师范生反思性数学学习简论

探讨了反思性数学学习的内涵、构念及其特点;阐述了师范生反思性数学学习的特殊意义和师范生进行反思性数学学习的具体方法.     

混合式教学条件下师范生反思性思维培养策略探赜

杜威反思性思维及冯友兰、唐君毅对其思想的诠释和发展,对于师范生的发展具有重要影响。基于师范生反思性思维培养需要而开展的混合式教学,能够帮助教师解决课堂教学中的浅思维甚至是无思维问题,从而提高课堂教学质量,提升人才培养品质。混合式教学条件下师范生反思性思维的培养,有助于增强师范生学习的主体意识,强化其学习责任感;增进师范生深度学习能力,提高其内容理解程度;增强师范生问题探究能力,提升其问题解决能力。通过混合式教学培养师范生反思性思维时,教师可以从师范生职前教育所必需的本体性知识、条件性知识和实践性知识入手,通过将情境、问题、探究与师范生的知识、经验、实践相融合,帮助他们融通教育理论与教育实践,从而发展他们的反思性思维能力。     

师范生反思性教学能力现状调查报告

文章在对关于师范生反思性教学能力问卷调查分析的基础上,对师范生教学反思的认知特征、行为特征做了调查分析,并对我国培养反思型教师提出了两点建议：改革教育类课程设计,构建开展反思性教学的以师范生为本的教学观;通过理论学习进行反思、在案例教学中引导师范生反思、撰写学习日志和博客、与同学交流,改进反思合作的方法,培养师范生的反思教学能力。     

试论反思性数学学习

指出了反思性数学学习的概念,探讨了反思性数学学习的意义和基本特征,并提出了反思性数学学习的具体内容。     

反思性教学在英语师范生培养中的应用及成效

将反思性教学应用在英语师范生的教学中,既能帮助学生发现自身的不足,也能有效提高学生的学习效率。本文重点分析了如何利用反思性教学培养英语师范生的综合实践能力,以提高英语教师教师的教学效率。     

指导学生进行数学反思性学习的探索

本文作者通过学习研究,认识到学生反思性学习能力在当前数学教育中的重要性,引经据典给出了数学反思性学习的定义,阐述指导学生进行数学反思性学习的涵义、基本要求、坚持的原则和学习的方法,以期从新的角度来探索数学反思性学习。     

课堂教学视野下的反思性数学学习

数学课程标准对学生的反思性数学学习给予了很高的关注,但当前数学课堂教学中学生反思性学习的现实状况却不容乐观。这主要表现为：教师的课堂权威挤占了学生进行自我反思的空间;学生在数学学习中的自我反思能力水平普遍偏低。通过分析课堂教学视野下反思性数学学习的具体内涵,可以发现数学课堂教学中学生进行反思性学习的重要意义主要在于发展学生的数学思维能力、促成个体化的数学学习方式和促进学生自主性的发展。     

论中学数学教师MPCK及其对数学教学的影响

中学数学教师MPCK是由数学学科知识、一般教学法知识、有关数学学习的知识和教育技术知识等经过教学实践反思融合而成的一个有机知识体系。数学教师MPCK的发展经历了假想、萌芽、成型与完善等阶段。数学教师MPCK水平对学生有效数学信念的形成、提供学习任务水平及学生探究性学习的支撑等有着重要影响。在职前教育中加强师范生对数学统领性知识的理解、设置初等数学教材疏通课程,在职后加强反思性实践等是提高数学教师MPCK水平的重要途径。     

高师小学数学教育类课程改革的路径选择

高师小学数学教育类课程,既不能是"书院式",也不能是"工匠式",应该在理论的基石上凸显实践导向;要从学科、教育、实践三个视角选择课程内容,着重培养师范生解读和加工小学数学教材、分析和指导学生数学学习、践行和反思小学数学教学等诸多能力;在课程实施上,要坚持课程资源开发的开放性,强调教学团队建设的协作性,增加教学方式的交互性,注重学业评价内容的实践性,以促进师范生反思性教学实践能力的发展。     

师范生数学思维特点的实证研究

以师范生作为研究对象,以数学活动为载体,采用质化研究法对数学思维特点进行了实证研究,形成了研究结论,即思维的目的性、概括性、灵活性、简缩性、建构性、诊断性、反思性和抑制性.     

黄冈市重点中学和普通中学高一学生数学学习特征比较

本研究采用“国际学生能力评估计划（PISA）”的学生调查问卷,对黄冈市重点中学和普通中学的535名学生的数学学习特征进行调查与分析,旨在探讨重点中学和普通中学学生数学学习特征的差异性。结果发现：重点中学的学生与普通中学的学生相比具有更加浓厚的数学学习兴趣、更强烈的学习动机、更积极的自我概念和自我效能感以及低水平的焦虑体验,并且他们更擅长运用各种学习策略。黄冈市高中一年级学生的数学学习特征在性别上存在着显著差异。     

