也谈学术期刊的分级问题

文章从学术期刊质量的内涵入手 ,分析了学术期刊分级的意义。并从分级依据、不同专业期刊质量并行定级、分级原则包括要素、期刊的优胜劣汰等方面反驳了反对分级论者 ,从而提出了学术期刊分级的一种方法———主成分分析法     

学术性期刊数字出版云平台应用研究

以作者参与研发的学术性期刊数字出版云平台为案例,介绍数字出版云平台体系的开发经验,并以《指挥控制与仿真》为例,介绍云平台的应用经验及成效。     

科技学术期刊编辑学者化的途径

探讨科技期刊在岗编辑学者化的意义.提出了学者化编辑队伍建设的途径:聘请兼职编辑,把稿件学术质量关;鼓励学习进修,攻读高级学位;参加科学研究,提高业务水平;加强综合素质培养,提高业务能力.所取得的成绩是:在岗编辑学历提高,科学研究蔚然成风,编辑人员的综合素质提高,编辑业务能力显著加强,期刊质量稳步提升.     

Ideas on creating a consumer market for scholarly journals

Based upon the CIBER surveys of the behaviour of scholars using research journals online the authors propose a market structure for the publication of research in which payments would be made at the article level by individual users – using credits supplied by their institutions or research funders – broadly along the lines of the iTunes model.     

学术期刊编辑服务科研的策略

为了保证期刊优质稿源的稳定性,学术期刊编辑应从提供论文写作规范和技巧、专业期刊信息、科研前沿信息和文献资源信息等方面充分发挥为科研服务的职能,提高科研人员的科研能力和水平,培育稳定的优秀作者群和潜在的为期刊投稿的学术团队,提高他们写出优秀稿件的能力。     

The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals

This paper presents an index that measures reviewer contribution to editorial processes of scholarly journals. Following a metaphor of ranking algorithms in sports tournaments, we created an index that considers reviewers on different context-specific dimensions, i.e., report delivery time, the length of the report and the alignment of recommendations to editorial decisions. To test the index, we used a dataset of peer review in a multi-disciplinary journal, including 544 reviewers on 606 submissions in six years. Although limited by sample size, the test showed that the index identifies outstanding contributors and weak performing reviewers efficiently. Our index is flexible, contemplates extensions and could be incorporated into available scholarly journal management tools. It can assist editors in rewarding high performing reviewers and managing editorial turnover.     

中文学术期刊文献资源的集成整合与二次编辑

分析当前影响学术期刊文献资源有效利用的因素及传统的手工二次文献整合编辑存在的问题 ,强调了信息时代对中文学术期刊文献资源进行数字化集成整合与二次编辑的必要性 ,介绍《中国学术期刊 (光盘版 )》文献信息编辑的特点 ,以期引发读者对开发其他文献资源的思考。     

学术期刊服务科研的方法及提升策略

学术期刊可通过选题策划、学术审核、指导论文写作、刊发指南类文章、举办学术会议、举办科研方法及论文写作讲座等为科研工作服务.学术期刊应重视对科研服务能力的建设,通过为学术研究提供更多的支撑,不断提高学术期刊的生存力.     

Core issues in pricing models for scholarly journals: a qualitative overview

Rhetoric about the ideal pricing model for scholarly content is often both strident and ill‐informed. Recognition of the nature of the business model is sometimes overlooked in favour of slogans or blanket accusations. This paper reviews qualitatively some of the core issues surrounding the creation of a sustainable pricing model that will enable authors, readers, and publishers to coexist. No particular examples are recommended or rejected; what is important is that interested parties explore thoroughly the available options and make decisions based on available facts, instead of emotion or trends.     

