试析网络科学信息的OA运动对图书馆的影响

网络技术的快速发展与广泛应用，使得近十年来学术传播的方式与环境发生了巨大变化，出现一种新型的学术方式——“公开获取运动”。文章讨论该运动对图书馆产生的影响。     

e印本文库(e-print archive)研究--介绍一种非正式科学交流系统

“e—print archive”是开放存1R（Open Access）运动推荐的一种非正式科学交流系统，本文系统研究了“e—print archive”的中文翻译、学术交流理念、基本功能、学术交流过程、主要特点和基本类型等问题。     

大学图书馆在OA环境中的发展策略

本文介绍了OA的发展现状,分析了OA运动对大学图书馆的意义并探讨了OA环境中大学图书馆的发展策略,目的是使大学图书馆积极适应学术交流模式的转变,以稳固其知识交流中心的地位。     

开放获取政策与实践的关键问题探析

自2002年布达佩斯开放获取倡议提出以来,开放获取已经历了近20年的发展,金色开放获取和绿色开放获取两种开放获取实施路径也得到了全球科研人员、科研机构和出版单位的广泛认可和采用。文章从金色开放获取和绿色开放获取两个层面出发,剖析了当前全球开放获取政策与实践中掠夺性期刊、"数据孤岛"、只存储不开放、本土期刊发展受限等问题,并针对这些问题提出了相应的措施及建议。     

On Open Access Evangelism

As librarians take on the responsibility for promoting Open Access (OA) publishing at their institutions, they face many doubts and misconceptions about OA. This article reviews common misunderstandings about OA and reflects on different methods academic librarians can use to address researcher doubts and convince faculty to commit themselves to publishing their works in OA venues.     

开放存取期刊出版的发展现状及其影响分析

通过调研分析，指出开放存取(OA)期刊目前呈现出良好的发展态势，其规模与影响力不断扩大，有多种出版形式。同时，深入分析OA期刊出版对当前学术交流系统中的各利益关系方（包括科研人员、传统出版机构、图书馆和科研资助机构）所产生的积极影响。     

Knowledge of Open Access Journals Among Research Scientists in Ghana

There previously has been little research specifically about use of Open Access (OA) content in Ghana for information retrieval and for publication or information sharing, although several articles indicate that the infrastructure and the attitudes are in place. The objectives of this article are (1) to document research scientists’ awareness of OA journals, (2) to determine their attitudes toward OA journal use and publication, and (3) to determine the levels of use of OA materials. This article contributes to the growing body of literature on the potential of OA for the developing world in two ways: it provides information about OA adoption in Ghana, where little research has been done thus far, and it provides information about the beliefs of research scientists in a governmental organization, an area where little research heretofore has been done.     

The Great Transition of Scholarly Communication at the Thomas G. Carpenter Library

The library’s place in scholarly communication can be emphasized in many different ways. At the Thomas G. Carpenter Library at the University of North Florida (UNF), librarians have been able to preserve, organize, and promote community and academic resources very creatively. The UNF Digital Commons is used as a way to showcase faculty, staff, and university special collections and make them accessible to all users. Library space is also changing to invite faculty collaboration in areas previously devoted to print periodicals.     

我国科技期刊OA现状和发展策略研究

文章通过调研我国科技期刊开放存取（Open Access,简称OA）的发展现状,对我国科技期刊OA的数量、分布以及开放全文的特征进行了分析,找出目前我国科技期刊OA存在的主要问题,并对影响开放存取发展的各类因素进行了探析,最后从提升影响力、营造良好的宏观环境等方面对我国的科技期刊OA的发展提出有效的策略及建议。     

Scholar Commons @ USF: Sharing Knowledge Worldwide

Librarians and faculty members are now working together through Open Access (OA) publishing to make faculty-produced scholarly content available to researchers worldwide. The University of South Florida Tampa Library has been working with the Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress) Digital Commons platform to create a substantial institutional repository (IR) that includes OA journals, conference proceedings, and data sets, among other materials. Library staff members are currently involved in a variety of activities, including negotiating memoranda of understanding, loading backfiles, registering Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) with CrossRef, designing layout, doing final publication steps, and assisting with technical issues. In 2011, the IR, Scholar Commons @ USF, went live, allowing the library to pull fragmented collections previously hosted on other platforms into a single system with improved discoverability. This article discusses how the repository was established, what is involved, lessons learned, and plans for future directions.     

