基于SCI的我国医学教育研究国际影响力实证分析

国际期刊论文发表的数量和质量是反映国家、地区和机构医学教育研究国际影响力的重要指征。以近30年我国内地学者发表的国际医学教育研究论文为研究对象，运用文献计量方法、国际权威医学教育研究质量工具（Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument, MERSQI）和定性研究报告标准（Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research, SRQR）从发文量、发文期刊、主要合作国家、研究主题、论文质量评价等方面进行国际影响力的全景式分析。研究结果表明，我国医学教育研究数量和成果影响力正不断增长。然而，也存在研究国际影响力不足、研究质量参差不齐、国际合作水平较低的问题。研究建议，通过形成研究先导势能、深化科研体制机制改革、推动研究范式创新、大力开展成果推广等途径，全面提高我国医学教育研究质量和水平。     

国家认同教育研究热点及趋势——基于CiteSpace的计量分析

利用CiteSpace软件对CNKI数据库CSSCI和核心期刊2012篇国家认同教育相关论文进行统计分析发现:发文量出现两次峰值,其波动主要与相关政策颁布有关;发文作者主要来自高等师范院校,但未形成一定规模的合作群体;论文主要来自《外国教育研究》等期刊;研究内容主要聚焦在贯彻《爱国主义教育实施纲要》精神、基于爱国主义教...     

滁州学院近八年来教师发表论文分析

对滁州学院2000-2007年,八年来13个系部(专业)教师发表的论文进行系统分析。结果显示:①升本后国家级、省级论文发表数量均显著高于升本前同级别论文数,但系(部)间论文发表的数量存在显著差异,全校教师人均年发表论文数量偏少;②化学、生物、国土、中文、教育与法政等五个系部(专业)对发表论文的贡献较大;③《滁州学院学报》为教师提供良好的学术交流平台。结果表明:①教师科研总体水平及从事科研工作的积极性尚待提高,建议完善科研管理办法,建立教师科研工作考核的长效机制;②在提高科研奖励力度的同时,允许科研工作量折算成一定的教学工作量,建立科学的教学科研评价体系;③在严把稿件质量关的同时,鼓励教师向《滁州学院学报》投稿,并建议学校中级职称评审时,取消多篇《滁州学院学报》论文只算一篇的做法。     

Comparative/International Research on Juvenile Justice Issues: A Review of Juvenile Justice Specialty Journals

In recent years, leaders in the field of criminology and criminal justice have advocated for comparative/international and collaborative research; however, there is uncertainty regarding how much comparative/international research on the topic of juvenile justice is being conducted and how well information on juvenile justice issues with a cross-cultural or international focus is being disseminated. This study analyzed the number and focus of studies on international/comparative juvenile justice papers in the four major US juvenile justice specialty journals (Juvenile & Family Court Journal, Journal of Juvenile Justice, UC Davis Journal of Juvenile Law & Policy, and Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice). Data came from 567 papers published during the period of 2000–2013. The authors discuss the roles of the juvenile justice specialty journals to encourage the study of juvenile justice internationally.     

院校研究:美国高等教育变革的风向标--对RHE文章(1991-2001)的检索分析

对AIR会刊RHE11年间(1991-2001)所刊文章的分析显示:这一时期的研究主要集中在本科生教育、学生保持和学生满意度三方面。其时代背景是当时美国高等教育对本科生教育重视度的提升和政府经费缩减后以生源为导向的高等教育改革。研究表明,RHE刊载的文章是探究美国高等教育改革与发展的有效指标。     

国内高等教育学科发展分析报告（2013-2017） ———基于CNKI中国引文数据库的文献研究

文章基于CNKI中国引文数据库选取核心期刊,以2013-2017年为分析周期,对高等教育学科领域的科研论文进行统计分析。根据发文量、论文被引量、发文来源、优秀学者发文量及其成果被引等数据,结合当前国家战略与政策重点,分析近年来高等教育领域的研究热点及趋势,以衡量该学科的产出能力与创新力,以及相关学者在其研究领域的学术影响。2013-2017年间发表在高等教育学科领域核心期刊上的论文体现以下特征:发文量随着国家政策的发布及战略的需求浮动;在教育信息化的背景下,加强了大数据、教育技术、人工智能与教育融合等方向的研究;高产量及高被引学者持续关注高等教育重大改革方向;高被引论文的研究主题与高等教育创新等热点紧密相关。     