对科技期刊学术质量评估体系中参考文献构建指标的调查与研究

通过对我国38所高校自然科学版学报所载论文14717篇参考文献的调查与分析,得出如下结论:科技期刊学术质量评估体系中参考文献评估指标由近期文献引文率、核心期刊与经典专著引文率、外文文献引文率、中文文献引文率、篇均引文、无引文率等项内容所构建。另外,引文著录规范化率是否纳入评估指标体系之中,有待商讨。我们认为,为了全面提高科技期刊的学术质量,引文著录规范化问题理应引起科技期刊编辑的重视。如将此纳入评估体系中,首先必须确定出全国统一的科技期刊参考文献标准著录格式(目前标准不一致)。不然,评估既不合理,也缺乏可比性。     

Openness of Spanish scholarly journals as measured by access and rights

Metrics on open access (OA) availability of content published in scholarly journals (i.e. content licences, copyright ownership, and publisher‐stipulated self‐archiving permissions) are still scarce. This study implements the four core variables of the recently published Open Access Spectrum (OAS) (reader rights, reuse rights, copyright, and author posting rights) to measure the level of openness in all 1,728 Spanish scholarly journals listed in the Spanish national DULCINEA database at the end of 2015. Data exported from the database and used as variables for the analysis were: journal research area, type of publisher, type of access, self‐archiving and reuse policy, and type of Creative Commons (CC) licence used. Out of the total number of journals (1,728), 1,285 (74.5%) published their articles OA immediately after initial publication and thus received the maximum OAS score for reader rights; 37.5% of all journals used CC licences, and 79.5% allowed self‐archiving in some form. In 72% of journals, authors retained or publishers granted broad rights, which included author reuse and authorization rights (for others to reuse), whilst 13.5% did not specify any terms for copyright transfer. Similar studies could be carried out on other countries as this would enable comparisons of the general adoption and form of openness in different parts of the world.     

船舶类期刊集群信息融合服务模式研究

探索并优化新技术环境中船舶类期刊集群的知识信息服务与处理能力.根据新技术环境与知识管理需求,构建了新技术环境中船舶类期刊集群信息融合服务模型.基于此类模型,开发并实现了船舶信息融合服务应用平台.应用新技术,船舶类期刊集群衍生了较多的信息服务类产品,提高了船舶类期刊集群的信息融合服务能力与处理能力,获得了与用户共赢的服务成果.     

A qualitative study of the impact of electronic journals on scholarly information behavior

A qualitative study of the impact of electronic journals on the information behavior of academic researchers at Catalan universities shows that academic researchers now read more, and more widely. However, their reading is becoming more superficial; they are compelled to improve their discrimination skills in order to decide what to read in more depth. The electronic accessibility of journals means that researchers now make fewer library visits. Web browsing and table of contents (TOC) e-mail alerts are replacing physical browsing, and searching is a very popular option for keeping up to date with developments. Internet search engines, especially Google and Google Scholar, are becoming important sources of information for researchers. However, they face problems in managing their personal scientific information.     

高校学报与专业期刊网络传播效果的比较

通过对数字化出版特点及网络传播规律的分析,认为:无论是高校学报还是专业期刊,在网络世界里科技期刊的汇编权被肢解,学术信息以微内容的形式存在和传播,平等地供使用者搜索;因此,长期困扰高校学报发展的综合性劣势在淡化,为高校学报的发展提供了机遇。利用中国学术期刊网络出版总库检索,获取部分高校学报和专业期刊2010年的发文量,以及在相同发表时间内的网络下载次数,并计算出每种期刊篇均下载次数。结果表明,与专业期刊相比,高校学报网络传播效果略占优势,影响传播的主要因素是科技期刊的内容和品牌效应而不是综合性或专业性。     

How research becomes impact: Librarians helping faculty use scholarly metrics to select journals

Many librarians support faculty with the publishing process, which includes journal selection and evaluating the impact of their scholarly output. While large universities have the resources for entire departments devoted to bibliometrics, the authors of this article give strategies for faculty publishing support at a smaller liberal arts university. The authors created a LibGuide with publishing resources and presented the initiative to several academic divisions. Faculty were surveyed, and the results indicated that the majority of respondents were interested in assessing journal quality and viewed the library as a resource for help with the publishing process.