科学研究论文信息量的测度

本文探讨了科研论文信息量的计算程序。研究指出:以论文的真实性为前提,可以用创新性、重要性、学术性、科学性及深难度等五要素,对论文的信息量进行度量,并给出了计算实例。     

科学语言的结构和特征

本文通过对各类科学论文及科学著作的考察,提出除日常语言外,科学语言还包含五种基本语言类型:符号语言,逻辑语言,数学语言,图表语言及专业术语。并探讨了基本语言类型组合的结构特征及其相互关系,可为编辑审读科技文稿提供借鉴。     

话说退稿

阐明退稿工作中存在的一些问题及其原因和退稿不当产生的负面影响.认为编辑应站在期刊求生存和求发展的高度,站在作者本身的角度正确对待退稿问题,做到"审稿准确,诚恳待人,讲究方式,秉公办事".     

Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers

Review papers tend to be cited more frequently than regular research articles. This fact, together with the continuous increase of the share of reviews in scientific literature, can have important consequences for the measurement of individuals’ research output, usually based on citation analysis. However, studies evaluating the differences in citations of review papers compared to original research articles are almost non-existing in the literature. This paper presents a thorough analysis of the overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers of the 35 largest subject categories in Science Citation Index-Expanded. Results indicate the average citations received by reviews depends largely on the research area considered, varying from 1.34 to 6.74 times the citations received by original research articles (average value is 2.95). Correlated with this overcitation, there is an important overrepresentation of reviews in the most cited papers, this overrepresentation being greater when the most highly cited papers are considered, i.e. 0.05% and 0.1% most cited papers, where the share of reviews have increased from 16 to 18% in 1990 to around 40% in 2010. Interestingly, the overcitation and overrepresentation in the most cited papers is more important in the areas with the lowest shares of reviews in total publications.     

期刊论文引文中的中国新闻传播学

本文以中国期刊网为研究资料来源，分析中国大陆新闻传播学论文引文。看看被引著述的作者的知名度和影响力。但是，本考察的目的不是替新闻传播名校和名学者排定座次。因为著述引证统计反映了我国特定的教育制度和学术制度，所以，本文更是一次制度分析。     

研究型论文与综述型论文引文量的对比分析

研究型论文和综述型论文是2种不同类型的科技期刊论文。本文的抽样统计表明,综述型论文篇均引文量远大于研究型论文。对其原因作了简要分析。认为在论文写作、编辑以及文献分析时对这2种不同类型论文的参考文献引证数量应区别对待。     

The order in the lists of authors in multi-author papers revisited

The leaders of scientific groups appear in the last place (or in the first place) of the authors’ lists of multi-author papers more often than other scientists (group-members). The preferential position of the group leader depends on the branch of science, geographical location and the time point. New tools to study the order of authors were introduced. The validity of assessment of the contributions of particular authors to the paper solely from their ranks in the authors’ lists was challenged.     

科技论文洗稿行为的表现形式及其甄别策略

洗稿是一种高级抄袭行为,隐蔽性强、危害性大。该研究结合编辑实践梳理洗稿典型案例的发现和甄别过程,归纳科技论文洗稿行为的表现类型和特点,分析其形成的诱因及学术不端属性。文字重组、结构拆分重组和图表文字互换是洗稿的常见表现形式;洗稿行为侵犯作者著作权。洗稿行为的有效发现和甄别,需要科技期刊编辑部不断强化内部管理,提高防范意识,注重细节,增强智能工具应用能力,严格初审把关。