学术互动对博士生国际期刊论文产出的影响 ——基于2017年全国博士毕业生调查数据的分析

博士生是科学研究的生力军,也是高校科研产出的重要贡献者。然而,博士生从“学术学徒”到“独立研究者”的蜕变过程,必定要借助来自外界的经验丰富的同行们的学术指导、交流、共享和帮助。那么,以知识共享为核心的学术互动对博士生培养质量有什么样的影响呢?运用标准负二项回归对“中国博士生毕业调查数据”的全国61所高校8207份博士生数据进行分析。结果显示,“与导师的学术互动频次和质量”和“与其他教师的学术互动频次与质量”均对博士生国际期刊论文产出具有正向影响;“与博士生同学的学术互动频次和质量”对国际期刊论文产出的影响不显著。     

Reflections on an Emerging Field: Researching Mathematics Teacher Education

This paper reports a survey of research in mathematics teacher education from 1999 to 2003 done by an international team of five mathematics educators and researchers. The survey included published research in international mathematics education journals, international handbooks of mathematics education and international mathematics education conference proceedings. Some regional sources from various parts of the world were also included. We investigated who was writing, from and in what settings, with what theoretical frameworks, and with what sorts of study designs for what core questions. We also examined the range of findings and conclusions produced in these studies. Our analysis presented here focuses on four themes that stood out from our initial investigation of almost 300 published papers, and systematically elaborated through a focused study of a 160 papers across key journals and conference proceedings in the field. From this vantage point, the paper offers a reflection on the current state of the field of mathematics teacher education research. Our aim is to stimulate discussion that can support the development of the field, not make final pronouncements about its nature. The research presented in this paper was done by five mathematics education researchers, the authors listed above, and presented at ICME10 in Copenhagen in July 2004. This Survey Team (Survey Team 3) was nominated by the International Program Committee for the Congress and asked to survey “Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers” and present this in a plenary at the Congress. A copy of the presentation can be viewed at: http://www.wits.ac.za/jadler/presentations.html. An earlier version of this paper will also appear in the ICME10 proceedings.     

Author-field interaction following publication in “higher education” journals

This paper examines the interactions that authors of articles appearing in the core higher education journals have with members of the field subsequent to the publication of their work. Interactions were examined by the epistemological structure of the articles and data suggest that papers with different structures exact different types of reader-initiated reactions, though there are similarities regardless of type. It appears that published scholarship leads to further activities in research, scholarly, and professional sectors as a consequence of readers' initiatives and the resulting responses by authors. It is argued that examinations of knowledge use should go beyond traditional conceptions and examine the development of new communities of interest as professional actors attempt to fulfill varied agendas on the basis of published scholarship.     

Do Returnee Faculty Promote the Internationalization of Higher Education? A Study Based on the “2014 Faculty Survey in China”

Abstract

Based on data from the “2014 Chinese University Faculty Survey,” this article analyzes the distribution characteristics and manifestations of internationalization from returnee faculty to Chinese colleges as well as their impacts on the internationalization of higher education in the three dimensions of scientific research output, teaching content and methods, and international exchanges. Compared to local teachers, returnee faculty members adjust their research output strategies to reach a higher level of internationalization. They favor publishing papers in international journals and publish fewer domestic papers and make fewer domestic patent applications. They focus on international perspectives and content in their course teaching content and methods. In terms of international exchanges, they participate in international academic conferences and travel abroad more often for advanced studies. Their experiences studying overseas accumulate their comparative advantage in the internationalization of the academic profession. Higher education institutions should make them play larger roles in promoting the internationalization of scientific research and teaching as well as international academic exchanges to improve the level of internationalization of Chinese higher education.     

Working in separate silos? What citation patterns reveal about higher education research internationally

Higher education research is a growing, inter-disciplinary and increasingly international field of study. This article examines the citation patterns of articles published in six leading higher education journals—three published in the United States and three published elsewhere in the world—for what they reveal about the development of this field. The analysis shows that the American journals are not only dominated by American-based authors, but that they also cite predominantly articles, books, chapters and other publications published in the United States. By contrast, the three non-American journals accommodate a much broader spread internationally of both authors and citations. Possible explanations for these patterns, and whether they matter, are discussed.     

Growth or steady state? A bibliometric focus on international comparative higher education research

The study combines a bibliometric approach with a content analysis of abstracts of articles to explore the patterns of international comparative higher education research in leading international journals. The overall data set covers 4,095 publications from the Web of Science for the period 1992–2012 and the amount of international comparative articles in this data set is analyzed utilizing a geographical coding. Contrary to a general proliferation of international and global trends in higher education, the results of the analysis most importantly reveal a relatively steady state of international comparative higher education research over the past 20 years. Further patterns examined show that international collaborative articles have a much higher share in international comparative research compared to non-comparative research, small-scale country clusters are preferred for comparison and there is a dense network of comparative clusters between Europe and the US. Finally, rationales for these patterns are discussed, as well as potential implications.     

