一路走去

携一身久坐斗室的疲惫,他,走了出去,从喧嚣的城市,朝着黄昏中的原野走了出去,仿佛一只快乐的小鸟逃出牢笼。空气,空气是那么的清新,就像雨水洗过,洗过的森林。春泥散发出迷人的体味。植物吐纳出可人的馨香。农家屋顶炊烟袅袅,像一个扭着腰肢走秀的模特。田间小路,劳作一天归家的形影匆匆。屋檐下,夜归的燕子展翅,划出丽影。一路走去,风景,越来越美。一幅偌大的画卷,大自然巧夺天工的画卷,徐徐,在他面前,打开,展开,铺开。他,是幸运的,他破卷而入。美丽的风景让他疲惫渐消。脚步轻快,他踏歌而去。     

乡村哲学

<正>在偏远的乡下,随便的一块地里,拔起一根葱,或者挖出一棵荠菜,不用洗,简单收拾一下,就可放在嘴里生吃掉。是的,上面什么也没有。除了一些干透的雨渍,一些风的印痕,一些阳光的温度,最多,有一只不合时宜的虫子。但,都是香的。雨渍是香的,风是香的,阳光是香的,虫子的不合时宜也是香的。那是一种干净的香。偏远的乡村,靠天吃饭,坏的东西是进不来的。包括,那些坏掉了的良心。有一个人跋山涉水,在村子里,终于找到了要找的人。他来赎罪。在那个特殊的年代,他说了不该说的     

饮料人生

饮料与人生,有着不可分割的密切关系。少年多喜欢喝汽水。它甜,变化多。少年不知愁滋味,人生的酸甜苦辣,他独尝到甜味。世界在他眼中,犹如味道各异的汽水,缤纷多彩。进入青春期,他工作了,恋爱了。这时,他的口味,已由汽水转向了咖啡,亦苦亦甜,也香也涩,有一种成熟的刺激感,符合他复杂多变的心境。     

烟雨田园情

九月未央,烟雨薄凉兮,淡若素。白色裙摆,随风叠叠飞,轻如燕。雨声清脆,荡起漪漪画,冷若丝。阳光田园,麦苗漫漫舞,飘如烟。九月,初秋的麦田以生机勃勃的姿态迎接着雨的挥洒,酝酿着一场自然与自然的邂逅。历经一夜,潮湿的水珠已然藏匿于每一处。秋季的干燥仿佛从未存在一般。静待温暖归来。秋水薄凉,伊人藏于流水间。     

心中的2100

2100年,一个全新的世界。这里,繁荣昌盛,没有任何天灾人祸。当然,此时最具魅力的还是先进的科技。大街上人流如潮,大家手拿千奇百怪的小玩意,瞧着,听着,说着。是什么呢?找人一问,才知是手机。有长方形,正方形,圆形,梯形,菱形……形状各异,真是一道亮丽的风景线。手机     

爱的日子

落日夕阳,走在归家的路上。清风吹过,几片落叶打着转儿飘过脸颊。不经意的,目光触及舞动的叶子。云淡,天高。悦目,赏心。秋,一个丰盈、愉悦、盛产憧憬的季节。给予爱的日子。怀表图/一世情缘价格:128元十一点,于我来说是一个永远停驻脑海的时刻,同样的秋日,同样的宁静,我遇见了阳光灿烂的他。时针又一次驻足在这一瞬间,听着滴滴答答的声音,唤起了心底那丝温暖的记忆。     

曹操《短歌行》庸解

对酒当歌,人生几何?譬如朝露,去日苦多。慨当以慷,忧思难忘。何以解忧,唯有杜康。青青子衿,忧忧我心。但为君故,沉吟至今。呦呦鹿鸣,食野之萍。我有嘉宾,鼓瑟吹笙。明明如月,何时可掇。忧从中来,不可断绝。越陌度阡,枉用相存。契阔谈宴,心念旧恩。月明星稀,乌鹊南飞。绕树三匝,无枝可栖。山不厌高,海不厌深。周公吐哺,天下归心。曹操的《短歌行》是诗,还是歌?回答自然是双重肯定的。是诗,也是歌,是歌行体的诗歌。这种回答似乎循环解释,又像绕口的文字游戏,但似乎也不能完全用无以做答故以滑头充塞来置评。因为至少它还示意有另外一种解读,说明了歌行是诗体的一种。     

