基于校园网络平台的高校思想道德修养课多媒体教学应用

为了提高高校学生学习思想道德修养课的兴趣和思想道德修养课授课的效果，作尝试借助网络进行思想道德修养课的多媒体教学。本总结了在运用网络进行思想道德修养课多媒体教学应用中的经验，提出了基于网络平台的思想道德修养课多媒体教学的基本模式、特点和应注意的问题。     

高职《思想道德修养》教学初探

《思想道德修养》是“两课”（马克思主义理论和思想品德课）教学中的主干课程之一。如何结合高职教育的特点，搞好《思想道德修养》课的教学，本人结合教学实践谈一些粗浅的体会。 一、在教学内容上进行增删 目前，《思想道德修养》课的内容有的是与中学重复的内容，有的是“两课”各门课程之间相互重叠的内容。如“人生价值”这一内容，高二的“思想政治课”课中已对人生价值的内涵、特点及如何实现人生价值等问题进行了系统的阐述，而在《思想道德修养》这门课中又进行了分析和阐述，虽然提出和分析的角度和深度有所不同，但内容基本一致…     

高职“基础”课考核评价体系和方式方法的创新

高职《思想道德修养与法律基础》课是培养学生思想道德素质和法治素养的重要课程。高职院校应当坚持从高职生的客观实际出发,在知、行统一,多元评价主体互动,形成性评价为主、终结性评价为辅等原则的指导下,加强《思想道德修养与法律基础》课考核评价体系和方式方法的创新性研究,构建符合高职生特点的考核评价体系和方式方法。这对于推动《思想道德修养与法律基础》课课堂教学变革、激发学生学习动力、促进学生发展有重大意义。     

高职教育中思想道德修养课定位之我见

进入21世纪以来，思想道德修养课的重新定位问题已成为众多高校和学者关注的焦点．而高职思想道德修养课的相关研究却相对滞后，致使本课在实践中呈现出两种倾向：一种是一些高职院校一直是在比照普通本科大学实行的，没有随着高职培养目标的定位而发生实质性的变化．另一种是个别院校采取了大量削减课时或变相取消课程等做法。如何把握高职特色，使思想道德修养课服从．服务于高职教育的总体培养目标，给予这门课一个恰当的定位，文中提出了一些相应的对策．     

关于加强思想道德修养课实践教育的思考

本从分析思想道德修养课的课程性质和特点入手，阐述了思想道德修养课实践教育的重要作用和新时期加强思想道德修养课实践教育的必要性，提出了构建合理的实践内容体系，突出课堂教学实践性，强化修养课的课外实践，改革修养课课程设置和考核方式等加强实践教育的具体措施。     

辩论式课堂教学在高职《思想道德修养》课程中的应用

高职的《思想道德修养》课是对大学生进行系统的马克思主义世界观、人生观、价值观教育的主渠道，其课程体系的覆盖面直接关系着社会主义办学方向的实现，其教育教学改革的成效直接影响着高职教育人才培养的质量。而现行高职《思想道德修养》课堂教学模式主要存在缺乏创新性、实效性，任课教师科研投入不够等弊病。因此，现行高职《思想道德修养》的课堂教学必须探索新的教学模式，即把辩论引入高职的《思想道德修养》课堂，这也是实施素质教育培养学生创新精神的重要举措之一。     

高职院校《思想道德修养与法律基础》课多元化考核问题探析

《思想道德修养与法律基础》课是高职院校对学生进行思想道德与法律教育的主渠道。然而,当前高职院校《思想道德修养与法律基础》课的考核方法单一,建立多样化考核机制,通过多样化的考核形式,积极引导学生良好道德和法律修养的形成,从而增强课程教育教学的实效性。     

谈加强思想道德修养课教学的实效性

思想道德修养课作为一门理论综合性强、应用范围广的课程,教学内容应具有一定的灵活性。政治性和思想性是思想道德修养课的基本前提与方向,理论性和知识性是思想道德修养课的核心,实践性和指导性是思想道德修养课发挥实效的基本途径,深化思想道德修养课的教学内容改革,加强教学的实效性,必须准确把握它的基本特点。     

民族地区高职院校思想道德修养与法律基础课程教学创新研究

针对当前思想道德修养与法律基础课程教学中面临的问题，结合少数民族地区高职院校学生的特点，提出民族地区高职院校思想道德修养与法律基础课程教学创新四方面的策略。     

高校思想道德修养课改革谈

文章提出了要明确“思想道德修养”课教学的总体目标，充实和拓展“思想道德修养”课的教学内容，改进和创新“思想道德修养”课的教学方法，推进和深化“思想道德修养”课的课程建设。     

提高高校思想政治理论课实效性的几点思考

高校思想政治理论课在我国高等教育中具有特殊的重要地位和作用，各高等院校都十分重视思想政治理论课的建设，努力发挥和实现思想政治理论课在对大学生进行思想政治教育中的主渠道、主阵地的作用。但是，现实中思想政治理论课的教学实效性并不能令人乐观，与我们对课程的重视程度还存在相当大的差距。因此，如何提高思想政治理论课的教学实效性是一个亟待解决的问题。     