开发OA资源创新图书馆服务

面对网络中不断出现的OA资源，图书馆应认真研究0A出版的各种运行机制，积极参与0A出版活动，为创建一个真正服务于学术信息交流的无障碍系统做出应有贡献。     

The Power of “Open”

ABSTRACT

In a vision session at the 31st NASIG Annual Conference, Heather Joseph provided an assessment of the Open Access movement addressing how far it has come since its inception, how well it has met its original goals, what has and has not worked well, and what is not happening at all. She talked about the importance of open (in all senses—open access, open education, and open data) as a public good, and shared feedback from a recent strategic review of the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition and the Open Access movement. Joseph also explored the implications of using open as an enabling strategy for researchers, scholarly publishers, policymakers, and the larger academic community, and emphasized the importance of deliberately considering what outcomes open can help each community achieve—rather than thinking about open as an end to itself.     

Bridging the Gap Between Digital Measures and Digital Commons in Support of Open Access: Or,How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Human Mediation

Utah State University is home to a Digital Commons repository and an instance of the Digital Measures activity-reporting tool. The prospect of linking these two systems, such that content is automatically harvested from Digital Measures for upload into the Digital Commons, is alluring. Our initial efforts were abandoned due to lack of faculty permissions and low-quality metadata. However, with the passage of an Institutional Open Access Policy, we resumed investigation. We found that the process of harvesting from Digital Measures and uploading to Digital Commons could be streamlined, if not fully automated. Our initial harvest revealed that human-mediation is desirable.     

A Publisher Perspective: How One Publisher is Responding to the Changing World of Scholarly Communication

For this talk, Marks was tasked with summarizing the important trends in scholarly publishing in 45 minutes. The speaker reflected on the rapid changes that have occurred in journal publishing, which followed more than 300 years of relatively slow progress. Marks discussed key technology trends such as data curation, Open Access (OA) mandates, and the changes occurring in the global landscape of scholarly communications and library budgets. Wolters Kluwer Health has been responding to these trends with new publishing experiments including a Platinum OA model in emerging markets. Marks discussed the ways that publishers and libraries need to alter their traditional practices and instill a focus on their customers and communities.     

Beginning the Conversation: Discussing Scholarly Communication

Since the earliest scholarly journals began, journal literature answered a need to communicate scholarly and scientific findings and preserve a validated scholarly record of accomplishments and areas for further research. Scholars are profoundly interested in the transformation of scholarship and the implications for their disciplines. Librarian expertise within the digital serials realm and partnering with faculty to prioritize learning in the library will imaginatively create opportunities for learning with library resources. Discussing scholarly communication changes and traditions provides excellent common ground for serials librarians to begin conversations with disciplinary faculty.     

Open Access for Scholars Left Behind: The Issue of Limited Access to Data and Scholarship

Abstract

This column discusses information literacy instruction through the lens of open access (OA) to better serve researchers who have limited access to scholarship due to cost. After providing a definition of OA, the benefit of OA is exemplified through both researchers who lose access to information, like students, and those who have little access to begin with, like researchers in disenfranchised locations. Information literacy instruction librarians who teach the use of OA resources increase awareness for global researchers, ensure alumni access to scholarship after loss of institutional affiliation, and increase scholarship published in OA mediums, supporting those without traditional access.     

学术交流模型研究

系统阐述Garvey Griffith模型、信息流模型、生命周期模型、价值网络模型、Bjrk模型、供应链模型、网络结构模型7种学术交流模型的内涵、发展及其特点,深入比较分析上述7种学术交流模型各自的优势与不足。认为Bjrk模型是比较完善的学术交流模型,是对当前传统与现代交织的混合型学术交流模式的最好阐释。     

Dialectic: The Aims of Institutional Repositories

ABSTRACT

In the early 2000s, Clifford Lynch and Raym Crow had two different visions for the future of institutional respositories. Using their works as a starting point, T. Scott Plutchak discussed the initial aims of institutional respositories and addressed the dialectic between the view of institutional repositories as providing a method of preserving and nurturing new forms of scholarly communication and that of the institutional repository as a mechanism to transition to Open Access models for scholarly publications. Plutchak concludes that institutional repository librarians should focus efforts on collecting and preserving material outside of the formal publishing program in order to advance the work of our institutions, and to advance what libraries can do.     

Somewhere to Run to,Nowhere to Hide

Stephen Rhind-Tutt of Alexander Street Press described his perspective on historical trends in the information industries, particularly publishing, and extrapolates them to the future. The presentation begins with an examination of the current challenges facing the information industries. This is followed by a definition of technology forecasting and its application to the information industries, showing how the Internet lends itself to particular types of development and the wants and needs of information customers drive change. The likely direction of such change in the information industry is outlined. Members of the industry must choose to embrace and evolve with these changes in order to remain relevant.