共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
数字鸿沟是全球范围内数字生态的内在失衡;是由地域、教育水平和种族不同的群体在掌握和运用电脑、网络等数字化技术上存在的差距;是传统的国际和国内经济的不平等和不平衡、传统社会分化现象在新时代下的延续的一种表现形式,需要引起各国政府的高度重视。 相似文献
2.
Ahsan Abdullah 《The Information Society》2013,29(4):346-356
This study examined how caste influences adoption of information and communication technologies. It entailed a survey of 2750 farmers, who were interviewed in person, in rural Punjab (Pakistan), and two different methods for data analysis—data mining and indices-based statistical analysis. The analysis shows digital divides at the caste level. Furthermore, it shows that old and new technologies diffuse differently among castes. 相似文献
3.
数字鸿沟的本质解析 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
随着社会信息化的推进,数字鸿沟问题日益凸显,严重影响了和谐社会的构建,要想从根本上弥合数字鸿沟就必须剖析其本质。数字鸿沟本质上是由技术、经济、知识和社会4个层面构成的综合性的差距。在技术层面上,它反映了不同主体在接入新兴信息技术方面存在的差距,是新兴信息技术普及过程中出现的"技术鸿沟";在经济层面上,它反映了国际国内经济不平等和贫富差距在信息时代的延续,是信息时代经济发展进程中出现的"经济鸿沟";在知识层面上,它反映了不同群体使用新兴信息技术获取和利用信息资源方面的差距,是信息主体获取和利用信息资源过程中出现的"知识鸿沟";在社会层面上,它反映了信息社会的阶层分化和社会分化现象,是信息社会不平等导致的"社会鸿沟"。Abstract: With the development of social informatization,the digital divide problem figures increasingly prominently and affects the construction of the harmonious society seriously.In order to close the digital divide fundamentally,it's necessary to anatomize its essence.Digital divide is essentially a comprehensive gap which consists of factors in the technical,economic,knowledge and social aspects.In technical aspect,it reflects the differences among different agents to get access to new information technologies,and it's the "technological gap" which appears in the popularization process of new information technologies.In economic aspect,it reflects the international and domestic economic inequality and the continuation of polarization of poor and rich in the information age,and it's the "economic gap" which appears in the economic development process in the information age.In knowledge aspect,it reflects the differences among different groups to use new information technologies to obtain and utilize information resources,and is the "knowledge gap" which appears in the information resources acquisition and utilization process by information agents.In social aspect,it reflects the stratum differentiation and social differentiation in the information society,and is the "social gap" caused by the inequality of the information society. 相似文献
4.
数字鸿沟的成因、测度、影响及弥合方法 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
从数字鸿沟的形成原因、测度、影响及弥合方法四个角度,梳理国内外学者对数字鸿沟的研究与贡献,并发现数字鸿沟是一个需要全面认识的现象,未来应着重对数字鸿沟的形成原因及测度进行研究。 相似文献
5.
6.
目前,国外学界对二级鸿沟问题的研究十分关注,已取得不少研究成果.文章对国外围绕二级鸿沟展开的相关研究进行了总结,具体包括二级鸿沟的提出过程、二级鸿沟的含义,二级鸿沟的形成原因及解决措施等,并分析了二级鸿沟的研究意义. 相似文献
7.
我国数字鸿沟的社会效应分析 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
数字技术在给我们带来诸多便利的同时,也带来了新的不平等和新的社会分化,这就是数字鸿沟.数字鸿沟对社会产生的影响即是数字鸿沟的社会效应.教育鸿沟、性别鸿沟、城乡鸿沟是其3个主要方面.直接影响着经济社会的和谐发展. 相似文献
8.
我国区域"数字鸿沟"的实证研究 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
“数字鸿沟”已经成为网络时代全球性的问题,主要表现为不同群体利用互联网进行各种活动的差距。本文主要运用指数法对2004年我国网络可接入性、网络利用、网络意识、网络外部环境4个一级指标和11个二级指标进行分析,来对我国区域“数字鸿沟”进行实证研究。结果表明,东部沿海地区的网络化水平指数明显高于中、西部地区。北京、广东、上海、浙江、江苏的网络化水平指数位居前列,而西藏、青海、海南、内蒙古、贵州则处于相对落后的位置。网络化水平指数的差距正是我国区域间“数字鸿沟”的体现。 相似文献
9.
