高等学校技术贸易中常见合同纠纷原因及对策研究

从信息不对称、人才流动、学术活动、企业经济条件所限、高校科研成果管理不完善、侵犯他人的专利权、专利权失效七个方面分析了高等学校技术贸易中常见合同纠纷原因及应采取的对策。     

商标合同纠纷若干问题探讨

商标合同纠纷的基本法律性质是合同纠纷。因此,审理此类纠纷的基本法律依据应该是《合同法》及当事人的合同约定。鉴于契约性纠纷与侵权纠纷有很大差异,法院在审理此类纠纷时的基本思维方式应该符合《合同法》的规定。以下就相关问题分别进行分析。     

网络信息资源管理——知识产权纠纷及保护

网络知识产权问题纠纷分为四类：侵犯网页著作权的纠纷,网站链接权的纠纷,域名注册权的纠纷,侵犯内容著作权的纠纷。本文对这四类问题加以详细的探讨和分析,并提出了网络知识产权保护的对策。     

论知识产权密集型商品的生产

 21世纪是知识经济时代,商品生产历经劳动密集型、资金密集型、技术密集型到今天的知识产权密集型,商品竞争也走过了质量之争、价格之争、服务之争到今天的融品牌、专利技术、智力知识等于一体的组合式知识产权之争。知识产权密集型商品——一种集知识、技术、法律、经济于一身,进可攻城略地,退可防守反击的经济尤物,成为经济发达国家和企业竞争优势所在,执世界消费潮流之牛耳。     

浅析医闹中患者保护的法律对策

在当今社会,作为白衣天使的一部分人以开药牟取私利,视患者死活如儿戏,引发医闹事件,并在全国范围内逐步升级,由小到大,由弱到强,最后发展到带有黑社会组织性质的职业医闹群体行为。本文通过对＂医闹＂这一社会现象进行分析,为构建多元、灵活、高效的医疗纠纷解决机制,提出一些设想。     

中日东海争端的现状与解决前景路径探析

东海争端的焦点是划界原则和钓鱼岛归属问题,中国主张以大陆架原则划界。钓鱼岛是中国固有领土,而日本提出中间线原则并占有钓鱼岛。本文论述中日两国东海争端的内容、现状和实质,从历史、国际法和逻辑角度阐述中日东海争端中中国立场的合法性和合理性,并分析东海油气资源对中国石油安全的意义,最后提出东海争端解决的前景和思路。     

The realness of risk: gene technology in Germany

This paper examines the material relations of risk within a dispute about the hazards of manufacturing human insulin using gene technology, and the r?le played by the referent 'real risk' in the technical performance of risk in that dispute. It draws on recent work in science and technology studies that extends actor-network theory to examine the performance of reality in scientific practice. The multiplicity of risks in the dispute, and the links made and unmade between them, are examined. I argue that in the dispute, risks were contingently linked and separated around a referent 'real risk' that emerged within the recombinant DNA debate of the late 1970s. I contrast my account of risk with realist and relativist accounts, each of which values risk as an abstract entity. In my account, risk's value is contingent upon sets of material relations that link hazards and procedures for their minimization. Risk's realness emerges as some risks are linked and others separated, working a multiple/singular relation in an ontological politics of risk.     

2009年国外语言哲学研究中的重要问题

文章重点关注2009年国外语言哲学研究中的若干前沿热点问题。在2009年发表的研究成果中,较为值得关注的问题包括对语旨行为的界定、维特根斯坦是否是反实在论者之争、语义规范主义之争、格兰仕伯格的语义学和“真”的相对性、非指示性语境论,以及罗宾·杰申的专名理论。     

我国多元化争议解决机制的建立——以ADR为视角

随着社会多样化的发展,社会纠纷的出现亦纷繁复杂,诉讼作为解决争议的最为平常、权威的方法日益受到挑战。 ADR 逐渐在各国发展起来成为与民事诉讼并行不悖、相互补充的重要社会纠纷解决机制,本文结合 ADR 之特色与存在的缺陷,分析在我国如何构建多元化的争议解决机制。     