A Review of Methodological Characteristics of Research Published in Key Journals in Higher Education: Implications for Graduate Research Training

Professional journals serve an important function within most disciplines as they offer a mechanism for professional communication. In the field of higher education, research on methodological characteristics of the published literature has been sparse. This study used content analysis to identify the types of research designs and analytical approaches utilized most often in 3 leading higher education journals during 5 recent years. Results indicated that across all 3 journals, most studies used quantitative analyses based on either primary or secondary survey data, though there were some differences among the journals. The bulk of quantitative studies were based on procedures normally taught in intermediate and advanced statistical courses. The results suggest that graduate-level research training may need modifications if higher education professionals are to contribute to or fully appreciate the published higher education literature.     

学前教育公平研究十年:回顾与展望——基于2002-2011年期刊论文的分析

通过对2002-2011年间期刊论文的统计分析可知:学前教育公平领域的研究总体呈上升趋势;研究期刊分布较广,但质量高的期刊不多;研究主题广泛,但仍有较大提升与拓展的空间;研究视角较为狭窄,且研究方法单一。对于今后学前教育公平领域的研究走向,应在范式上走出纯思辨的藩篱;应在视角上跳出纯教育学的视野;应在内容上进一步拓展与深化。     

Attitudes of Taiwanese scholars toward English and Chinese as languages of publication

Under the influence of globalization, English has almost become the default language in scientific academia. While the culture-independent nature of scientific research may result in scholars' preference for using one common language, over-reliance on English may shape non-English-speaking scholars' negative attitudes toward their national languages and may constrain their use of these languages in the domain of scientific publication. Therefore, this study investigated the attitudes of Taiwanese science scholars toward English and Chinese as languages of publication. The findings indicated that it is not “English” itself but its “pragmatic value” (which is accrued through publishing in international indexed journals) that drives the choice of English over Chinese. However, this choice has led to an early sign of diglossia and the minimal use of Chinese in scientific publication. To mitigate this problem, it is believed that stakeholders in both international indexed journals and local universities should make efforts to value different languages as well as local journals published in other languages.     

An analysis of Asia–Pacific educational technology research published internationally in 2000–2013

The past fourteen years have seen a significant rise in the percentage of Asia–Pacific papers on educational technology (ET) published internationally: from 13.7 % in 2000 to 38.4 % in 2013. This study seeks to identify the overall trends and gaps in this research. Of the 4,332 articles published in five selected international journals between 2000 and 2013, 1,137 (26.2 %) from the Asia–Pacific region [the Asia–Pacific (AP) region includes countries specified by UNESCO and Western Asia (Middle East) countries defined by United Nations] were selected for analysis. It was found that the majority of these came from Taiwan, Korea, Australia, Singapore and China, revealing a need for more studies from such countries as Japan and Indonesia, West and Central Asia and the Pacific Islands. The papers most commonly addressed issues at the micro-level in formal education, particularly higher education, focusing on the introduction of digital technology into on- or off-campus settings. There were few macro-level studies into such areas as policy making, quality assurance or evidence of educational outcomes and impact. It is suggested that researchers should undertake more such comprehensive studies into ET integration, not only in formal education but non-formal, informal, incidental and implicit learning.     

6种职业教育专业性期刊学术影响力比较研究

采用科技期刊学术影响力动态评估模型，对6种国内公开发行的职业教育专业性期刊2002—2004年的期刊评价指标进行综合分析。结果显示，各职业教育期刊的学术影响力逐年提高。在影响因子、被引频次、来源文献量、即年指标及他引率方面存在差异。整体而言，职教专业性期刊影响因子普遍较低，国际合作论文、基金论文少，学术质量及规范性有待提高。     

生物科学本科生科研创新能力的培养

结合国家级、校级大学生创新性实验计划和大学生课外学术科研基金等项目,在指导教师系统教导下,对本科生进行科研训练。包括科研兴趣培养,文献检索和阅读训练,实验设计训练,实验技能训练,实验结果记录和分析训练,科技论文撰写训练,科研素质训练等等。通过本科生科研实践不但促进了专业基础理论知识的融会贯通,还提高了发现问题、分析问题、解决问题的能力,增强学生科研创新能力。