教,如何克服学生评教的负面影响,构建以人为本的学生评教系统,从而使评教活动真正达到改进教学、提高教学效果的目的.     

关联规则在学生评教中的应用

以高校学生评教的原始记录为挖掘数据集,介绍了数据挖掘中关联规则算法在学生评教中的应用,学生评教结果与各类教师素质特征得到较客观的对应。     

自愿评教：走出学生评教困境的有益探索

学生评教是高校教学质量管理的重要组成部分,但强制评教造成学生消极评教、教师质疑评教、评教分数贬值等问题,并最终导致评教陷入困境。通过取消学生必须参加评教的限制,设置反映学生需求的评教指标,变一次性评教为周期性评教,改革评教监管机制,加强评教宣传引导等措施,构建学生自愿评教机制,是从根本上解决评教问题,使学生评教走出困境的有效手段。     

学生评教结果的有效性及其科学应用

怎样的学生评教才是有效的？笔者认为，在于学生评教过程的合理性、科学性、可行性，评教结果的效度和信度，同时须考量其是否促进了教师的发展、教学与管理水平的提高和学生的进步等。     

类型化的学生评教行为偏差及其制度性破解

以“自主性-效能感”为标准进行聚类分析,发现学生评教行为偏差可划分为利己顺从型、趋众盲从型、被迫受制型和缺位抗拒型4类。采用因子分析及回归分析发现：评教“定位偏移”对四类评教行为偏差全部产生显著影响,对利己顺从型评教偏差行为产生影响最为显著;除此之外,趋众盲从型评教偏差行为主要受评教“定位不明”“指标所指不清”与“指标区分度低”影响,被迫受制型评教偏差行为主要受“强制性评教方式”影响,缺位抗拒型主要受“信息供给失衡”与“反馈缺失”影响。针对以上4类评教行为偏差,可分别采取回归促学为本制度定位、构建面向学习的制度设计、完善评教协商机制及施行评教信息共享机制等相关制度性举措予以纠正。     

Excel数据分析工具在学生评教中的应用研究

对学生评教的大量原始数据,只有借用一定的分析技术与方法进行处理,才能使蕴含在其中的总体数量特征和规律显示出来。本文运用EXCEL的数据分析工具,结合我院学生评教的特点,介绍了一些学生评教数据分析的方法,以期对学生评教工作的管理者有所帮助。     

学生评教制度的操作“失当”及其有效评教策略探讨

学生楚教学过程的在场主体,通过学生并依靠学生反馈和评价教师的教育教学效果是学校考核和评价教师教学质量的有效的、也是必要途径。然而,许多学校在让学生评价教师时,诸多具体做法并未能够充分发挥制度本身的积极作用,操作适当。科学有效的学生评教制度应该是一种标准把握适当,管理者直接参与,立体、多维、全面的评教体系。     

谈"三级评教"系统中的"学生评教"

本文对"三级评教"和"学生评教"的含义进行了阐述,论述了"学生评教"在"三级评教"系统中的地位和作用,对"三级评教"系统中的"学生评教"存在的问题及应对策略进行了探索。     

论学生评教结果的反馈

学生评教结果反馈是实现教学评价闭环管理,督促教师重视教学,提高教学质量的重要环节。应增强评教结果反馈的具体性,在评教结果等级的精确认定和模糊处理间保持平衡,评教结果可按学科大类在一定范围内公开,评教结果要和教师管理适度挂钩。     

“学生评教”意欲何为

学生评教本应体现学校民主、以学生为本,促进教师专业成长。但在学校普遍实施的“学生评教”实践中,却并没有体现以学生为本、教师为本,而是以管理为本。管理主义单独以效率为中心的价值取向不仅影响教育组织目标的实现,而且管理主义中的人性假设与教育中的人性假设存在着很大的矛盾。“学生评教”应走出这种管理主义的误区,充分体现出高校管理的本质是为教育服务。     

高校学生评教探析

学生评教在实际的教学过程中发挥着积极的作用。本文论述了学生评教的内涵、作用与功能、学生评教应遵循的原则及应注意的事项。     

信息熵对教学效果的影响

信息熵是指由信源发出的信息,通过信道传送,再由信宿获取的过程,而教学过程正是教学信息由教师、教材输送给学生的传递过程。如何提高教学效果,实质上是如何提高教学中有效信息传递的问题。该文着重讨论信息熵对教学效果的影响。     

Regular Feedback from Student Ratings of Instruction: Do College Teachers Improve their Ratings in the Long Run?

