高校学报影响因子与其所属高校综合实力的相关性

根据武书连"2012中国大学综合实力排行榜"和2012年版《中国科技期刊引证报告》的数据,对综合实力排名前10位的高校(排名)和其学报影响因子按学科分别进行了统计学相关性分析,同时对全国自然科学、人文社科类高校学报影响因子与其所属高校的排名进行了统计学相关性分析。结果表明,在一定条件下高校学报的影响因子与其高校排名存在一定相关性,但总体而言,相关性不强。     

The impact of on-line search availability on literature retrieval patterns of researchers

The ready availability of on-line information resources may have resulted in a change in biomedical researchers' patterns of use of resources which are not available on-line. To investigate the occurrence and extent of these changes, the distribution patterns by date of citations from every major article published in ten high-impact biomedical journals in 1959, 1969, and 1979 were analyzed. The analysis showed that in all three time periods approximately 89% of the references fell within fifteen years of the journal's publication date. In 1979, however, references were more evenly distributed over the fifteen years available on-line. In addition, a marked increase was noted in the number of cited references per article. To verify the citation analysis results, a random selection of senior authors of 1979 papers was surveyed. Major findings showed that: (1) approximately 29% of the respondents had used a computer bibliography to prepare the paper which was analyzed; (2) approximately 73% of those using a computer search used it in combination with a manual search; and (3) less than 22% of all respondents had never used a computer-generated bibliography.     

An analysis of book versus article productivity based on top researchers careers

This study analyzed the productivity of top scholars in the field in terms of published books in order to (1) equate the relative value of published books in comparison to published research articles, and (2) provide a scholarship ranking which takes into consideration both published books and published research articles. The list of the top 102 researchers in the field, as identified by Hickson, Stacks, and Bodon (1999) and 29 additional researchers identified by Funkhouser (1996) as the top “most cited”; researchers served as the parameters for this study. The total number of articles from those researchers (2,687) was divided by the number of books they had written (426), producing an article‐to‐book ratio of 6.3. Each book was multiplied by that coefficient and that number was added to the number of articles for each author to produce a ranking of the top 100 prolific researchers in communication, based on a combination of both articles and books published.     

自动化发展对高校图书馆建设的影响

本文着重阐述自动化的发展，尤其是今天网络技术普及后的自动化发展对我国高等学校图书馆建设的影响。这种影响是深远的，它渗透了图书馆建设的方方面面，促进了图书馆建设的快速发展。     

辽宁省高校图书馆讲座问题研究

文章利用中国教育网对辽宁省27所高校图书馆开设的读者培训讲座从访问路径、讲座内容、讲座形式等方面进行了调查与分析,阐述了存在的问题,对今后的发展提出了有效完善讲座的建议.     

国外大学图书馆联盟研究对我国的启示

文章概述加拿大、德国、日本等发达国家大学图书馆联盟在理论和实践方面的发展历程及其特点,阐述了对我国图书馆联盟发展的启示。     

论高校图书馆参与西部大开发的作为

从高校图书馆的信息优势和资源优势出发，探讨其在西部大开发中的地位和使命，论述了高校图书馆在西部大开如应有所作为。     

高校图书馆期刊有效采访研究

期刊是高校图书馆文献资源建设的重要组成部分,本文分析了影响高校图书馆期刊有效采访的各种不利因素,提出了期刊有效采访的对策与措施。     

中美大学图书馆学科馆员服务比较研究

本文从服务内容、人员素质、管理体制三个方面比较了中美大学图书馆学科馆员服务的差异,从而为我国大学图书馆学科馆员服务的发展提供了有益的启示.     

高校图书馆关键绩效指标体系研究

介绍KPI相关理论,揭示高校图书馆建立KPI的必要性,探索高校图书馆、馆内各部门、图书馆馆员三级KPI指标体系的构建。     

Needs assessment of nurse researchers through a research lifecycle framework

Objective:Health sciences librarian roles are evolving to better meet the needs of faculty. This study explores nursing faculty needs at the University of British Columbia through the research lifecycle framework of planning, conducting, disseminating, and assessing the impact of their research.Methods:A mixed methods survey study with Likert scale, multiple-choice, or ordinal ranking-scale questions and six open-response questions was conducted. The format was a web-based Qualtrics survey; participants had approximately three weeks to respond.Results:Nursing faculty identified the dissemination phase as benefiting most from library support prioritizing reference management and archiving research data as the top needs in that phase. Assessing impact skills such as citation analysis and Altmetrics training was ranked second. The Planning phase was ranked third with systematic review and literature review support most needed. The Conducting phase was identified as the phase where they needed the least support.Conclusion:Understanding the needs of researchers and enhancing scholar productivity is vital to offering responsive library research services. Across the research lifecycle, nursing faculty identified reference management, data management, metrics evaluation, systematic reviews, and literature reviews as the key areas for which they need support.     