专利商标案件审理中的若干问题

专利、商标纠纷案件的审理是知识产权审判工作的重要组成部分。多年来,北京市法院在审理专利、商标纠纷案件中,遇到并解决了不少疑难问题,积累了一定的经验。下面就一些经常遇到的问题作一介绍。     

医患纠纷产生的原因及防范的伦理要求

医患纠纷产生的原因很多,可以从制度、伦理、法律等方面进行分析。本文主要从医者、患者、管理、媒体、法律等角度,对医患纠纷产生的原因进行分析,由此提出医务人员防范医患纠纷的伦理要求。     

认知疗法在大学生人际交往纠纷处理中的应用

对一突发学生人际交往纠纷案例进行处理,在处理过程中自觉运用认知疗法,采取深度分析,引导双方当事人重新审视事件,发现偏差在于对同一行为的不同理解上。和当事人一起探究原因,并进行认知重构,摒弃＂忖度＂,使双方放下成见,合手言欢,妥善解决了纠纷。     

论多哈回合谈判中的“法庭之友”悬案

尽管WTO争端解决实践表明了“法庭之友”制度具有可接受性,但多哈回合谈判中WTO成员方对于“法庭之友”制度的建立意见分歧。解决多哈回合谈判中的“法庭之友”悬案,必须对“法庭之友”制度设计中的利益平衡、程序保障、“法庭之友”的地位及范围等关键问题进行科学合理的规划。     

The changing patterns of China’s international standardization in ICT under techno-nationalism: A reflection through 5G standardization

The U.S.-China dispute surrounding 5G motivates further examination on China’s approach to international standardization. While China’s challenges with various standard initiatives to the global standards regime peaked in the 5G dispute have attracted public interests, scholarly approach to the dispute is still limited. We place the dispute in the context of China’s long-standing attempts for international standardization in ICT sectors. With enhanced economic power, China has pursued for pushing indigenous technologies into international standards, which has been a core part of its national science and technology (S&T) policy. This paper examines China’s international standard initiatives from the perspective of techno-nationalism. Our literature review identifies three pillars of techno-nationalism: state empowerment, growth orientation, and global connection. Then we investigate three cases of WAPI, TD-SCDMA and 5G and discuss how the patterns of developing international standards have varied in the framework of techno-nationalism. Over time, China’s international standard initiatives based on techno-nationalism have strengthened global connection and growth orientation, with increasing proximity to techno-nationalism of the Western style. In particular, China’s aspiration for growth orientation was much enhanced with the 5G standard initiative, compared to WAPI or TD-SCDMA, as it aims to be the first mover in the 5G race. Overall, our study suggests that China’s national S&T policy has been moving from the ‘catch-up’ to the ‘first-mover’ strategy, but the transformation continues to take place in the framework of techno-nationalism.     

How does the World Trade Organization know? The mobilization and staging of scientific expertise in the GMO trade dispute

The World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement procedure is a key arena for establishing global legal norms for what counts as relevant knowledge. As a high-profile case, the WTO trade dispute on GMOs mobilized scientific expertise in somewhat novel ways. Early on, the Panel put the dispute under the Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement through a new legal ontology; it classified transgenes as potential pests and limited all environmental issues to the 'plant and animal health' category. The selection of scientific experts sought a multi-party consensus through a fast adversarial process, reflecting a specific legal epistemology. For the SPS framing, focusing on the defendant's regulatory procedures, the Panel staged scientific expertise in specific ways that set up how experts were questioned, the answers they would give, their specific role in the legal arena, and the way their statements would complement the Panel's findings. In these ways, the dispute settlement procedure co-produced legal and scientific expertise within the Panel's SPS framework. Moreover, the Panel operated a procedural turn in WTO jurisprudence by representing its findings as a purely legal-administrative judgement on whether the EC's regulatory procedures violated the SPS Agreement, while keeping implicit its own judgements on substantive risk issues. As this case illustrates, the WTO settlement procedure mobilizes scientific expertise for sophisticated, multiple aims: it recruits a source of credibility from the scientific arena, thus reinforcing the standard narrative of 'science-based trade discipline', while also constructing new scientific expertise for the main task--namely, challenging trade restrictions for being unduly cautious.     