反思性教学中几对基本关系的剖析

反思性教学作为当前倡导的一种重要教学思想,在落实到行动时产生了不少的困惑,究其根本就是对反思性教学的整体把握还有偏差,因此需要对反思性教学与教学反思、反思性教学与反思实践、反思性教学与行动研究、反思性教学与教师专业发展这样几对基本关系作一个梳理,从而为反思性教学的持续有效开展奠定基础。     

解放旨趣下反思型教师教育课程文化建构

提高师范生反思能力,培养反思型教师是我国教师教育改革的一项重要任务。师范生的反思指向教育理论和教育实践,解放旨趣下,师范院校可通过培养反思的实践者、增加实践性课程、营造反思性课堂文化、采用多元评价方式来建构反思型教师教育课程文化,滋润反思型教师的成长。     

小学教师关于反思日记的认识

反思日记是提高教师反思能力的有效方式。了解教师对反思日记的看法是对教师进行培训干预的基础。通过开放式问卷对北京市8所小学的65名教师进行了调查,结果发现教师认为写作反思日记增强了其反思意识,提高了教育教学能力和理论水平,并积累了丰富的素材。在写作反思日记的过程中遇到的最大困难是没有时间、缺乏理论知识、找不到反思点和需要专家的指导。教师建议加强反思日记的交流,希望学校管理者给予支持和正确的引导。     

Understanding and assessing preservice teachers’ reflective thinking

This study reviews the criteria for assessing reflective thinking, and investigates how the process of reflective thinking develops in preservice teachers. Reflections of preservice teachers are assessed from two perspectives: content and depth. The findings include variations in the content, and that the pace at which reflective thinking deepens depends on personal background, field experience contexts, and the mode of communication. The study includes insights into how to measure the quality of reflective thinking and how to enhance reflective thinking and cultivate reflective practitioners, including the kinds of experiences that could be incorporated in a teacher education program.     

Using Reflective Journals to Enhance Impoverished Practicum Placements: A case in teacher education in Ethiopia

This article investigates the value of writing reflective journals for student teachers during practicum placement. The author invited 10 pre‐service education degree teachers to write a weekly reflective journal throughout their four weeks practicum teaching. Each student teacher was given the opportunity to revisit the issues in his journals through a subsequent reflective dialogue. At the end of the practicum, the student teachers were asked to complete one additional reflective journal to provide their views about how useful and challenging they found the task of writing reflective journals on their teaching experiences. The author also kept observation notes to reflect on his own experiences of involving student teachers in reflective journal writing. It was concluded that the student teachers benefited immensely from their experiences of writing reflective journals for the purpose of reflecting on their practical experiences. They reported that the activity helped them improve their teaching experiences and deepen their understanding of the complexities involved in learning to teach. The study has implications on the role of reflective journals as a means of engaging teacher candidates in reflective thinking, a recently emerging notion in the education of teachers in Ethiopia.     

Three dimensions of reflective thinking in solving design problems: a conceptual model

Design tasks are omnipresent in our everyday lives. Previous research shows that reflective thinking is one of the critical factors in solving design problems. Related research has attempted to capture designers’ reflective thinking process. Yet a close inspection of designers’ reflective thinking taking place during their design process demands further effort. To understand designer’s reflective practice and to find better ways to promote novices’ reflective thinking in solving real-world design problems, a comprehensive model was developed. This model identified three dimensions to guide the understanding of designers’ reflective thinking during a design process: (1) the timing of reflection, indicating the points in the process where reflective thinking occurs, (2) the objects of reflection, showing the different types of objects that designers may reflect upon, and (3) the levels of reflection, referring to the different levels of designers’ reflection. This model provides for meaningful aspects of reflective thinking to be situated in a design process, which can guide educators and instructional designers in developing appropriate learning environments for facilitating novice and practicing designers’ reflective thinking. Moreover, the model can serve as a stepping stone for further research.     

Reflecting Reflective Practice

This paper demystifies reflective practice on teaching by focusing on the idea of reflection itself and how it has been conceived by two philosophers, Plato and Irigaray. It argues that reflective practice has become a standardized method of defining the teacher in teacher education and teacher accreditation systems. It explores how practices of reflection themselves can suggest ways out of dictated pathways of reflection in teaching. Drawing on Luce Irigaray's and Plato's ideas on reflection, the paper includes a critical overview of how reflective practice can contradict its own aims and become non‐reflective, shutting off possibilities for transformations and educational differences that it has set out to achieve. Keeping up the deconstructive mood, the paper draws on Irigaray's re‐reading of Plato's parable of the cave to argue that reflective teaching that merely reflects phallogocentric educational systems and that attempts to universally reproduce standardized forms of reflective practice can never be conducive to the diversification of educational spaces.

The paper seeks to re‐think Plato's idea of reflection as mere copying and takes up Irigaray's strategic mimesis to explore ways through which reflective practice can regain its critical edge and reactivate teachers' reflective voices. It argues for the repetition of the practice of reflection by drawing on a feminist critique that challenges phallogocentric reflective tendencies in education and for mimetic strategies that engender difference.     

反思性教学在高职思想政治理论课教学中的运用

本文论述了思想政治理论课反思性教学反思的内容和实施策略,以便高职思想政治理论课教师在教学过程中能不断提高教学效果,提高自我理论与实践水平。