大学图书馆远程教育初步研究

本文在介绍远程教育的基础上,探讨了大学图书馆远程教育的内容及发展措施,目的是寻求大学图书馆远程教育信息服务的新途径。     

高校图书馆科研工作的SWOT分析

利用SWOT分析方法,分析了高校图书馆科研工作的优势、劣势、机遇、挑战,得出高校图书馆科研工作的战略选择：增强图书馆科研意识,提高馆员素质,培养科研带头人,组建科研团队,积极调动各方面的积极因素等。     

高校图书馆对科研资料的管理与开发

科研资料保留了专家们在学科前沿进行创造性研究时的宝贵信息,对于高校的教学科研及其管理工作都有重要的参考价值.文章从科研资料的收集、分类、存贮和开发等方面阐述了高校图书馆对科研资料进行有效管理的方法.     

The impact of information-seeking self-efficacy and online learning self-efficacy on students' performance proficiency

This study surveyed 359 online undergraduate and graduate students regarding their information-seeking self-efficacy, online learning self-efficacy, and performance proficiency. A mediation model was conducted to examine the direct effect of students' online learning self-efficacy on their performance proficiency and the mediation effect of information-seeking self-efficacy. Multivariate correlational analysis showed that all three variables significantly correlated. Of the three variables, online learning self-efficacy has the strongest correlation to performance proficiency, while the variable with the least amount of correlation is between online-learning and information-seeking efficacies. Moreover, a significant regression equation showed that students' average performance proficiency increased by 0.359 for each point of online learning self-efficacy and 0.323 for each point of information-seeking self-efficacy. Furthermore, mediation analysis revealed that information-seeking self-efficacy partially mediated the relationship between online learning self-efficacy and performance proficiency. In conclusion, information-seeking self-efficacy is a partial mediator and plays a buffering role between online learning self-efficacy and performance proficiency.     

高校图书馆开展学术研究探讨

探讨了高校图书馆开展学术研究的必要性,提出了争取馆领导的积极参与和支持,学术研究要与图书馆服务工作有效地结合等5项措施,并指出了学术研究工作需要注意的问题,鼓励图书馆开展学术研究。以提高图书馆的服务层次。     

Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor

Objective

This study gathered information about the retraction policies of the top 200 scientific journals, ranked by impact factor.

Methods

Editors of the top 200 science journals for the year 2012 were contacted by email.

Results

One hundred forty-seven journals (74%) responded to a request for information. Of these, 95 (65%) had a retraction policy. Of journals with a retraction policy, 94% had a policy that allows the editors to retract articles without authors’ consent.

Conclusions

The majority of journals in this sample had a retraction policy, and almost all of them would retract an article without the authors’ permission.     

高校图书馆国际生信息服务研究

文章分析了高校国际生利用图书馆存在的诸多问题,指出大学图书馆应该采用多维信息服务模式,从加强人馆教育、利用检索工具个别帮助、开展网上参考咨询服务、加强馆员个人素养、提升馆员业务技能等五个方面论述了高校图书馆开展国际生信息服务的具体举措,以适应国际化要求,提高国际生信息服务水平。     

Citation impact analysis of top ranked computer science journals and their rankings

Citation based approaches, such as the impact factor and h-index, have been used to measure the influence or impact of journals for journal rankings. A survey of the related literature for different disciplines shows that the level of correlation between these citation based approaches is domain dependent. We analyze the correlation between the impact factors and h-indices of the top ranked computer science journals for five different subjects. Our results show that the correlation between these citation based approaches is very low. Since using a different approach can result in different journal rankings, we further combine the different results and then re-rank the journals using a combination method. These new ranking results can be used as a reference for researchers to choose their publication outlets.