The authors examined whether feedback from student ratings of instruction not augmented with consultation helps college teachers to improve their student ratings on a long-term basis. The study reported was conducted in an institution where no previous teaching-effectiveness evaluations had taken place. At the end of each of four consecutive semesters, student ratings were assessed and teachers were provided with feedback. Data from 3122 questionnaires evaluating 12 teachers were analyzed using polynomial and piecewise random coefficient models. Results revealed that student ratings increased from the no-feedback baseline semester to the second semester and then gradually decreased from the second to the fourth semester, although feedback was provided after each semester. The findings suggest that student ratings not augmented with consultation are far less effective than typically assumed when considered from a long-term perspective.     

学生评教的研究现状及启示

学生评教是高校改进教师教学和教学管理工作的重要手段,也是近年来高等教育研究者关注的一个焦点.介绍了国内外学生评教的发展历程,系统地梳理了学生评教的研究重点,即对学生评教的可靠性、有效性、影响因素、指标体系的研究,分析了学生评教实践中存在的诸多问题,得出对学生评教实践的启示,以促进学生评教工作的良性发展.     

The Development and Validation of the Student Evaluation of Online Teaching Effectiveness

Abstract

Sponsored by a Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers to Use Technology(PT3) grant, we participated in various activities designed to help us learn to infuse technology in our teacher education courses. The purpose of this paper is to describe the specific impact of the PT3 project activities on our change process-including the formation, evolution, and efforts of our curriculum design team-and to share the activities and products that we developed through participation in the grant activities.     

The Relative Merits of Different Types of Overall Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness

An unresolved issue in student evaluations of teaching effectiveness (SETE) literature is what type of overall evaluation of teaching effectiveness should be used in personnel decisions. The objective of this study is to compare the merits of: (a) an overall evaluation made by students, (b) a weighted average overall evaluation with the weights determined by students, (c) a weighted average overall evaluation with the weights being determined by the individual instructors teaching their respective classes, (d) an unweighted average overall evaluation, and (e) a second-order factor that proxies for an overall evaluation. Our results indicate that: (a) all of these overall evaluations were very highly intercorrelated, (b) the unweighted and weighted average overall evaluations measured virtually the same thing, and (c) the second-order factor that served as an overall evaluation was most highly correlated with the other overall evaluations and had the advantage of being most understandable to the faculty.     

Factorial Validity of Student Ratings of Instruction

This study tested the Systematic Distortion Hypothesis by examining the factorial validity of student ratings of university teaching. Factorial validity is defined as the degree to which covariance among judged traits resembles the actual or true covariation of observable behaviors underlying these traits. Although many studies have examined the factorial validity of ratings, results are inconsistent. The present study used a more complete methodology to address some of the limitations of previous studies. Student ratings of teaching and measurements of actual teaching behaviors were obtained for 32 instructors. Student ratings were compared to frequency counts of actual teaching behaviors obtained from videotape and to students’ similarity judgments of teacher characteristics. It was found, first, that the structure of student ratings showed a moderately strong relation to the structure of actual behaviors, and a somewhat stronger relation to the structure of conceptual associations; and second, that the effects of systematic distortion were more pronounced for low-inference student ratings than for high-inference ratings.     

提高学生参与度 增强教学有效性

在思想品德课的教学中,学生的参与是提高课堂教学效果的有效策略,教师可采取多种方式增强学生的参与意识,提高学生学习的积极性,如:通过加强师生交流以建立平等的师生关系;通过适时提出问题、组织实践活动、巧设乐学情境等方式,激发学生的学习兴趣;以及及时反馈、适度评价等方式提高思想品德课的课堂有效性。     

试论信息不对称与高等学校学生评教

学生评教是高等学校教学质量管理的关键举措.在其运作过程中存在诸多信息不时称现象,它会造成学生和教师的逆选择及败德行为.根据信息不对称理论对学生评教的分析,学生、教师的逆选择和败德行为的发生不仅与评教过程中的信息不对称有关,还与目前学生评教制度运作的不科学有关.所以,完善学生评教制度,需要促成教学信息在管理方、教师和学生之间的对称配置,同时应使学生评教制度回归到服务学生和实现学生利益这一基点上.