图书馆信息资源整合研究

馆藏信息资源多样化的态势，亟需进行信息资源的整合。本文论述了图书馆信息资源整合的必要性、信息资源整合的方式、信息资源整合对图书馆工作的要求和信息资源整合的发展方向。     

基于高校图书馆网站的信息集成服务模式研究

本文通过对我国高校图书馆网站的调查，分析了网络环境下高校图书馆网络用户信息需求的发展趋势，提倡当前高校图书馆网站应打破以信息共享为目标的局限，逐步走向提供基于共享的集成服务和基于知识的集成服务的共同发展。     

新信息环境下基于OPAC的图书馆资源整合

随着OPAC的不断发展,基于OPAC的图书馆资源整合仍然是新信息环境下数字资源整合的一种重要方式.将图书馆电子资源与OPAC书目查询系统整合在一起,为读者开辟了更加快捷地获取文献全文的渠道.本文结合实际,就电子资源与图书馆OPAC的整合谈一些看法.     

信息资源管理学--图书馆学、情报学、档案学学科一体化的发展方向

在信息社会,信息资源管理(IRM)学作为一门新兴学科,得到了快速发展.文章对图书馆学、情报学、档案学学科一体化的情况及存在的问题进行了介绍,并认为在IRM体系框架中三学科的一体化将取得新的进展,最后提出了一个具有图书情报特色的IRM学科体系框架.     

图书馆信息服务的未来与我国图书馆现有服务的拓展

本文介绍了图书馆信息服务的新技术以及国外信息服务的新方式，探讨了我国图书馆信息服务方式的拓展。     

重新定义图书馆与图书资讯学

本文讨论图书馆、图书资讯服务与图书资讯学的新意义。     

EditorialEvidence based library and information practice

Whilst many of us engage in supporting clinicians in identifying, appraising and using evidence, how many of us adopt the same approach to our own work? A recent survey by the UK LIS Research Coalition indicated that 60% of respondents use research reports as a source of information whilst a similar proportion of health library respondents use professional events such as conferences as a source of information. This summer sees the 6^th International Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP6) being held at the University of Salford, UK between 27^th‐30^th June which will go some way to satisfying this latter information need whilst the Health Information and Libraries Journal can help satisfy the need for research reports. Whatever you’re doing this summer, let’s make it evidence based.     

论并校办馆中的融合

合并后的高校图书馆,如何将并馆带来的机遇性优势转化为现实的优势,关键在于实现实质性融合,在此基础上,本文阐述了并馆融合的指导思想及融合中应遵循的原则,提出了开创并馆融合工作新局面的七项措施.     

基于MODS的数字图书馆元数据集成

文章通过分析数字图书馆中主要存在的元数据DC和MARC格式以及MODS元数据的特点,提出基于MODS的数字图书馆元数据集成方法,为解决数字图书馆集成化检索和统一编目的问题提供新的思路。     

图书馆网站信息构建的设计应用

文章介绍了信息构建的含义、发展和应用，以图书馆网站为对象，强调了网络数字服务的重要性，分析了网站建设在设计上普遍存在的问题，指出了用信息构建的理论方法进行构建的一般过程。最后描述了经过信息构建之后，网站应达到的实用效果，并以北京大学图书馆新网站为例，对其进行了简单的信息构建效果评价。     

Collaboration in information and library science doctoral education

Coauthorship is increasing across all areas of scholarship. Despite this trend, dissertations as sole-authored monographs are still revered as the cornerstone of doctoral education. As students learn the norms and communicative behaviors of their field during their doctoral education, do they also learn collaborative behaviors? This study investigated this issue through triangulation of 30 interviews, 215 questionnaires, and bibliometric analyses of 97 CVs in the field of library and information science (LIS). The findings demonstrate that collaboration occurs in about half of advisee/advisor relationships and is primarily understood as research dissemination outside the dissertation. Respondents reported that the dissertation was not and should not be considered a collaborative product. The discussion also includes a commentary about grant funding and the implications for this on models of academic scholarship and research production.