一步与一生

一步又一步,马蹄下践踏的,是她的芳华。一声又一声,铃儿摇动的,是她的心声。徐行在路上,昭君无言。眼前,是黄沙漫漫,衰草连连;身后,是歌舞升平,觥筹交错。心中按捺不住的,是对故国的思恋。日影衔山,落日归家了,那么人呢?也许,她并不悔,自己的那一步。面对画师的勒索,面对大家默认的"规矩",她转身一步,拒绝了。红     

纸上的玫瑰

冬日的午后,她在家收拾书柜,翻出一摞书信。她打开信,慢慢地读。信纸的右下角,画着一枝红玫瑰,似开未开的花苞,诉说着温柔的心事。沿着记忆的藤蔓,她又想起那段青葱岁月。同学们聚在一起,在操场上排练节目。过了一会,她出场了,开始清唱。几位高年级的同学路过,吹着口     

那个被你伤害最深的人

见过一个父亲的泪。他蹲在一堵墙外,满身疲惫的风尘。先是呆呆地看着街景,后来,他手捂住脸呜咽。双肩耸动,单薄的身影,像极秋深时,枝上一枚欲抖落的叶。眼泪从他指缝处,不住地溢出来,成小溪流。午后的阳光,照在上面,反射着惨痛的晶莹。     

“存在”之“光”——海德格尔美论研究

海德格尔认为"美"源自审美状态,而审美状态并非是主体的某种精神状态,而是"存在"的本然状态。美是存在者自身的显现,"存在"即是美的本质,也是美的功用,美不是显现的结果,而是"显一现"这个动态过程。存在之显现之所以美是因为,人无法在流变的世界中领会与观照存在之本质,存在必然在生活的日常状态中被遗忘,只有打破了这种遗忘状态,人才能获得真正的自由,获得存在之澄明,这种获得存在之澄明状态过程,就是获得美的本质与本源的过程,美就是存在者的澄明之光,是存在之光。     

Disillusionment of the American Dream——On An American Tragedy

Theodore Dreiser is now regarded as one of the pre-eminent American realistic novelists of the first half of the twentieth century.an anatomist of the American Dream.In his great work An American Tragedy,Dreis- er exposes and criticizes mercilessly the corruption and black side of American society.The disillusionment of the American Dream is an important theme of the fiction.This paper illustrates "An American Tragedy" is the re- flection of disillusionment of the American Dream in the perspectives of the tragedy of a mortal,the tragedy of American society,and the tragedy of the American Dream.     

从文明无知、文明冲突到文明交往、文明和谐--对学术界三种文明观的基本述评

文明是决定和影响人类活动的长期的基本因素。冷战结束后，特别是随着“文明冲突论”的提出，各种文明观的讨论逐渐演化成文明学的各种派系。当前主要有三种文明观：文明冲突论、文明对话论、文明交往论。在处理国与国关系的实践中应承认并维护文明的多样性。文明发展的趋势是文明和谐和文明相处。人类真正的危险在于各个民族、国家间文明的互不相融，以及由此导致的误解、紧张、冲突乃至战争。世界的持久和平与持续发展有赖于人与人之间、民族与民族之间、国家与国家之间文明的对话、沟通和理解，有赖于文明间的和谐，共同发展。     

论老子哲学的“无”

老子对其“道”有着一以贯之的思路,即道是对生命本真存在的体悟。“无”在老子道论中具有核心地位,“无”是道的超验性的指称。因此,道之“生”,并非宇宙论的化生,而是出于生命的体验,其本质就在于“无”之生,是“无”之心体对万物的当下成就。以“无”为本体的“无—有”一体化运作形成道的内在结构,“无”在“言”出“有”中踏入了超验性与经验性的两难境地,而“有”对“无”的当下回归使物我保其真性。在这个结构中,“真”是“无”的内涵,“虚”与“静”构成了“无”的动力机制。     

黑格尔与正义

黑格尔认为,理性即正义。现实的正义不过是理性的正义的自我实现,正义的现实性存在于正义的必然性之中,人类正义的发展历程决不是田园诗般令人快意的,人民群众只是理性和正义自我实现的工具。黑格尔看不到人民群众在正义的实现中的主体作用。     

中国羊角蚱属、柯蚱属、台蚱属的分类检索及七新种记述(直翅目:蚱总科)

系统地记录中国蚱总科中羊角蚱属、柯蚱属及台蚱属的种类,以检索表形式进行分类研究,共记述羊角蚱属33种,柯蚱属29种,台蚱属55种,其中包括7新种,即广东羊角蚱Criotettix guangdongensis sp.nov.、广州柯蚱Coptotettix guangzhouensis sp.nov.、尖峰柯蚱Coptotettix jianfengensis sp.nov.、直缘柯蚱Coptotettix orthomarginis sp.nov.、海南台蚱Formosatettix hainanensis sp.nov.、波股台蚱Formosatettix undulatifemura sp.nov.及黑胫台蚱Formosatettix nigritibia sp.nov..模式标本保存于陕西师范大学动物研究所.     