论新刑诉法和解程序的纠纷解决属性

刑事案件是纠纷的一种特殊形式,并非所有刑事案件均必须采取落实刑罚权的方式解决。协商性司法作为一种可移植的刑事纠纷解决方式,具有保护被害人权益、恢复受损社会秩序的特点,对于我国刑事诉讼一定范围内刑事纠纷的平和解决具有现实意义。刑事和解是协商性司法理念与我国实践结合后本土化的产物,2013年新刑事诉讼法实施后对此进行了立法确认。刑事诉讼的解纷属性考察应以纠纷解决为视角,在此基础上,进行准确的制度设计以实现在刑事诉讼中纠纷的平和解决。     

东海油气资源及中国、日本在东海大陆架划界问题的研究

东海有丰富的油气资源,成为与中国海域相邻与相向的日本国觊觎已久的目标.中、日东海油气资源之争,源于中、日专属经济区界限划分之争.按照<联合国海洋法公约>的规定,沿海国可以从领海基线量起,向外200n mile划出专属经济区.在专属经济区内的所有资源归沿海国拥有和专属管辖.由于中日东海海域之间的宽度不到400n mile,中日在东海尚未划界.为此,日本单方面提出所谓的"中、日中间线".日方提出的"中间线"的日本一侧,实际上是中国的专属经济区.由于这种划分不符合国际法的精神,中国决不会承认.而中、日之间东海海域的划界应遵循"大陆架自然延伸"的原则.中国从未承认过"中间线",而在"中间线"以东海域属于争议海域,日方在这一海域无权采取单方面行动.文中对中、日两国东海大陆架划界分歧进行了分析,提出了我国按照国际法划分东海大陆架的原则以及我国的政策,从而提出了中、日东海大陆架划界方案.     

科学可以计划吗？——二十世纪三四十年代以英国为中心的争论

 发生于1930年代末的关于科学是要计划还是要自由的贝-波之争,其源流可追溯到第二届国际科学史大会。整个三十年代英国科学家中的科学与社会运动,是该争论的过程因素。该争论实非二人之争,而是存在于两个科学家群体之间,Nature杂志在其中起到了推波助澜的作用,若干科学组织牵涉其中,争论所涉及范围远超英国之外,过程比较曲折,历史影响极为深远。科学家们争论的问题包括科学、计划和自由的内涵,科学发展的机制,科学家的责任,科学的社会关系等等问题。它不仅促生了科学学、科学社会学等学科,而且将科学哲学和科学史研究推向一个新的高潮。更为重要的是,这场争论极大地改变了人们的科学观念,它使功利主义科学观从此深入人心,与之后苏联之外各国科学的计划化不无关系。     

美国知识产权保护规则的新一轮变迁——以《双边投资协定》为拓展的保护手段

为应对经济发展需求,美国不断在全球推行高标准、宽范围、强制约的知识产权保护制度,引发了现代知识产权国际保护规则的新一轮变迁。BIT作为知识产权国际保护的一种重要形式,在投资争端解决机制、技术化本地措施、政府竞争中立等方面都对知识产权予以强保护。通过对2012年BIT范本中知识产权保护新议题的研究,探讨知识产权保护规则的未来趋势,为我国在调整争议解决机制、待遇适用标准和政府管制范围等方面提供建议,以应对美国知识产权保护新规则带来的挑战。     

域名与知识产权保护最新发展动态

从全球的角度，对最近几年互联网域名系统发展过程中因域名的注册和使用而引起的知识产权纠纷的解决进程作了比较系统的介绍，重点介绍和分析了WIPO第二次域名问题全球性磋商和目前该领域的几个热点问题，供有关人士参考。