Vasja Vehovar Pavle Sicherl Tobias Hüsing Vesna Dolnicar 《The Information Society》2013,29(5):279-290
The term “digital divide” has been used for almost a decade and typically relates to sociodemographic differences in the use of information and communication technology. However, the corresponding measurement is still relatively imprecise. Very often it is simply reduced to comparisons of Internet penetration rates. This article extends the measurements above the usual bivariate comparisons. Within this context, three essential approaches are presented and critically evaluated. First, loglinear modeling is used to address the interactions among the factors affecting the digital divide. Second, compound measures (i.e., the Digital Divide Index) that integrate a number of variables into a single indicator are discussed. Third, time-distance methodology is applied to analyze changes in the digital divide. The article argues that these approaches often yield entirely different conclusions compared to simple bivariate analysis. The examples are presented as a general warning against an oversimplified methodological approach to digital divide studies. 相似文献
10.
Methodological Challenges of Digital Divide Measurements 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Vasja Vehovar Pavle Sicherl Tobias Hü sing Vesna Dolnicar 《The Information Society》2006,22(5):279-290
The term “digital divide” has been used for almost a decade and typically relates to sociodemographic differences in the use of information and communication technology. However, the corresponding measurement is still relatively imprecise. Very often it is simply reduced to comparisons of Internet penetration rates. This article extends the measurements above the usual bivariate comparisons. Within this context, three essential approaches are presented and critically evaluated. First, loglinear modeling is used to address the interactions among the factors affecting the digital divide. Second, compound measures (i.e., the Digital Divide Index) that integrate a number of variables into a single indicator are discussed. Third, time-distance methodology is applied to analyze changes in the digital divide. The article argues that these approaches often yield entirely different conclusions compared to simple bivariate analysis. The examples are presented as a general warning against an oversimplified methodological approach to digital divide studies. 相似文献
11.
12.
Over the last few years, information and communication technologies have become an essential part of daily life, affecting education, employment, and leisure, among other activities. Nonetheless, many individuals still reap few or no benefits from these technologies, and there are resilient gaps in their use. Within this larger context, the authors examine the Internet digital divide between people with and without disabilities from a multidimensional approach. Rather than analyzing the gap in terms of “haves” and “have-nots,” a range of Internet-related dimensions—affordability, motivation and attitudes, skills, usage, and others—is taken into account. 相似文献
13.
我国数字鸿沟的空间表现及原因分析 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
文章介绍了数字鸿沟的概念,用GIS软件表现出我国数字鸿沟空间差距并给予相应的分类,分析了我国地区间和城乡间数字鸿沟的具体体现,并对产生这种数字鸿沟的原因给予相应的具体分析。 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
本文构建了城乡数字鸿沟的测度指标体系,对重庆市2003-2014年城乡数字鸿沟及其影响因素进行了实证分析。研究发现重庆市的城乡数字鸿沟整体上呈现不断扩大趋势。经济因素、城乡居民受教育程度的差异以及地理、制度因素等是城乡数字鸿沟的重要影响因素。文章提出了相应的对策措施以弥合城乡数字鸿沟,促进城乡统筹发展。 相似文献
17.
18.
Giuseppe Bruno Emilio Esposito Andrea Genovese Kholekile L. Gwebu 《The Information Society》2013,29(1):16-28
Several composite indexes grouping several variables into a single figure have been proposed for measuring the digital divide. In this article, the authors analyze shortcomings of extant indexes. Using multivariate analysis tools, they show that in the definition of composite indexes it is possible to individuate a limited set of more influencing and significant variables. This finding suggests the possibility of replacing some redundant variables with other dimensions that include other aspects of the digital divide that are not considered in extant measures. 相似文献
19.
Govindan Parayil 《The Information Society》2005,21(1):41-51
The far-reaching advances in information and communications technologies (ICTs) in tandem with the globalization of trade, investment, business regulation, production, and consumption have signaled the rise of “informational capitalism.” This article reflects on the social and economic inequalities of informational capitalism by examining two contradictions of ICTs-led economic development—increasing returns and the digital divide. Two main and interrelated strands of evidence are presented: First, contrary to expectations that rising income per capita will tend to reduce wealth and wage disparities, the distribution of income and wealth both between countries and individuals has sharply skewed in the information age; second, knowledge production is a self-reinforcing cycle that tends to disproportionately reward some and exclude others. The so-called digital divide is as much a symptom and a cause of these broader techno-economic phenomena, and regarding it as a simple issue of connectivity is simplistic and reductive. 相似文献
20.
随着经济社会的发展和新技术利用程度的差异,欠发达地区在信息资源的获得和利用方面与发达地区存在很大的差距,从而阻碍了欠发达地区的经济发展。欠发达地区政府要充分认识到解决数字鸿沟的重要性,分析数字鸿沟产生的原因,开展竞争情报工作缩小与发达地区的数字鸿沟,促进本地区经济社会发展。 相似文献