弗洛伊德“性力升华说”探微

弗洛伊德坚持“性欲乃是人类取得的一切成就的源泉”，认为“本能的升华是最引人注目的文化发展的特征；正是由于升华，高级的心智活动、科学活动、艺术活动或思想活动才成为可能。”人们对此很有异议。其实，弗洛伊德是在对“性”的最广泛意义的理解基础上创建他的“动力心理学”的，他试图从他对人的个体心理理解的立场出发，来解释人类的全部历史、全部事件和社会生活的结构，并以此建立一整套关于人类精神生活规律的学说和理论。深入探寻弗洛伊德性学说的底蕴，澄清他的“性力”、“原欲”概念的内涵，真正领悟其“升华”思想的真谛，才有可能拓宽我们的视野，深化对复杂纷繁的人的精神世界的研究。     

Kierkegaardian Implications of Punishment, Guilt, and Forgiveness for Education

Students have to be punished if they have made a serious transgression. Avoidance of punishment will lead to serious complications. But punishment is inseparably linked with guilt and forgiveness. The inability of individuals to forgive themselves was regarded by Kierkegaard to be an emanation of individual false pride, a kind of vanity. This type of despair, a psychological and spiritual disorder, is a serious and debilitating problem. The inability to escape this despair of forgiveness can lead to a loss of genuine humanness. Unchecked, this despair can lead to unrelatedness of self to itself and fear of the possibility of freedom. Thus the self-knowledge attainable in despair over the forgiveness of an offense would lead to what we would call a successful rehabilitation of the individual and his or her conjunct reintegration into society. Kierkegaard's ideas on punishment are interesting — historically and philosophically speaking — because they represent a softening of a harsh view of punishment by stressing the humanizing aspects of guilt and forgiveness.     

消极个性与积极个性--分析五四主流思想家个性观的一个新视角

个性观念是陈独秀、李大钊、胡适等五四主流思想家的主导话语 ,是一个重要的现代性观念。可以从消极和积极两个维度理解五四时期的个性观。消极个性指对宗法性和奴隶性的反抗 ,积极个性与认识论上的理性主义、伦理学上的功利主义等有密切关联。五四时期的个性观从一个侧面反映现代性意识的发育历程。五四主流思想家注意到消极个性与积极个性的多重内涵与意义 ,表明中国知识分子对现代性理解的深化。同时 ,个性观上的局限也表明中国现代性意识发展的曲折性与困难性     

Public education and the post-fordist accumulation regime: A case study of Australia

This paper discusses the current radical changes in the Australian education policy. Central to the argument is the claim that the radical restructuring of the public sector hastened the loss of the possibility of any critical evaluation of national policy.The paper argues that this shift has been forced on the Australian state by the objective conditions expressed in a new realignment of the dominant transnational capital with the subordinate domestic capital, and in the shifts in a global capacity for consumption. The argument is underpinned by the claim that a new, post-Fordist (or flexible specialization) regime of capital accumulation is at present replacing the Fordist regime of mass production and consumption.The paper further argues that in order to achieve the system-preferred changes in the Australian education policy, the Australian government introduced radical changes in the production rules of policy formation. This involved a narrowing of policy making context and, crucially, an exclusion of voices critical of the shift towards economic reductionism.This loss of a critical sensibility constitutes the central concern of this paper. To advance the argument, in Part One, the paper discusses the relationship between the Australian state and the post-Fordist objective conditions of capital accumulation. Part Two argues that the lack of intellectual tradition in Australian public life was at least partially responsible for the easy passage given to neoclassical economics¹ perspective in becoming a dominant public policy paradigm. Part Three locates the role of education within the context of the European philosophical tradition. It provides the link between critical sensibility, the project of Western civilization (which clearly extends beyond the modern vs. postmodern dichotomy), and the role of public discourse. Finally, the paper argues that education policy needs to take the issue of critical sensibility seriously. For this reason, it needs to be informed by a desire to go beyond the mere technical fit between graduates and the workplace, and allow itself to be inspired by new ideas, and new ways of seeing.Parts One and Two of this Article appeared in INTERCHANGE, Vol. 26, #2, 1995.