专业课双语教学的实践与讨论

详细介绍了近两年来研究生专业课开展双语教学的实践，并做出了客观的总结，指出高校的专业课双语教学不同于专业英语课；高校的专业课双语教学可分为随进度掌握专业英文词汇，原版教材汉语授课，原版教材的双语，英语或外教授等三个层次；高师的双语教学应兼顾和有别于中小学的双语教学。对高校专业课双语教学提出了加大投入，政策激励，师资培训，教材要求，模式研究五项推进措施。     

A Low-Inference Indicator of Lesson Structure in Mathematics

High school geometry students were presented lessons with either a high degree of structure or a low degree of structure. Structure was defined in terms of the frequency with which concepts were repeated from one sentence to the next. After the lessons, students were tested for comprehension of the material covered and then they rated the lessons in terms of perceived effectiveness. Students presented the high-structure lesson achieved significantly higher and rated the lessons higher. These findings are discussed in relation to previous research on structure.     

Impact of curriculum reform: Evidence of change in classroom practice in the United States

The purpose of the study reported in this article is to examine the impact of curriculum on instruction. Over a three-year period, we observed 579 algebra-related lessons in grades 6-8. Approximately half the lessons were taught in schools that had adopted a Standards-based mathematics curriculum called the Connected Mathematics Program (CMP), and the remainder of the lessons were taught in schools that used more traditional curricula (non-CMP). We found many significant differences between the CMP and non-CMP lessons. The CMP lessons, emphasized the conceptual aspects of instruction to a greater extent than the non-CMP lessons and the non-CMP lessons emphasized the procedural aspects of instruction to a greater extent than the CMP lessons. About twice as many CMP lessons as non-CMP lessons were structured to use group work as a method of instruction. During lessons, non-CMP students worked individually on homework about three times as often as CMP students. When it came to text usage, CMP teachers were more likely than non-CMP teachers to work problems from the text and to follow lessons as laid out in the text. However, non-CMP students and teachers were more likely than CMP students and teachers to review examples or find formulas in the text. Surprisingly, only small proportions of the CMP lessons utilized calculators (16%) or manipulatives (11%).     

How Students Study for Three Types of Objective Tests

Abstract

Fifth grade social studies students of various verbal ability levels were presented lessons with a high degree of structure or a low degree of structure. Structure was defined in terms of the frequency with which concepts were repeated from one sentence to the next. After the lessons students were tested for comprehension of the material covered and then they rated the lessons in terms of perceived effectiveness. Students presented the high structure lessons achieved significantly higher and rated the lessons higher. These findings are discussed in relation to previous research on structure.     

关于如何上好电大辅导课的思考和探索

本分析了音像课和辅导课在电大教学中的地位和作用,提出了两课同步,融为一体的“两课融合法”。这种教学方法有四个优点;采用这种方法进行辅导教学,其讲解必须具有指要性、扩展性和清晰性。     

数学教学中学生联想能力的培养

结合自己的教学实践 ,阐述了新授课、习题布置、习题课、复习课、专题讲座在培养学生联想能力中的作用 ,并就精选例题在这些教学环节中培养学生的联想能力谈了一些体会     

高职物理实验教学在高职教育中的引导作用

高职物理实验教学的着眼点不应仅仅放在实验课本身。而要依据高职教育的培养目标，针对高职学生的具体情况，在实验教学中充分发挥高职物理实验课在高职教育中的引导作用，服务于专业理论课和技能课教学，提高学生的综合素质。     

数学系毕业生应该过好说课关

说课与授课是两个不同的教学概念，学生为了更好地适应社会需要，尤其是在就业选择中多一种竞争能力，不仅应该具有一定的授课能力，还必须具有一定的说课能力，数学系的毕业生也必须如此。     

Time-of-day matters in text learning and recall: Evening lessons are advantageous for adults with ADHD though not for typical peers

Motor skill (“how-to” knowledge) consolidation is enhanced when individuals with ADHD practice at evening. We tested, in adults with and without ADHD, whether evening lessons are advantageous for recalling texts (declarative memory). Participants (N = 40) listened to and read narrative texts in morning and evening lessons (crossover study). Recall was tested immediately post-lesson and 24 h and 8–10 days later. Recall tended to decrease over time but independently of ADHD status or the time-of-day of the lesson. Nevertheless, typical participants showed a morning advantage immediately post-lesson and in later recall, correlated with stronger morning chronotype. In contrast, participants with ADHD benefited more from evening lessons; nearer their preferred time-of-day. In adults with ADHD long-term declarative memory was no less durable than in typical adults after both morning and evening lessons, but a mismatch with their preferred diurnal “on-peak” time can lead to less effective engagement in learning during morning lessons.